Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Publishing and Performing Digital Musicology on the Web: Signature Sound Vienna Cover

Publishing and Performing Digital Musicology on the Web: Signature Sound Vienna

Open Access
|Jul 2026

References

  1. Ballester, C., Bacot, B., Bigo, L., Borsan, V. N., Couturier, L., Déguernel, K., Dinel, Q., Feisthauer, L., Frieler, K., Gotham, M., Groult, R., Hentschel, J., d’Hooge, A., Le, D.‑V.‑T., and Levé, F. (2025). Interacting with annotated and synchronized music corpora on the Dezrann web platform. Transactions of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval, 8(1). 10.5334/tismir.212.
  2. Bechhofer, S., Page, K., Weigl, D. M., Fazekas, G., and Wilmering, T. (2017). Linked data publication of live music archives and analyses. In International Semantic Web Conference, Vienna, Austria (pp. 2937). Springer.
  3. Bonardi, A. (2000). IR for contemporary music: What the musicologist needs. In International Symposium on Music Information Retrieval, Plymouth, Massachusetts, USA.
  4. Borsan, V. N., Giraud, M., and Groult, R. (2023). The games we play: Exploring the impact of ISMIR on musicology. In Proceedings of the 24th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, Milan, Italy.
  5. Cannam, C., Sandler, M., Jewell, M. O., Rhodes, C., and d’Inverno, M. (2010). Linked data and you: Bringing music research software into the semantic web. Journal of New Music Research, 39(4), 313325. 10.1080/09298215.2010.522715.
  6. Capadisli, S. (2020). Linked research on the decentralised web. In PhD thesis. Universitäts‑und Landesbibliothek Bonn, Germany.
  7. Crawford, T., Page, K. R., Lewis, D., and De Roure, D. (2017). Digital musicology: Through research and teaching. In Digital Humanities 2017 Conference Abstracts, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  8. de Berardinis, J., Carriero, V. A., Jain, N., Lazzari, N., Meroño‑Peñuela, A., Poltronieri, A., and Presutti, V. (2023). The Polifonia ontology network: Building a semantic backbone for musical heritage. In The Semantic Web – ISWC 2023, Athens, Greece (pp. 302322). Springer Nature.
  9. De Roure, D., Klyne, G., Pybus, J., Weigl, D. M., and Page, K. (2018). Music SOFA: An architecture for semantically informed recomposition of digital music objects. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Semantic Applications for Audio and Music, Monterey, California, USA (pp. 3341). Association for Computing Machinery.
  10. Dix, A., Armstrong, C., Cowgill, R., Twidale, M., Bashford, C., Downie, S., Ridgewell, R., and Reagan, M. (2022). FAIR but flexible: Designing for dynamic user contributions in digital musicology resources. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Digital Libraries for Musicology, DLfM ’22, Prague, Czechia (pp. 4149). Association for Computing Machinery.
  11. Downie, J. S., Byrd, D., and Crawford, T. (2009). Ten years of ISMIR: Reflections on challenges and opportunities. In Proceedings of the 10th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, Kobe, Japan (pp. 1318).
  12. Dreyfus, L., Lewis, D., and Page, K. (2025). A digital companion for musicological scholarship: The Lohengrin TimeMachine. Journal of New Music Research, 53(3–4), 115. 10.1080/09298215.2025.2487100.
  13. Garijo, D., and Poveda‑Villalón, M. (2020). Best practices for implementing FAIR vocabularies and ontologies on the web. In Applications and Practices in Ontology Design, Extraction, and Reasoning (pp. 3954). IOS Press.
  14. Goebl, W., and Weigl, D. M. (2024). Mei‑friend: An interactive web‑based editor for digital music encodings. Journal of Open Source Software, 9(98), 6002. 10.21105/joss.06002.
  15. Hankinson, A., Roland, P., and Fujinaga, I. (2011). The Music Encoding Initiative as a document‑encoding framework. In Proceedings of the 12th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, Miami, Florida, USA (pp. 293298).
  16. Have, I., and Enevoldsen, K. (2021). From close listening to distant listening: Developing tools for speech‑music discrimination of Danish music radio. DHQ: Digital Humanities Quarterly, 15(1). 10.63744/mfjvu5mhtc6y.
  17. Hawkins, A. (2022). Archives, archives, linked data and the digital humanities: Increasing access to digitised and born‑digital archives via the semantic web. Archival Science, 22, 319344. 10.1007/s10502-021-09381-0.
  18. Hofmann, A., Miksa, T., Knees, P., Bakos, A., Sağlam, H., Ahmedaja, A., Yimwadsana, B., Chan, C., and Rauber, A. (2021). Enabling FAIR use of ethnomusicology data–through distributed repositories, linked data and music information retrieval. Empirical Musicology Review, 16(1), 4764. 10.18061/emr.v16i1.7632.
