Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Observational Study of IncobotulinumtoxinA for Cervical Dystonia or Blepharospasm (XCiDaBLE): Interim Results for the First 170 Subjects with Blepharospasm Cover

Observational Study of IncobotulinumtoxinA for Cervical Dystonia or Blepharospasm (XCiDaBLE): Interim Results for the First 170 Subjects with Blepharospasm

Open Access
|Jul 2014

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Subject Demographics and Disease Characteristics

CharacteristicBlepharospasm N = 170
Female gender, n (%)131 (77.1)
Race,1 n (%)
Asian5 (2.9)
Black7 (4.1)
White156 (91.8)
Other2 (1.2)
Age at enrollment (years), mean (SD)63.7 (11.4)
Age at onset (years), mean (SD)n = 169 53.9 (12.6)
Estimated duration of disease (years), mean (SD)n = 169 10.9 (8.3)
Age at first botulinum toxin treatment prior to enrollment on this study (years), mean (SD)n = 157 58.7 (11.1)
Time since most recent botulinum toxin injection (months), mean (SD)n = 163 4.3 (9.7)
Subjects with previous botulinum toxin therapy, n (%)164 (96.5)
Previous botulinum toxin treatments2
AbobotulinumtoxinA, n (%)4 (2.4)
Mean number of treatments (SD)n = 4 2.3 (1.3)
IncobotulinumtoxinA, n (%)43 (25.3)
Mean number of treatments (SD)n = 43 1.6 (1.1)
OnabotulinumtoxinA, n (%)162 (95.3)
Mean number of treatments (SD)n = 152 21.8 (19.1)
RimabotulinumtoxinB, n (%)6 (3.5)
Mean number of treatments (SD)n = 6 10.7 (20.8)
Effect of previous botulinum toxin treatment
None1 (0.6)
Partial35 (20.6)
Near complete/full127 (74.7)
Unknown7 (4.1)
Previous botulinum toxin duration (days), mean (SD)n = 157 79.0 (31.6)
Baseline employment
Employed at time of onsetN = 169
Yes100 (59.2)
If employed at onset, was employment status affected
Different job with less responsibility4 (4.0)
Loss of employment11 (11.0)
No75 (75.0)
Same job, less pay1 (1.0)
Unknown9 (9.0)
Receiving or seeking disability benefits?n = 161
Yes19 (11.8)

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='TFN01t01'] } Abbreviation: SD, Standard Deviation.

1 A subject may select multiple races.

2 Subjects may have received more than one serotype and thus the total number of subjects per treatment sums to more than the total number of subjects.

Percentages are based on non-missing values.

Table 2

Summary of IncobotulinumtoxinA Dosing

Blepharospasm N = 170
Dose at first injection visit, mean units (SD)71.5 (50.6)
Most frequent volume (mL) of saline/100 U incobotulinumtoxinA at 1st injection visit [range]2 (1–10)
Dosing by muscle for both eyes: total at first injection visit,1 mean units (SD)
Orbicularis oculi, n = 16826.2 (14.7)
Procerus, n = 777.1 (5.7)
Corrugator supercilii, n = 1188.5 (7.1)
Summary of muscle identification at first injection visit, n (%)
Anatomical location168 (98.8)
Electromyography2 (1.2)
Electrical stimulation
Sonography

Abbreviation: SD, Standard Deviation.

1 More than one muscle could have been treated.

Table 3

Global Impressions (Investigator and Patient)

Blepharospasm, n (%)
SeverityImprovement
CategoryBaselineBaselineCategory4 Weeks
(1st Injection Visit)(1st Injection Visit)Post 1st Injection
Investigator SeverityPatient SeverityPatient Improvement
N = 169N = 165N = 159
Not assessed02 (1.2)Not assessed5 (3.1)
Normal (1)12 (7.1)34 (20.6)Very much improved (1)24 (15.1)
Borderline (2)10 (5.9)18 (10.9)Much improved (2)57 (35.9)
Mildly (3)32 (18.9)33 (20.0)Minimally improved (3)43 (27.0)
Moderately (4)71 (42.0)40 (24.2)No change (4)17 (10.7)
Markedly (5)29 (17.2)23 (13.9)Minimally worse (5)5 (3.1)
Severely (6)15 (8.9)12 (7.3)Much worse (6)7 (4.4)
Extremely (7)03 (1.8)Very much worse (7)1 (0.6)
Table 4

Summary of Work Productivity and Activity Impact Questionnaire

All SubjectsEmployed Subjects
Currently employed (yes), n (%)How much did health affect non-work during the previous week? (range 0–10), mean (SD)Hours worked in the previous week, mean (SD)Hours missed from work due to ill health during previous week, mean (SD)Hours missed from work due to other reasons during previous week, mean (SD)How much did health affect productivity during previous week? (range 0–10), mean (SD)
Blepharospasm
Baseline (N = 167)53 (31.7)n = 165 3.1 (2.8)n = 52 34.2 (17.0)n = 52 1.2 (5.7)n = 52 5.2 (11.0)n = 52 1.9 (2.3)
Week 1 (N = 158)47 (29.7)n = 150 2.9 (2.9)n = 47 33.2 (19.5)n = 47 1.4 (6.3)n = 47 5.3 (14.2)n = 43 1.6 (1.7)
Week 2 (N = 154)47 (30.5)n = 146 3.1 (3.0)n = 46 26.6 (17.1)n = 46 5.2 (19.4)n = 46 4.3 (10.8)n = 38 1.5 (2.1)
Week 3 (N = 154)46 (29.9)n = 148 2.6 (2.7)n = 46 30.3 (19.6)n = 46 1.9 (7.8)n = 46 4.6 (10.1)n = 40 1.5 (2.1)
Week 4 (N = 170)49 (28.8)n = 159 2.8 (2.8)n = 49 28.7 (19.2)n = 49 1.1 (5.9)n = 49 3.5 (8.9)n = 41 1.6 (2.0)

[i] Abbreviation: SD, Standard Deviation.

[ii] The productivity and daily activities questions are based on a 10-point scale where 0 = health problems had no effect on daily activity and 10 = health problems completely prevented productivity/activities. Percentages are based on non-missing values.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/tohm.181 | Journal eISSN: 2160-8288
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 4, 2014
Accepted on: Jun 18, 2014
Published on: Jul 16, 2014
Published by: Columbia University Libraries/Information Services
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2014 Hubert H. Fernandez, Joseph Jankovic, John B. Holds, Daniel Lin, John Burns, Amit Verma, Kapil Sethi, Eric J. Pappert, on behalf of the XCiDaBLE Study Group, published by Columbia University Libraries/Information Services
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.