References
- 1Aall J, ‘Waiver of Human Rights: Waiver of Procedural Rights According to ECHR Article 6 (Part III/III)’ (2011) 29 Nordic J of Human Rights. DOI: 10.18261/ISSN1891-814X-2011-02-03-04
- 2Allen & Overy, A&O Cross-Border Surveys on Virtual Hearings (2020).
- 3Ambos K, Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Article-By-Article Commentary (Beck, 2022). DOI: 10.17104/9783406779268
- 4Ansems LFM, Procedural Justice on Trial: A Critical Test of Perceived Procedural Justice From the Perspective of Criminal Defendants (Utrecht University, 2021).
- 5Asciutto v. Italy App no 35795/02 (ECtHR, 2007).
- 6Cocan S,
‘Le dialogue entre juridictions et quasi-juridictions internationales de protection des droits de la personne – L’exemple de la prohibition de la torture et autres peines ou traitements cruels, inhumains ou dégradants’ (DPhil thesis, Université Laval 2019). - 7Consolidated Decision on The Continuation of Proceedings, Hadži (IT-04-75-T), Trial Chamber, 25 October 2015.
- 8Council of Europe, ‘Guide on Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights’ (as updated on 31 August 2022) <
www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/guide_art_6_criminal_eng > accessed 26 October 2023. - 9Council of Europe, ‘Key Theme – Article 6 (criminal) Hearings via video link’ (last updated 28 February 2023) <
ks.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr-ks/hearings-via-video-link > accessed 26 October 2023. - 10Decision Establishing General Principles Governing Applications to Restrict Disclosure pursuant to Rule 81 (2) and (4) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Lubanga (ICC-01/04-01/06-108-Corr), Trial Chamber I, 20 May 2006.
- 11Decision on Defence Appeal of the Decision on Future Course of the Proceedings, Stanisic and Simatovic (IT-03-69-AR73.2) AC, 16 May 2008.
- 12Decision on Defence request for excusal from attendance at, or for adjournment of, the status conference scheduled for 8 October 2014, Kenyatta (ICC-01/09-02/11-960), Trial Chamber V(b), 30 September 2014.
- 13Decision on Defence Request for Mr Gicheru to Attend the First Status Conference via Video Technology, Gicheru (ICC-01/09-01/20-169), Trial Chamber III, 3 September 2021.
- 14Decision on Defence Request for the Accused to Attend the Closing Statements via Video Technology, Gicheru (ICC-01/09-01/20-334), Trial Chamber III, 13 June 2022.
- 15Decision on Further Defence Request for a Medical Examination, Ongwen (ICC-02/04-01/15-1622), Trial Chamber IX,1 October 2019.
- 16Decision on Ieng Sary’s Appeal Against Trial Chamber’s Order Requiring His Presence in Court, Supreme Court Chamber, Case 002 (E130/4/3), Supreme Court Chamber, 13 January 2012.
- 17Decision on Interlocutory Appeal of the Trial Chamber’s Decision on the Assignment of Defence Counsel, Milosevic (IT-02-54-AR73.7), AC, 1 November 2004.
- 18Decision on Interlocutory Appeal, Zigiranyirazo (CTR-2001-73-AR73) AC, 30 October 2006.
- 19Decision on ‘Motion for Severance or, in the Alternative, Adjournment or Appearance Pursuant to Rule 134bis of the Rules, Bemba et al. (ICC-01/05-01/13-1269), Trial Chamber VII, 18 September 2015.
- 20Decision on Mr Ruto’s Request for Excusal from Continuous Presence at Trial, Ruto and Sang (ICC-01/09-01/11-777), Trial Chamber V(a), 18 June 2013.
- 21Decision on Request for In Absentia Procedure and Other Matters Related to the Legal Representation of the Accused and Their Presence at Trial, S.A.L and Al Amin (STL-14-06/PT /CJ) Contempt Judge, 11 February 2016.
- 22Decision on the Conduct of Trial Proceedings, Kabuga (MICT-13-38-T), Trial Chamber, 13 February 2023.
- 23Decision on the ‘Defence Request pursuant to Rule 124(1) for Mr. William Ruto to Waive his Right to be Present for part of the Confirmation of charges Hearing’, Ruto et al. (ICC-01/09-01/11-302), Pre-Trial Chamber II, 29 August 2011.
- 24Decision on the Defence Request to Order a Medical Examination of Dominic Ongwen, Ongwen (ICC-02/04-01/15-637-Red), Trial Chamber IX, 16 December 2016.
- 25Decision on the Request of the Defence for Thomas Lubanga Dyilo seeking his Appearance via Video-Link at the Hearings of 11, 13 and 14 October 2016, Lubanga (ICC-01/04-01/06-3243-tENG), Trial Chamber II, 6 October 2016.
