Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Identifying Institutional Entrepreneurs: Initiative-Taking and Individual Characteristics in Italian Public Sector Accounting Reform Cover

Identifying Institutional Entrepreneurs: Initiative-Taking and Individual Characteristics in Italian Public Sector Accounting Reform

Jahrbuch der Schweizerischen Verwaltungswissenschaften
Volume 16 (2025): Issue 1
By: Christoph Schuler,  Donatello Porta and  Lukas Augustin  
Open Access
|Dec 2025

References

  1. 1Argento, D., Bartocci, L., & Natalizi, D. (2024). Collective institutional entrepreneurship for the EPSAS programme: The missing link. Public Money & Management, 1–10. 10.1080/09540962.2024.2335637
    Back to article
  2. 2Argento, D., Peda, P., & Grossi, G. (2018). The enabling role of institutional entrepreneurs in the adoption of IPSAS within a transitional economy: The case of Estonia. Public Administration and Development, 38(1), 39–49. 10.1002/pad.1819
    Back to article
  3. 3Armenakis, A. A., Harris, S. G., & Mossholder, K. W. (1993). Creating readiness for organizational change. Human Relations, 46(6), 681–703. 10.1177/001872679304600601
    Back to article
  4. 4Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a Psychology of Human Agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 164–180. 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x
    Back to article
  5. 5Bandura, A. (2018). Toward a Psychology of Human Agency: Pathways and Reflections. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 130–136. 10.1177/1745691617699280
    Back to article
  6. 6Battilana, J. (2006). Agency and Institutions: The Enabling Role of Individuals’ Social Position. Organization, 13(5), 653–676. 10.1177/1350508406067008
    Back to article
  7. 7Battilana, J., & D’Aunno, T. (2009). Institutional work and the paradox of embedded agency. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional Work (pp. 31–58). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511596605.002
    Back to article
  8. 8Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). 2 How Actors Change Institutions: Towards a Theory of Institutional Entrepreneurship. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65–107. 10.1080/19416520903053598
    Back to article
  9. 9Benfante, G., Casali, A., Mozzoni, I., & Ferretti, M. (2024). Navigating accounting reforms: A qualitative comparative analysis of accrual implementation in Italian local governments. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 37(6), 1–27. 10.1108/JPBAFM-02-2024-0016
    Back to article
  10. 10Bergmann, A., Fuchs, S., & Schuler, C. (2019). A theoretical basis for public sector accrual accounting research: Current state and perspectives. Public Money & Management, 39(8), 560–570. 10.1080/09540962.2019.1654319
    Back to article
  11. 11Breiman, L. (1996). Bagging predictors. Machine Learning, 24(2), 123–140. 10.1007/BF00058655
    Back to article
  12. 12Brusca, I., & Montesinos, V. (2013). From Rhetoric to Practice: The Case of Spanish Local Government Reforms. Financial Accountability & Management, 29(4), 354–377. 10.1111/faam.12019
    Back to article
  13. 13Carpenter, V. L., & Feroz, E. H. (2001). Institutional theory and accounting rule choice: An analysis of four US state governments’ decisions to adopt generally accepted accounting principles. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26(7), 565–596. 10.1016/S0361-3682(00)00038-6
    Back to article
  14. 14Caruana, J., Dabbicco, G., Jorge, S., & Jesus, M. A. (2019). The Development of EPSAS: Contributions from the Literature. Accounting in Europe, 16(2), 146–176. 10.1080/17449480.2019.1624924
    Back to article
  15. 15Christiaens, J., Reyniers, B., & Rollé, C. (2010). Impact of IPSAS on reforming governmental financial information systems: A comparative study. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76(3), 537–554. 10.1177/0020852310372449
    Back to article
  16. 16Columbano, C., Biondi, L., & Bracci, E. (2023). Properties of accrual accounts in public sector entities: Evidence from the Italian National Health Service. Journal of Public Budgeting Accounting & Financial Management, 35(6), 240–261. 10.1108/JPBAFM-06-2023-0101
    Back to article
  17. 17Cunningham, C. E., Woodward, C. A., Shannon, H. S., MacIntosh, J., Lendrum, B., Rosenbloom, D., & Brown, J. (2002). Readiness for organizational change: A longitudinal study of workplace, psychological and behavioural correlates. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75(4), 377–392. 10.1348/096317902321119637
    Back to article
  18. 18Deephouse, D. L., & Suchman, M. (2008). Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 49–77). SAGE Publications Ltd. 10.4135/9781849200387
    Back to article
  19. 19Dietterich, T. G. (2000). Ensemble Methods in Machine Learning. Multiple Classifier Systems, 1–15. 10.1007/3-540-45014-9_1
    Back to article
  20. 20DiMaggio, P. J. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations (pp. 3–22). Ballinger Publishing Co.
