Have a personal or library account? Click to login
An Interdisciplinary Review of Music Performance Analysis Cover

An Interdisciplinary Review of Music Performance Analysis

Transactions of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval
Volume 3 (2020): Issue 1
By: Alexander Lerch,  Claire Arthur,  Ashis Pati and  Siddharth Gururani  
Open Access
|Nov 2020

References

  1. 1Abeßer, J., Cano, E., Frieler, K., & Pfleiderer, M. (2014a). Dynamics in jazz improvisation: Scoreinformed estimation and contextual analysis of tone intensities in trumpet and saxophone solos. In 9th Conference on Interdisciplinary Musicology (CIM14), Berlin, Germany.
    Back to article
  2. 2Abeßer, J., Cano, E., Frieler, K., & Zaddach, W.-G. (2015). Score-informed analysis of intonation and pitch modulation in jazz solos. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), Malaga, Spain.
    Back to article
  3. 3Abeßer, J., Frieler, K., Cano, E., Pfleiderer, M., & Zaddach, W.-G. (2017). Score-informed analysis of tuning, intonation, pitch modulation, and dynamics in jazz solos. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing, 25(1), 168–177. DOI: 10.1109/TASLP.2016.2627186
    Back to article
  4. 4Abeßer, J., Hasselhorn, J., Grollmisch, S., Dittmar, C., & Lehmann, A. (2014b). Automatic competency assessment of rhythm performances of ninth-grade and tenth-grade pupils. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference (ICMC), Athens, Greece.
    Back to article
  5. 5Abeßer, J., Lukashevich, H., & Schuller, G. (2010). Feature-based extraction of plucking and expression styles of the electric bass guitar. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pages 2290–2293, Dallas. DOI: 10.1109/ICASSP.2010.5495945
    Back to article
  6. 6Abeßer, J., Pfleiderer, M., Frieler, K., & Zaddach, W.-G. (2014c). Score-informed tracking and contextual analysis of fundamental frequency contours in trumpet and saxophone jazz solos. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Audio Effects (DAFx), Erlangen, Germany.
    Back to article
  7. 7Arzt, A., & Widmer, G. (2015). Real-time music tracking using multiple performances as a reference. In Müller, M., & Wiering, F., editors, Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), pages 357–363, Malaga, Spain.
    Back to article
  8. 8Ashley, R. (2002). Do[n’t] change a hair for me: The art of jazz rubato. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19(3), 311–332. DOI: 10.1525/mp.2002.19.3.311
    Back to article
  9. 9Atli, H. S., Bozkurt, B., & Sentürk, S. (2015). A method for tonic frequency identification of Turkish makam music recordings. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Folk Music Analysis (FMA), Paris, France. Association Dirac. DOI: 10.1109/SIU.2015.7130148
    Back to article
  10. 10Aucouturier, J.-J., & Bigand, E. (2012). Mel Cepstrum & Ann Ova: The difficult dialog between MIR and music cognition. In ISMIR, pages 397–402.
    Back to article
  11. 11Bantula, H., Giraldo, S. I., & Ramirez, R. (2016). Jazz ensemble expressive performance modeling. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), New York.
    Back to article
  12. 12Battcock, A., & Schutz, M. (2019). Acoustically expressing affect. Music Perception, 37(1), 66–91. DOI: 10.1525/mp.2019.37.1.66
    Back to article
  13. 13Bayle, Y., Maršík, L., Rusek, M., Robine, M., Hanna, P., Slaninová, K., Martinovic, J., & Pokorný, J. (2017). Kara1k: A karaoke dataset for cover song identification and singing voice analysis. In International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM), pages 177–184, Taichung, Taiwan. IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ISM.2017.32
    Back to article
  14. 14Behne, K.-E., & Wetekam, B. (1993). Musikpsychologische Interpretationsforschung: Individualität und Intention. Musikpsychologie. Jahrbuch der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Musikpsychologie, 10, 24–37.
    Back to article
  15. 15Bektaş, T. (2005). Relationships between prosodic and musical meters in the beste form of classical Turkish music. Asian Music, 36(1), 1–26. DOI: 10.1353/amu.2005.0003
    Back to article
  16. 16Benetos, E., Dixon, S., Giannoulis, D., Kirchhoff, H., & Klapuri, A. (2013). Automatic music transcription: Challenges and future directions. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 41(3), 407–434. DOI: 10.1007/s10844-013-0258-3
    Back to article
  17. 17Bergeron, V., & Lopes, D. M. (2009). Hearing and seeing musical expression. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 78(1), 1–16. DOI: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2008.00230.x
    Back to article
  18. 18Bishop, L., & Goebl, W. (2018). Performers and an active audience: Movement in music production and perception. Jahrbuch Musikpsychologie, 28, 1–17. DOI: 10.5964/jbdgm.2018v28.19
    Back to article
  19. 19Bowman Macleod, R. (2006). Influences of Dynamic Level and Pitch Height on the Vibrato Rates and Widths of Violin and Viola Players. Dissertation, Florida State University, College of Music, Tallahassee, FL.
    Back to article
  20. 20Bozkurt, B., Ayangil, R., & Holzapfel, A. (2014). Computational analysis of Turkish makam music: Review of state-of-the-art and challenges. Journal of New Music Research, 43(1), 3–23. DOI: 10.1080/09298215.2013.865760
    Back to article
  21. 21Bozkurt, B., Baysal, O., & Yüret, D. (2017). A dataset and baseline system for singing voice assessment. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computer Music Modeling and Retrieval (CMMR), Matosinhos.
    Back to article
  22. 22Bresin, R., & Friberg, A. (2013). Evaluation of computer systems for expressive music performance. In Kirke, A., & Miranda, E. R., editors, Guide to Computing for Expressive Music Performance, pages 181–203. Springer, London. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-4123-5_7
    Back to article
  23. 23Broze, G. J. III (2013). Animacy, Anthropomimesis, and Musical Line. PhD Thesis, The Ohio State University.
    Back to article
  24. 24Busse, W. G. (2002). Toward objective measurement and evaluation of jazz piano performance via MIDIbased groove quantize templates. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19(3), 443–461. DOI: 10.1525/mp.2002.19.3.443
    Back to article
  25. 25Cancino-Chacón, C. E., Gadermaier, T., Widmer, G., & Grachten, M. (2017). An evaluation of linear and non-linear models of expressive dynamics in classical piano and symphonic music. Machine Learning, 106(6), 887–909. DOI: 10.1007/s10994-017-5631-y
    Back to article
  26. 26Cancino-Chacón, C. E., & Grachten, M. (2016). The Basis Mixer: A computational Romantic pianist. In Late Breaking Demo (Extended Abstract), International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), New York.