- 26Decision on the Scheduling of the appeal Hearing and a Status Conference, Mladic (MICT-13-56-A), AC, 17 July 2020.
- 27Decision on the Use of Audio-Video Link Technology, Said (ICC-01/14-01/21-464), Trial Chamber VI, 4 August 2022.
- 28Decision rescheduling the hearing before the Appeals Chamber, Gbagbo and Blé Goudé (ICC-02/11-01/15 A) AC, 17 June 2020.
- 29Decision vacating the hearing before the Appeals Chamber, Gbagbo and Blé Goudé (ICC-02/11-01/15-13522), AC, 22 May 2020.
- 30Defence Appeal Brief against the “Decision on the Use of Video-Link Technology” (ICC-01/14-01/21-442) delivered on 4 August 2022, Said (ICC-01/14-01/21-464-tENG), AC, 29 August 2022.
- 31Defence submissions on the scheduled oral hearing, Ntaganda (ICC-01/04-02/06), AC, 5 May 2020.
- 32de Vocht D, ‘Trials by video link after the pandemic: the pros and cons of the expansion of virtual justice’ (2022) 8 China-EU LJ. DOI: 10.1007/s12689-022-00095-9
- 33Dissenting Opinion of Judge Cuno Tarfusser, Gbagbo and Blé Goudé (ICC-02/11-01/15-846-Anx), Trial Chamber I, 10 March 2017.
- 34Donoghue J, ‘The Rise of Digital Justice: Courtroom Technology, Public Participation and Access to Justice’ (2017) 80 Mod L Rev. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2230.12300
- 35Ellis L and Giacomo Rojas Elgueta, ‘The Psychology of Remote Hearings’ in Does a Right to a Physical Hearing Exist in International Arbitration? (The ICCA Reports No. 10, 2022).
- 36Fair Trials, Safeguarding the Right to a Fair Trial During the Coronavirus Pandemic: Remote Criminal Justice Proceedings (2020).
- 37Gibbs P, Defendants on video – conveyor belt justice or a revolution in access? (Transform Justice, 2017).
- 38Grigoryevskikh v. Russia App no 22/03 (ECtHR, 2009).
- 39Haileamlak A, ‘Pandemics Will be More Frequent’ (2022) 32 Ethiop J Health Sci. DOI: 10.4314/ejhs.v32i5.1
- 40Ieng Sary’s Appeal Against the Trial Chamber’s Decision Denying Its Right to Waive Its Presence in the Courtroom During Trial and Denying Its Constitutional Right to Assist in Its Own Defence, Case 002 (E130/4/1), Supreme Court Chamber, 5 January 2012.
- 41International Commission of Jurists, Videoconferencing, Courts and COVID-19 Recommendations Based on International Standards (2020).
- 42Joint Dissenting Opinion of Judge Luz Del Carmen Ibáñez Carranza and Judge Solomy Balungi Bossa, Al Bashir (ICC-02/05-01/09-397-Anx2), Appeals Chamber, 6 May 2019.
- 43Judgment on the appeal of the Prosecutor against the decision of Trial Chamber V(a) of 18 June 2013 entitled Decision on Mr Ruto’s Request for Excusal from Continuous Presence at Trial”, Ruto and Sang (ICC-01/09-01/11-1066), AC, 25 October 2013.
- 44Kamber K, ‘The Right to a Fair Online Hearing’ (2022) 22 Human Rights L Rev. DOI: 10.1093/hrlr/ngac006
- 45Leborne J, ‘La vidéojustice: la justice pénale à l’ère de la video’ (2021) 13 Cahiers Droit, Sciences & Technologies. DOI: 10.4000/cdst.4202
- 46Maliti T, Judges Remove Ongwen from Court for Disrupting Hearing (International Justice Monitor, 19 March 2018) <
www.ijmonitor.org/2018/03/judges-remove-ongwen-from-court-for-disrupting-hearing/ > accessed 25 October 2023. - 47Marcello Viola v. Italy App no 45106/04 (ECtHR, 2006).
- 48McCabe J, ‘Exploring perceptions of cognitive load and mental fatigue in pandemic-era zoom classes’ (2023) American Psychological Association. DOI: 10.1037/stl0000347
- 49Naouri J and Dov Jacobs,
‘Reflecting on the Rights of the Defense at the International Criminal Court: the Importance of Ensuring Fair Trials to Deliver Exemplary Justice’ in Carsten Stahn (eds), The International Criminal Court in Its Third Decade (Brill, Nijhoff, 2023). DOI: 10.1163/9789004529939_014 - 50Organization for Security and Co-Operation in Europe, The functioning of courts in the Covid-19 pandemic (2020).
