References
- 1Coeckelbergh, M. (2021). “How to use virtue ethics for thinking about the moral standing of social robots: a relational interpretation in terms of practices, habits, and performance.” International Journal of Social Robotics 13(1): 31–40.
- 2Crawford, K. (2013). “The hidden biases in big data.” Harvard Business Review Online.
- 3Friedman, B., P. Kahn and A. Borning (2002). “Value sensitive design: Theory and methods.” University of Washington technical report(02–12).
- 4Green, B. (2021). “Data science as political action: Grounding data science in a politics of justice.” Journal of Social Computing 2(3): 249–265.
- 5Hursthouse, R. and G. Pettigrove (2018). Virtue Ethics. Winter edition, Edward N. Zalta (ed.).
- 6Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld: From garden to earth. Bloomington, Indiana University Press.
- 7Introna, L. (2017). Phenomenological Approaches to Ethics and Information Technology. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy E. N. Zalta. <
https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/ethics-it-phenomenology/ >. - 8Jacobson, D. (2005). “Seeing by feeling: virtues, skills, and moral perception.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8(4): 387–409.
- 9Keymolen, E. (2016).
A utopian belief in big data . Mind You. The art of ethics in the information society. L. Janssens. Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press: 67–77. - 10Keymolen, E. and L. Taylor (2021).
Data Ethics and Data Science: An Uneasy Marriage? Data Science for Entrepreneurship: How Entrepreneurs Can Leverage Big Data and AI for New Value Creation. W. J. Liebregts, W. J. A. M. Van den Heuvel and J. A. Van den Born. forthcoming, available at SSRN:https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3797116 , Springer. - 11Kudina, O. (2019). The technological mediation of morality: value dynamism, and the complex interaction between ethics and technology. PhD, University of Twente.
- 12La Fors, K., B. Custers and E. Keymolen (2019). “Reassessing values for emerging big data technologies: integrating design-based and application-based approaches.” Ethics and Information Technology: 1–18.
- 13O’neil, C. (2017). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy, Crown.
- 14Plessner, H. (1928). Die Stufen des Organischen und der Mensch. Einleitung in die Philosophische Anthropologie. Berlin, Leipzig,, W. de Gruyter & co.
- 15Plessner, H. (2019).
Levels of Organic Life and the Human . Levels of Organic Life and the Human, Fordham University Press. - 16Saltz, J. S. and N. Dewar (2019). “Data science ethical considerations: a systematic literature review and proposed project framework.” Ethics and Information Technology 21(3): 197–208.
- 17Scott, J. (1998). Seeing like a state. How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, Yale University Press.
- 18Steen, M., M. Sand and I. Van de Poel (2021). “Virtue Ethics for Responsible Innovation.” Business and Professional Ethics Journal.
- 19Vallor, S. (2015). “Moral deskilling and upskilling in a new machine age: Reflections on the ambiguous future of character.” Philosophy & Technology 28(1): 107–124.
- 20Vallor, S. (2016). Technology and the Virtues. A philosophical guide to a future worth wanting. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
- 21Verbeek, P.-P. (2012). “Expanding Mediation Theory.” Foundations of Science 17(4): 391–395.
- 22Verbeek, P.-P. (2015).
Designing the public sphere: Information technologies and the politics of mediation . The Onlife Manifesto. Being human in a hyperconnected era. L. Floridi. Cham, Springer: 217–227. - 23Verbeek, P.-P., & Tijink, D. (2020). Guidance Ethics Approach: An ethical dialogue about technology with perspective on actions. Den Hague, ECP-Platform voor de InformatieSamenleving.