    Back to article
  27. 27Cancino-Chacón, C. E., Grachten, M., Goebl, W., & Widmer, G. (2018). Computational models of expressive music performance: A comprehensive and critical review. Frontiers in Digital Humanities, 5. DOI: 10.3389/fdigh.2018.00025
    Back to article
  28. 28Caro Repetto, R., Gong, R., Kroher, N., & Serra, X. (2015). Comparision of the singing style of two Jingju schools. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), Malaga, Spain.
    Back to article
  29. 29Chen, K. (2013). Characterization of pitch intonation of Beijing opera. Master’s thesis, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona.
    Back to article
  30. 30Cheng, E., & Chew, E. (2008). Quantitative analysis of phrasing strategies in expressive performance: Computational methods and analysis of performances of unaccompanied Bach for solo violin. Journal of New Music Research, 37(4), 325–338. DOI: 10.1080/09298210802711660
    Back to article
  31. 31Chew, E. (2016). Playing with the edge: Tipping points and the role of tonality. Music Perception, 33(3), 344–366. DOI: 10.1525/mp.2016.33.3.344
    Back to article
  32. 32Choi, K., Fazekas, G., Sandler, M. B., & Cho, K. (2017). Transfer learning for music classification and regression tasks. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), pages 141–149, Suzhou, China.
    Back to article
  33. 33Chuan, C.-H., & Chew, E. (2007). A dynamic programming approach to the extraction of phrase boundaries from tempo variations in expressive performances. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR), Vienna, Austria.
    Back to article
  34. 34Clarke, E. F. (1993). Imitating and evaluating real and transformed musical performances. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3), 317–341. DOI: 10.2307/40285573
    Back to article
  35. 35Clarke, E. F. (1998). Rhythm and timing in music. In The Psychology of Music, pages 473–500. Academic Press, San Diego, 2nd edition. DOI: 10.1016/B978-012213564-4/50014-7
    Back to article
  36. 36Clarke, E. F. (2002a). Listening to performance. In Rink, J., editor, Musical Performance – A Guide to Understanding. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511811739.014
    Back to article
  37. 37Clarke, E. F. (2002b). Understanding the psychology of performance. In Rink, J., editor, Musical Performance – A Guide to Understanding. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511811739.005
    Back to article
  38. 38Clayton, M. (2008). Time in Indian Music: Rhythm, Metre, and Form in North Indian Rag Performance. Oxford University Press, New York.
    Back to article
  39. 39Collier, G. L., & Collier, J. L. (1994). An exploration of the use of tempo in jazz. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(3), 219–242. DOI: 10.2307/40285621
    Back to article
  40. 40Collier, G. L., & Collier, J. L. (2002). A study of timing in two Louis Armstrong solos. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19(3), 463–483. DOI: 10.1525/mp.2002.19.3.463
    Back to article
  41. 41Cuesta, H., Gómez Gutiérrez, E., Martorell Domínguez, A., & Loáiciga, F. (2018). Analysis of intonation in unison choir singing. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition (ICMPC), Graz, Austria.
    Back to article
  42. 42Dalla Bella, S., & Palmer, C. (2004). Tempo and dynamics in piano performance: The role of movement amplitude. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Music Perception & Cognition (ICMPC), Evanston.
    Back to article
  43. 43Davies, M., Madison, G., Silva, P., & Gouyon, F. (2013). The effect of microtiming deviations on the perception of groove in short rhythms. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 30(5), 497–510. DOI: 10.1525/mp.2013.30.5.497
    Back to article
  44. 44De Poli, G., Canazza, S., Rodà, A., & Schubert, E. (2014). The role of individual difference in judging expressiveness of computer-assisted music performances by experts. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 11(4), 22:1–22:20. DOI: 10.1145/2668124
    Back to article
  45. 45Dean, R. T., Bailes, F., & Drummond, J. (2014). Generative structures in improvisation: Computational segmentation of keyboard performances. Journal of New Music Research, 43(2), 224–236. DOI: 10.1080/09298215.2013.859710
    Back to article
  46. 46Devaney, J. (2016). Inter- versus intra-singer similarity and variation in vocal performances. Journal of New Music Research, 45(3), 252–264. DOI: 10.1080/09298215.2016.1205631
    Back to article
  47. 47Devaney, J., Mandel, M. I., Ellis, D. P. W., & Fujinaga, I. (2011). Automatically extracting performance data from recordings of trained singers. Psychomusicology: Music, Mind and Brain, 21(1–2), 108–136. DOI: 10.1037/h0094008
    Back to article
  48. 48Devaney, J., Mandel, M. I., & Fujinaga, I. (2012). A study of intonation in three-part singing using the Automatic Music Performance Analysis and Comparison Toolkit (AMPACT). In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), Porto, Portugal.
    Back to article
  49. 49Dibben, N. (2014). Understanding performance expression in popular music recordings. In Fabian, D., Timmers, R., & Schubert, E., editors, Expressiveness in Music Performance: Empirical Approaches Across Styles and Cultures. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199659647.003.0007
    Back to article
  50. 50Dillon, R. (2001). Extracting audio cues in real time to understand musical expressiveness. In Proceedings of the MOSART workshop, Barcelona.
    Back to article
  51. 51Dillon, R. (2003). A statistical approach to expressive intention recognition in violin performances. In Proceedings of the Stockholm Music Acoustics Conference (SMAC), Stockholm.
    Back to article
  52. 52Dillon, R. (2004). On the Recognition of Expressive Intentions in Music Playing: A Computational Approach with Experiments and Applications. Dissertation, University of Genoa, Faculty of Engineering, Genoa.
    Back to article
  53. 53Dimov, T. (2010). Short Historical Overview and Comparison of the Pitch Width and Speed Rates of the Vibrato Used in Sonatas and Partitas for Solo Violin by Johann Sebastian Bach as Found in Recordings of Famous Violinists of the Twentieth and the Twenty- First Centuries. D.M.A., West Virginia University, United States.
    Back to article
  54. 54Dittmar, C., Pfleiderer, M., Balke, S., & Müller, M. (2018). A swingogram representation for tracking micro-rhythmic variation in jazz performances. Journal of New Music Research, 47(2), 97–113. DOI: 10.1080/09298215.2017.1367405
    Back to article
  55. 55Dixon, S., Goebl, W., & Cambouropoulos, E. (2006). Perceptual smoothness of tempo in expressively performed music. Music Perception, 23(3), 195–214. DOI: 10.1525/mp.2006.23.3.195
    Back to article
  56. 56Dixon, S., Goebl, W., & Widmer, G. (2002). The Performance Worm: Real time visualisation of expression based on Langner’s tempo loudness animation. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference (ICMC), Göteborg.
