Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Pixelating Forests: Remote Sensing Technologies in Forest Monitoring in Switzerland Cover

Pixelating Forests: Remote Sensing Technologies in Forest Monitoring in Switzerland

Open Access
|Feb 2022

References

  1. 1Agnew, J. (1994). The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy, 1(1), 5380. DOI: 10.1080/09692299408434268
  2. 2Akrich, M. (2006). La description des objets techniques. In M. Akrich, M. Callon & B. Latour (Eds.), Sociologie de la traduction. Textes fondateurs (pp. 159178). Paris: Presse des Mines. DOI: 10.4000/books.pressesmines.1197
  3. 3Arts, B., & Visseren-Hamakers, I. J. (2012). Forest governance: Mainstream and critical views. Moving Forward with Forest Governance. ETFRN News, 53, 310.
  4. 4Åström Boss, H. (2019). 3D-Stockwerkeigentum - Technisch bereit, 3DGI 2019 - Internat. Fachtagung zu 3D-Geoinformation FHNW Muttenz. Retrieved from: https://www.3dgi.ch/
  5. 5Bachmann, P. (2005). Forstliche Planung – heute und morgen. Schweiz. Z. Forstwes, 156(5), 137141. DOI: 10.3188/szf.2005.0137
  6. 6Bakker, K., & Ritts, M. (2018). Smart earth: A meta-review and implications for environmental governance. Global Environmental Change, 52, 201211. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.07.011
  7. 7Bastin, J. F., Finegold, Y., Garcia, C., Mollicone, D., Rezende, M., Routh, D., Zohner, C. M., & Crowther, T. W. (2019). The global tree restoration potential. Science, 365, 7679. DOI: 10.1126/science.aax0848
  8. 8Beck, U. (2007). The Cosmopolitan Condition: Why Methodological Nationalism Fails. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(7–8), 28690. DOI: 10.1177/02632764070240072505
  9. 9Benoit-Godet, S. (2021, june 29). Vue depuis l’espace, la Suisse, c’est une seule vallée. L’illustré, 5860.
  10. 10Bončina, A., Simončiča, T., & Rosset, C. (2019). Assessment of the concept of forest functions in Central European forestry. Environmental Science and Policy, 99, 123135. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.05.009
  11. 11Borup, M., Brown, N., Konrad, K., & van Lente, H. (2006). The sociology of expectations in science and technology. Technol. Anal. Strat. Manag., 18, 285298. DOI: 10.1080/09537320600777002
  12. 12Boyce, G. A. (2016). The rugged border: surveillance, policing and the dynamic materiality of the US/Mexico frontier. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 34(2), 245262. DOI: 10.1177/0263775815611423
  13. 13Branch, J. (2017). Territory as an institution: spatial ideas, practices and Technologies. Territory, Politics, Governance, 5(2), 131144. DOI: 10.1080/21622671.2016.1265464
  14. 14Brändli, U.-B., Abegg, M., & Leuch, B. A. (Eds.) (2020). Inventaire forestier national suisse Résultats du quatrième inventaire 2009–2017. Bern and Birmensdorf: WSL/FOEN. DOI: 10.16904/envidat.147
  15. 15Bridge, G. (2013). Territory, now in 3D. Political Geography, 34, 5557. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2013.01.005
  16. 16Callon, M. (1984). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action, and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196223). London, Boston: Routledge & Paul. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1984.tb00113.x
  17. 17Chazdon, R. L., Brancalion, P. H., Laestadius, L., Bennett-Curry, A., Buckingham, K., Kumar, C., Moll-Rocek, J., Vieira, I. C. G., & Wilson, S. J. (2016). When is a forest a forest? Forest concepts and definitions in the era of forest and landscape restoration, Ambio, 45(5), 538550. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-016-0772-y
  18. 18Dalby, S. (2020). Bordering sustainability in the Anthropocene. Territory, Politics, Governance, 8, 144160. DOI: 10.1080/21622671.2018.1559758
  19. 19Damm, A., Paul-Limoges, E., Kükenbrink, D., Bachofen, C., & Morsdorf, F. (2020). Remote sensing of forest gas exchange: Considerations derived from a tomographic perspective. Global Change Biol, 26, 27172727. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15007
  20. 20Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  21. 21Descola, P. (2005). Par-delà nature et culture. Paris: Gallimard.
