Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Learning Sonata Form Structure on Mozart’s String Quartets Cover

Figures & Tables

tismir-2-1-27-g1.png
Figure 1

Andante con moto of the String Quartet #16 in E♭ Major, K 428, 2nd movement. Encoded in Lilypond by Maurizio Tomasi for the Mutopia Project. This slow movement has a sonata form, as detailed in Section 2.1. Following notations of Hepokoski and Darcy (2006), the primary themes (P/P’) are followed by transitions (TR/TR’), ended with Medial Caesuras (MC/MC’) – they are here Half Cadences (HC) in the main tonality (I). In the exposition, the secondary theme (S) and the conclusion (C) are here in the tonality of the dominant (V, E♭ major). In the recapitulation, both S’ and C’ come back to the main tonality. In the exposition, the S theme ends with a perfect authentic cadence (PAC) named essential expositional closure (EEC), whereas, in the recapitulation, the S’ theme ends with an essential structural closure (ESC). Between the exposition and the recapitulation, the development (Dev) moves to other keys and is concluded by a retransition (RT) focusing on the dominant of the primary key.

tismir-2-1-27-g2.png
Figure 2

Model topologies describing the most common sonata form structure at several resolutions. The set of states Qn has n states. Q3 and Q7 model the basic sections of the sonata form. Q14 (used by the model of Bigo et al. (2017)) and Q18 further model Intro, TR, RT and Coda sections as well as transitional states between these sections, represented with squares: the medial cesuras MC and MC’, but also short transitions between the end of the closing zone and the complete end of the exposition (transition after the closing zone, TC), between the exposition and the development (d), between the development and the recapitulation (r), and between the recapitulation and the Coda (TC’). Initial and final states are circled twice.

tismir-2-1-27-g3.png
Figure 3

Extract of the reference analysis for the second movement of the String Quartet #16 in E♭ major (K428.2), as viewed on http://www.dezrann.net/ (left) and represented as a json file (right). The Primary theme (P) ends with a half cadence in the primary key (I:HC). Here a Transition zone (TR) begins, which stops on different beats according to the references. The A analysis starts the secondary (S) theme after the HC in the primary key on measure 10, whereas the F analysis rather starts it on measure 14 (HC on the dominant key). Onsets in the json file are expressed in quarter notes.

tismir-2-1-27-g4.png
Figure 4

Reference analysis A of 32 sonata-form and sonata-form-like movements in Mozart string quartets. The analyses are projected on the 18 states of Q18. Vertical lines show cadences.

tismir-2-1-27-g5.png
Figure 5

Medial Caesura in Allegro K80.2, measure 15. This half cadence (HC) has a very simple but very efficient tonic/dominant schema. It is reinforced by the sudden change of texture (break) between the unison in eighth notes and the triple hammer blow (hammer) that accentuates the dominant chord on D.

Table 1

Feature tallies for sections of the sonata form on the 32 movements of the corpus of Mozart string quartet movements in sonata form (see Section 4.1). The table shows, for each feature, the number of quarter notes where this feature occurs followed by its number of occurrences on quarter notes labeled as each of the sections in the reference annotation A, as well as, in gray, its expected number should the feature be random or uniformly distributed across the quarter notes. Bold, italic, and the ≫ and ≪ symbols indicate an estimation of the significance of their presence or absence compared to all the other sections as well as to adjacent sections. The total numbers of quarter notes can differ slightly from the sums of the different sections due to rounding of non-integer lengths on some sections (see Figure 3).

Status
FeaturesquartersIntroPTRMCSCTCdDevRT
pat:P24483520858*193341*235151323*2500*2000*130*1210*3858*50
pat:S30080*250*237482*28936*16686*308304*2466160*148*4730*61
ton:I44914138553*354311*4322223229*460222*36718240*22360*70711591
ton:II5100418*40744912*2725279*411214*210780210
ton:III479042737544642704964*398252125*7599
ton:IV173431*14186*136104*1661934*17736*14121948168*2732535
ton:V25140*2141*198467*24236*13683*257468*2051*13412327*3967051
ton:VI4796412*3754462298*4966*39022290750*9
ton:VII38693203030370214*392331420194*6017
ton:i89237847052*853416*9123*7212422*414814042*18
ton:ii53444334210*510213*5417*431202156*84810
ton:iii356635*2870*344168*3646290112*14856147
ton:iv34912*26*270*3301163551*280181114*54187
ton:v46003223669445238478*373212162*7229
ton:vi10520846*83731012511210751*8614505368*1650*21
ton:vii187310*14221800211936*150140142903
cad:PAC416432032224092484272*34120229*6548
cad:rIAC1422116118133015149110000292212
harm:#1442113111813607145111010272212
harm:711224949*881161080568*115869118*635271*1761722
ped971108116*7676930542*99667915041861522019
rest33162352611*3112*11533382741213952186
seq1254241057*9961*120269512860*1023629*6420*1970*25
unison68516591*544365734370595624*327*368*1071213
break482142438504612*2364947395212747599
hammer2680214218*2514*149*2720210101524275
Total1431812211301378761468117178712255292
Table 1 (continued)

Feature tallies for sections of the sonata form on the 32 movements of the corpus of Mozart string quartet movements in sonata form.

States
FeaturesquartersrP’TR’MC’S’C’TC’Coda
pat:P244855770*184317*243151220*2640*2180*1732*125
pat:S3008061*227444*29934*15692*3243072690*207*153
ton:I44912010582*339524*44744*23640*484497*4011731295*229
ton:II5100116*3828505225*545645030*26
ton:III47911183624*470216*514642631*24
ton:IV173403156130230*17299269*187256*1551612188*88
ton:V25144536*189132*2501313112*27177*224101734*128
ton:VI47931183635470258512742037*24
ton:VII38600172980*38323541273412*21819
ton:i89252115*67148*881041099646*7921*63245
ton:ii534014440645322815736478358*27
ton:iii356009*2618350126382831220*18
ton:iv349009*269*3401233778*3102417
ton:v46001243443450233492741232123
ton:vi105202577977104251041136894277753
ton:vii187000*14341810232017167159
cad:PAC416002631254182464473*37122821
cad:rIAC1420018105141017159120097
harm:#14400141014144016157122167
harm:711221253*849311105100121196*1001273557
ped97112131*7367960547*104848626120*49
rest331503524143214*116353329323116
seq12540258*94172*125361181351201120832*64
unison6858*196*5144687343*73496127*42235
break482312436524814*237525243533624
hammer2681014208*2612*146281623011013
Total143183210811427741545128099732
Table 2

Classification results, with F1-measures of the five studied HMMs as well as of baseline models on the 14318 quarter notes of the corpus against the reference A. The confusion matrix is detailed for M18: Each column denotes the quarter notes of a section in the reference analysis, and the rows show how these quarter notes are classified (after cross-validation (c-val.)) by M18. Underlined values are discussed in the text.

Q18IntroPTRMCSCTCdDevRTrP’TR’MC’S’C’TC’Coda
Intro0154303··············
P36751238124·············
TR1861751012147·2835··1632429···
MC141936·········1···
S1·608275883572·11·····309··
C1240636435510·202·56···38·0
TC·2368·51021114··12······
d3·29·5266101··9······
Dev4985134112683536016132087367562621103236
RT302420·3012··393141145751312··5
r········20252492·····
P’··1·1···0·7713282113514
TR’···········4616141743·1
MC’··1·1······21886··3
S’··1437314·····754920471393·16
C’·····25··2115·58197103532133258
TC’·····4··34··945342491112
Coda········224·2832832846324587
quarter notes122113013787614681171787122552923210811427741545128099732
F1 (M18, c-val.)0.000.690.180.050.380.320.000.050.530.260.030.660.180.150.300.190.070.53
F1 (equal)0.000.560.140.040.290.240.000.000.300.120.200.420.020.000.190.150.000.26
F1 (fixed)0.020.150.180.010.190.150.010.010.270.040.000.140.180.010.190.160.010.10
Q14PTRMCSCdDevRTrP’TR’MC’S’C’
quarter notes11301378761468125071225529232108114277415622095
F1(M14, c-val.)0.760.170.050.380.280.050.580.250.030.660.180.150.280.56
F1 (M14*)0.660.350.030.270.260.040.160.140.020.290.330.090.290.61
F1 (equal)0.400.050.000.200.040.000.160.080.110.230.000.000.120.31
F1 (fixed)0.150.180.010.190.160.010.270.040.000.140.180.010.200.26
Q7PSCDevP’S’C’
quarter notes2582147113212580258015652095
F1 (M7, c-val.)0.650.370.250.680.540.330.54
F1 (equal)0.500.360.230.440.390.180.37
F1 (fixed)0.310.190.170.310.310.200.26
Q3ExpDevRec
quarter notes537425806240
F1 (M3, c-val.)0.760.570.85
F1 (equal)0.410.300.68
F1 (fixed)0.550.310.61
Table 3

Number of boundaries predicted exactly or within one measure (+), within between 2 and 3 measures (=), beyond 3 measures (–) or not predicted (!), compared to the reference analysis A. The bottom part of the table shows results obtained with a subset of features.

main boundaries (total: 124)all boundaries
+=!+=!
M14*23454436821154115
M18341753209045147104
M1431165621873814687
M735126116701510130
M3168400468420
M18, no pat:P/pat:S137977322922996
M18, no ton:*31110010323123687
M18, no cad:*35165716904015997
M18, only ton:*381049242724788
M18, no break features33126118853616897
tismir-2-1-27-g6.png
Figure 6

Detection precision (relative to the reference analysis A) of the five HMMs. Boundaries are predicted exactly or within 1 measure (green, + on Table 3), within between 2 and 3 measures (blue, =), more than 3 measures (red, –), or not predicted at all (gray, !). The lines at the left show the numbers of the spurious sections falsely predicted by the models.

tismir-2-1-27-g7.png
Figure 7

Comparison between the reference analysis A (top) and the predicted analysis by M18 (bottom) on six string quartet movements.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/tismir.27 | Journal eISSN: 2514-3298
Language: English
Submitted on: Dec 28, 2018
Accepted on: Oct 31, 2019
Published on: Dec 17, 2019
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Pierre Allegraud, Louis Bigo, Laurent Feisthauer, Mathieu Giraud, Richard Groult, Emmanuel Leguy, Florence Levé, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.