    Back to article
  57. 57Ellis, M. C. (1991). An analysis of “swing” subdivision and asynchronization in three jazz saxophonists. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 73(3), 707–713. DOI: 10.2466/pms.1991.73.3.707
    Back to article
  58. 58Eremenko, V., Morsi, A., Narang, J., & Serra, X. (2020). Performance assessment technologies for the support of musical instrument learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU), Prague. DOI: 10.5220/0009817006290640
    Back to article
  59. 59Fabian, D., & Schubert, E. (2008). Musical character and the performance and perception of dotting, articulation and tempo in 34 recordings of Variation 7 from J.S. Bach’s Goldberg Variations (BWV 988). Musicae Scientiae, 12(2), 177–206. DOI: 10.1177/102986490801200201
    Back to article
  60. 60Fabian, D., & Schubert, E. (2009). Baroque expressiveness and stylishness in three recordings of the D minor Sarabanda for solo violin (BWV 1004) by J. S. Bach. Music Performance Research, 3, 36–55.
    Back to article
  61. 61Falcao, F., Bozkurt, B., Serra, X., Andrade, N., & Baysal, O. (2019). A dataset of rhythmic pattern reproductions and baseline automatic assessment system. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), Delft, The Netherlands.
    Back to article
  62. 62Farbood, M. M., & Upham, F. (2013). Interpreting expressive performance through listener judgments of musical tension. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00998
    Back to article
  63. 63Finney, S. A., & Palmer, C. (2003). Auditory feedback and memory for music performance: Some evidence for an encoding effect. Memory & Cognition, 31(1), 51–64. DOI: 10.3758/BF03196082
    Back to article
  64. 64Franz, D. M. (1998). Markov chains as tools for jazz improvisation analysis. Master’s thesis, Virginia Tech.
    Back to article
  65. 65Friberg, A., & Sundberg, J. (1999). Does music performance allude to locomotion? A model of final ritardandi derived from measurements of stopping runners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105(3), 1469–1484. DOI: 10.1121/1.426687
    Back to article
  66. 66Friberg, A., & Sundström, A. (2002). Swing ratios and ensemble timing in jazz performance: Evidence for a common rhythmic pattern. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19(3), 333–349. DOI: 10.1525/mp.2002.19.3.333
    Back to article
  67. 67Frieler, K., Pfleiderer, M., Zaddach, W.-G., & Abeßer, J. (2016). Midlevel analysis of monophonic jazz solos: A new approach to the study of improvisation. Musicae Scientiae, 20(2), 143–162. DOI: 10.1177/1029864916636440
    Back to article
  68. 68Frühauf, J., Kopiez, R., & Platz, F. (2013). Music on the timing grid: The influence of microtiming on the perceived groove quality of a simple drum pattern performance. Musicae Scientiae, 17(2), 246–260. DOI: 10.1177/1029864913486793
    Back to article
  69. 69Fu, Z., Lu, G., Ting, K. M., & Zhang, D. (2011). A survey of audio-based music classification and annotation. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 13(2), 303–319. DOI: 10.1109/TMM.2010.2098858
    Back to article
  70. 70Gabrielsson, A. (1987). Once again: The theme from Mozart’s Piano Sonata in A Major (K. 331): A comparison of five performances. In Gabrielsson, A., editor, Action and Perception in Rhythm and Music, pages 81–103. Royal Swedish Academy of Music, No. 55, Stockholm.
    Back to article
  71. 71Gabrielsson, A. (1999). The performance of music. In Deutsch, D., editor, The Psychology of Music. Academic Press, San Diego, 2nd edition. DOI: 10.1016/B978-012213564-4/50015-9
    Back to article
  72. 72Gabrielsson, A. (2003). Music performance research at the millennium. Psychology of Music, 31(3), 221–272. DOI: 10.1177/03057356030313002
    Back to article
  73. 73Gadermaier, T., & Widmer, G. (2019). A study of annotation and alignment accuracy for performance comparison in complex orchestral music. In Flexer, A., Peeters, G., Urbano, J., & Volk, A., editors, Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), pages 769–775, Delft, Netherlands.
    Back to article
  74. 74Ganguli, K. K., & Rao, P. (2017). Towards computational modeling of the ungrammatical in a raga performance. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), Suzhou, China.
    Back to article
  75. 75Gasser, M., Arzt, A., Gadermaier, T., Grachten, M., & Widmer, G. (2015). Classical music on the web: User interfaces and data representations. In Müller, M., & Wiering, F., editors, Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), pages 571–577, Malaga, Spain.
    Back to article
  76. 76Geringer, J. M. (1995). Continuous loudness judgments of dynamics in recorded music excerpts. Journal of Research in Music Education, 43(1), 22–35. DOI: 10.2307/3345789
    Back to article
  77. 77Gillick, J., Roberts, A., Engel, J., Eck, D., & Bamman, D. (2019). Learning to groove with inverse sequence transformations. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pages 2269–2279.
    Back to article
  78. 78Gingras, B., Pearce, M. T., Goodchild, M., Dean, R. T., Wiggins, G., & McAdams, S. (2016). Linking melodic expectation to expressive performance timing and perceived musical tension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(4), 594. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000141
    Back to article
  79. 79Gjerdingen, R. O. (1988). Shape and motion in the microstructure of song. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 35–64. DOI: 10.2307/40285415
    Back to article
  80. 80Goebl, W. (1999). Numerisch-klassifikatorische Interpretationsanalyse mit dem ‘Bösendorfer Computerflügel’. Diploma Thesis, Universität Wien, Vienna, Austria.
    Back to article
  81. 81Goebl, W. (2001). Melody lead in piano performance: Expressive device or artifact? The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110(1), 563–572. DOI: 10.1121/1.1376133
    Back to article
  82. 82Goebl, W., Dixon, S., De Poli, G., Friberg, A., Bresin, R., & Widmer, G. (2005). ‘Sense’ in expressive music performance: Data acquisition, computational studies, and models. In Leman, M., & Cirotteau, D., editors, Sound to Sense, Sense to Sound: A Stateof- the-Art. Logos, Berlin.
    Back to article
  83. 83Goebl, W., & Palmer, C. (2008). Tactile feedback and timing accuracy in piano performance. Experimental Brain Research, 186(3), 471–479. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1252-1
    Back to article
  84. 84Gong, R. (2018). Automatic Assessment of Singing Voice Pronunciation: A Case Study with Jingju Music. PhD Thesis, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
    Back to article
  85. 85Gong, R., Yang, Y., & Serra, X. (2016). Pitch contour segmentation for computer-aided Jingju singing training. In Proceedings of the Sound and Music Computing Conference (SMC), Hamburg, Germany.
    Back to article
  86. 86Grachten, M., Cancino-Chacón, C. E., & Chacón, C. E. C. (2017). Temporal dependencies in the expressive timing of classical piano performances. In The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction, pages 360–369. Routledge, New York. DOI: 10.4324/9781315621364-40
    Back to article
  87. 87Grachten, M., & Widmer, G. (2012). Linear basis models for prediction and analysis of musical expression. Journal of New Music Research, 41(4), 311–322. DOI: 10.1080/09298215.2012.731071
    Back to article
  88. 88Gupta, C., & Rao, P. (2012). Objective assessment of ornamentation in Indian classical singing. In Ystad, S., Aramaki, M., Kronland-Martinet, R., Jensen, K., & Mohanty, S., editors, Speech, Sound and Music Processing: Embracing Research in India, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 1–25. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
    Back to article
  89. 89Gururani, S., Pati, K. A., Wu, C.-W., & Lerch, A. (2018). Analysis of objective descriptors for music performance assessment. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition (ICMPC), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
    Back to article
  90. 90Hakan, T., Serra, X., & Arcos, J. L. (2012). Characterization of embellishments in ney performances of makam music in Turkey. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), Porto, Portugal.
