Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Joined Cases Aranyosi and Căldăraru: A New Limit to the Mutual Trust Presumption in the Area of Freedom, Security, and Justice? Cover

The Joined Cases Aranyosi and Căldăraru: A New Limit to the Mutual Trust Presumption in the Area of Freedom, Security, and Justice?

Open Access
|Sep 2016

Abstract

In this case, the CJEU answers the question whether Article 1(3) of the Framework Decision on the European arrest warrant must be interpreted as meaning that when there are strong indications that detention conditions in the issuing Member State infringe Article 4 of the Charter, the executing judicial authority must refuse surrender of the person against whom a European arrest warrant is issued. The CJEU rules that if, after a two-stage assessment, the executing judicial authority finds that there is a real risk of an Article 4 violation for the requested person once surrendered, the execution of the arrest warrant must initially be deferred and, where such a risk cannot be discounted, the executing judicial authority must decide whether or not to terminate the surrender procedure. This conclusion shakes the system of mutual trust upon which the principle of mutual recognition is built.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ujiel.337 | Journal eISSN: 2053-5341
Language: English
Page range: 112 - 121
Submitted on: Apr 20, 2016
Accepted on: Sep 15, 2016
Published on: Sep 29, 2016
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2016 Koen Bovend'Eerdt, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.