References
- 1Amos Rapoport, The Meaning of the Built Environment: A Non-Verbal Approach (Sage 1982).
- 2Anne Wallace,
‘Justice and the “Virtual” Expert: Using Remote Witness Technology to Take Forensic Evidence’ (PhD dissertation, University of Sydney 2011). - 3Anne Wallace, ‘Using Videolink to Take Forensic Evidence: Lessons from an Australian Case Study’ [2013] 17 International Journal of Evidence and Proof 221. DOI: 10.1350/ijep.2013.17.3.428
- 4Anne Wallace, ‘Virtual Justice in the Bush: The Use of Court Technology in Remote and Regional Australia’ [2008] 19 Journal of Law and Information Science 1.
- 5Bradley D McAuliff and Margaret Bull Kovera, ‘Do Jurors Get What They Expect? Traditional Versus Alternative Forms of Children’s Testimony’ [2012] 18 Psychology, Crime and Law 27. DOI: 10.1080/1068316X.2011.613391
- 6C O’Grady, Child Witnesses and Jury Trials (Western Australia Ministry of Justice 1996).
- 7Carolyn McKay, The Pixelated Prisoner: Prison Video Links, Court ‘Appearance’ and the Justice Matrix (Routledge 2018). DOI: 10.4324/9781315111506
- 8Carrie Heeter, ‘Being There: The Subjective Experience of Presence’ [1992] 1 Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 262. DOI: 10.1162/pres.1992.1.2.262
- 9Cassandre D Larivière, Quintan Crough, and Joseph Eastwood, ‘The Effects of Rapport Building on Information Disclosure in Virtual Interviews’ [2022] 38 Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology 452. DOI: 10.1007/s11896-022-09535-5
- 10Catrina Denvir and Amanda D Selvarajah, ‘Safeguarding Access to Justice in the Age of the Online Court’ [2021] 85(1) The Modern Law Review 25. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2230.12670
- 11Charlotte N Gunawardena, ‘Social Presence Theory and Implications for Interaction and Collaborative Learning in Computer Conferences’ [1995] 1 International Journal of Educational Telecommunications 147.
- 12Cheryl Campanella Bracken, ‘Presence and Image Quality: The Case of High-Definition Television’ [2005] 7 Media Psychology 191. DOI: 10.1207/S1532785XMEP0702_4
- 13Christina Peristeridou and Dorris De Vocht, ‘I’m not a cat! Remote criminal justice and a human-centred approach to the legitimacy of the trial’ [2023] Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 97. DOI: 10.1177/1023263X231193214
- 14David F Ross, Steve Hopkins, Elaine Hanson, Roderick CL Lindsay, Kirk Hazen and Tammie Eslinger, ‘The Impact of Protective Shields and Videotape Testimony on Conviction Rates in a Simulated Trial of Child Sexual Abuse’ [1994] 18 Law and Human Behavior 553. DOI: 10.1007/BF01499174
- 15Elizabeth A Boyle, Anne H Anderson and Alison Newlands, ‘The Effects of Visibility on Dialogue and Performance in a Cooperative Problem Solving Task’ [1994] 37 Language and Speech 1.
- 16Emma Rowden, ‘Distributed Courts and Legitimacy: What do we lose when we lose the courthouse?’ [2018] 14 Law, Culture and the Humanities 263. DOI: 10.1177/1743872115612966
- 17Emma Rowden,
‘Remote Participation and the Distributed Court: An Approach to Court Architecture in the Age of Video-Mediated Communications’ (PhD dissertation, University of Melbourne 2011). - 18Emma Rowden and Anne Wallace, ‘Performing Expertise: The Design of Audiovisual Links and the Construction of the Remote Expert Witness in Court’ [2019] 28 Social & Legal Studies 698. DOI: 10.1177/0964663918802991
- 19Emma Rowden and others, Gateways to Justice: Design and Operational Guidelines for Remote Participation in Court Proceedings (University of Western Sydney 2013).
