1BhatiaKP, BainP, BajajN, et al. Consensus Statement on the classification of tremors. from the task force on tremor of the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. Mov Disord. 2018;33:75–87. DOI: 10.1002/mds.27121
2HeS, WestTO, PlazasFR, et al. Cortico-thalamic tremor circuits and their associations with deep brain stimulation effects in essential tremor. Brain. 2025;148:2093–2107. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awae387
3HersheyT, MinkJW. Using functional neuroimaging to study the brain’s response to deep brain stimulation. Neurology. 2006;66:1142–1143. DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000216425.34178.dd
4FangW, ChenH, WangH, et al. Essential tremor is associated with disruption of functional connectivity in the ventral intermediate Nucleus—Motor Cortex—Cerebellum circuit. Hum Brain Mapp. 2016;37:165–78. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23024
5GalleaC, PopaT, Garcia-LorenzoD, et al. Intrinsic signature of essential tremor in the cerebello-frontal network. Brain. 2015;138:2920–2933. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awv171
6JenkinsIH, BainPG, ColebatchJG, ThompsonPD, FindleyLJ, FrackowiakRS, MarsdenCD, BrooksDJ. A positron emission tomography study of essential tremor: evidence for overactivity of cerebellar connections. Ann Neurol. 1993;34:82–90. DOI: 10.1002/ana.410340115
12TuleascaC, NajdenovskaE, RegisJ, et al. Pretherapeutic Motor Thalamus Resting-State Functional Connectivity with Visual Areas Predicts Tremor Arrest After Thalamotomy for Essential Tremor: Tracing the Cerebello-thalamo-visuo-motor Network. World Neurosurg. 2018;117:e438–449. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.049
17MiddlebrooksEH, OkromelidzeL, WongJK, et al. Connectivity correlates to predict essential tremor deep brain stimulation outcome: Evidence for a common treatment pathway. Neuroimage Clin. 2021;32:102846. DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102846
20TuleascaC, BoltonTAW, RégisJ, et al. Normalization of aberrant pretherapeutic dynamic functional connectivity of extrastriate visual system in patients who underwent thalamotomy with stereotactic radiosurgery for essential tremor: a resting-state functional MRI study. J Neurosurg. 2019;132:1792–1801. DOI: 10.3171/2019.2.JNS183454
22PowerJD, SchlaggarBL, PetersenSE. Recent progress and outstanding issues in motion correction in resting state fMRI. Neuroimage. 2014;105:536–551. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.044
23La RosaPS, BrooksTL, DeychE, ShandsB, PriorF, Larson-PriorLJ, ShannonWD. Gibbs distribution for statistical analysis of graphical data with a sample application to fcMRI brain images. Stat Med. 2016;35:566–580. DOI: 10.1002/sim.6757
28FahnS, TolosaE, MarinC. Clinical rating scale for tremor. In: JankovicJ, TolosaE, editors. Parkinson’s disease and movement disorders. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1993. pp. 271–280.
29MiezinFM, MaccottaL, OllingerJM, PetersenSE, BucknerRL. Characterizing the hemodynamic response: effects of presentation rate, sampling procedure, and the possibility of ordering brain activity based on relative timing. Neuroimage. 2000;11:735–59. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0568
31BucknerRL, HeadD, ParkerJ, FotenosAF, MarcusD, MorrisJC, SnyderAZ. A unified approach for morphometric and functional data analysis in young, old, and demented adults using automated atlas-based head size normalization: reliability and validation against manual measurement of total intracranial volume. Neuroimage. 2004;23:724–38. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.06.018
34GrattonC, DworetskyA, CoalsonRS, et al. Removal of high frequency contamination from motion estimates in single-band fMRI saves data without biasing functional connectivity. Neuroimage. 2020;217:116866. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116866
35GrattonC, DworetskyA, CoalsonRS, et al. Removal of high frequency contamination from motion estimates in single-band fMRI saves data without biasing functional connectivity. Neuroimage. 2020;217:116866. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116866
36SeitzmanBA, GrattonC, MarekS, RautRV, DosenbachNUF, SchlaggarBL, PetersenSE, GreeneDJ. A set of functionally-defined brain regions with improved representation of the subcortex and cerebellum. Neuroimage. 2020;206:116290. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116290
38FortG, Lambert-LacroixS. Classification using partial least squares with penalized logistic regression. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:1104–1111. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti114
39SnyderAZ, NishinoT, ShimonyJS, et al. Covariance and Correlation Analysis of Resting State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data Acquired in a Clinical Trial of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction and Exercise in Older Individuals. Front Neurosci. 2022. 10.3389/fnins.2022.825547
