
Figure 1
Flowchart showing data recruitment and analysis.
From 80 subjects with prior YGTSS scores, 10 were imaged, with 9 TS subjects and 10 matched control subjects showing images with acceptable image quality.
Table 1
Subject Age and Comorbidity Data
| Subject | Age | Medications | childhood OCD | Y-BOCS | ADHD diagnosis | Conners total | Conners inattentive | Conners Hyperactive |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21 | no | 17 | yes | 82 | 82 | 69 | |
| 2 | 21 | fluoxetine, dextroamphetamine, zolpidem | yes | 27 | yes | 82 | 82 | 69 |
| 3 | 20 | yes | 18 | no | 71 | 66 | 66 | |
| 4 | 24 | atomoxetine | yes | 0 | yes | 63 | 59 | 61 |
| 5 | 19 | yes | 20 | yes | 78 | 82 | 64 | |
| 6 | 28 | no | 0 | no | 71 | 59 | 74 | |
| 7 | 32 | yes | 0 | yes | 89 | 82 | 81 | |
| 8 | 27 | Nortryptiline | no | 0 | yes | 78 | 77 | 69 |
| 9 | 20 | no | 0 | yes | 46 | 46 | 46 | |
| 10 | 23 | no | 0 | yes | 44 | 46 | 44 |
Table 2
Subject Baseline and Follow-up Tic Severity
| Subject | YGTSS1 motor | YGTSS1 vocal | YGTSS1 total tic | YGTSS1 tic impairment | YGTSS1 total | YGTSS2 motor | YGTSS2 vocal | YGTSS2 total tic | YGTSS2 tic impairment | YGTSS2 total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21 | 21 | 42 | 30 | 72 | 23 | 13 | 36 | 20 | 56 |
| 2 | 21 | 14 | 35 | 30 | 65 | 11 | 14 | 25 | 30 | 55 |
| 3 | 18 | 9 | 27 | 20 | 47 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 20 | 41 |
| 4 | 12 | 11 | 23 | 20 | 43 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 14 |
| 5 | 18 | 10 | 28 | 30 | 58 | 17 | 6 | 23 | 10 | 33 |
| 6 | 13 | 11 | 24 | 10 | 34 | 20 | 13 | 33 | 25 | 58 |
| 7 | 12 | 10 | 22 | 20 | 42 | 15 | 12 | 27 | 5 | 32 |
| 8 | 20 | 22 | 42 | 40 | 82 | 13 | 10 | 23 | 20 | 43 |
| 9 | 13 | 17 | 30 | 30 | 60 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| 10 | 12 | 8 | 20 | 10 | 30 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 10 | 20 |

Figure 2
Difference in Fisher-transformed Correlation between Samples (Control – TS) for each Pair of 116 regions in the AAL brain atlas.
The blue square in the middle shows significantly higher correlation for TS subjects (p = 0.016) averaging correlation for all connections between occipital lobe regions (ROIs 43–56).

Figure 3
Differences in Correlation as a Function of Strength of Functional “Connection.”
Scatter plot shows difference in correlation (Control – TS) as a function of mean correlation for the connection over all 20 participants.

Figure 4
Differences in Correlation as a Function of Distance of Functional “Connection.”
Scatter plot shows difference in correlation (Control – TS) as a function of distance between the centroids of the ROIs for each functional “connection.”