- 51Partially Dissenting Opinion of Judge Kuniko Ozaki on Kenyatta Decision, Kenyatta (ICC-01/09-02/11-960-Anx), Trial Chamber V(b), 30 September 2014.
- 52Peristeridou C and Dorris de Vocht, ‘I’m not a cat! Remote criminal justice and a human-centred approach to the legitimacy of the trial’ [2023] Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law.
- 53Phillips RL,
‘Frail Accused and Fitness to Stand Trial’ in Simon M Meisenberg and Ignaz Stegmiller (eds) The Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia: assessing their contribution to international criminal law (Asser Press 2016). DOI: 10.1007/978-94-6265-105-0_17 - 54Philp G, Listening and Responding to the Future of Virtual Court: A Report on the future of virtual courts in Canada (Nova Scotia Court of Appeal Cowan Internship Project, 2022).
- 55Prosecution’s response to ‘Blé Goudé Defence Urgent Request for Postponement pursuant to Article 67 of the Statute’, Gbagbo and Blé Goudé (ICC-02/11-01/15-1341), AC, 8 May 2020.
- 56Public redacted version Decision on the fitness of Laurent Gbagbo to take part in the proceedings before this Court, Gbagbo (ICC-02/11-01/11-293), Pre-Trial Chamber 1, 2 November 2012.
- 57Public Redacted Version of ‘Blé Goudé Defence Urgent Request for Postponement pursuant to Article 67 of the Statute’, Gbagbo and Blé Goudé (ICC-02/11-01/15), AC, 6 May 2020.
- 58Public redacted version of Decision on Defence Adjournment Request, Al Hassan (ICC-01/12-01/18-940-Red) Trial Chamber X, 2 September 2020.
- 59Public redacted version of Decision on the Prosecution’s Request for the Trial to be Held Partially in Bangui, Said (ICC-01/14-01/21-389-Red), Trial Chamber VI, 5 July 2022.
- 60Public redacted version of the Decision on Mr Gbagbo’s Detention, Gbagbo and Blé Goudé (ICC-02/11-01/15-1038-Red), Trial Chamber I, 25 September 2017.
- 61Request for Leave for Mr. Gicheru to Appear Remotely during the Closing Statements, Gicheru (ICC-01/09-01/20-330), Trial Chamber III, 9 June 2022. DOI: 10.1055/a-1708-5090
- 62Rowden E et al., Gateways to Justice: design and operational guidelines for remote participation in court proceedings (University of Western Sydney, 2013).
- 63Schabas W, The International Criminal Court: a commentary on the Rome Statute (OUP 2016).
- 64Scoppola v. Italy (No. 2), App no 10249/0317 (ECtHR, 2009).
- 65Sentencing Judgement, Simic (IT-95-9/2), Trial Chamber II, 7 October 2002, para 8, fn 18; Transcript, Simic (IT-95-9/2), 11 February 2002. DOI: 10.1023/A:1016827726627
- 66Tait D et al., Towards a distributed courtroom (Western Sydney University, 2017).
- 67Tladi DD,
‘Presence of the Accused: Right or Duty? The Art of Interpretation in a Tense Political Climate’ in Charles Chernor Jalloh and Ilias Bantekas (eds), The International Criminal Court and Africa (OUP 2017). DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198810568.003.0008 - 68Transcript, Al-Hassan (ICC-01/12-01/18-T-015), 30 June 2020. DOI: 10.31782/IJCRR.2020.121830
- 69Transcript, Confirmation of Charges Hearing, Katanga (ICC-01/04-01/07-T-46-ENG ET) Pre-Trial Chamber, 11 July 2008.
- 70Transcript, Yekatom and Ngaïssona (ICC-01/14-01/18-T-012-ENG), Trial Chamber V, 9 July 2020.
- 71Transcript, Yekatom and Ngaïssona (ICC-01/14-01/18-T-184-Red2-ENG), Trial Chamber V, 5 December 2022.
- 72Version publique expurgée de la ‘Réponse de la Défense à la « Prosecution’s request for the trial be held partially in Bangui’, Said (ICC-01/14-01/21), Trial Chamber VI, 14 June 2022.
- 73Victims’ response to ‘Defence Request for Excusal from Attendance pursuant to Rule 134 quater or to Adjourn the Status Conference Scheduled for 8 October 2014 and Permit Mr Kenyatta to Attend on a Rescheduled Date by Means of Video link pursuant to Rule 134 bis’, Kenyatta (ICC-01/09-02/11) 29 September 2014.
- 74Wheeler CH, The Right to Be Present at Trial in International Criminal Law (Brill Nijhoff, 2018). DOI: 10.1163/9789004376861
- 75White ER, ‘Towards a New Normal: Digitization of International Criminal Law in the Age of Coronavirus’ (2022) 60 Colum J Transnat’l L Bulletin. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3819276