    Back to article
  91. 91Han, Y., & Lee, K. (2014). Hierarchical approach to detect common mistakes of beginner flute players. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), pages 77–82, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Back to article
  92. 92Hartmann, A. (1932). Untersuchungen über das metrische Verhalten in musikalischen Interpretationsvarianten. Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie, 84, 103–192.
    Back to article
  93. 93Hashida, M., Matsui, T., & Katayose, H. (2008). A new music database describing deviation information of performance expressions. In Bello, J. P., Chew, E., & Turnbull, D., editors, Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), pages 489–494, Philadelphia, PA.
    Back to article
  94. 94Hawthorne, C., Stasyuk, A., Roberts, A., Simon, I., Huang, C.-Z. A., Dieleman, S., Elsen, E., Engel, J., & Eck, D. (2019). Enabling factorized piano music modeling and generation with the MAESTRO Dataset. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR). arXiv: 1810.12247.
    Back to article
  95. 95Henkel, F., Balke, S., Dorfer, M., & Widmer, G. (2019). Score following as a multi-modal reinforcement learning problem. Transactions of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval, 2(1), 67–81. DOI: 10.5334/tismir.31
    Back to article
  96. 96Hill, P. (2002). From score to sound. In Rink, J., editor, Musical Performance – A Guide to Understanding. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511811739.010
    Back to article
  97. 97Howes, P., Callaghan, J., Davis, P., Kenny, D., & Thorpe, W. (2004). The relationship between measured vibrato characteristics and perception in Western operatic singing. Journal of Voice, 18(2), 216–230. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2003.09.003
    Back to article
  98. 98Huang, J., & Krumhansl, C. L. (2011). What does seeing the performer add? It depends on musical style, amount of stage behavior, and audience expertise. Musicae Scientiae, 15(3), 343–364. DOI: 10.1177/1029864911414172
    Back to article
  99. 99Huang, J., & Lerch, A. (2019). Automatic assessment of sight-reading exercises. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), Delft, Netherlands.
    Back to article
  100. 100Huron, D. (2001). Tone and voice: A derivation of the rules of voice-leading from perceptual principles. Music Perception, 19(1), 1–64. DOI: 10.1525/mp.2001.19.1.1
    Back to article
  101. 101Huron, D. (2015). Affect induction through musical sounds: An ethological perspective. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 370(1664), 20140098. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0098
    Back to article
  102. 102Iyer, V. (2002). Embodied mind, situated cognition, and expressive microtiming in African-American music. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19(3), 387–414. DOI: 10.1525/mp.2002.19.3.387
    Back to article
  103. 103Järvinen, T. (1995). Tonal hierarchies in jazz improvisation. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(4), 415–437. DOI: 10.2307/40285675
    Back to article
  104. 104Järvinen, T., & Toiviainen, P. (2000). The effect of metre on the use of tones in jazz improvisation. Musicae Scientiae, 4(1), 55–74. DOI: 10.1177/102986490000400103
    Back to article
  105. 105Jeong, D., Kwon, T., Kim, Y., Lee, K., & Nam, J. (2019a). VirtuosoNet: A hierarchical RNN-based system for modeling expressive piano performance. In Flexer, A., Peeters, G., Urbano, J., & Volk, A., editors, Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), pages 908–915, Delft, Netherlands.
    Back to article
  106. 106Jeong, D., Kwon, T., Kim, Y., & Nam, J. (2019b). Graph neural network for music score data and modeling expressive piano performance. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 3060–3070.
    Back to article
  107. 107Juchniewicz, J. (2008). The influence of physical movement on the perception of musical performance. Psychology of Music, 36(4), 417–427. DOI: 10.1177/0305735607086046
    Back to article
  108. 108Jure, L., Lopez, E., Rocamora, M., Cancela, P., Sponton, H., & Irigaray, I. (2012). Pitch content visualization tools for music performance analysis. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), Porto.
    Back to article
  109. 109Juslin, P. N. (2000). Cue utilization in communication of emotion in music performance: Relating performance to perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 26(6), 1797–1813. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.26.6.1797
    Back to article
  110. 110Juslin, P. N. (2003). Five myths about expressivity in music performance and what to do about them. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Arts and Humanities, Honululu, Hawaii.
    Back to article
  111. 111Juslin, P. N., & Laukka, P. (2003). Communication of emotions in vocal expression and music performance: Different channels, same code? Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 770–814. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.770
    Back to article
  112. 112Katz, M. (2004). Capturing Sound: How Technology has Changed Music. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.
    Back to article
  113. 113Kawase, S. (2014). Importance of communication cues in music performance according to performers and audience. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 6(2), 49. DOI: 10.5539/ijps.v6n2p49
    Back to article
  114. 114Kehling, C., Abeßer, J., Dittmar, C., & Schuller, G. (2014). Automatic tablature transcription of electric guitar recordings by estimation of score- and instrument-related parameters. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Audio Effects (DAFx), Erlangen, Germany.
    Back to article
  115. 115Kendall, R. A., & Carterette, E. C. (1990). The communication of musical expression. Music Perception, 8(2), 129–164. DOI: 10.2307/40285493
    Back to article
  116. 116Kirke, A., & Miranda, E. R., editors (2013). Guide to Computing for Expressive Music Performance. Springer Science & Business Media, London. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-4123-5
    Back to article
  117. 117Knight, T., Upham, F., & Fujinaga, I. (2011). The potential for automatic assessment of trumpet tone quality. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), pages 573–578, Miami, FL.
    Back to article
  118. 118Kosta, K., Bandtlow, O. F., & Chew, E. (2015). A change-point approach towards representing musical dynamics. In Collins, T., Meredith, D., & Volk, A., editors, Mathematics and Computation in Music, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 179–184, Cham. Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20603-5_18
    Back to article
  119. 119Kosta, K., Bandtlow, O. F., & Chew, E. (2018). Dynamics and relativity: Practical implications of dynamic markings in the score. Journal of New Music Research, 47(5), 438–461. DOI: 10.1080/09298215.2018.1486430
    Back to article
  120. 120Kosta, K., Ramirez, R., Bandtlow, O., & Chew, E. (2016). Mapping between dynamic markings and performed loudness: A machine learning approach. Journal of Mathematics and Music, 10(2), 149–172. DOI: 10.1080/17459737.2016.1193237
    Back to article
  121. 121Krumhansl, C. L. (1996). A perceptual analysis of Mozart’s Piano Sonata K. 282: Segmentation, tension, and musical ideas. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(3), 401–432. DOI: 10.2307/40286177
    Back to article
  122. 122Langner, J., & Goebl, W. (2002). Representing expressive performance in tempo-loudness space. In Proceedings of the Conference European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music (ESCOM), Liege.