  22. 22Elden, S. (2005). Missing the point: globalization, deterritorialization and the space of the world. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30(1), 819. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2005.00148.x
  23. 23Elden, S. (2010). Land, Terrain, Territory. Progress in Human Geography, 34(6), 799817. DOI: 10.1177/0309132510362603
  24. 24Elden, S. (2013). Secure the volume: vertical geopolitics and the depth of power. Political Geography, 34, 3551. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2012.12.009
  25. 25Elden, S. (2017). Legal terrain—the political materiality of territory. London Review of International Law, 5(2), 199224. DOI: 10.1093/lril/lrx008
  26. 26Fahlbusch, C. (2016, November). Rétrospective et bilan des “pères” d’e-geo.ch, e-geo.ch. Newsletter, 28, 78. Retrieved from www.geo.admin.ch/
  27. 27Fässler, D. (2020, June). Sicherstellung der nachhaltigen Pflege und Nutzung des Waldes. Motion 20. 3745. Retrieved from https://www.parlament.ch/
  28. 28ForêtSuisse. (2020). Rapport annuel 2019. Solothurn: ForêtSuisse.
  29. 29Friedlingstein, P. M., Allen, J. G., Canadell, G. P., Peters, P., & Seneviratne, S. I. (2019). Comment on “The global tree restoration potential”. Science, 366, eaay8060. DOI: 10.1126/science.aay8060
  30. 30Gabrys, J. (2016). Program Earth: Environmental Sensing Technology and the Making of a Computational Planet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. DOI: 10.5749/minnesota/9780816693122.001.0001
  31. 31Gabrys, J. (2020). Smart forests and data practices: From the Internet of Trees to planetary governance. Big Data & Society, 1, 110. DOI: 10.1177/2053951720904871
  32. 32Gartmeier, M., Bauer, J., Gruber, H., & Heid, H. (2008). Negative Knowledge Understanding Professional Learning and Expertise. Vocations and Learning, 1(2), 87103. DOI: 10.1007/s12186-008-9006-1
  33. 33Ginzler, C., & Hobi, M. L. (2015). Countrywide stereo-image matching for updating digital surface models in the framework of the Swiss National Forest Inventory. Remote Sensing, 7(4), 43434370. DOI: 10.3390/rs70404343
  34. 34Glasersfeld, E. (1991). A Constructivist’s View of Learning and Teaching. In R. Duit, F. Goldberg & H. Niedderer (Eds.), Research in physics 135 learning: Theoretical issues and empirical studies. Proceedings of an international workshop (pp. 2939). Kiel, Germany.
  35. 35Godrillo, G. (2018). Terrain as insurgent weapon: An affective geometry of warfare in the mountains of Afghanistan. Political Geography, 64, 5362. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.03.001
  36. 36Goldstein, J. E. (2020). The Volumetric Political Forest: Territory, Satellite Fire Mapping, and Indonesia’s Burning Peatland. Antipode, 52(4), 10601082. DOI: 10.1111/anti.12576
  37. 37Gollut, C., & Rosset, C. (2018). État de la planification forestière dans les cantons en 2017. Rapport Final. Bern: FOEN.
  38. 38Kaul, C. (2019, April). 10 Years of “Law on Geoinformation” in Switzerland - Current Situation and Outlook, 9938. Paper presented at FIG-Working Week, Hanoi, Vietnam.
  39. 39Klauser, F. (2021). Police Drones and the Air: Towards a Volumetric Geopolitics of Security. Political Science Review, 27(1), 158169. DOI: 10.1111/spsr.12431
  40. 40Küchli, C., & Blaser, J. (2005). Forests and decentralization in Switzerland: A Sampling. In C. J. P. Colfer & D. Capistrano (Eds.), The Politics of Decentralization: Forests, Power and People (pp. 152165). London: Earthscan.
