Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Prevalence of Diagnosed Essential Tremor in the United States: An Administrative Claims-Based Study Cover

Prevalence of Diagnosed Essential Tremor in the United States: An Administrative Claims-Based Study

Open Access
|Oct 2025

Figures & Tables

tohm-15-1-1060-g1.png
Figure 1

Estimated Prevalence of Diagnosed Essential Tremor by Age Group and Case Definition (2022 Data From MarketScan).

aPrimary analysis: patients are considered to have diagnosed ET upon the second of at least two claims with a diagnosis of ET between 1 and 365 days apart during the study period.

bSensitivity analysis 1: patients are considered to have diagnosed ET upon the second of at least two claims with a diagnosis of ET between 1 and 730 days apart during the study period.

cSensitivity analysis 2: patients are considered to have diagnosed ET with a record of at least one ICD10 code, at any time during the study period.

The study period starts on 1/1/2016 and extends through 12/31/2022; n represents the respective denominator in the MarketScan data.

Table 1

Prevalence of diagnosed essential tremor (ET) in MarketScan in 2022, among adults overall and by age subgroup.

OVERALL: AGE ≥18 YEARS NOT AGE-STANDARDIZEDAGE SUBGROUPS
AGE 18–40 YEARSAGE 41–64 YEARSAGE 65–74 YEARSAGE 75+ YEARS
Individuals at-riska; N (% of all adults at-risk)7,743,775 (100.0)2,950,151 (38.1)4,021,413 (51.9)404,069 (5.2)368,142 (4.8)
Primary analysis: At least two claims, 1–365 days apartb
Patients with prevalent diagnosed ET; N21,7801,89410,0283,9155,943
Prevalence of diagnosed ET; % (95% CI)0.28 (0.28, 0.29)0.06 (0.06, 0.07)0.25 (0.24, 0.25)0.97 (0.94, 1.00)1.61 (1.57, 1.66)
Prevalence of diagnosed ET; per 1,000 patients (95% CI)2.81 (2.78, 2.85)0.64 (0.61, 0.67)2.49 (2.44, 2.54)9.69 (9.39, 9.99)16.14 (15.74, 16.55)
Sensitivity analysis 1: At least two claims, 1–730 days apartc
Patients with prevalent diagnosed ET; N23,5762,07910,9264,2146,357
Prevalence of diagnosed ET; % (95% CI)0.30 (0.30, 0.31)0.07 (0.07, 0.07)0.27 (0.27, 0.28)1.04 (1.01, 1.07)1.73 (1.69, 1.77)
Prevalence of diagnosed ET; per 1,000 patients (95% CI)3.04 (3.01, 3.08)0.70 (0.67, 0.73)2.72 (2.67, 2.77)10.43 (10.12, 10.74)17.27 (16.85, 17.69)
Sensitivity analysis 2: At least one claimd
Patients with prevalent diagnosed ET; N42,4394,69620,4557,20310,085
Prevalence of diagnosed ET; % (95% CI)0.55 (0.54, 0.55)0.16 (0.16, 0.16)0.51 (0.50, 0.52)1.78 (1.74, 1.82)2.74 (2.69, 2.79)
Prevalence of diagnosed ET; per 1,000 patients (95% CI)5.48 (5.43, 5.53)1.59 (1.55, 1.64)5.09 (5.02, 5.16)17.83 (17.42, 18.23)27.39 (26.87, 27.92)

[i] aIndividuals at risk include adults who are observable on each day of 2022 with at least 365 days of baseline observability prior to the start of 2022.

bPrimary analysis: patients are considered to have diagnosed ET upon the second of at least two claims with a diagnosis of ET between 1 and 365 days apart during the study period.

cSensitivity analysis 1: patients are considered to have diagnosed ET upon the second of at least two claims with a diagnosis of ET between 1 and 730 days apart during the study period.

dSensitivity analysis 2: patients are considered to have diagnosed ET upon the occurrence of at least one claim with a diagnosis of ET during the study period.

Age assessed on 1/1/2022.

95% CI estimated as follows: letting n be the number of patients and p the observed proportion of successes, if np(1-p) < 5, the Clopper-Pearson method is used; otherwise, the Wald interval is used.

The study period starts on 1/1/2016 and extends through 12/31/2022.

CI, confidence interval; ET, essential tremor.

Table 2

Proportion of patients receiving possible treatment in 2022 in MarketScan among patients with diagnosed essential tremor (ET), overall and by age subgroup.

OVERALL: AGE ≥18 YEARS NOT AGE-STANDARDIZEDAGE SUBGROUPS
AGE 18–40 YEARSAGE 41–64 YEARSAGE 65–74 YEARSAGE 75+ YEARS
Patients with diagnosed ET in 2022a; N19,5111,7028,9273,4735,409
Patients diagnosed with ET who received possible treatment in 2022b; N14,3978936,5262,7334,245
Proportion of patients who received possible treatment; % (95% CI)73.79% (73.17%, 74.41%)52.47% (50.10%, 54.84%)73.10% (72.18%, 74.02%)78.69% (77.33%, 80.06%)78.48% (77.34%, 79.58%)

[i] aPatients at risk include patients with at least two claims with a diagnosis of ET who are observable on each day of 2022, who have at least 365 days of baseline observability prior to the start of 2022, and 6 months (180 days) of additional follow-up observability following first ET diagnosis (second of two claims with a diagnosis code for ET, 1–365 days apart).

bPatients are considered to have received treatment if a claim for possible ET treatment is observed on or after the first ET diagnosis (second of two claims with a diagnosis code for ET, 1–365 days apart) during the study period.

Age assessed on 1/1/2022.

95% CI estimated as follows: letting n be the number of patients and p the observed proportion of successes, if np(1-p) < 5, the Clopper-Pearson method is used; otherwise, the Wald interval is used.

The study period starts on 1/1/2016 and extends through 12/31/2022.

CI, confidence interval; ET, essential tremor.

Table 3

Top treatments by class and medication observed in 2022 in MarketScan following first observed prevalent essential tremor (ET) diagnosis, among adults with prevalent diagnosed ET who received possible treatment, overall and by age subgroup.

OVERALL: AGE ≥18 YEARS NOT AGE-STANDARDIZEDAGE SUBGROUPS
AGE 18–40 YEARSAGE 41–64 YEARSAGE 65–74 YEARSAGE 75+ YEARS
Patients with prevalent 2022 ET who received possible treatmenta; N14,3979836,5262,7334,245
Patients with treatment in 2022 by treatment class; N (%)
Beta blockers9,398 (65.3)554 (62.0)4,194 (64.3)1,770 (64.8)2,880 (67.8)
Anticonvulsants7,723 (53.6)356 (39.9)3,414 (52.3)1,581 (57.8)2,372 (55.9)
Benzodiazepines2,545 (17.7)169 (18.9)1,368 (21.0)470 (17.2)538 (12.7)
Antidepressants2,037 (14.1)134 (15.0)902 (13.8)415 (15.2)586 (13.8)
Botulinum toxins (A)499 (3.5)42 (4.7)297 (4.6)73 (2.7)87 (2.0)
Calcium channel blockers428 (3.0)10 (1.1)152 (2.3)104 (3.8)162 (3.8)
Antipsychotics196 (1.4)28 (3.1)82 (1.3)37 (1.4)49 (1.2)
Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors78 (0.5)13 (1.5)31 (0.5)9 (0.3)25 (0.6)
Potassium channel blockers6 (0.0)0 (0.0)5 (0.1)1 (0.0)0 (0.0)
Patients with treatment in 2022 by medication; N (%)
Beta blockers: propranolol6,048 (42.0)502 (56.2)3,104 (47.6)1,014 (37.1)1,428 (33.6)
Anticonvulsants: primidone3,833 (26.6)111 (12.4)1,492 (22.9)867 (31.7)1,363 (32.1)
Anticonvulsants: gabapentin3,280 (22.8)127 (14.2)1,524 (23.4)655 (24.0)974 (22.9)
Beta blockers: metoprolol2,983 (20.7)42 (4.7)946 (14.5)684 (25.0)1,311 (30.9)
Antidepressants: trazodone1,537 (10.7)107 (12.0)751 (11.5)316 (11.6)363 (8.6)
Benzodiazepines: alprazolam1,402 (9.7)80 (9.0)721 (11.0)270 (9.9)331 (7.8)
Anticonvulsants: topiramate1,371 (9.5)95 (10.6)710 (10.9)266 (9.7)300 (7.1)
Benzodiazepines: clonazepam1,221 (8.5)98 (11.0)686 (10.5)214 (7.8)223 (5.3)
Anticonvulsants: pregabalin761 (5.3)31 (3.5)391 (6.0)174 (6.4)165 (3.9)
Antidepressants: mirtazapine589 (4.1)38 (4.3)183 (2.8)117 (4.3)251 (5.9)
Beta blockers: atenolol489 (3.4)14 (1.6)202 (3.1)102 (3.7)171 (4.0)
Botulinum toxins: onabotulinumtoxinA451 (3.1)40 (4.5)268 (4.1)64 (2.3)79 (1.9)
Anticonvulsants: levetiracetam411 (2.9)52 (5.8)165 (2.5)65 (2.4)129 (3.0)
Calcium channel blockers: nifedipine239 (1.7)4 (0.4)69 (1.1)55 (2.0)111 (2.6)
Antipsychotics: olanzapine183 (1.3)24 (2.7)79 (1.2)34 (1.2)46 (1.1)
Calcium channel blockers: verapamil190 (1.3)6 (0.7)84 (1.3)49 (1.8)51 (1.2)
Anticonvulsants: zonisamide159 (1.1)14 (1.6)78 (1.2)25 (0.9)42 (1.0)
Beta blockers: nadolol126 (0.9)4 (0.4)57 (0.9)26 (1.0)39 (0.9)
Beta blockers: sotalol74 (0.5)1 (0.1)14 (0.2)13 (0.5)46 (1.1)
Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors: acetazolamide61 (0.4)13 (1.5)27 (0.4)4 (0.1)17 (0.4)
Botulinum toxins: incobotulinumtoxinA42 (0.3)2 (0.2)25 (0.4)7 (0.3)8 (0.2)
Antipsychotics: clozapine13 (0.1)4 (0.4)3 (0.0)3 (0.1)3 (0.1)
Botulinum toxins: abobotulinumtoxinA11 (0.1)0 (0.0)8 (0.1)2 (0.1)1 (0.0)
Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors: methazolamide18 (0.1)1 (0.1)4 (0.1)5 (0.2)8 (0.2)
Anticonvulsants: perampanel6 (0.0)0 (0.0)5 (0.1)1 (0.0)0 (0.0)
Beta blockers: pindolol6 (0.0)0 (0.0)3 (0.0)1 (0.0)2 (0.0)
Calcium channel blockers: nimodipine0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
Potassium channel blockers: perampanel6 (0.0)0 (0.0)5 (0.1)1 (0.0)0 (0.0)
Patients treated with surgical therapies in 2022; N (%)
Deep brain stimulation38 (0.3)2 (0.2)18 (0.3)14 (0.5)4 (0.1)
Radio-surgical gamma knife thalamotomy24 (0.2)0 (0.0)6 (0.1)10 (0.4)8 (0.2)
Focused ultrasound17 (0.1)0 (0.0)7 (0.1)3 (0.1)7 (0.2)

