Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A New Curated Corpus of Historical Electronic Music: Collation, Data and Research Findings Cover

A New Curated Corpus of Historical Electronic Music: Collation, Data and Research Findings

Open Access
|Sep 2018

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Corpus formation issues and their resolution.

IssueResolution
Should only studio pieces be included, or live performances?Studio recordings were the mainstay of the corpus, though allowing that some pieces are the result of live performance in a studio.
Art music or popular music?The decision was made to include examples from many styles and not try to impose a hard category boundary.
Representation of female composersAn effort was made to include such pioneers as Daphne Oram and Else Marie Pade; See below for more data.
Representation outside of standard Western canonWe attempted to include some composers outside of the typical European and North American spheres, but are limited by historical imbalance in access and critical coverage.
How electronic is electronic?In some cases, iconic pieces of ‘electronic music’ involve part acoustic or standard rock instrumentation.
How obscure is permissible?We try to include works that are discussed in critical texts or representative of trends in electronic music, even if not a mass market release or unambiguously acknowledged in histories.
How minimal can works be?Some drone pieces should be represented. Eliane Radigue’s Transamorem – Transmortem (1973) is a very subtly and slowly shifting 67 minute work. Its inclusion potentially distorts feature averages taken across works, but to ignore it is to ignore a rich territory of electronic drone music. Nonetheless, Raymond Scott’s repetitive Tic Toc (1963, from Soothing Sounds for Baby Vol. 1) was not included, though other pieces from the same album were.
What source is best?Audio CDs were the primary source, but there are still issues of original releases versus remastered CDs, edited or mixed versions. Resolution here is often pragmatic because of the availability of particular releases to purchase.
Are humour and kitsch acceptable?Some representation is necessary to capture the breadth of musical life. For instance, selected pieces from Perrey & Kingsley’s The Out Sound From Way In! The Complete Vanguard Recordings (1966–7) were included.
Exact date to attributeIn metadata we initially separated Year of Composition from Year of Release/First Performance but in practice the two were so often close together as to provide no real gain to the database, and too difficult to get data on for every piece. Year of Composition is the standard one used in this study. If a range of years of composition was provided, only the latest year was taken.
Complete works versus movementsOccasionally, works would appear split into movements (one movement per audio file). We would allow this, except where it became unmanageable for many very small segments, when we joined the snippets back together as one file.
Exact name to attributeA producer (such as Tim Simenon) may hide behind an alias (such as Bomb the Bass). Well known aliases as attributed on releases themselves are used rather than producer names (we use Aphex Twin rather than Richard James, for instance).
tismir-1-1-5-g1.png
Figure 1

Number of pieces per year in the corpus, 1950 to 1999.

tismir-1-1-5-g2.png
Figure 2

Total duration in minutes summing across all pieces from each year in the corpus.

tismir-1-1-5-g3.png
Figure 3

Log to base 10 of duration of each piece, plotted for its year of composition.

tismir-1-1-5-g4.png
Figure 4

Incidence counts for music from female artists (either solo or within a group).

Table 2

The 22 features extracted.

Feature numberFeatureDescription
0LoudnessPsychoacoustic model of loudness
1Sensory dissonancePsychoacoustic sensory dissonance model after Sethares (2005)
2Spectral centroidMeasure of brightness
3Attack slopeAverage of the last ten attack slopes in the signal (with detection of attacks via an energy based onset detector)
4Jensen-Shannon divergenceCompare the spectral distributions over ERB bands within the last two seconds; acts as a spectral change detector (so, similar spectral frames mean little divergence)
5TransientnessMeasure of transient energy in the signal, based on a wavelet transform
6–8Onset statisticsIn the last two seconds, the density (raw count) of attacks, and the mean and standard deviation of inter-onset intervals
9–12Beat statisticsBeat histogram statistics; the entropy of the beat histogram, the ratio of the largest to the second largest entries in the beat histogram, the diversity (Simpson’s D measure) of beat histogram, and metricity (consistency of high energy histogram entries to integer multiples or divisors of strongest entry)
13HarmonicityRoot mean square amplitude (over 1024 sample windows) of tonal (harmonic) component of signal after median source separation
14PercussivenessRoot mean square amplitude (over 1024 sample windows) of percussive component of signal after median source separation
15Key clarityActing on the tonal part of the signal, the degree of presence of a clearcut major or minor key mode (note this does not assume the work has to be in 12TET, just that ‘clarity’ is an interesting attribute varying between pieces)
16Spectral entropySpectral entropy of spectral distribution of tonal component of the signal.
17–193 Energy bandsEnergy for low (400 Hz cutoff), mid (centred 3000 Hz), and high frequency (cutoff 6000 Hz) regions
20Stereo spatial ebbSpectral movement measure comparing left and right channels (see text)
21Two channel loudness differenceAbsolute difference in perceptual loudness between the left and right channels
Table 3