- 20Eryn J Newman and Norbert Schwarz, ‘Good Sound, Good Research: How The Audio Quality of Talks and Interviews Influences Perceptions of the Researcher and the Research’ [2018] 40 Science Communication 246. DOI: 10.1177/1075547018759345
- 21Esther M Sternberg, Healing Spaces: The Science of Place and Well-Being (Harvard University Press 2009). DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvjghtgs
- 22G Daniel Lassiter, Patrick J Munhal, Andrew L Geers, Paul E Weiland and Ian M Handley, ‘Accountability and the Camera Perspective Bias in Videotaped Confessions’ [2001] 1 Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 53. DOI: 10.1111/1530-2415.00003
- 23Gail S Goodman, Ann E Tobey, Jennifer M Batterman-Faunce, Holly Orcutt, Sherry Thomas, Cheryl Shapiro and Toby Sachsenmaier, ‘Face-to-face Confrontation: Effects of Closed-Circuit Technology on Children’s Eyewitness Testimony and Jurors’ Decisions’ [1998] 22 Law and Human Behavior 165. DOI: 10.1023/A:1025742119977
- 24Gary Ulman,
‘Proposal to amend the Evidence (Audio and Audio Visual Links) Act 1998 to Create a Presumption for First Appearance Bail Proceedings’ (Letter from Law and Justice Foundation to NSW Department of Justice, 06 July 2016) <https://www.lawsociety.com.au/sites/default/files/2018-06/Letter%20to%20Attorney%20General%20-%20Expanding%20Audio%20Visual%20Links%20%28AVL%29%20-%20Proposals%20to%20amend%20the%20Evidence%20%28Audio%20and%20Audio%20Visual%20Links%29%20Act%201998%20%28the%20Act%29%20-%2030%20April%202018.pdf > accessed 28 December 2023. - 25Gemma Hamilton, Elizabeth A Whiting, Sonja P Brubacher and Martine B Powell, ‘The Effects of Face-to-Face Versus Live Video-feed Interviewing on Children’s Event Reports’ [2016] 22 Legal and Criminological Psychology 260. DOI: 10.1111/lcrp.12098
- 26Harold Garfinkel, ‘Conditions of Successful Degradation Ceremonies’ [1956] 61 American Journal of Sociology 420. DOI: 10.1086/221800
- 27Hazel Genn, Judging Civil Justice (Cambridge University Press 2010) 114. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139192378
- 28Hisashi Yamagata and Danielle Fox, ‘Evaluating the Use of Videoconferencing Technology in Domestic Violence ex Parte Hearings: Assessing Procedural Consistency’ [2017] 38 Justice System Journal 135. DOI: 10.1080/0098261X.2016.1251363
- 29Ingrid V Eagly, Steven Shafer and Jana Whalley, ‘Detaining Families: A Study of Asylum Adjudication in Family Detention’ [2018] 106 California Law Review 785.
- 30Jacob Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd edn, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1988).
- 31Jane Goodman-Delahunty, Natalie Martschuk and Mandeep K Dhami ‘Interviewing High Value Detainees: Securing Cooperation and Disclosures’ [2014] 28 Applied Cognitive Psychology 883. DOI: 10.1002/acp.3087
- 32Jane Donoghue, ‘The Rise of Digital Justice: Courtroom Technology, Public Participation and Access to Justice’ [2017] 80 The Modern Law Review 995. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2230.12300
- 33Jeremy N Bailenson, Jim Blascovich, Andrew C Beall and Jack M Loomis, ‘Equilibrium Theory Revisited: Mutual Gaze and Personal Space in Virtual Environments’ [2001] 10 Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 583. DOI: 10.1162/105474601753272844
- 34JH Phillips, ‘Casting a Girdle Round the Earth’ (1999) 73 Australian Law Journal 545.
- 35John Short, Ederyn Williams and Bruce Christie, The Social Psychology of Telecommunications (Wiley 1976).
- 36Jonathan P Vallano, Jacqueline R Evans, Nadja Schreiber Compo, and Jenna M Kieckhaefer, ‘Rapport-building during Witness and Suspect Interviews: A Survey of Law Enforcement’ [2015] 29 Applied Cognitive Psychology 369. DOI: 10.1002/acp.3115
- 37Jonathan P Vallano and Nadja Schreiber Compo, ‘A Comfortable Witness Is a Good Witness: Rapport-Building and Susceptibility to Misinformation in an Investigative Mock-Crime Interview’ [2011] 25 Applied Cognitive Psychology 960. DOI: 10.1002/acp.1789
- 38Jonathan P Vallano and Nadja Schreiber Compo, ‘Rapport-Building With Cooperative Witnesses and Criminal Suspects: A Theoretical and Empirical Review’ [2015] 21 Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 85. DOI: 10.1037/law0000035
- 39Joyce Plotnikoff and Richard Woolfson,
Evaluation of Video Link Pilot at Manchester Crown Court (London, The Home Office 2000). - 40Joyce Plotnikoff and Richard Woolfson, Preliminary Hearings: Video Links Evaluation of Pilot Projects (London, The Home Office 1999).
- 41Judith Cashmore,
‘Innovative Procedures for Child Witnesses’ in H. L. Westcott, G. M. Davies and R. H. C. Bull (eds), Children’s Testimony: A Handbook of Psychological Research and Forensic Practice (Wiley 2002). DOI: 10.1002/9780470713679.ch13 - 42Judith Cashmore and Lily Trimboli, An Evaluation of the New South Wales Sexual Assault Specialist Jurisdiction (New South Wales Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research 2005).
