References
- 1Ažubalytė, R and I Titko, ‘Remote Criminal Trial—Fair Trial?’ (2022) 8 International Comparative Jurisprudence 178
- 2Belgian Constitutional Court (Grondwettelijk Hof) 21 June 2018, decision no 76/2018
- 3Ben Moumen v Italy, app no 3977/13 (ECHR, 23 June 2016)
- 4Bivolaru v Romania (No. 2), app no 66580/12 (ECHR, 2 October 2018)
- 5Clooney, A, and P Webb, The Right to a Fair Trial in International Law (Oxford University Press 2020) 469 DOI: 10.1093/law/9780198808398.001.0001
- 6Coster van Voorhout, J, Ineffective Legal Assistance: Redress for the Accused in Dutch Criminal Procedure and Compliance with ECHR Case Law (PhD thesis, University of Utrecht, the Netherlands 2016) DOI: 10.1163/9789004319370
- 7de Vocht, D, ‘Trials by video-link after the pandemic: the pros and cons of the expansion of virtual justice’ (2022) 8 China-EU Law Journal 33, 41 DOI: 10.1007/s12689-022-00095-9
- 8Decreto Legislativo 28 luglio 1989, n. 271, Norme di attuazione, di coordinamento e transitorie del codice di procedura penale)
- 9Di Chiara, G, ‘Il canto delle sirene. Processo penale e modernità sceintifico-tecnologica: prova dichiarativa e diagnostica della verità’ (2007) Criminalia 19
- 10Dijkhuizen v The Netherlands, app no 61591/16 (ECHR, 8 June 2021)
- 11Directive (EU) 2016/343 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on the strengthening of certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the right to be present at the trial in criminal proceedings, OJ L 65, 11.3.2016
- 12Fair Trials, ‘Briefing Paper on the Communication on Digitalisation of Justice in the European Union’ (January 2021), <
https://www.fairtrials.org/app/uploads/2021/11/DIGITALISATION-OF-JUSTICE-IN-THE-EUROPEAN-UNION.pdf ) > 4, accessed 19 July 2024 - 13Falcone, A,
‘Online Hearings and the Right to Effective Defence in Digitalised Trials’ , in S Ruggeri and L Bachmaier Winter (eds), Investigating and Preventing Crime in the Digital Era: New Safeguards, New Rights (Springer 2022_ DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-13952-9_9 - 14Fielding N, et al, ‘Video Enabled Justice Evaluation. Final Report: Version 12’ (May 2020) 1
- 15French Constitutional Court (Conseil Constitutionnelle), Décision no 2020-872 QPC du 15 janvier 2021
- 16Hynes, J, N Gill and J Tomlinson, ‘In defence of the hearing? Emerging geographies of publicness, materiality, access and communication in court hearings’ (2020) 14 Geography Compass 7 DOI: 10.1111/gec3.12499
- 17Jackson, S K, ‘Constitutional Risks Associated with the Implementation of Videoconference Technology in Criminal Trials’ (2022) 48 Rutgers Computer & Tech L J 224
- 18Jallow v Norway, app no 36516/19 (ECHR, 2 December 2021
- 19Kamber, K, ‘The Right to a Fair Online Hearing’ (2022) 22 Human Rights Law Review 4 DOI: 10.1093/hrlr/ngac006
- 20Law 25 April 2024, Wet houdende organisatie van zittingen per videoconferentie in het kader van gerechtelijke procedures
- 21Law of 29 January 2016
- 22Mami v Croatia, App no 21714/22 (ECHR, 7 November 2022
- 23Massaro, A, ‘La videoconferenza nel procedimento penale italiano: riflessioni a margine della recente riforma Cartabia in materia di partecipazione a distanza’ (2023) La legislazione penale, 1
- 24Marcello Viola v Italy, app no 45106/04 (ECHR, 5 October 2006)
- 25Mazza, O, ‘Distopia del processo a distanza’ (2020) 1 Archivio penale 1 DOI: 10.12871/97888331807316
- 26OCSE (Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe), ‘The Functioning of Courts in the Covid-19 Pandemic’ (October 2020) <
https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/5/5/469170.pdf > accessed 7 October 2024 - 27Ovey, C and R C A White, Jacobs & White: The European Convention on Human Rights (Oxford University Press 2006) 175
- 28Peristeridou, C, A Pivaty and D L F de Vocht, ‘Het digitale strafproces: een procedural justice-perspectief’ (2021) 2 Bsb 50 DOI: 10.5553/Bsb/266669012021002002003
- 29Peristeridou C and D L F de Vocht, ‘I’m not a cat! Remote criminal justice and a human-centred approach to the legitimacy of the trial’ (2023) 30 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 97 DOI: 10.1177/1023263X231193214
- 30Poulin, A B, ‘Criminal Justice and Videoconferencing Technology: The Remote Defendant’ (2004) 78 Tul L Rev 1089
- 31Quattrocolo, S and S Ruggeri (eds), Personal Participation in Criminal Proceedings: A Comparative Study of Participatory Safeguards and in absentia Trials in Europe (Springer 2019) DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-01186-4
- 32Rossner, M, et al, ‘The Dock on Trial: Courtroom Design and the Presumption of Innocence’ (2017) 44 Journal of Law and Society 317 DOI: 10.1111/jols.12033
- 33Rowden, E and A Wallace, ‘Remote judging: the impact of video links on the image and the role of the judge’ (2018) 14 International Journal of Law in Context 504 DOI: 10.1017/S1744552318000216
- 34Rowden, E, ‘Distributed Courts and Legitimacy: What do we Lose When we Lose the Courthouse?’ (2018) 14(2) Law, Culture and the Humanities 272 DOI: 10.1177/1743872115612966
- 35R v Sussex Justices, ex parte McCarthy (1924) 1 KB 256
- 36Sakhnovski v Russia, app. no 21272/03 (ECHR, 2 November 2010)
- 37Sanders, A, ‘Video-Hearings in Europe Before, During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic’ (2020) 12 International Journal for Court Administration 1 DOI: 10.36745/ijca.379
- 38Susskind, R, Online Courts and the Future of Justice (Oxford University Press 2021)
- 39Tait, D, et al, ‘Towards a Distributed Courtroom’ (2017) <
https://courtofthefuture.org/publications/towards-distributed-courtroom/ > accessed 7 October 2024 - 40Turner, J I, ‘Remote Criminal Justice’ (2021) 53 Tex Tech L Rev 197 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3699045
- 41Vernimmen K, ‘Verantwoordt de coronacrisis een speciale behandeling van inverdenkinggestelden in voorlopige hechtenis’ (2022) 6 Themis Strafrecht 315
- 42Wetsontwerp houdende organisatie van zittingen per videoconferentie in het kader van gerechtelijke procedures, 1 December 2003, Doc 44 3722/001.
- 43Yevdokimov and others v Russia, app nos 27236/05, 44223/05, 53304/07, 40232/11, 60052/11, 76438/11, 14919/12, 19929/12, 42389/12, 57043/12 and 67481/12 (ECHR, 16 February 2016)