    Back to article
  123. 123Leman, M., & Maes, P.-J. (2014). The role of embodiment in the perception of music. Empirical Musicology Review, 9(3–4), 236–246. DOI: 10.18061/emr.v9i3-4.4498
    Back to article
  124. 124Lerch, A. (2009). Software-Based Extraction of Objective Parameters from Music Performances. GRIN Verlag, München.
    Back to article
  125. 125Lerch, A. (2012). An Introduction to Audio Content Analysis: Applications in Signal Processing and Music Informatics. Wiley-IEEE Press, Hoboken. DOI: 10.1002/9781118393550
    Back to article
  126. 126Lerch, A., Arthur, C., Pati, A., & Gururani, S. (2019). Music performance analysis: A survey. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), Delft.
    Back to article
  127. 127Li, B., Liu, X., Dinesh, K., Duan, Z., & Sharma, G. (2019). Creating a multitrack classical music performance dataset for multimodal music analysis: Challenges, insights, and applications. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 21(2), 522–535. DOI: 10.1109/TMM.2018.2856090
    Back to article
  128. 128Li, P.-C., Su, L., Yang, Y.-H., & Su, A. W. Y. (2015). Analysis of expressive musical terms in violin using score-informed and expression-based audio features. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), pages 809–815, Malaga, Spain.
    Back to article
  129. 129Li, S., Dixon, S., & Plumbley, M. D. (2017). Clustering expressive timing with regressed polynomial coefficients demonstrated by a model selection test. In Cunningham, S. J., Duan, Z., Hu, X., & Turnbull, D., editors, Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), pages 457–463, Suzhou, China.
    Back to article
  130. 130Liem, C. C., & Hanjalic, A. (2011). Expressive timing from cross-performance and audio-based alignment patterns: An extended case study. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), Miami, FL.
    Back to article
  131. 131Liem, C. C., & Hanjalic, A. (2015). Comparative analysis of orchestral performance recordings: An imagebased approach. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), Malaga, Spain.
    Back to article
  132. 132Livingstone, S. R., Thompson, W. F., & Russo, F. A. (2009). Facial expressions and emotional singing: A study of perception and production with motion capture and electromyography. Music Perception, 26(5), 475–488. DOI: 10.1525/mp.2009.26.5.475
    Back to article
  133. 133Luizard, P., Brauer, E., & Weinzierl, S. (2019). Singing in physical and virtual environments: How performers adapt to room acoustical conditions. In Proceedings of the AES Conference on Immersive and Interactive Audio, York. AES.
    Back to article
  134. 134Luizard, P., Steffens, J., & Weinzierl, S. (2020). Singing in different rooms: Common or individual adaptation patterns to the acoustic conditions? The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 147(2), EL132–EL137. DOI: 10.1121/10.0000715
    Back to article
  135. 135Luo, Y.-J. (2015). Detection of common mistakes in novice violin playing. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), pages 316–322, Malaga, Spain.
    Back to article
  136. 136Maempel, H.-J. (2011). Musikaufnahmen als Datenquellen der Interpretationsanalyse. In von Lösch, H., & Weinzierl, S., editors, Gemessene Interpretation – Computergestützte Aufführungsanalyse im Kreuzverhör der Disziplinen, Klang und Begriff, pages 157–171. Schott, Mainz.
    Back to article
  137. 137Maezawa, A., Yamamoto, K., & Fujishima, T. (2019). Rendering music performance with interpretation variations using conditional variational RNN. In Flexer, A., Peeters, G., Urbano, J., & Volk, A., editors, Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), pages 855–861, Delft, Netherlands.
    Back to article
  138. 138Malik, I., & Ek, C. H. (2017). Neural translation of musical style. arXiv:1708.03535 [cs].
    Back to article
  139. 139Marchini, M., Ramirez, R., Papiotis, P., & Maestre, E. (2014). The sense of ensemble: A machine learning approach to expressive performance modeling in string quartets. Journal of New Music Research, 43(3), 303–317. DOI: 10.1080/09298215.2014.922999
    Back to article
  140. 140Mayor, O., Bonada, J., & Loscos, A. (2009). Performance analysis and scoring of the singing voice. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society Convention, pages 1–7.
    Back to article
  141. 141McFee, B., Humphrey, E. J., & Bello, J. P. (2015). A software framework for musical data augmentation. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), Malaga, Spain.
    Back to article
  142. 142McNeil, A. (2017). Seed ideas and creativity in Hindustani Raga music: Beyond the compositionimprovisation dialectic. Ethnomusicology Forum, 26(1), 116–132. DOI: 10.1080/17411912.2017.1304230
    Back to article
  143. 143McPherson, G. E., & Thompson, W. F. (1998). Assessing music performance: Issues and influences. Research Studies in Music Education, 10(1), 12–24. DOI: 10.1177/1321103X9801000102
    Back to article
  144. 144Molina, E., Barbancho, I., Gómez, E., Barbancho, A. M., & Tardón, L. J. (2013). Fundamental frequency alignment vs. note-based melodic similarity for singing voice assessment. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pages 744–748, Vancouver, Canada. DOI: 10.1109/ICASSP.2013.6637747
    Back to article
  145. 145Müller, M., Konz, V., Bogler, W., & Arifi-Müller, V. (2011). Saarland Music Data (SMD). In Late Breaking Demo (Extended Abstract), International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), Miami, FL.
    Back to article
  146. 146Nakamura, T. (1987). The communication of dynamics between musicians and listeners through musical performance. Perception & Psychophysics, 41(6), 525–533. DOI: 10.3758/BF03210487
    Back to article
  147. 147Nakano, T., Goto, M., & Hiraga, Y. (2006). An automatic singing skill evaluation method for unknown melodies using pitch interval accuracy and vibrato features. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Langaunge Processing (INTERSPEECH), volume 12, Pittsburgh, PA.
    Back to article
  148. 148Narang, K., & Rao, P. (2017). Acoustic features for determining goodness of tabla strokes. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), pages 257–263, Suzhou, China.
    Back to article
  149. 149Ohriner, M. S. (2012). Grouping hierarchy and trajectories of pacing in performances of Chopin’s Mazurkas. Music Theory Online, 18(1). DOI: 10.30535/mto.18.1.6
    Back to article
  150. 150Okumura, K., Sako, S., & Kitamura, T. (2011). Stochastic modeling of a musical performance with expressive representations from the musical score. In Klapuri, A., & Leider, C., editors, Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), pages 531–536, Miami, FL. University of Miami.
