Figure 1.
(A, B) Two Spirals that Received Ratings of 0.5.
Figure 2.
(A, B) Two Spirals that Received Ratings of 1.0.
Figure 3.
(A, B) Two Spirals that Received Ratings of 1.5.
Figure 4.
(A, B) Two Spirals that Received Ratings of 2.
Figure 5.
(A, B) Two Spirals that Received Ratings of 3.
Table 1.
Inter-rater Agreement in Ratings of Tremor in the First Set of 548 Spirals
| US Rater | Neurologist 1 (China) | Neuroepidemiologist (China) | |
| US Rater | r = 0.56, p<0.001 | r = 0.49, p<0.001 | |
| ICC = 0.68, p<0.001 | ICC = 0.49, p<0.001 | ||
| Neurologist 1 (China) | r = 0.62, p<0.001 | ||
| ICC = 0.67, p<0.001 | |||
| Neuroepidemiologist (China) |
Table 2.
Inter-rater Agreement in Ratings of Tremor in Second Set of 200 Spirals
| US Rater | Neurologist 1 (China) | Neurologist 2 (China) | Neuroepidemiologist (China) | |
| US rater | r = 0.74, p<0.001 | r = 0.67, p<0.001 | r = 0.73, p<0.001 | |
| ICC = 0.79, p<0.001 | ICC = 0.70, p<0.001 | ICC = 0.77, p<0.001 | ||
| Neurologist 1 (China) | r = 0.78, p<0.001 | r = 0.91, p<0.001 | ||
| ICC = 0.81, p<0.001 | ICC = 0.92, p<0.001 | |||
| Neurologist 2 (China) | r = 0.87, p<0.001 | |||
| ICC = 0.89, p<0.001 | ||||
| Neuroepidemiologist (China) |