  41. 41Küchli, C., & Blaser, J. (2011). Schweizer Waldpolitik – zwischen internationaler verantwortung und nationalen interessen (essay). Schweiz Z Forstwes, 162(4), 96106. DOI: 10.3188/szf.2011.0096
  42. 42Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  43. 43Latour, B. (2014). The More Manipulations, the Better. In C. Coopmans, J. Vertesi, M. Lynch & S. Woolgar (Eds.), Representation in Scientific Practice Revisited (pp. 347350). Cambridge: MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262525381.003.0022
  44. 44Latour, B. (2017). Visualisation and cognition: Drawing things together. Philosophical Literary Journal Logos, 27(2), 95156. DOI: 10.22394/0869-5377-2017-2-95-151
  45. 45Law, J., & Mol, A. (2001). Situating technoscience: an inquiry into spatialities. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 19, 609621. DOI: 10.1068/d243t
  46. 46Lieberherr, E., & Thomann, E. (2020). Linking throughput and output legitimacy in Swiss forest policy implementation. Policy Sciences, 53, 495533. DOI: 10.1007/s11077-020-09374-3
  47. 47Märki, F. (2020). Application of ground penetrating radar to study the tree root system architecture in Swiss agroforestry systems (Master Thesis, ETH, Zurich).
  48. 48Matthewman, S. (2013). Michel Foucault, Technology, and Actor-Network Theory. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 17(2), 274292. DOI: 10.5840/techne201311205
  49. 49McNeill, D. (2019). Volumetric urbanism: the production and extraction of Singaporean territory. Environment and Planning A, 51(4), 849868. DOI: 10.1177/0308518X19830699
  50. 50Menkman, R. (2019). Refuse to Let the Syntaxes of (a) History Direct Our Futures. In D. Rubinstein (Ed.), Fragmentation of the Photographic Image in the Digital Age (pp. 116128). London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781351027946-9
  51. 51Mennicken, A. M., & Espeland, W. (2019). What’s new with numbers? Sociological approaches to the study of quantification. Annual Review of Sociology, 45, 223245. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041343
  52. 52Monnet, J. M., Mermin, E., & Dupire, S. (2016). Mise en valeur des données LiDAR – Canton du Valais. Rapport Final. Irstea., 127.
  53. 53Moser, I. (2008). Making Alzheimer’s disease matter: Enacting, interfering and doing politics of nature. Geoforum, 39(1), 98110. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.12.007
  54. 54Noucher, M. (2009). La donnée géographique aux frontières des organisations: approche socio-cognitive et systèmique de son appropriation (Doctoral Thesis, EPFL, Lausanne). DOI: 10.4000/cdg.2203
  55. 55November, V., Camacho-Hübner, E., & Latour, B. (2010). Entering a risky territory: space in the age of digital navigation. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28, 581599. DOI: 10.1068/d10409
  56. 56Olbrich, W. (2019). Technological Expectations and Global Politics: Three Waves of Enthusiasm in Non-Governmental Remote Sensing. Space Policy, 47, 107116. DOI: 10.1016/j.spacepol.2018.08.003
  57. 57Oliver, M. (2014). To be Human is to Sing your own Song. In M. Oliver, (ed.) Blue Horses (p. 37). New York: Penguin Press.
  58. 58Ortloff, W. (1999). Sustainability issues in Switzerland’s forests. New Forests, 18(59), 419433. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-2689-4_27
  59. 59Parkan, M. J. (2017) Données LiDAR aériennes: pertinence de l’interprétation visuelle pour la foresterie. Schweiz Z Forstwes, 168(3), 127133. DOI: 10.3188/szf.2017.0127
  60. 60Parkan, M. J. (2019). Combined Use of Airborne Laser Scanning and Hyperspectral Imaging for Forest Inventories (Doctoral Thesis, EPFL, Lausanne). DOI: 10.5075/epfl-thesis-9033
  61. 61Parks, L. (2005). Cultures in Orbit: Satellites and the Televisual. Durham: Duke University Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv11hpmm4
  62. 62Pickles, B. J., & Simard, S. W. (2017). Mycorrhizal networks and forest resilience to drought. In N. C. Johnson, C. Gehring, & J. Jansa (Eds.), Mycorrhizal Mediation of Soil - Fertility, Structure, and Carbon Storage (pp. 319339). Elsevier, Amsterdam. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-804312-7.00018-8
  63. 63Rath, L., Hilfiker, K., Tinner, R., Ackermann, N., & Böhler, J. (2021). Wissenstransfer: Erkennen der Vitalität von Bäumen anhand von Satellitendaten Abschlussbericht SBB Pilot “Forest & Remote Sensing. Bern: FOEN.