    Back to article
  21. 21DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147. 10.2307/2095101
    Back to article
  22. 22Dorado, S. (2005). Institutional Entrepreneurship, Partaking, and Convening. Organization Studies, 26(3), 385–414. 10.1177/0170840605050873
    Back to article
  23. 23Drori, I., & Honig, B. (2013). A Process Model of Internal and External Legitimacy. Organization Studies, 34(3), 345–376. 10.1177/0170840612467153
    Back to article
  24. 24Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What Is Agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023. 10.1086/231294
    Back to article
  25. 25Fabbrini, F. (2022). Italy’s national recovery and resilience plan: Context, content and challenges. Journal of Modern Italian Studies, 27(5), 658–676. 10.1080/1354571X.2022.2124672
    Back to article
  26. 26Fligstein, N. (1997). Social Skill and Institutional Theory. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(4), 397–405. 10.1177/0002764297040004003
    Back to article
  27. 27Fuchs, S. (2017). Public Sector Accounting Reforms and the Impact of the IPSASs [Doctoral Thesis]. University of Zaragoza.
    Back to article
  28. 28Garud, R., Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2007). Institutional Entrepreneurship as Embedded Agency: An Introduction to the Special Issue. Organization Studies, 28(7), 957–969. 10.1177/0170840607078958
    Back to article
  29. 29Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration (1. publ). University of California Press.
    Back to article
  30. 30Gourfinkel, D. (2021). The main challenges of Public Sector Accounting reforms and World Bank’s Public Sector Accounting and Reporting (PULSAR) Program. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). 10.1108/JPBAFM-05-2021-0079
    Back to article
  31. 31Grandis, F. G., & Mattei, G. (2012). The harmonization of accounting in the Italian public sector: A new accrual basis standard versus IPSAS. Italian J. Pub. L., 4, 376.
    Back to article
  32. 32Greenwood, R., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutional Entrepreneurship In Mature Fields: The Big Five Accounting Firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 27–48. 10.5465/amj.2006.20785498
    Back to article
  33. 33Hall, J. (2008). Cross-sectional survey design. In Encyclopedia of survey research methods (Vol. 1–0). Sage Publications, Inc. 10.4135/9781412963947
    Back to article
  34. 34Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2017). Institutional Entrepreneurship and Change in Fields. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. Lawrence, & R. Meyer (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. SAGE Publications Ltd. 10.4135/9781526415066
    Back to article
  35. 35Holm, P. (1995). The Dynamics of Institutionalization: Transformation Processes in Norwegian Fisheries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 398. 10.2307/2393791
    Back to article
  36. 36Holt, D. T., & Vardaman, J. M. (2013). Toward a Comprehensive Understanding of Readiness for Change: The Case for an Expanded Conceptualization. Journal of Change Management, 13(1), 9–18. 10.1080/14697017.2013.768426
    Back to article
  37. 37Hoogstraaten, M. J., Frenken, K., & Boon, W. P. C. (2020). The study of institutional entrepreneurship and its implications for transition studies. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 36, 114–136. 10.1016/j.eist.2020.05.004
    Back to article
  38. 38Hyvönen, T., Järvinen, J., Oulasvirta, L., & Pellinen, J. (2012). Contracting out municipal accounting: The role of institutional entrepreneurship. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 25(6), 944–963. 10.1108/09513571211250198
    Back to article
  39. 39IPSASB. (2014). Conceptual Framework for General Purpose Financial Reporting by Public Sector Entities. International Federation of Accountants (IFAC).
    Back to article
  40. 40Italian Government: Presidency of the Council of Ministers. (2024). DECRETO-LEGGE 9 agosto 2024, n. 113—Normattiva. Gazzetta Ufficiale. https://www.normattiva.it/uri-res/N2Ls?urn:nir:stato:decreto-legge:2024-08-09;113!vig=
    Back to article
  41. 41Italian Government: Presidency of the Council of Ministers. (2025). Equipping public administrations with a single accrual accounting system. Equipping Public Administrations with a Single Accrual Accounting System. https://www.italiadomani.gov.it:443/content/sogei-ng/it/en/Interventi/riforme/riforme-abilitanti/dotare-le-pubbliche-amministrazioni-di-un-sistema-unico-di-conta.html
    Back to article
  42. 42James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2021). Tree-Based Methods. In G. James, D. Witten, T. Hastie, & R. Tibshirani (Eds.), An Introduction to Statistical Learning: With Applications in R (pp. 327–365). Springer US. 10.1007/978-1-0716-1418-1_8
    Back to article
  43. 43Jorge, S., Nogueira, S. P., & Ribeiro, N. (2020). The institutionalization of public sector accounting reforms: The role of pilot entities. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). 10.1108/JPBAFM-08-2019-0125
    Back to article
  44. 44Kang, I.-G., Kim, N., Loh, W.-Y., & Bichelmeyer, B. A. (2021). A Machine-Learning Classification Tree Model of Perceived Organizational Performance in U.S. Federal Government Health Agencies. Sustainability, 13(18), Article 18. 10.3390/su131810329
    Back to article
  45. 45Kuhn, M., & Johnson, K. (2013). Classification Trees and Rule-Based Models. In M. Kuhn & K. Johnson (Eds.), Applied Predictive Modeling (pp. 369–413). Springer. 10.1007/978-1-4614-6849-3_14
    Back to article
  46. 46Lawrence, T., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and Institutional Work (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 3197577). Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3197577
    Back to article
  47. 47Leca, B., Battilana, J., & Boxenbaum, E. (2008). Agency and Institutions: A Review of Institutional Entrepreneurship. Working Paper.
