References
- 1Beazley A, ‘Take (What They Say) With a Pinch of Salt: Engaging in Empirical Research to Understand the Parameters of the “Quality” in ‘Poor-Quality Defence Lawyering’ (2022) 2 (1) Journal of Legal Research Methodology 75. DOI: 10.19164/jlrm.v2i1.1289
- 2Bellone ET, ‘Private Attorney- Client Communications and the Effect of Videoconferencing in the Courtroom’ (2012) 8 (1) Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology 24.
- 3Bild E and others, ‘Sound and Credibility in the Virtual Court: Low Audio Quality Leads to Less Favorable Evaluations of Witnesses and Lower Weighting of Evidence.’ (2021) 45 (1) Law and Human Behavior 481. DOI: 10.1037/lhb0000466
- 4Blackstock J and others, Inside Police Custody: An Empirical Account of Suspects’ Rights in Four Jurisdictions, vol 113 (Intersentia 2013).
- 5Bruquetas Callejo MM, Dubelaar MJ and Geertsema KE, ‘The Lawyer as a Key Player in Guaranteeing Access to Justice in the Digital Era’ (2022) 43 (2) Recht der Werkelijkheid 89. DOI: 10.5553/RdW/138064242022043002006
- 6de Hoon AM, Hirsch Ballin MFH and Bollen SGMJ,
‘De Verdachte in Beeld. Eisen En Waarborgen Voor Het Gebruik van Videoconferentie Ten Aanzien van Verdachte in Het Nederlandse Strafproces in Rechtsvergelijkend Perspectief’ (Vrije Universiteit – Faculteit der Rechtsgeleerdheid 2020). - 7Gunz S and Gunz H, ‘Ethical Decision Making and the Employed Lawyer’ (2008) 81 Journal of Business Ethics 927. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-007-9558-2
- 8McConville M and others,
‘Standing Accused: The Organization and Practices of Criminal Defence Lawyers in Britain’ (OUP 1994). DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198258681.001.0001 - 9McKay C and Macintosh K, ‘Digital Vulnerability: People-in-Prison, Videoconferencing and the Digital Criminal Justice System’ (2024) 57(3) Journal of Criminology 313. DOI: 10.1177/26338076231217794
- 10Mercer P, Strong T and Wilkinson MA, ‘The Practice of Ethical Precepts: Dissecting Decision-Making by Lawyers’ (1996) 9 (1) Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 141.
- 11Moorhead R and Hinchly V, ‘Professional Minimalism? The Ethical Consciousness of Commercial Lawyers’ (2015) 42 (3) Journal of Law and Society 387. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2015.00716.x
- 12Muir BR, Newman EJ and Rossner M, ‘The Role of Video Background Cues in the Virtual Court: A Psychological Perspective’ [2023] Psychology, Crime & Law 1. DOI: 10.1080/1068316X.2023.2224493
- 13Newman D, Legal Aid Lawyers and the Quest for Justice (Bloomsbury Publishing 2013).
- 14Pivaty A,
‘Criminal Defence at the Police Station: A Comparative and Empirical Study’ (Doctoral Thesis, 2019). DOI: 10.4324/9780367178079 - 15Pivaty A, ‘Contemporary Criminal Defence Practice: Importance of Active Involvement at the Investigative Stage and Related Training Requirements’ (2020) 27 (1) International Journal of the Legal Profession 25. DOI: 10.1080/09695958.2019.1706528
- 16Poulin A, ‘Criminal Justice and Videoconferencing Technology: The Remote Defendant’ (2004) 78 (4) Tulane Law Review 1089.
- 17Rossner M and Tait D, ‘Presence and Participation in a Virtual Court’ (2023) 23 (1) Criminology & Criminal Justice 135. DOI: 10.1177/17488958211017372
- 18Roulston K and Choi M,
‘Qualitative Interviews’ [2018] in Uwe Flick (ed) The SAGE handbook of qualitative data collection (SAGE Publications Ltd. 2018) 233. DOI: 10.4135/9781526416070.n15 - 19Rowden E and Wallace A, ‘Remote Judging: The Impact of Video Links on the Image and the Role of the Judge’ (2018) 14 (4) International Journal of Law in Context 504. DOI: 10.1017/S1744552318000216
- 20Rowden E and Wallace A, ‘Performing Expertise: The Design of Audiovisual Links and the Construction of the Remote Expert Witness in Court’ (2019) 28 (5) Social & Legal Studies 698. DOI: 10.1177/0964663918802991
- 21Tata C, ‘In the Interests of Clients or Commerce? Legal Aid, Supply, Demand, and “Ethical Indeterminacy” in Criminal Defence Work’ (2007) 34 (4) Journal of Law and Society 489. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2007.00402.x
- 22ter Voert M, Pivaty A, Marique, E, ‘Access to Justice in the Digital Era’ (2022) 2 Recht der Werkelijkheid 3. DOI: 10.5553/RdW/138064242022043002001
- 23ter Voert, M and others, ‘Gevolgen van COVID-19 Voor de Rechtspraak en Kwetsbare Rechtzoekenden: een Onderzoek Naar Maatregelen en de Positie van Rechtzoekenden Binnen het Straf-, Civiele Jeugdbeschermings-, en Vreemdelingenrecht’ (Radboud University, Utrecht University and Leiden University 2022) >
https://scholarlypublications.universiteitleiden.nl/handle/1887/3279384 < accessed 10 October 2024. - 24van Wingerden SGC and Vanderveen GNG, ‘Effectieve Participatie in Strafzaken via Een Beeldscherm: Ervaringen van Gedetineerden, Advocaten En Rechtbankverslaggevers Tijdens de Lockdown’ (2023) 64 Tijdschrift voor Criminologie 427. DOI: 10.5553/TvC/0165182X2022064004005
- 25Vanderhallen M and others, Toga’s in De Verhoorkamer: De Invloed Van Rechtsbijstand Op Het Politieverhoor (Boom Lemma 2014).
- 26Interrogating Young Suspects II. Procedural Safeguards from an Empirical Perspective (Intersentia 2016).
- 27Visser M, Schouteten R and Dikkers J, ‘Controlling the Courts: New Public Management and the Dutch Judiciary’ (2019) 40 (1) Justice System Journal 39. DOI: 10.1080/0098261X.2018.1539645
- 28Welsh L, Access to Justice in Magistrates’ Courts A Study of Defendant Marginalisation (Hart Publishing 2022). DOI: 10.5040/9781509937868
- 29Welsh L and Newman D, ‘Camaraderie and Conflict: Developing an Occupational Culture Typology of Publicly Funded Criminal Defence Lawyers in England and Wales’ (2023) 31(1) International Journal of the Legal Profession 1. DOI: 10.1080/09695958.2023.2260747
- 30Zimmerman N and Tyler T, ‘Between Access to Counsel and Access to Justice: A Psychological Perspective’ 37 (1) Fordham Urban Law Journal 473.