41GlickmanME, RaoSR, SchultzMR. False discovery rate control is a recommended alternative to Bonferroni-type adjustments in health studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67:850–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.012
43LenkaA, BhalsingKS, PandaR, JhunjhunwalaK, NaduthotaRM, SainiJ, BharathRD, YadavR, PalPK. Role of altered cerebello-thalamo-cortical network in the neurobiology of essential tremor. Neuroradiology. 2017;59:157–168. DOI: 10.1007/s00234-016-1771-1
45EklundA, NicholsTE, KnutssonH. Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2016;113:7900–7905. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1602413113
46GottsSJ, GilmoreAW, MartinA. Brain networks, dimensionality, and global signal averaging in resting-state fMRI: Hierarchical network structure results in low-dimensional spatiotemporal dynamics. Neuroimage. 2020;205:116289. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116289
47LanH, SuoX, LiW, et al. Abnormalities of intrinsic brain activity in essential tremor: A meta-analysis of resting-state functional imaging. Hum Brain Mapp. 2021;42:3156–3167. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25425
51GalleaC, PopaT, Garcia-LorenzoD, et al. Intrinsic signature of essential tremor in the cerebello-frontal network. Brain. 2015;138:2920–2933. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awv171
53LiJ-Y, SuoX-L, LiN-N, et al. Altered spontaneous brain activity in essential tremor with and without resting tremor: a resting-state fMRI study. MAGMA. 2021;34:201–212. DOI: 10.1007/s10334-020-00865-1
54SharifiS, BuijinkAWG, LuftF, ScheijbelerEP, PottersWV, van WingenG, HeidaT, BourLJ, van RootselaarAF. Differences in Olivo-Cerebellar Circuit and Cerebellar Network Connectivity in Essential Tremor: a Resting State fMRI Study. Cerebellum. 2023;22:1123–1136. DOI: 10.1007/s12311-022-01486-1
55BuijinkAWG, van der StouweAMM, BroersmaM, SharifiS, GrootPFC, SpeelmanJD, MauritsNM, van RootselaarA-F. Motor network disruption in essential tremor: a functional and effective connectivity study. Brain. 2015;138:2934–47. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awv225
58FangW, ChenH, WangH, et al. Essential tremor is associated with disruption of functional connectivity in the ventral intermediate Nucleus—Motor Cortex—Cerebellum circuit. Hum Brain Mapp. 2016;37:165–78. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23024
59ThachWT, GoodkinHP, KeatingJG. The cerebellum and the adaptive coordination of movement. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1992;15:403–42. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ne.15.030192.002155
61LeeA, FuruyaS, AltenmüllerE. Epidemiology and treatment of 23 musicians with task specific tremor. J Clin Mov Disord. 2014;1:5. DOI: 10.1186/2054-7072-1-5
62CameronE, DykeJP, HernandezN, LouisED, DydakU. Cerebral gray matter volume losses in essential tremor: A case-control study using high resolution tissue probability maps. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2018;51:85–90. DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.03.008
63RajputA, RobinsonCA, RajputAH. Essential tremor course and disability: A clinicopathologic study of 20 cases. Neurology. 2004;62:932–936. DOI: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000115145.18830.1A
64DamoiseauxJS, RomboutsSARB, BarkhofF, ScheltensP, StamCJ, SmithSM, BeckmannCF. Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2006;103:13848–13853. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0601417103
67FeysP, HelsenWF, LiuX, LavrysenA, LoontjensV, NuttinB, KetelaerP. Effect of visual information on step-tracking movements in patients with intention tremor due to multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2003;9:492–502. DOI: 10.1191/1352458503ms949oa
69Larson-PriorLJ, ZempelJM, NolanTS, PriorFW, SnyderAZ, RaichleME. Cortical network functional connectivity in the descent to sleep. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:4489–94. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0900924106
72BolyM, PerlbargV, MarrelecG, SchabusM, LaureysS, DoyonJ, Pélégrini-IssacM, MaquetP, BenaliH. Hierarchical clustering of brain activity during human nonrapid eye movement sleep. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:5856–5861. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1111133109
76LaumannTO, GordonEM, AdeyemoB, et al. Functional System and Areal Organization of a Highly Sampled Individual Human Brain. Neuron. 2015;87:657–70. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.06.037
77GerbinM, VinerAS, LouisED. Sleep in essential tremor: a comparison with normal controls and Parkinson’s disease patients. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2012;18: 279–84. DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2011.11.004
80Larson-PriorLJ, ZempelJM, NolanTS, PriorFW, SnyderAZ, RaichleME. Cortical network functional connectivity in the descent to sleep. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:4489–94. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0900924106