References
- 1Andersen, S. C., & Jakobsen, M. L. (2018). Political pressure, conformity pressure, and performance information as drivers of public sector innovation adoption. International Public Management Journal, 21(2), 213–242. DOI: 10.1080/10967494.2018.1425227
- 2Andrews, R., Beynon, M. J., & McDermott, A. M. (2015). Organizational Capability in the Public Sector: A Configurational Approach. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(2), 239–258. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/muv005
- 3Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., & Walker, R. M. (2011). Dimensions of publicness and organizational performance: A review of the evidence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(suppl_3), i301–i319. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mur026
- 4Arundel, A., Bloch, C., & Ferguson, B. (2019). Advancing innovation in the public sector: Aligning innovation measurement with policy goals. Research Policy, 48(3), 789–798. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.12.001
- 5Arundel, A., Bowen Butchart, D., Gatenby-Clark, S., & Goedegebuure, L. (2016). Management and service innovations in Australian and New Zealand universities. [
https://melbourne-cshe.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/2564221/management-and-service-innovations-in-australian-and-new-zealand-universitiesfinal-preliminary-report.pdf ]. - 6Arundel, A., Casali, L., & Hollanders, H. (2015). How European public sector agencies innovate: The use of bottom-up, policy-dependent and knowledge-scanning innovation methods. Research Policy, 44(7), 1271–1282. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2015.04.007
- 7Arundel, A., & Huber, D. (2013). From too little to too much innovation? Issues in measuring innovation in the public sector. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 27, 146–159. DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2013.06.009
- 8Athias, L., Macina, M., & Wicht, P. (2019).
Public-private partnerships: A swiss perspective . Swiss public administration (pp. 187–204). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-92381-9_11 - 9Bakici, T., Almirall, E., & Wareham, J. (2013). The role of public open innovation intermediaries in local government and the public sector. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 25(3), 311–327. DOI: 10.1080/09537325.2013.764983
- 10Bass, B. M., Avolio, B. J., Jung, D. I., & Berson, Y. (2003). Predicting Unit Performance by Assessing Transformational and Transactional Leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 207–218. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.207
- 11Berkun, S. (2010). The Myths of Innovation. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.
- 12Bontis, N., