| Key words | No of publications |
|---|---|
| essential tremor AND non-motor | 42 |
| essential tremor AND cognition | 96 |
| essential tremor AND non-motor AND depression | 13 |
| essential tremor AND non-motor AND personality | 6 |
| essential tremor AND non-motor AND anxiety | 10 |
| essential tremor AND non-motor AND sleep | 9 |
| essential tremor AND non-motor AND hearing | 6 |
| essential tremor AND non-motor AND olfaction | 4 |
| essential tremor AND non-motor AND pain | 3 |

Figure 1
Features that May Support the Hypothesis that Non-motor Manifestations in ET are Primary Disease Features Rather than Secondary Phenomena. Features that may support the hypothesis that non-motor manifestations in ET are primary disease features rather than secondary phenomena.
Table 1
Literature Review of Cognitive Functions in Patients with ET
| A) Executive Dysfunction Deficits | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gasparini et al.9 | Lombardi et al.2 | Tröster et al.11 | Sahin et al.20 | Duane et al.25 | León et al.14 | Higginson et al.23 | Kim et al.24 | |
| WCST | ++ | ++ | NS | NS | NS | NP | NP | NP |
| Verbal fluency test (FAS) | ++ | NP | NP | NP | NP | NP | NS | NP |
| Verbal fluency (letters and animals) | NP | ++ | ++ | NP | NP | ++ | NP | NP |
| Stroop test | ++ | NP | + | ++ | NP | NP | NP | NP |
| Towers of London and Hanoi | NS | NP | NP | NS | NP | NP | NP | NP |
| Matrix reasoning | NP | ++ | NP | NP | NP | NP | NS | NP |
| TMT A | ++ | NP | NP | NS | NP | ++ | NP | NP |
| TMT B | NP | NP | NP | NS | NP | NP | NP | NP |
| Controlled oral word-association test | NP | NP | NP | NP | NP | NP | NP | ++ |
| B) Deficits in Attention and Concentration | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gasparini et al.9 | Lombardi et al.2 | Tröster et al.11 | Sahin et al.20 | Duane et al.25 | León et al.14 | Higginson et al.23 | Kim et al.24 | |
| WAIS-R DS-forward | NP | ++ | NP | NS | NS | NP | ++ | ++ |
| WAIS-R DS-backward | NP | ++ | NP | NS | NS | NP | ++ | ++ |
| Verbal fluency K-A-S | NP | NP | NP | ++ | NP | NP | NP | NP |
| Symbol search | NP | NP | NP | NP | NP | NP | ++ | NP |
| Brief test of attention | NP | NP | ++ | NP | NP | NP | NP | NP |
| Spatial span | NP | NS | NP | NP | NP | NP | NP | NP |
| Letter–number sequencing | NP | ++ | NP | NP | NP | NP | NP | NP |
| Letter cancellation task | NP | NP | NP | NP | ++ | NP | NP | NP |
| C) Memory Deficits | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gasparini et al.9 | Lombardi et al.2 | Tröster et al.11 | Sahin et al.20 | Duane et al.25 | León et al.14 | Higginson et al.23 | Kim et al.24 | |
| CVLT (total) | NP | ++ | ++ | ++ | NP | NP | NP | NP |
| CVLT (short delay free recall) | NP | ++ | ++ | NS | NP | ++ | NP | NP |
| CVLT (long delay free recall) | NP | ++ | ++ | NS | NP | ++ | NP | NP |
| CVLT (semantic clustering) | NP | NS | ++ | NS | NP | NP | NP | NP |
| CVLT (serial clustering) | NP | NS | ++ | NS | NP | NP | NP | NP |
| CVLT (slope) | NP | NS | NS | NS | NP | NP | NP | NP |
| CVLT (recognition discrimination) | NP | ++ | ++ | ++ | NP | NP | NP | NP |
| WMS (figural memory) | NP | NP | NS | NP | NP | NP | ++ | NP |
| WMS (logical memory I) | NP | NP | NS | NP | NP | ++ | NP | |
| WMS (logical memory II) | NP | NP | NS | NP | NP | ++ | NP | |
| WMS (logical memory percent retention) | NP | NP | NS | NP | NP | NP | NP | NP |
| ROF | NP | NP | NP | NP | NS | NP | NS | ++ (recognition) |
| Three-word registration | NP | NP | NP | NP | NP | NP | NP | NS |
| Three-word recall | NP | NP | NP | NP | NP | NP | NP | NS |
| HVLT | NP | NP | NP | NP | NP | NP | NP | ++ (recall) |
| D) Visuospatial Function Deficits | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gasparini et al.9 | Lombardi et al.2 | Tröster et al.11 | Sahin et al.20 | Duane et al.25 | León et al.14 | Higginson et al.23 | Kim et al.24 | |
| Benton Facial Recognition | NP | NS | ++ | ++ | NP | NP | NP | NP |
| Benton line Orientation | NP | NP | NP | ++ | NP | NP | NP | NP |
| Block design | NP | NP | NP | NS | NP | NP | NP | NP |
| HVOT | NP | NS | NS | ++ | NP | NP | NP | NP |
[i] Abbreviations: +, Significant Difference Between the Patients and Controls; ++, XXX; CVLT, California Verbal Learning Test; FAS, XXX; HVLT, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test; HVOT, Hooper Visual Organization Test; K-A-S, test with (K.A and S letters); NP, Not Performed; NS, No Significant Difference Between Patients and Controls; ROF, Rey-Osterreith Complex Figure; TMT, Trail Making Test; WAIS-R DS, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Digit Span; WCST, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test; WMS, Wechsler Memory Scale.
Table 2
Review of Literature on Personality Changes in Patients with ET
| Chatterjee et al.27 | Lorenz et al.29 | Thenganatt et al.28 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| No. of Patients | 55 | 105 | 60 |
| Scale used | TPQ | EPQ-R | TPQ |
| Results | Personality profile characterized by greater HA | ET patients of this study are kinder, more tender-minded, and less aggressive than the normal population | Personality profile characterized by greater HA |
| Comments | ET patients are pessimistic, fearful, shy, anxious, and easily fatigued. There were a lot of non-responders in their study, which was a major limitation | ET patients are kinder, tender minded and less aggressive | ET patients are pessimistic worriers who tend to anticipate harm and failure and they have difficulties getting over humiliating and embarrassing experiences |
Table 3
Review of Literature on Anxiety in Patients with ET
Table 4
Review of Literature on Depression in Patients with ET
| Study | Lombardi et al.2 | Lacritz et al.10 | Louis et al.1 | Dogu et al.31 | Miller et al.*12 | Louis et al.34 | Louis et al.35 | Li et al.**36 | Chandran et al.33 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of patients | 18 | 13 | 89 | 89 | 53 | 235 | 187 | 61 | 50 |
| Scale used | GDS | BDI | Depression module of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV | HDRS | BDI | Self-reported depression | PGCMS | MADRS | HDRS |
| Results | Significantly increased (p<0.02) depression scores in patients compared to controls | 4 in 13 (∼30%) patients had depression (p values not reported) | Found that current major depression was associated with greater self-reported disability | Significantly increased HDRS scores (p = 0.003) in patients compared to controls | No significant difference in depression scores between PD, dystonia and ET | Significantly increased self reported depression (p<0.001) in patients compared to controls | Significantly increased (p = 0.006) PGCMS score in patients compared to controls | Depressive symptoms in ET patients possess distinct characteristics compared to those in depressed patients without ET | Significantly increased (p = 0.009) HDRS scores in patients compared to controls |
| Significant correlation of depression scores with tremor severity | No | INA | No | Yes | Yes | INA | INA | Yes | Yes |
[i] Abbreviations: *, Comparison Among PD, ET, and dystonia; **, Comparison Between ET Patients with Depression and Major Depressive Patients Without ET; BDI, Beck Depression Inventory; DSM-IV, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV; ET, Essential Tremor; GDS, Geriatric Depression Scale; HDRS, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; INA, Information Not Available; MADRS, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale; PD, Parkinson's Disease; PGCMS, Philadelphia Geriatric Center Morale Scale.