Linear regression results for average feature means against year of composition (no Bonferroni correction on p-values).

Feature numberFeatureSlope (gradient)InterceptRegression coefficientp-value
0Loudness0.002780.1230.8673.821e-16
1Sensory dissonance0.00049–0.00020.8412.172e-14
2Spectral centroid0.001460.1050.7194.092e-09
3Attack slope0.000460.0090.6893.240e-08
4Jensen-Shannon divergence–0.000380.036–0.5572.609e-05
5Transientness0.001040.0130.8571.904e-15
6Attack density0.003860.2970.8261.566e-13
7Mean of IOIs–0.000640.095–0.7955.658e-12
8Standard deviation of IOIs–0.001270.102–0.9212.716e-21
9Beat histogram entropy5.1e-050.9930.3940.005
10Beat histogram ratio first to second largest entries0.000510.3560.8851.603e-17
11Beat histogram diversity–1.3e-050.982–0.6338.283e-07
12Metricity0.000660.2990.6815.397e-08
13Strength of tonal part0.002670.0470.8951.888e-18
14Percussiveness0.001570.0130.9241.175e-21
15Key clarity of tonal part0.001180.4040.7445.983e-10
16Spectral entropy of tonal part2.3e-050.0150.1250.386
17Low frequency energy0.00220.0340.9014.818e-19
18Mid frequency energy0.000850.0170.8392.854e-14
19High frequency energy0.00111–0.0030.9123.333e-20
20Stereo spatial ebb0.000550.0170.6681.186e-07
21Two channel loudness difference–4e-060.036–0.0040.978
tismir-1-1-5-g5.png
Figure 5

The five most significant feature mean trails against years of composition. The features are: 1) standard deviation of IOIs 2) strength of tonal component 3) percussiveness 4) low frequency energy 5) high frequency energy.

Table 4

Database fields.

FieldDetail
Popular vs artInteger, 0 for popular music, 1 for art music, 2 for a borderline case
Gender0 for male composed, 1 for female composed, 2 for a mixed group
Path nameRelative to a base directory for the project, with subfolders helping to group associated pieces
ArtistArtist name
Title of workTitle of work
Year of compositionYear first noted as completed as a composition (for a range, last year taken)
Year of release/first performance (if different to year of composition)For some works in the corpus, the year of release or public performance is slightly different to the year of composition. Nonetheless, the year of composition is taken as the standard, and this data is not supplied for all works in the corpus
Source titleTitle of audio CD from which music was ripped
Source record labelRecord label of source audio CD
Source year of releaseSource CD release; for example, some works were only available through remasters or re-releases with a more recent date than might otherwise be expected; historic works can only have appeared on CD from 1982
Source record label release codeRecord label’s own internal catalogue code for a release to help identify an exact source recording if necessary
Additional notesIndicates, for instance, if there is slight mixing between works at the beginning or ending of a track (as appears in some electronic dance music releases in particular), or other matters
MusicBrainz recording IDAs found by an automated search based on strict match by artist name and track title, or where that failed, by closest match according to a non-strict inquiry to the MusicBrainz API
MusicBrainz strict match foundFlag to indicate those tracks where the recording ID was found through an exact artist and title match, and thus, most likely to be accurate
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/tismir.5 | Journal eISSN: 2514-3298
Language: English
Submitted on: Sep 20, 2017
Accepted on: Feb 22, 2018
Published on: Sep 4, 2018
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2018 Nick Collins, Peter Manning, Simone Tarsitani, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.