Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Functional Aspects of Gait in Essential Tremor: A Comparison with Age-Matched Parkinson’s Disease Cases, Dystonia Cases, and Controls Cover

Functional Aspects of Gait in Essential Tremor: A Comparison with Age-Matched Parkinson’s Disease Cases, Dystonia Cases, and Controls

By: Elan D. Louis and  Ashwini K. Rao  
Open Access
|May 2015

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of 422 Participants

ControlsDystoniaETPD
n1734612677Significance
Age (years)74.1 ± 9.073.2 ± 4.275.7 ± 8.374.4 ± 4.2p = 0.19 5
Female gender1 106 (61.6)34 (73.9)65 (52.0)36 (47.4)p = 0.01 6
Caucasian1 151 (89.3)42 (91.3)119 (95.2)68 (89.5)p = 0.32 6
Symptom duration (years)NA18.5 ± 13.833.0 ± 19.59.1 ± 11.0p <0.001 7
Macular degeneration1 13 (7.6)2 (4.3)2 (1.6)5 (6.6)p = 0.13 6
Neuropathy1 17 (9.9)2 (4.3)14 (11.3)8 (10.7)p = 0.59 6
Orthopedic problems1 106 (61.3)34 (73.9)76 (60.3)40 (53.3)p = 0.16 6
Mini-mental State Examination28.6 ± 1.7 (29.0)28.3 ± 1.9 (29.0)28.7 ± 1.6 (29.0)28.3 ± 2.0 (29.0)p = 0.46 7
ABC1 (Confidence when you stand on your tiptoes and reach for something)72.2 ± 31.6 (90)76.4 ± 25.2 (90)64.8 ± 31.7 (72.5) 3 61.8 ± 34.5 (70) 3 p = 0.002 8
ABC2 (Confidence when you stand on a chair and reach for something)62.5 ± 35.6 (75)63.0 ± 34.8 (70)53.5 ± 35.1 (60) 3 43.5 ± 33.2 (40) 3 p <0.001 8
ABC3 (Confidence when you are bumped into by people as you walk)75.7 ± 28.4 (90)74.4 ± 24.0 (80)69.7 ± 31.7 (80)61.1 ± 34.1 (70) 3 p = 0.001 8
ABC4 (Confidence when you step onto or off an escalator while holding the handrail)81.8 ± 25.2 (90)75.6 ± 28.5 (90)75.8 ± 28.4 (90) 4 68.7 ± 32.0 (80) 3 p = 0.001 8
ABC5 (Confidence when you step onto or off an escalator while holding onto parcels)63.8 ± 36.6 (80)58.0 ± 38.0 (70)54.6 ± 35.2 (60) 3 47.3 ± 34.3 (50) 3 p <0.001 8
ABC6 (Confidence when you walk outside on icy sidewalks)46.9 ± 33.9 (50)42.5 ± 33.4 (40)39.7 ± 31.5 (30) 4 36.5 ± 30.8 (37.5) 3 p <0.001 8
ABC-6 total score67.2 ± 27.5 (76.7)65.0 ± 25.5 (68.3)59.7 ± 27.7 (65.4) 3 53.1 ± 28.9 (54.1) 3 p <0.001 8
Number of near-falls in past year5.3 ± 29.3 (0)4.1 ± 11.0 (0)13.2 ± 41.9 (0)61.4 ±120.9 (5) 3 p <0.001 8
Number of falls in past year0.6 ± 0.9 (0)0.5 ± 1.0 (0)1.0 ± 3.2 (0)9.9 ± 47.5 (1) 3 p = 0.001 8
Number of fallers in past year2 9 (5.2)2 (4.3)12 (9.5)21 (27.3) 3 p <0.001 6
Use of walking aid (in home)p <0.001 6
 No164 (94.8)46 (100)115 (91.3)56 (72.7)
 Cane4 (2.3)0 (0.0)5 (4.0)7 (9.1)
 Walker5 (2.9)0 (0.0)4 (3.2)12 (15.6)
 Wheelchair0 (0.0)0 (0.0)2 (1.6)2 (2.6) 3
Use of walking aid (outside of home)p <0.001 6
 No143 (82.7)42 (91.3)103 (81.7)44 (57.1)
 Cane25 (14.5)4 (8.7)13 (10.3)17 (22.1)
 Walker5 (2.9)0 (0.0)7 (5.6)11 (14.3)
 Wheelchair0 (0.0)0 (0.0)3 (2.4)5 (6.5) 3

Values are mean ± standard deviation (median) or number (percentage).