    Back to article
  48. 48Leca, B., & Naccache, P. (2006). A Critical Realist Approach To Institutional Entrepreneurship. Organization, 13(5), 627–651. 10.1177/1350508406067007
    Back to article
  49. 49Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-Level Bureaucracy, 30th Anniversary Edition: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. Russell Sage Foundation.
    Back to article
  50. 50Lockett, A., Currie, G., Waring, J., Finn, R., & Martin, G. (2012). The role of institutional entrepreneurs in reforming healthcare. Social Science & Medicine, 74(3), 356–363. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.02.031
    Back to article
  51. 51Lowndes, V. (2005). Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed …: How institutions change (and stay the same) in local governance. Policy Studies, 26(3–4), 291–309. 10.1080/01442870500198361
    Back to article
  52. 52Lyons, J. B., Swindler, S. D., & Offner, A. (2009). The Impact of Leadership on Change Readiness in the US Military. Journal of Change Management, 9(4), 459–475. 10.1080/14697010903360665
    Back to article
  53. 53Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. B. (2004). Institutional Entrepreneurship in Emerging Fields: HIV/AIDS Treatment Advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 657–679. 10.5465/20159610
    Back to article
  54. 54Mahzouni, A. (2019). The role of institutional entrepreneurship in emerging energy communities: The town of St. Peter in Germany. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 107, 297–308. 10.1016/j.rser.2019.03.011
    Back to article
  55. 55Manes Rossi, F., & Aversano, N. (2015). Advancing performance measurement: Italian local government vis-à-vis the IPSASB project. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 64(1), 76–93. 10.1108/IJPPM-07-2013-0134
    Back to article
  56. 56Manes Rossi, F., Caperchione, E., Cohen, S., & Brusca, I. (2019). Financial Management and Public Sector Accounting in an Age of Reforms: Developments and Changes in Public Sector Financial Management: Permanent Study Group 12: Public Sector Financial Management. In E. Ongaro (Ed.), Public Administration in Europe (pp. 235–246). Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978-3-319-92856-2_22
    Back to article
  57. 57Manes-Rossi, F., Cohen, S., Caperchione, E., & Brusca, I. (2016). Introduction: The Gordian knot of public sector accounting and the role of the International Public Sector Accounting Standards. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(4), 718–723. 10.1177/0020852316665048
    Back to article
  58. 58Mazzotta, B., Aprile, R., & D’Amore, M. (2022). La riforma della contabilità economico-patrimoniale nel PNRR. AZIENDAITALIA, 10/2022, 1515–1529.
    Back to article
  59. 59Mussari, R., Cepiku, D., & Sorrentino, D. (2021). Governmental accounting reforms at a time of crisis: The Italian governmental accounting harmonization. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 33(2), 138–156. 10.1108/JPBAFM-04-2020-0051
    Back to article
  60. 60Mussari, R., & Sorrentino, D. (2017). Italian Public Sector Accounting Reform: A Step Towards European Public Sector Accounting Harmonisation. Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, 7(2), 137–153. 10.1515/ael-2017-0006
    Back to article
  61. 61Mutch, A. (2007). Reflexivity and the Institutional Entrepreneur: A Historical Exploration. Organization Studies, 28(7), 1123–1140. 10.1177/0170840607078118
    Back to article
  62. 62Oliver, C. (1992). The Antecedents of Deinstitutionalization. Organization Studies, 13(4), 563–588. 10.1177/017084069201300403
    Back to article
  63. 63Pacheco, D. F., York, J. G., Dean, T. J., & Sarasvathy, S. D. (2010). The Coevolution of Institutional Entrepreneurship: A Tale of Two Theories. Journal of Management, 36(4), 974–1010. 10.1177/0149206309360280
    Back to article
  64. 64Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. 10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
    Back to article
  65. 65Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. B., & Hardy, C. (2000). Inter-organizational Collaboration and the Dynamics of Institutional Fields. Journal of Management Studies, 37(1), 1467–6486.00171. 10.1111/1467-6486.00171
    Back to article
  66. 66Polzer, T., Gårseth-Nesbakk, L., & Adhikari, P. (2019). “Does your walk match your talk?” Analyzing IPSASs diffusion in developing and developed countries. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 33(2/3), 117–139. 10.1108/IJPSM-03-2019-0071
    Back to article