[i] aPatients are considered to have received treatment if a claim for possible ET treatment is observed on or after the first ET diagnosis (second of two claims with a diagnosis code for ET, 1–365 days apart) during the study period.

Age assessed on 1/1/2022.

The study period starts on 1/1/2016 and extends through 12/31/2022.

ET, essential tremor.

Table 4

Estimated number of patients with essential tremor (ET) in the United States (US) in 2024, adults overall and by age subgroup.

OVERALL: ≥18 YEARS AGE-STANDARDIZED ESTIMATEaAGE SUBGROUPS
18–40 YEARS41–64 YEARS65–74 YEARS75+ YEARS
Number of people in the US population, 2024267,400,939104,825,01999,221,58035,876,76327,477,577
Primary analysis: At least two claims, 1–365 days apartb
Prevalence of diagnosed ET (%)0.420.060.250.971.61
Estimated number of patients in the US with diagnosed ETc1,123,50067,298247,424639,545752,730
Proportion of patients with diagnosed ET who received possible treatment (%)73.7952.4773.1078.6978.48
Estimated number of patients in the US with ET who received possible treatmentd851,59035,310180,877273,542348,120
Sensitivity analysis 1: At least two claims, 1–730 days aparte
Prevalence of diagnosed ET (%)0.450.070.271.041.73
Estimated number of patients in the US with diagnosed ETc1,210,72673,871269,581374,156474,477
Sensitivity analysis 2: At least one claimf
Prevalence of diagnosed ET (%)0.780.160.511.782.74
Estimated number of patients in the US with diagnosed ETc2,089,908166,859504,693639,545752,730

[i] aThe total number of adults age ≥18 years in the US diagnosed with ET is calculated by summing across the age-specific estimates. The age-specific N’s are calculated by applying the age group-specific adult prevalence estimates to the corresponding US population estimate.

bPrimary analysis: patients are considered to have diagnosed ET upon the second of at least two claims with a diagnosis of ET between 1 and 365 days apart during the study period.

c(Prevalence of diagnosed ET [95% CI]) ×(Number of patients in the US population).

d(Proportion of patients with diagnosed ET at risk who received possible treatment) × (Number of patients in the US population).

eSensitivity analysis 1: patients are considered to have diagnosed ET upon the second of at least two claims with a diagnosis of ET between 1 and 730 days apart during the study period.

fSensitivity analysis 2: patients are considered to have diagnosed ET upon the occurrence of at least one claim with a diagnosis of ET during the study period.

Prevalence of diagnosed ET is calculated as described in Table 1. Proportion of patients with diagnosed ET is calculated as described in Table 2.

US population estimates are based on 2024 estimates from the International Database of the U.S. Census Bureau International Programs Center https://www.census.gov/data-tools/demo/idb/#/pop?menu=popViz.

ET, essential tremor.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/tohm.1060 | Journal eISSN: 2160-8288
Language: English
Submitted on: Jun 12, 2025
Accepted on: Oct 1, 2025
Published on: Oct 21, 2025
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Junji Lin, Rajesh Pahwa, Elan D. Louis, Ragy Saad, Kelly E. Lyons, Michael Markowitz, Liza R. Gibbs, Aisara Chansakul, John Kroner, Douglas S. Fuller, Weiyi Ni, Arthur Sillah, Michelle Baladi, Luigi M. Barbato, Sanket Shah, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.