- 43Katherine Hoogesteyn, Brianna L Verigin, Danielle Finnick, and Ewout H Meijer, ‘Rapport Building: Online vs In-person Interviews’ [2023] 20 Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling 162. DOI: 10.1002/jip.1609
- 44Laurence Dumoulin and Christian Licoppe, ‘Videoconferencing, New Public Management, and Organizational Reform in the Judiciary’ [2016] 8 Policy and Internet 313. DOI: 10.1002/poi3.124
- 45Legal Assistance Foundation of Metropolitan Chicago and Chicago Appleseed Fund for Justice,
‘Videoconferencing in Removal Proceedings: A Case Study of the Chicago Immigration Court’ (Chicago, IL60604 , 2005) <http://chicagoappleseed.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/videoconfreport_080205.pdf > accessed 28 December 2023. - 46Linda Mulcahy, ‘An Unbearable Lightness of Being? Shifts towards the Virtual Trial’ [2008] 25 Journal of Law and Society 464. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2008.00447.x
- 47Louise Ellison and Vanessa E Munro, ‘A Special Delivery? Exploring the Impact of Screens, Live-Links and Video Recorded Evidence on Mock Juror Deliberations in Rape Trials’ [2014] 23 Social and Legal Studies 3. DOI: 10.1177/0964663913496676
- 48Lynne Wainfan and Paul K Davis, Challenges in virtual Collaboration: Videoconferencing, Audioconferencing, and Computer-Mediated Communications (Rand Corporation 2004).
- 49Martine B Powell, Nina Westera, Jane Goodman-Delahunty and Anne-Sophie Pichler, An Evaluation of How Evidence is Elicited from Complainants of Child Sexual Abuse (Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse 2016).
- 50Matthew Lombard and Theresa Ditton ‘At the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence’ [1997] 3 Journal of Computer Mediated Communication JCMC321. DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00072.x
- 51Meredith Rossner, David Tait, and Jane Goodman-Delahunty, ‘Students vs. Jurors: Responding to Enhanced Video Technology’ [2014] 3 Laws 618. DOI: 10.3390/laws3030618
- 52Midfield D Dale and Desiree Smith, ‘Making the Case for Videoconferencing and Remote Child Custody Evaluations (RCCES): The Empirical, Ethical, and Evidentiary Arguments for Accepting New Technology’ [2021] 27 Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 30. DOI: 10.1037/law0000280
- 53Molly T Johnson and Elizabeth C Wiggins, ‘Videoconferencing in Criminal Proceedings: Legal and Empirical Issues and Directions for Research’ [2006] 28 Law and Policy 211. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9930.2006.00224.x
- 54Natalie Taylor and Jacqueline Joudo, The Impact of Pre-Recorded Video and Closed Circuit Television Testimony by Adult Sexual Assault Complainants on Jury Decision-Making: An Experimental Study (Research and Public Policy Series No. 68, Australian Institute of Criminology 2005). DOI: 10.1037/e583042012-001
- 55Peter Deakin,
‘Examination in Chief’ (NSW Bar Practice Course, 2011) <https://nswbar.asn.au/docs/ professional/prof_dev/BPC/course_files/Examination_in_Chief_-_Deakin_QC_updated.pdf > accessed 05 July 2024. - 56Richard L Daft and Robert H Lengel, ‘Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design’ [1986] 32 Management Science 554. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
- 57Richard Susskind, ‘Our Purpose’ (Remote Courts Worldwide, 27 Mar 2020) <
https://remotecourts.org/ > accessed 28 Dec 2023. - 58Robert H Mnookin and Lewis Kornhauser, ‘Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce’ [1979] 88 Yale LJ 950. DOI: 10.2307/795824
- 59Roderick CL Lindsay, David F Ross, James A Lea and Cynthia Carr, ‘What’s Fair When a Child Testifies?’ [1995] 25 Journal of Applied Social Psychology 870. DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb02650.x
- 60Ronald E Rice, ‘Media Appropriateness: Using Social Presence Theory to Compare Traditional and New Organisational Media’ [1993] 19 Human Communcation Research 451. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1993.tb00309.x
- 61Sara Landström and Pär A Granhag, ‘Children›s Truthful and Deceptive Testimonies: How Camera Perspective Affects Adult Observers’ Perception and Assessment’ [2008] 14 Psychology, Crime and Law 381. DOI: 10.1080/10683160701580107
- 62Shari S Diamond, Locke E Bowman, Manyee Wong and Matthew M Patton, ‘Efficiency and Cost: The Impact of Videoconferenced Hearings on Bail Decisions’ [2010] 100 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 869.
- 63Stephen Owen-Conway, ‘How to Cross-examine a Witness in an Australian Court’ (3 March 2014) <
https://svensonbarristers.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/how_to_crossexamine_a_witness_in_an_australian_court__sample.pdf > accessed 28 December 2023. - 64Susan Rutberg, ‘Conversational Cross-examination’ [2005] 29 American Journal of Trial Advocacy 353.
- 65Suzie Forell, Meg Laufer and Erol Digiusto, ‘Legal Assistance by Video Conferencing: What is known?’ [2011] 15 Justice Issues Paper 1.
- 66Tom R Tyler, ‘Procedural Justice and the Courts’ [2007] 44 Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association 26.