Abbreviations: ABC, Activities of Balance Confidence; ET, Essential Tremor; NA, Not Applicable; PD, Parkinson’s Disease.

1 Data missing on <1% of subjects.

2 As in prior analyses, we and others have defined fallers as those who have had more than two falls in the previous year.14

3 Significantly different from controls (p <0.05, Mann–Whitney test).

4 Marginally significantly different from controls (p <0.10, Mann–Whitney test).

5 Analysis of variance comparing all four groups.

6 Chi-square test comparing all four groups.

7 Kruskal–Wallis test comparing all four groups.

8 Jonckheere–Terpstra rank order test of four groups.

Table 2

Characteristics of Dystonia Cases Compared with Controls

ControlsDystonia–BlepharospasmDystonia– Torticollis
N1731327
Age (years)74.1 ± 9.074.2 ± 4.473.2 ± 4.1
Female gender1 106 (61.6)10 (76.9)20 (74.1)
Caucasian1 151 (89.3)10 (76.9)27 (100) 4
Symptom durationNA24.3 ± 16.317.5 ± 14.0
ABC1 (Confidence when you stand on your tiptoes and reach for something)72.2 ± 31.6 (90)88.1 ± 15.5 (90)67.0 ± 27.0 (70) 5
ABC2 (Confidence when you stand on a chair and reach for something)62.5 ± 35.6 (75)66.8 ± 40.4 (90)57.4 ± 33.0 (60)
ABC3 (Confidence when you are bumped into by people as you walk)75.7 ± 28.4 (90)77.7 ± 24.2 (90)70.3 ± 24.7 (80)
ABC4 (Confidence when you step onto or off an escalator while holding the handrail)81.8 ± 25.2 (90)88.5 ± 17.7 (100)71.0 ± 28.9 (80) 3,5
ABC5 (Confidence when you step onto or off an escalator while holding onto parcels)63.8 ± 36.6 (80)77.5 ± 31.8 (90)50.7 ± 35.2 (50) 4,5
ABC6 (Confidence when you walk outside on icy sidewalks)46.9 ± 33.9 (50)52.9 ± 29.3 (40)34.1 ± 32.1 (20) 4,6
ABC-6 total score67.2 ± 27.5 (76.7)75.2 ± 23.7 (80.0)58.8 ± 25.1 (58.3) 4,5
Number of near-falls in past year5.3 ± 29.3 (0)4.6 ± 14.3 (0)2.3 ± 4.3 (0)
Number of falls in past year0.6 ± 0.9 (0)0.6 ± 1.5 (0)0.4 ± 0.8 (0)
Number of fallers in past year2 9 (5.2)1 (7.7)1 (3.7)
Use of walking aid (in home)
 No164 (94.8)13 (100)27 (100)
 Cane4 (2.3)0 (0)0 (0)
 Walker5 (2.9)0 (0)0 (0)
 Wheelchair0 (0.0)0 (0)0 (0)
Use of walking aid (outside of home)
 No143 (82.7)10 (76.9)27 (100)
 Cane25 (14.5)3 (23.1)1 (3.7)
 Walker5 (2.9)0 (0)0 (0)
 Wheelchair0 (0.0)0 (0)0 (0)

Values are mean ± standard deviation (median) or number (percentage).

Abbreviations: ABC, Activities of Balance Confidence; NA, Not Applicable.

1 Data missing on <1% of subjects.

2 As in prior analyses, we and others have defined fallers as those who have had more than two falls in the previous year.14

3 Significantly different from controls (p <0.05, Mann–Whitney test).

4 Marginally significantly different from controls (p <0.10, Mann–Whitney test).

5 Significantly different from dystonia cases with blepharospasm (p <0.05, Mann–Whitney test).

6 Marginally significantly different from dystonia cases with blepharospasm (p <0.10, Mann–Whitney test).

Table 3

Gait and Balance in ET Cases Stratified Based on Different Clinical Characteristics