  67. 67Qureshi, I., Kistruck, G. M., & Bhatt, B. (2016). The Enabling and Constraining Effects of Social Ties in the Process of Institutional Entrepreneurship. Organization Studies, 37(3), 425–447. 10.1177/0170840615613372
    Back to article
  68. 68Rafferty, A. E., Jimmieson, N. L., & Armenakis, A. A. (2013). Change Readiness: A Multilevel Review. Journal of Management, 39(1), 110–135. 10.1177/0149206312457417
    Back to article
  69. 69Salignac, F., Galea, N., & Powell, A. (2018). Institutional entrepreneurs driving change: The case of gender equality in the Australian construction industry. Australian Journal of Management, 43(1), 152–169. 10.1177/0312896217705179
    Back to article
  70. 70Salonen, H., Suomalainen, M., & Pyysiäinen, J. (2024). Learning to relocalize: Institutional entrepreneurs as transformative agents in public food services. Acta Borealia, 41(1), 44–59. 10.1080/08003831.2024.2334625
    Back to article
  71. 71Schuler, C., Grossi, G., & Fuchs, S. (2023). New development: The role of education in public sector accounting reforms in emerging economies: a socio-material perspective. Public Money & Management, 1–7. 10.1080/09540962.2023.2255387
    Back to article
  72. 72Seo, M.-G., & Creed, W. E. D. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 222–247. 10.2307/4134353
    Back to article
  73. 73Setia, M. S. (2023). Cross-Sectional Studies. In A. L. Nichols & J. Edlund (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Research Methods and Statistics for the Social and Behavioral Sciences: Volume 1: Building a Program of Research (pp. 269–291). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781009010054.014
    Back to article
  74. 74Sforza, V., & Cimini, R. (2017). Central government accounting harmonization in EU member states: Will EPSAS be enough? Public Money & Management, 37(4), 301–308. 10.1080/09540962.2016.1266191
    Back to article
  75. 75Siciliano, R. (1999). Latent Budget Trees for Multiple Classification. In M. Vichi & O. Opitz (Hrsg.), Classification and Data Analysis (S. 121–128). Springer. 10.1007/978-3-642-60126-2_16
    Back to article
  76. 76Steccolini, I. (2004). Is the Annual Report an Accountability Medium? An Empirical Investigation into Italian Local Governments. Financial Accountability & Management, 20(3), 327–350. 10.1111/j.0267-4424.2004.00389.x
    Back to article
  77. 77Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. 10.2307/258788
    Back to article
  78. 78Tost, L. P. (2011). An Integrative Model of Legitimacy Judgments. Academy of Management Review, 36(4), 686–710. 10.5465/amr.2010.0227
    Back to article
  79. 79Tummers, L., & Bekkers, V. (2014). Policy Implementation, Street-level Bureaucracy, and the Importance of Discretion. Public Management Review, 16(4), 527–547. 10.1080/14719037.2013.841978
    Back to article
  80. 80Tummers, L., Bekkers, V., Vink, E., & Musheno, M. (2015). Coping During Public Service Delivery: A Conceptualization and Systematic Review of the Literature. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(4), 1099–1126. 10.1093/jopart/muu056
    Back to article
  81. 81Valdesalici, A., & Trettel, M. (2023). The System of Local Government in Italy: A Stress-Test to Traditional Paradigms? In M. Nicolini & A. Valdesalici (Eds.), Local Governance in Multi-Layered Systems: A Comparative Legal Study in the Federal-Local Connection (pp. 261–282). Springer Nature Switzerland. 10.1007/978-3-031-41792-4_12
    Back to article
  82. 82van Helden, J. (2016). Literature review and challenging research agenda on politicians’ use of accounting information. Public Money & Management, 36(7), 531–538. 10.1080/09540962.2016.1237162
    Back to article
  83. 83Weiner, B. J. (2009). A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implementation Science, 4(1), 67. 10.1186/1748-5908-4-67
    Back to article
  84. 84Xu, L., Sophia, J. I., & Dellaportas, S. (2021). The role of institutional entrepreneurship in the development of accounting in the early 20th century in China. Business History, 63(6), 1007–1029. 10.1080/00076791.2019.1676229
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ssas.237 | Journal eISSN: 2632-9255
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Sep 16, 2025
Accepted on: Dec 1, 2025
Published on: Dec 16, 2025
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Local Government,
Institutional Entrepreneurship,
Public Sector Accounting Reform,
Italy,
Classification Tree

© 2025 Christoph Schuler, Donatello Porta, Lukas Augustin, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 16 (2025): Issue 1