Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Multi-Residency Implementation of an Online Movement Disorders Curriculum Based on Real Patient Videos Cover

Multi-Residency Implementation of an Online Movement Disorders Curriculum Based on Real Patient Videos

Open Access
|Sep 2021

Figures & Tables

tohm-11-1-654-g1.png
Figure 1

Categories and phenomenological descriptors with example (tremor).

tohm-11-1-654-g2.png
Figure 2

CONSORT statement outlining the enrollment, allocation and follow-up of learners in the trial.

Table 1

Baseline characteristics of participating residents and programs (median and ranges).

CONTROL GROUPINTERVENTION GROUP
Median (range) number of residents in program (PGY2-PGY4)18 (6–18)18.5 (10–35)
Residents with interest in movement disorders3/25 (12%)11/86 (13%)
Year of training for participating residents
      – PGY-2
      – PGY-3
      – PGY-4
      – Other
7/25 (28%)
9/25 (36%)
9/25 (36%)
0
32/86 (37%)
26/86 (30%)
21/86 (24%)
5/86 (6%)
Median (range) number of movement disorders faculty members4 (1–6)4.5 (2–10)
Median (range) number of mandatory half-day clinical experiences in movement disorders throughout residency24 (20–70)7.5 (0–34)
Median (range) number of hours of didactic teaching in movement disorders per year16 (11–30)12.5 (5–15)
Median (range) time from completion of pre-test to immediate post-test, in days.*152 (102–157)26 (0–143)
Median (range) time from completion of pre-test to delayed post-test, in days*210 (167–249)204 (67–399)
Median (range) time from completion of final module to delayed post-test, in days.*173 (38–345)

[i] * For controls, “pre-test” was defined as completed in 2018, “immediate post-test” January–March 2019, and “delayed post-test” April–June 2019, to mirror the intervention group.

Table 2

Comparison of test scores (out of 10) between control and intervention groups.

CONTROL GROUP
MEAN (STD DEV)
INTERVENTION GROUP
MEAN (STD DEV)
P-VALUECOHEN’S EFFECT SIZE (d)
Pre-test6.92 (1.12)6.33 (1.50)0.18
Immediate post-test
(<30 days)
6.79 (1.35)8.00 (1.39)0.0010.88
Delayed post-test
(>30 days)
6.92 (1.71)7.92 (1.19)0.010.68
Table 3

Comparison of test scores (out of 10) between intervention participants who completed ≤ five modules vs. 6–10 modules.

TESTNUMBER OF MODULES COMPLETEDnMEANSTD DEVP-VALUE
Pret-test5 or Fewer136.221.280.763
6–10616.361.56
Immediate Postt-test5 or Fewer76.431.27<0.001
6–10428.261.23
Table 4

Individual question and categorical means of survey questions.

CATEGORYQUESTION (ABBREVIATED)MEAN (SD)CATEGORICAL MEAN (SD)
TechnicalVideo Image4.48 (0.75)4.48 (0.10)
Video Sound4.50 (0.68)
Ease of access4.54 (0.71)
Questions linked to answers4.45 (0.64)
Table of contents4.28 (0.78)
Text4.58 (0.59)
Embedded images4.55 (0.60)
QuantityRight duration4.68 (0.76)4.63 (0.07)
Right number4.58 (0.87)
EnthusiasmGood use of time4.70 (0.82)4.67 (0.10)
Enjoyment4.58 (0.84)
Recommend for other subspecialties4.72 (0.79)
Recommend for other residents4.79 (0.73)
Appropriate for learning level4.58 (0.84)
KnowledgeUnderstand basic concepts4.70 (0.82)4.56 (0.15)
Understand difficult concepts4.45 (0.90)
“Get” concepts didn’t understand4.41 (0.94)
Confident in diagnosis4.67 (0.84)

[i] (SD = standard deviation).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/tohm.654 | Journal eISSN: 2160-8288
Language: English
Submitted on: Aug 6, 2021
Accepted on: Sep 10, 2021
Published on: Sep 22, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Sara M. Schaefer, Zachary London, Joseph M. Ferrara, Matthew A. McCoyd, Carolyn Cronin, Emily Poole Pharr, Raymond Price, Heather B. Rigby, Scott Vota, Molly Cincotta, Martin D. Slade, Jeremy J. Moeller, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.