  64. 64Rey, L. (2014, February 12). Des prestations qui ont un coût. Comment les garantir à long terme, Dossier Forêt. Environnement Magazine, 1, 1214. Retrieved from https://issuu.com/bundesamt-fuer-umwelt-bafu/docs/notre_foret
  65. 65Rigling, A., Landolt, D., & Manser, R. (2015). The Forest in the Process of Change. In A. Rigling & H. P. Schaffer (Eds.), Forest Report 2015. Condition and Use of Swiss Forest (pp. 924). Bern: FOEN.
  66. 66Robbins, P. (2001). Fixed categories in a portable landscape: The causes and consequences of land cover classification. Environment and Planning A, 33(1), 161179. DOI: 10.1068/a3379
  67. 67Rothe, D. (2017). Seeing like a satellite: Remote sensing and the ontological politics of environmental security. Security Dialogue, 48(4), 334353. DOI: 10.1177/0967010617709399
  68. 68Rothe, D., & Schim, D. (2018). Sensing the ground: On the global politics of satellite-based activism. Review of International Studies, 44(3), 414437. DOI: 10.1017/S0260210517000602
  69. 69Ruth, A. (2013). Nutzung des Untergrunds: Referate eines Workshops. Geomatik Schweiz, 111(11), 608622. DOI: 10.5169/seals-349313
  70. 70Rutishauser, T. (Ed.) (2021). Digitalization and change in the forest. Schweizerische Zeitschrift Forstwesen, 174(4), 198245.
  71. 71Sassen, S. (2013). When Territory Deborders Territoriality. Territory, Politics, Governance, 1(1), 2145. DOI: 10.1080/21622671.2013.769895
  72. 72Sawyer, S., Erickson, I., & Jarrahi, M.H. (2019). Infrastructural competence. In D. Ribes & J. Vertesi (Eds.), Digital STS hand-book (pp. 267279). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9780691190600-020
  73. 73Schim, D. (2014). Remote sensing place: Satellite images as visual spatial imaginaries. Geoforum, 51, 152160. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.11.002
  74. 74Schlaepfer, R. (1985). Les inventaires forestiers en Suisse. Rev. For. Fr., 4, 251261. DOI: 10.4267/2042/21807
  75. 75Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing Like a State. New Haven: Yale University Press. DOI: 10.12987/9780300128789-003
  76. 76Tordjman, H. (2021). La croissance verte contre la nature. Critique de l’écologie marchande. Paris: La Découverte. DOI: 10.3917/dec.tordj.2021.01
  77. 77Tsing, A. L. (2012), On nonscalability: the living world is not amenable to precision-nested scales. Common Knowledge, 18(3), 505524. DOI: 10.1215/0961754X-1630424
  78. 78Vandergeest, P., & Peluso, N. L. (2015). Political forests. In R. L. Bryant (Ed.), The International Handbook of Political Ecology (pp. 162175). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. DOI: 10.4337/9780857936172.00020
  79. 79Vertesi, J. (2014). Drawing as: Distinctions and Disambiguation in Digital Images of Mars. In C. Coopmans, J. Vertesi, M. Lynch & S. Woolgar (Eds.), Representation in Scientific Practice Revisited (pp. 1535). Cambridge: MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262525381.003.0002
  80. 80Vidalou, J.-P. (2017). Être forêts. Habiter des territoires en lutte. Paris: Zones.
  81. 81Walker, D., & Artho, J. (2018). Les propriétaires forestiers en Suisse. Étude sur les relations des propriétaires publics et privés avec leur forêt. Bern: FOEN.
  82. 82Walser, O., Thévoz, L., Joerin, F., Schuler, M., Joost, S., Debarbieux, B., & Dao, H. (Eds.) (2011). Les SIG au service du développement territorial. Lausanne: Presses Polytechniques et universitaires romandes.
  83. 83Zürcher-Gasser, N., Kühne, K., Thormann, J.-J., Küffer, C., Schwitter, R., Zürcher, S., & Frehner, M. (2016). Échange de connaissances et controlling: les facteurs clés d’une gestion forestière adaptative. In A. R. Pluess, S. Augustin & P. Brang (Eds.), Forêts et changements climatiques. Éléments pour des stratégies d’adaptation (pp. 413424). Bern: Haupt Verlag.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ssas.161 | Journal eISSN: 2632-9255
Language: English
Submitted on: Aug 15, 2021
Accepted on: Oct 12, 2021
Published on: Feb 14, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Donata Dettwiler, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.