    Back to article
  151. 151Oore, S., Simon, I., Dieleman, S., Eck, D., & Simonyan, K. (2020). This time with feeling: Learning expressive musical performance. Neural Computing and Applications, 32(4), 955–967. DOI: 10.1007/s00521-018-3758-9
    Back to article
  152. 152Ornoy, E., & Cohen, S. (2018). Analysis of contemporary violin recordings of 19th century repertoire: Identifying trends and impacts. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02233
    Back to article
  153. 153Page, K. R., Nurmikko-Fuller, T., Rindfleisch, C., Weigl, D. M., Lewis, R., Dreyfus, L., & De Roure, D. (2015). A toolkit for live annotation of opera performance: Experiences capturing Wagner’s Ring Cycle. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), Malaga, Spain.
    Back to article
  154. 154Palmer, C. (1989). Mapping musical thought to musical performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(2), 331–346. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.15.2.331
    Back to article
  155. 155Palmer, C. (1996). On the assignment of structure in music performance. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(1), 23–56. DOI: 10.2307/40285708
    Back to article
  156. 156Palmer, C. (1997). Music performance. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 115–138. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.115
    Back to article
  157. 157Papiotis, P. (2016). A Computational Approach to Studying Interdependence in String Quartet Performance. PhD thesis, Univesitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
    Back to article
  158. 158Pati, K. A., Gururani, S., & Lerch, A. (2018). Assessment of student music performances using deep neural networks. Applied Sciences, 8(4), 507. DOI: 10.3390/app8040507
    Back to article
  159. 159Peperkamp, J., Hildebrandt, K., & Liem, C. C. (2017). A formalization of relative local tempo variations in collections of performances. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), Suzhou.
    Back to article
  160. 160Pfleiderer, M., Frieler, K., Abeßer, J., Zaddach, W.-G., & Burkhart, B., editors (2017). Inside the Jazzomat: New Perspectives for Jazz Research. Schott Campus.
    Back to article
  161. 161Pfordresher, P. Q. (2005). Auditory feedback in music performance: The role of melodic structure and musical skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31(6), 1331–1345. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1331
    Back to article
  162. 162Pfordresher, P. Q., & Palmer, C. (2002). Effects of delayed auditory feedback on timing of music performance. Psychological Research, 16, 71–79. DOI: 10.1007/s004260100075
    Back to article
  163. 163Platz, F., & Kopiez, R. (2012). When the eye listens: A meta-analysis of how audio-visual presentation enhances the appreciation of music performance. Music Perception, 30(1), 71–83. DOI: 10.1525/mp.2012.30.1.71
    Back to article
  164. 164Povel, D.-J. (1977). Temporal structure of performed music: Some preliminary observations. In Acta Psychologica, volume 41, pages 309–320. DOI: 10.1016/0001-6918(77)90024-5
    Back to article
  165. 165Prögler, J. A. (1995). Searching for swing: Participatory discrepancies in the jazz rhythm section. Ethnomusicology, 39(1), 21–54. DOI: 10.2307/852199
    Back to article
  166. 166Ramirez, R., Hazan, A., Maestre, E., & Serra, X. (2008). A genetic rule-based model of expressive performance for jazz saxophone. Computer Music Journal, 32(1), 38–50. DOI: 10.1162/comj.2008.32.1.38
    Back to article
  167. 167Repp, B. H. (1989). Expressive microstructure in music: A preliminary perceptual assessment of four composers’ “pulses”. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6(3), 243–273. DOI: 10.2307/40285589
    Back to article
  168. 168Repp, B. H. (1990). Patterns of expressive timing in performances of a Beethoven minuet by nineteen famous pianists. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (JASA), 88(2), 622–641. DOI: 10.1121/1.399766
    Back to article
  169. 169Repp, B. H. (1992). A constraint on the expressive timing of a melodic gesture: Evidence from performance and aesthetic judgment. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(2), 221–241. DOI: 10.2307/40285608
    Back to article
  170. 170Repp, B. H. (1993). Music as motion: A synopsis of Alexander Truslit’s (1938) Gestaltung und Bewegung in der Musik. Psychology of Music, 21(1), 48–72. DOI: 10.1177/030573569302100104
    Back to article
  171. 171Repp, B. H. (1996a). The art of inaccuracy: Why pianists’ errors are difficult to hear. Music Perception, 14(2), 161–184. DOI: 10.2307/40285716
    Back to article
  172. 172Repp, B. H. (1996b). The dynamics of expressive piano performance: Schumann’s ‘Träumerei’ revisited. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (JASA), 100(1), 641–650. DOI: 10.1121/1.415889
    Back to article
  173. 173Repp, B. H. (1996c). Pedal timing and tempo in expressive piano performance: A preliminary investigation. Psychology of Music, 24(2), 199–221. DOI: 10.1177/0305735696242011
    Back to article
  174. 174Repp, B. H. (1997a). The aesthetic quality of a quantitatively average music performance: Two preliminary experiments. Music Perception, 14(4), 419–444. DOI: 10.2307/40285732
    Back to article
  175. 175Repp, B. H. (1997b). The effect of tempo on pedal timing in piano performance. Psychological Research, 60(3), 164–172. DOI: 10.1007/BF00419764
    Back to article
  176. 176Repp, B. H. (1998a). A microcosm of musical expression. I. Quantitative analysis of pianists’ timing in the initial measures of Chopin’s Etude in E major. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (JASA), 104(2), 1085–1100. DOI: 10.1121/1.423325
    Back to article
  177. 177Repp, B. H. (1998b). Obligatory “expectations” of expressive timing induced by perception of musical structure. Psychological Research, 61(1), 33–43. DOI: 10.1007/s004260050011
    Back to article
  178. 178Repp, B. H. (1999). Effects of auditory feedback deprivation on expressive piano performance. Music Perception, 16(4), 409–438. DOI: 10.2307/40285802
    Back to article
  179. 179Rink, J. (2003). In respect of performance: The view from musicology. Psychology of Music, 31(3), 303–323. DOI: 10.1177/03057356030313004
    Back to article
  180. 180Roholt, T. C. (2014). Groove: A Phenomenology of Rhythmic Nuance. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. Google-Books-ID: qvJzBAAAQBAJ.
    Back to article
  181. 181Romani Picas, O., Rodriguez, H. P., Dabiri, D., Tokuda, H., Hariya, W., Oishi, K., & Serra, X. (2015). A real-time system for measuring sound goodness in instrumental sounds. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society Convention, volume 138, Warsaw.
    Back to article
  182. 182Rosenzweig, S., Scherbaum, F., Shugliashvili, D., Arifi- Müller, V., & Müller, M. (2020). Erkomaishvili Dataset: A curated corpus of traditional Georgian vocal music for computational musicology. Transactions of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval, 3(1), 31–41. DOI: 10.5334/tismir.44
    Back to article
  183. 183Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161–1178. DOI: 10.1037/h0077714
    Back to article
  184. 184Sapp, C. S. (2007). Comparative analysis of multiple musical performances. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR), Vienna, Austria.
