Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Evaluating Creativity in Automatic Reactive Accompaniment of Jazz Improvisation Cover

Evaluating Creativity in Automatic Reactive Accompaniment of Jazz Improvisation

Open Access
|Nov 2021

Figures & Tables

tismir-4-1-90-g1.png
Figure 1

The parts of “Au Privave” by Charlie Parker. The upper scale measures the bars, lower scale the time (m:ss).

Table 1

The 14 components of creativity and assigned weights (as percentages) suiting the domain of musical improvisational creativity. This table is adopted from Jordanous (2012a, p.169).

No.ComponentWeight
1Social Interaction and Communication14.9
2Domain Competence12.5
3Intention and Emotional Involvement13.9
4Active Involvement and Persistence7.8
5Variety, Divergence, and Experimentation7.1
6Dealing with Uncertainty6.4
7Originality5.8
8Spontaneity/Subconscious Processing5.4
9Independence and Freedom5.4
10Progression and Development5.4
11Thinking and Evaluation5.1
12Value5.1
13Generation of Results3.7
14General Intellect1.4
100.0
Table 2

p-values of all LMEMs. The components on the left are sorted by their importance for the domain of musical improvisation. The stars indicate the level of significance by Bonferroni-Holm adjusted p-values (p ≤ 0.05:*/p ≤ 0.01:**/p ≤ 0.001:***). Except System (column 2), none of the effect variables (columns 3–6) were significant at all.

ComponentSystem=EDIR_first=yesInstr.=PExper.=AExper.=E
Social Interaction and Communication  0.0061*0.04810.83890.39290.1100
Domain Competence  0.12160.37940.47270.47050.4202
Intention and Emotional Involvement  0.0004**0.17880.73180.30870.4393
Active Involvement and Persistence  0.22460.81160.58580.46310.9929
Variety, Divergence, and Experimentation<0.0001***0.36180.96350.44320.5929
Dealing with Uncertainty  0.01220.20010.75330.31940.5945
Originality  0.0002**0.29300.92780.36030.8921
Spontaneity and Subconscious Processing  0.0006**0.22080.39990.28750.6610
Independence and Freedom  0.02750.57050.99130.14670.7528
Progression and Development  0.0018*0.58310.47890.56800.5717
Thinking and Evaluation  0.13130.45860.57670.59470.5151
Value  0.26330.92290.93220.60920.2832
Generation of Results  0.0005**0.44340.51610.27600.5380
General Intellect  0.01190.61030.58180.22060.8446
Mean Rating  0.0020*0.31720.76910.29200.5314
Weighted Mean Rating  0.0016*0.23870.84760.30750.4258
Table 3

Results of the ratings on both systems sorted by adjusted p-value.

Componentβ(System = ED)p-valueadj. p-value
Variety, Divergence, and Experimentation4.3000<0.00010.0005
Originality4.15000.00020.0028
Intention and Emotional Involvement2.85000.00040.0050
Generation of Results3.45000.00050.0059
Spontaneity and Subconscious Processing3.60000.00060.0068
Progression and Development3.20000.00180.0183
Social Interaction and Communication1.80000.00610.0485
Dealing with Uncertainty1.75000.01220.0834
General Intellect2.45000.01190.0834
Independence and Freedom2.10000.02750.1373
Domain Competence0.85000.12160.4864
Active Involvement and Persistence0.60000.22460.4864
Thinking and Evaluation1.35000.13130.4864
Value1.00000.26330.4864
Mean Rating2.38930.00200.0183
Weighted Mean Rating1.59840.00160.0171
tismir-4-1-90-g2.png
Figure 2

Boxplots for the ratings on each SPECS component for iReal (iR) and EAR Drummer (ED).

tismir-4-1-90-g3.png
Figure 3

Statistics of the statements of preference. The bars show the percentage of user votes for EAR Drummer.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/tismir.90 | Journal eISSN: 2514-3298
Language: English
Submitted on: Feb 28, 2021
Accepted on: Oct 6, 2021
Published on: Nov 30, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Fabian Ostermann, Igor Vatolkin, Günter Rudolph, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.