  19. Inskip, C., and Wiering, F. (2015). In their own words: Using text analysis to identify musicologists’ attitudes towards technology. In 16th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, Malaga, Spain.
  20. Jensenius, A. R. (2021). Best versus good enough practices for open music research. Empirical Musicology Review, 16(1). 10.18061/emr.v16i1.7646.
  21. Jiang, Y., Weigl, D. M., and Goebl, W. (2025). Piano Precision: Advancing music performance analysis by integrating user‑correctable audio‑to‑score alignment. In Proceedings of the 22nd Sound and Music Computing Conference, Graz, Austria (pp. 160167).
  22. Kassler, M. (1966). Toward musical information retrieval. Perspectives of New Music, 5967. 10.2307/832213.
  23. Laplante, A., and Sauvé, J.‑S. (2023). Attitudes of music scholars towards digital musicology. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Digital Libraries for Musicology, DLfM ’23, Milan, Italy (pp. 3539). Association for Computing Machinery.
  24. Lee, J. H., and Cunningham, S. J. (2013). Toward an understanding of the history and impact of user studies in music information retrieval. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 41, 499521. 10.1007/s10844-013-0259-2.
  25. Lewis, D., Shibata, E., Saccomano, M., Rosendahl, L., Kepper, J., Hankinson, A., Siegert, C., and Page, K. (2022). A model for annotating musical versions and arrangements across multiple documents and media. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Digital Libraries for Musicology, Prague, Czechia (pp. 1018). Association for Computing Machinery.
  26. Lewis, D., Weigl, D. M., Bullivant, J., and Page, K. R. (2018). Publishing musicology using multimedia digital libraries: creating interactive articles through a framework for linked data and MEI. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Digital Libraries for Musicology, Paris, France (pp. 2125). Association for Computing Machinery.
  27. Lewis, D., Weigl, D., and Page, K. (2019). Musicological observations during rehearsal and performance: A linked data digital library for annotations. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Digital Libraries for Musicology, DLfM ’19, Hague, Netherlands (pp. 18). Association for Computing Machinery.
  28. Mansour, E., Sambra, A. V., Hawke, S., Zereba, M., Capadisli, S., Ghanem, A., Aboulnaga, A., and Berners‑Lee, T. (2016). A demonstration of the Solid platform for social web applications. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (pp. 223226). Association for Computing Machinery.
  29. Moretti, F. (2013). Distant Reading. Verso Books.
  30. Müller, M., Özer, Y., Krause, M., Prätzlich, T., and Driedger, J. (2021). Sync toolbox: A Python package for efficient, robust, and accurate music synchronization. Journal of Open Source Software, 6(64), 3434. 10.21105/joss.03434.
  31. Organisciak, P., and Downie, J. S. (2021). Research access to in‑copyright texts in the humanities. In Information and Knowledge Organisation in Digital Humanities (pp. 157177). Routledge.
  32. Page, K. R., Bechhofer, S., Fazekas, G., Weigl, D. M., and Wilmering, T. (2017). Realising a layered digital library: Exploration and analysis of the live music archive through linked data. In 2017 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL), Toronto, Ontario, Canada (pp. 110). Association for Computing Machinery.
  33. Pond, L., Meng, S., Kirby, L., Ngassam, S., Chow, S., Hillerbrand, D., and Fujinaga, I. (2025). SESEMMI for LinkedMusic: Democratizing access to musical archives via large language models. In 1st Workshop on Large Language Models for Music & Audio (LLM4MA), Daejeon, South Korea.
  34. Porter, A., Bogdanov, D., Kaye, R., Tsukanov, R., and Serra, X. (2015). AcousticBrainz: A community platform for gathering music information obtained from audio. In 16th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, New York City, New York, USA.
  35. Porter, A., Sordo, M., and Serra, X. (2013). Dunya: A system for browsing audio music collections exploiting cultural context. In 14th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, Curitiba, Brazil.
  36. Pugin, L. (2018). Interaction perspectives for music notation applications. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Semantic Applications for Audio and Music, Monterey, California, USA (pp. 5458). Association for Computing Machinery.
  37. Pugin, L., Zitellini, R., and Roland, P. (2014). Verovio: A library for engraving MEI music notation into SVG. In Proceedings of the 15th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, Taipei, Taiwan (pp. 107112).
  38. Raimond, Y., and Sandler, M. (2012). Evaluation of the music ontology framework. In Extended Semantic Web Conference, Heraklion, Crete, Greece (pp. 255269). Springer.