    Back to article
  185. 185Sapp, C. S. (2008). Hybrid numeric/rank similarity metrics for musical performance analysis. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR), Philadelphia, PA.
    Back to article
  186. 186Sarasúa, A., Caramiaux, B., Tanaka, A., & Ortiz, M. (2017). Datasets for the analysis of expressive musical gestures. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Movement Computing (MOCO), pages 1–4, London, UK. Association for Computing Machinery. DOI: 10.1145/3077981.3078032
    Back to article
  187. 187Schärer Kalkandjiev, Z., & Weinzierl, S. (2013). The influence of room acoustics on solo music performance: An empirical case study. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 99(3), 433–441. DOI: 10.3813/AAA.918624
    Back to article
  188. 188Schärer Kalkandjiev, Z., & Weinzierl, S. (2015). The influence of room acoustics on solo music performance: An experimental study. Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, and Brain, 25(3), 195–207. DOI: 10.1037/pmu0000065
    Back to article
  189. 189Schramm, R., de Souza Nunes, H., & Jung, C. R. (2015). Automatic Solfège assessment. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), pages 183–189, Malaga, Spain.
    Back to article
  190. 190Schubert, E., Canazza, S., De Poli, G., & Rodà, A. (2017). Algorithms can mimic human piano performance: The deep blues of music. Journal of New Music Research, 46(2), 175–186. DOI: 10.1080/09298215.2016.1264976
    Back to article
  191. 191Schubert, E., & Fabian, D. (2006). The dimensions of Baroque music performance: A semantic differential study. Psychology of Music, 34(4), 573–587. DOI: 10.1177/0305735606068105
    Back to article
  192. 192Schubert, E., & Fabian, D. (2014). A taxonomy of listeners’ judgments of expressiveness in music performance. In Fabian, D., Timmers, R., & Schubert, E., editors, Expressiveness in Music Performance: Empirical Approaches Across Styles and Cultures. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199659647.003.0016
    Back to article
  193. 193Seashore, C. E. (1938). Psychology of Music. McGraw-Hill, New York. DOI: 10.2307/3385515
    Back to article
  194. 194Serra, X. (2014). Creating research corpora for the computational study of music: The case of the CompMusic Project. In Proceedings of the AES International Conference on Semantic Audio, pages 1–9, London, UK. AES.
    Back to article
  195. 195Shaffer, L. H. (1984). Timing in solo and duet piano performances. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, 577–595. DOI: 10.1080/14640748408402180
    Back to article
  196. 196Shi, Z., Sapp, C. S., Arul, K., McBride, J., & Smith, J. O. (2019). SUPRA: Digitizing the Stanford University Piano Roll Archive. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), pages 517–523, Delft, The Netherlands.
    Back to article
  197. 197Siegwart, H., & Scherer, K. R. (1995). Acoustic concomitants of emotional expression in operatic singing: The case of Lucia in Ardi gli incensi. Journal of Voice, 9(3), 249–260. DOI: 10.1016/S0892-1997(05)80232-2
    Back to article
  198. 198Silvey, B. A. (2012). The role of conductor facial expression in students’ evaluation of ensemble expressivity. Journal of Research in Music Education, 60(4), 419–429. DOI: 10.1177/0022429412462580
    Back to article
  199. 199Sloboda, J. A. (1982). Music Performance. In Deutsch, D., editor, The Psychology of Music. Academic Press, New York. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-213562-0.50020-6
    Back to article
  200. 200Sloboda, J. A. (1983). The communication of musical metre in piano performance. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 35(2), 377–396. DOI: 10.1080/14640748308402140
    Back to article
  201. 201Srinivasamurthy, A., Holzapfel, A., Ganguli, K. K., & Serra, X. (2017). Aspects of tempo and rhythmic elaboration in Hindustani music: A corpus study. Frontiers in Digital Humanities, 4. DOI: 10.3389/fdigh.2017.00020
    Back to article
  202. 202Stowell, D., & Chew, E. (2013). Maximum a posteriori estimation of piecewise arcs in tempo time-series. In Aramaki, M., Barthet, M., Kronland-Martinet, R., & Ystad, S., editors, From Sounds to Music and Emotions, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 387–399, Berlin, Heidelberg. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-41248-6_22
    Back to article
  203. 203Su, L., Yu, L.-F., & Yang, Y.-H. (2014). Sparse cepstral, phase codes for guitar playing technique classification. In Wang, H.-M., Yang, Y.-H., & Lee, J. H., editors, Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), pages 9–14.
    Back to article
  204. 204Sulem, A., Bodner, E., & Amir, N. (2019). Perceptionbased classification of expressive musical terms: Toward a parameterization of musical expressiveness. Music Perception, 37(2), 147–164. DOI: 10.1525/mp.2019.37.2.147
    Back to article
  205. 205Sundberg, J. (1993). How can music be expressive? Speech Communication, 13(1), 239–253. DOI: 10.1016/0167-6393(93)90075-V
    Back to article
  206. 206Sundberg, J. (2018). The singing voice. In Frühholz, S., & Belin, P., editors, The Oxford Handbook of Voice Perception. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198743187.013.6
    Back to article
  207. 207Sundberg, J., Lã, F. M. B., & Himonides, E. (2013). Intonation and expressivity: A single case study of classical Western singing. Journal of Voice, 27(3), 391.e1–391.e8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.11.009
    Back to article
  208. 208Takeda, H., Nishimoto, T., & Sagayama, S. (2004). Rhythm and tempo recognition of music performance from a probabilistic approach. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR), Barcelona, Spain.
    Back to article
  209. 209Thompson, S., & Williamon, A. (2003). Evaluating evaluation: Musical performance assessment as a research tool. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21(1), 21–41. DOI: 10.1525/mp.2003.21.1.21
    Back to article
  210. 210Timmers, R. (2005). Predicting the similarity between expressive performances of music from measurements of tempo and dynamics. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117(1), 391–399. DOI: 10.1121/1.1835504
    Back to article
  211. 211Todd, N. P. M. (1992). The dynamics of dynamics: A model of musical expression. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 3540–3550. DOI: 10.1121/1.402843
    Back to article
  212. 212Todd, N. P. M. (1993). Vestibular feedback in musical performance. Music Perception, 10(3), 379–382. DOI: 10.2307/40285575
    Back to article
  213. 213Todd, N. P. M. (1995). The kinematics of musical expression. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (JASA), 97(3), 1940–1949. DOI: 10.1121/1.412067
    Back to article
  214. 214Toyoda, K., Noike, K., & Katayose, H. (2004). Utility system for constructing database of performance deviations. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR), Barcelona, Spain.
