References
- 1Anonymous, ‘Remote justice – a view of the pros and cons from an anonymous judge’ Transform Justice [2020], <
https://www.transformjustice.org.uk/news-insight/remote-justice-a-view-of-the-pros-and-cons-from-an-anonymous-judge/ > accessed 28 August 2024. - 2Anthony Duff, Lindsay Farmer, Sandra Marshall and Victor Tadros,
The Trial on Trial . Volume 3: Towards a Normative Theory of the Trial (Hart Publishing 2007). DOI: 10.2202/1554-4567.1076 - 3Carolyn McKay,
The Pixelated Prisoner: The Pixelated Prisoner: Prison Video Links, Court ‘Appearance’ and the Justice Matrix (Routledge, 2018). DOI: 10.4324/9781315111506 - 4Christina Peristeridou and Dorris de Vocht ‘I’m Not a Cat! Remote Criminal Justice and a Human-Centred Approach to the Legitimacy of the Trial’ [2023] Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 30. DOI: 10.1177/1023263X231193214
- 5Dorris de Vocht, ‘Trials by video link after the pandemic: the pros and cons of the expansion of virtual justice’ [2022] China EU Law Journal 8. DOI: 10.1007/s12689-022-00095-9
- 6Emma Rowden, ‘Distributed Courts and Legitimacy: What do we Lose when we Lose the Courthouse?’ [2018] Law, Culture and the Humanities 2.
- 7Emma Rowden,
‘Virtual courts and putting ‘summary’ back into ‘summary justice’: Merely brief, or unjust?’ in Renée Tobe, Jonathan Simon and Nicholas Temple (eds.), Architecture and justice: Judicial meanings in the public realm (Ashgate Publishing, 2013). - 8Gail S. Goodman and others, ‘Face-to-face confrontation: Effects of closed-circuit technology on children’s eyewitness testimony and jurors’ decisions’ [1998] 2 Law and Human Behavior 1998. DOI: 10.1023/A:1025742119977
- 9Holly K. Orcutt and others, ‘Detecting deception in children’s testimony: Factfinders’ abilities to reach the truth in open court and closed-circuit trials’ [2001] 4 Law and Human Behavior.
- 10Janet Clark, HMCTS, Evaluations of remote hearings during the Covid 19 pandemic, research report, December 2021 <
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/61b71ebd8fa8f5037b09c7b1/Evaluation_of_remote_hearings_v23.pdf > accessed 28 August 2024. - 11Jenia Iontcheva Turner, ‘Remote Criminal Justice’ [2021] 53 Texas Tech Law Review.
- 12Jenia Turner, ‘The emerging constitutional law of remote criminal justice’ [2024] Wake Forest Law Review.
- 13John Jackson, ‘Rethinking the Orality/Confrontation Paradigm in a World of Remote Evidence’ [2023] Criminal Law Review.
- 14John Thibaut and Laurens Walker,
Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis, Hillsdale (N.J. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1975). - 15Lisa Ansems,
Procedural Justice on Trial: A Critical Test of Perceived Procedural Justice from the Perspective of Criminal Defendants (Utrecht University, 2021). - 16Neal Feigenson, ‘Adjudication on Zoom and Beyond: Human Interaction in Virtual Courts’ [2023] 62 Washburn Law Journal.
- 17Nigel Fielding, Sabine Braun and Graham Hieke
‘Video enabled justice evaluation. Final report version 11’ , University of Surrey (2020), <https://www.sussex-pcc.gov.uk/media/4862/vej-final-report-ver-12.pdf > accessed 28 August 2024. - 18Sabine Drooglever Fortuyn, ‘Onderzoek videorechtspraak: echt contact met rechter blijft onmisbaar’ [2020] 100 Advocatenblad. DOI: 10.5553/AB/0165-13312020100008003
- 19Sabine Gless, ‘Could robot judges believe? Epistemic ambitions of the criminal trial as we approach the digital age. A comment on Sarah Summers “epistemic ambitions of the criminal trial: truth, proof, and rights”’ [2023] 5 International Journal on Evidential Legal Reasoning.
- 20Sara Landstrom, ‘Children’s live and videotaped testimonies: How presentation mode affects observers’ perception, assessment and memory’ [2007] 12 Legal and Criminological Psychology. DOI: 10.1348/135532506X133607
- 21Sarah Summers ‘The epistemic ambitions of the criminal trials: truth, proof, and rights’ [2023] 1 International Journal on Evidential Legal Reasoning’.
- 22Shari Seidman Diamond, Locke E. Bowman, Manyee Wong and Matthew M. Patton, ‘Efficiency and cost: The impact of videoconferenced hearings on bail decisions’ [2010] 3 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology.
- 23Steven Blader and Tom R. Tyler, ‘A Four-component Model of Procedural Justice: Defining the Meaning of a “Fair” Process’ 29 Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin [2003]. DOI: 10.1177/0146167203029006007
- 24Susan Bandes and Neal Feigenson, ‘Virtual Trials: Necessity, Invention, and the Evolution of the Courtroom’ [2020] 68 Buffalo Law Review.
- 25Tom R. Tyler, ‘Procedural Justice and the Courts’ 44 Court Review [2007].