  39. Sanderson, R., Ciccarese, P., and Young, B. (2017). Web annotation data model. W3C Recommendation. https://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-model/.
  40. Sandler, M., De Roure, D., Benford, S., and Page, K. (2019). Semantic web technology for new experiences throughout the music production‑consumption chain. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Workshop on Multilayer Music Representation and Processing, Milan, Italy (pp. 4955). IEEE.
  41. Sanfilippo, E. M., Freedman, R., and Mosca, A. (2025). Ontological modeling of music and musicological claims. A case study in early music. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 26(2), 118. 10.1007/s00799-025-00421-z.
  42. Schedl, M., Flexer, A., and Urbano, J. (2013). The neglected user in music information retrieval research. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 41(3), 523539. 10.1007/s10844-013-0247-6.
  43. Serra, X. (2014). Creating research corpora for the computational study of music: The case of the CompMusic project. In Proceedings of the AES 53rd International Conference: Semantic Audio, London, UK (pp. 19). Audio Engineering Society.
  44. Stutzbach, A. R. (2011). Digital media reviews: MusicBrainz. Notes: the Quarterly Journal of the Music Library Association, 68(1), 147151. 10.1353/not.2011.0134.
  45. Troncy, R., Mannens, E., Pfeiffer, S., and Deursen, D. V. (2012). Media Fragments URI 1.0 (basic). W3C Recommendation. https://www.w3.org/TR/media-frags/.
  46. Van Herwegen, J., and Verborgh, R. (2024). The community solid server: Supporting research & development in an evolving ecosystem. Semantic Web, 15(6), 25972611. 10.3233/SW-243726.
  47. VanderHart, C., and Weigl, D. M. (2025). Hand in Hand; Strauss’ Kaiser‑Walzer as a case study of interdisciplinary collaboration in digital musicology. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, fqaf093.
  48. Viglianti, R. (2016). The Music Addressability API: A draft specification for addressing portions of music notation on the web. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Digital Libraries for Musicology, DLfM ’16, New York, NY, USA (pp. 5760). Association for Computing Machinery.
  49. Weigl, D. M. (2025). Vienna’s New Year’s concerts: Same procedure as every year? Science communication project funded by the FWF –. Austrian Science Fund [SCP1556025].
  50. Weigl, D. M., and Page, K. (2017). A framework for distributed semantic annotation of musical score: “Take it to the bridge!”. In Proceedings of the 18th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, Suzhou, China.
  51. Weigl, D. M., Crawford, T., Gkiokas, A., Goebl, W., Gómez, E., Gutiérrez, N. F., Liem, C. C., and Santos, P. (2021). FAIR interconnection and enrichment of public‑domain music resources on the web. Empirical Musicology Review, 16(1), 1633. 10.18061/emr.v16i1.7643.
  52. Weigl, D. M., Goebl, W., Crawford, T., Gkiokas, A., Gutierrez, N. F., Porter, N., Santos, P., Karreman, C., Vroomen, I., Liem, C. C. S., Sarasúa, A., and van Tilburg, M. (2019). Interweaving and enriching digital music collections for scholarship, performance, and enjoyment. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Digital Libraries for Musicology, Hague, Netherlands (pp. 8488).
  53. Weigl, D. M., Goebl, W., Hofmann, A., Crawford, T., Zubani, F., Liem, C. S., and Porter, A. (2020). Read/write digital libraries for musicology. In 7th International Conference on Digital Libraries for Musicology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (pp. 4852). ACM Digital Library.
  54. Weigl, D. M., VanderHart, C., Pescoller, M., Rammler, D., Grassl, M., Trümpi, F., and Goebl, W. (2022). The Vienna Philharmonic Orchestra’s New Year’s Concerts: Building a FAIR data corpus for musicology. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Digital Libraries for Musicology, DLfM ’22, Prague, Czechia (pp. 3640). Association for Computing Machinery.
  55. Weigl, D. M., VanderHart, C., Rammler, D., Pescoller, M., and Goebl, W. (2023). Listen Here! a web‑native digital musicology environment for machine‑assisted close listening. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Digital Libraries for Musicology, Milan, Italy (pp. 109118). Association for Computing Machinery.
  56. Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.‑W., da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E., Bouwman, J., Brookes, A. J., Clark, T., Crosas, M., Dillo, I., Dumon, O., Edmunds, S., Evelo, C. T., Finkers, R., . . . Mons, B. (2016). The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), 19. 10.1038/sdata.2016.18.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/tismir.315 | Journal eISSN: 2514-3298
Language: English
Page range: 247 - 263
Submitted on: Jun 30, 2025
Accepted on: Mar 30, 2026
Published on: Jul 8, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 David M. Weigl, Chanda VanderHart, Werner Goebl, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.