TTS* Tremor Duration* Intention Tremor* Rest Tremor* Cranial Tremor*
LowerHigherShorterLongerNoYesNoYesNoYes
n5857695010021102195763
Age (years)72.7 ± 7.779.1 ± 7.474.2 ± 8.177.9 ± 8.275.3 ± 8.377.3 ± 7.975.1 ± 8.177.8 ± 8.272.7 ± 7.078.0 ± 8.5
ABC169.3 ± 29.760.9 ± 32.864.8 ± 33.064.3 ± 29.564.1 ± 30.969.5 ± 30.867.1 ± 30.151.6 ± 35.369.0 ± 30.559.7 ± 31.6
ABC261.6 ± 33.145.8 ± 35.451.8 ± 37.355.3 ± 30.853.9 ± 33.754.1 ± 39.556.5 ± 34.338.2 ± 35.155.5 ± 36.350.9 ± 33.9
ABC372.9 ± 29.567.9 ± 32.568.5 ± 31.873.3 ± 29.471.8 ± 28.763.8 ± 39.771.1 ± 30.264.0 ± 38.073.0 ± 31.566.1 ± 31.3
ABC478.9 ± 24.774.9 ± 29.678.2 ± 26.675.0 ± 28.376.9 ± 26.575.7 ± 30.577.5 ± 26.969.7 ± 32.978.1 ± 27.273.5 ± 28.6
ABC557.5 ± 35.051.8 ± 34.156.4 ± 35.353.6 ± 34.355.2 ± 34.255.2 ± 35.756.3 ± 34.346.2 ± 36.462.2 ± 31.847.2 ± 35.7
ABC644.2 ± 31.936.6 ± 30.938.5 ± 31.042.1 ± 32.339.9 ± 30.040.7 ± 36.841.8 ± 30.929.0 ± 32.344.5 ± 30.135.1 ± 32.2
ABC total64.1 ± 25.656.3 ± 27.959.7 ± 27.760.6 ± 26.760.3 ± 25.859.8 ± 31.761.7 ± 26.449.8 ± 30.863.7 ± 26.857.8 ± 27.0
Number of near-falls in past year11.1 ± 28.617.3 ± 55.011.7 ± 46.616.6 ± 37.712.1 ± 42.620.2 ± 43.28.1 ± 22.743.5 ± 90.18.1 ± 21.218.9 ± 55.3
Number of falls in past year0.7 ± 1.31.1 ± 4.01.2 ± 3.70.9 ± 2.61.0 ± 3.20.5 ± 0.90.9 ± 2.11.8 ± 6.81.3 ± 4.60.8 ± 1.3
Number of fallers in past year** 6 (10.3)5 (8.8)7 (10.1)5 (10.0)10 (10.0)1 (4.8)11 (10.8)1 (5.3)5 (8.8)7 (11.1)
Use of walking aid (in home)
 No56 (96.6)50 (87.7)64 (92.8)46 (92.0)94 (94.0)18 (85.7)96 (94.1)15 (78.9)54 (94.7)56 (88.9)
 Cane1 (1.7)3 (5.3)2 (2.9)2 (4.0)3 (3.0)1 (4.8)2 (2.0)2 (10.5)1 (1.8)3 (4.8)
 Walker1 (1.7)3 (5.3)3 (4.3)1 (2.0)2 (2.0)2 (9.5)3 (2.9)1 (5.3)1 (1.8)3 (4.8)
 WC0 (0.0)1 (1.8)0 (0.0)1 (2.0)1 (1.0)0 (0.0)1 (1.0)1 (5.3)1 (1.8)1 (1.6)
Use of walking aid (outside of home)
 No50 (86.2)47 (82.5)58 (84.1)41 (82.0)85 (85.0)17 (81.0)87 (85.3)14 (73.7)51 (89.5)49 (77.8)
 Cane7 (12.1)4 (7.0)5 (7.2)6 (12.0)9 (9.0)2 (9.5)9 (8.8)2 (10.5)4 (7.0)7 (11.1)
 Walker1 (1.7)4 (7.0)5 (7.2)2 (4.0)4 (4.0)2 (9.5)5 (4.9)1 (5.3)1 (1.8)5 (7.9)
 WC0 (0.0)2 (3.5)1 (1.4)1 (2.0)2 (2.0)0 (0.0)1 (1.0)2 (10.5)1 (1.8)2 (3.2)

Values are mean ± standard deviation (median) or number (percentage).

NA = not applicable.

WC = Wheelchair

* Data missing on < 10% of subjects

** As in prior analyses, we and others have defined fallers as those who had had >2 falls in the previous year [14].

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/tohm.242 | Journal eISSN: 2160-8288
Language: English
Submitted on: Mar 19, 2015
|
Accepted on: Apr 28, 2015
|
Published on: May 27, 2015
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2015 Elan D. Louis, Ashwini K. Rao, published by Columbia University Libraries/Information Services
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.