    Back to article
  215. 215Tsay, C.-J. (2013). Sight over sound in the judgment of music performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(36), 14580–14585. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1221454110
    Back to article
  216. 216Tzanetakis, G. (2014). Computational ethnomusicology: A music information retrieval perspective. In Proceedings of the Joint International Computer Music/Sound and Music Computing Conference, Athens.
    Back to article
  217. 217Van Herwaarden, S., Grachten, M., & De Haas, W. B. (2014). Predicting expressive dynamics in piano performances using neural networks. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), Taipei, Taiwan.
    Back to article
  218. 218van Noorden, L., & Moelants, D. (1999). Resonance in the perception of musical pulse. Journal of New Music Research, 28(1), 43–66. DOI: 10.1076/jnmr.28.1.43.3122
    Back to article
  219. 219Vidwans, A., Gururani, S., Wu, C.-W., Subramanian, V., Swaminathan, R. V., & Lerch, A. (2017). Objective descriptors for the assessment of student music performances. In Proceedings of the AES Conference on Semantic Audio, Erlangen. Audio Engineering Society (AES).
    Back to article
  220. 220Vieillard, S., Roy, M., & Peretz, I. (2012). Expressiveness in musical emotions. Psychological Research, 76(5), 641–653. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-011-0361-4
    Back to article
  221. 221Viraraghavan, V. S., Aravind, R., & Murthy, H. A. (2017). A statistical analysis of gamakas in Carnatic music. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), Suzhou, China.
    Back to article
  222. 222Wager, S., Tzanetakis, G., Sullivan, S., Wang, C.-i., Shimmin, J., Kim, M., & Cook, P. (2019). Intonation: A dataset of quality vocal performances refined by spectral clustering on pitch congruence. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pages 476–480, Brighton, UK. IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ICASSP.2019.8683554
    Back to article
  223. 223Wang, B., & Yang, Y.-H. (2019). PerformanceNet: Score-to-audio music generation with multi-band convolutional residual network. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 33(01), 1174–1181. DOI: 10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33011174
    Back to article
  224. 224Wang, C., Benetos, E., Lostanlen, V., & Chew, E. (2019). Adaptive time-frequency scattering for periodic modulation recognition in music signals. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), Delft, Netherlands.
    Back to article
  225. 225Wapnick, J., Campbell, L., Siddell-Strebel, J., & Darrow, A.-A. (2009). Effects of non-musical attributes and excerpt duration on ratings of high-level piano performances. Musicae Scientiae, 13(1), 35–54. DOI: 10.1177/1029864909013001002
    Back to article
  226. 226Wesolowski, B. C. (2016). Timing deviations in jazz performance: The relationships of selected musical variables on horizontal and vertical timing relations: A case study. Psychology of Music, 44(1), 75–94. DOI: 10.1177/0305735614555790
    Back to article
  227. 227Wesolowski, B. C., Wind, S. A., & Engelhard, G. (2016). Examining rater precision in music performance assessment: An analysis of rating scale structure using the multifaceted Rasch partial credit model. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 33(5), 662–678. DOI: 10.1525/mp.2016.33.5.662
    Back to article
  228. 228Widmer, G. (2003). Discovering simple rules in complex data: A meta-learning algorithm and some surprising musical discoveries. Artificial Intelligence, 146(2), 129–148. DOI: 10.1016/S0004-3702(03)00016-X
    Back to article
  229. 229Widmer, G., & Goebl, W. (2004). Computational models of expressive music performance: The state of the art. Journal of New Music Research, 33(3), 203–216. DOI: 10.1080/0929821042000317804
    Back to article
  230. 230Wilkins, J., Seetharaman, P., Wahl, A., & Pardo, B. (2018). VocalSet: A singing voice dataset. In Gómez, E., Hu, X., Humphrey, E., & Benetos, E., editors, Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), pages 468–474, Paris, France.
    Back to article
  231. 231Winters, R. M., Gururani, S., & Lerch, A. (2016). Automatic practice logging: Introduction, dataset & preliminary study. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), New York.
    Back to article
  232. 232Wolf, A., Kopiez, R., Platz, F., Lin, H.-R., & Mütze, H. (2018). Tendency towards the average? The aesthetic evaluation of a quantitatively average music performancea successful replication of Repp’s (1997) study. Music Perception, 36(1), 98–108. DOI: 10.1525/mp.2018.36.1.98
    Back to article
  233. 233Wu, C.-W., Gururani, S., Laguna, C., Pati, A., Vidwans, A., & Lerch, A. (2016). Towards the objective assessment of music performances. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition (ICMPC), pages 99–103, San Francisco.
    Back to article
  234. 234Wu, C.-W., & Lerch, A. (2016). On drum playing technique detection in polyphonic mixtures. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), New York. ISMIR.
    Back to article
  235. 235Wu, C.-W., & Lerch, A. (2018a). Assessment of percussive music performances with feature learning. International Journal of Semantic Computing (IJSC), 12(3), 315–333. DOI: 10.1142/S1793351X18400147
    Back to article
  236. 236Wu, C.-W., & Lerch, A. (2018b). From labeled to unlabeled data – on the data challenge in automatic drum transcription. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), Paris.
    Back to article
  237. 237Wu, C.-W., & Lerch, A. (2018c). Learned features for the assessment of percussive music performances. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC), Laguna Hills. IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ICSC.2018.00022
    Back to article
  238. 238Xia, G., & Dannenberg, R. (2015). Duet interaction: Learning musicianship for automatic accompaniment. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, NIME 2015, pages 259–264, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA. The School of Music and the Center for Computation and Technology (CCT), Louisiana State University.
    Back to article
  239. 239Xia, G., Wang, Y., Dannenberg, R. B., & Gordon, G. (2015). Spectral learning for expressive interactive ensemble music performance. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), pages 816–822, Malaga, Spain.
    Back to article
  240. 240Yang, L., Tian, M., & Chew, E. (2015). Vibrato characteristics and frequency histogram envelopes in Beijing opera singing. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Folk Music Analysis (FMA), Paris, France.
    Back to article
  241. 241Zhang, S., Caro Repetto, R., & Serra, X. (2014). Study of the similarity between linguistic tones and melodic pitch contours in Beijing opera singing. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), Taipei, Taiwan.
    Back to article
  242. 242Zhang, S., Caro Repetto, R., & Serra, X. (2015). Predicting pairwise pitch contour relations based on linguistic tone information in Beijing opera singing. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), Malaga, Spain.
    Back to article
  243. 243Zhang, S., Caro Repetto, R., & Serra, X. (2017). Understanding the expressive functions of Jingju metrical patterns through lyrics text mining. In Proceedings of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), Suzhou, China.
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/tismir.53 | Journal eISSN: 2514-3298
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Feb 28, 2020
Accepted on: Oct 5, 2020
Published on: Nov 19, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Music Performance Analysis,
Survey

© 2020 Alexander Lerch, Claire Arthur, Ashis Pati, Siddharth Gururani, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 3 (2020): Issue 1Next article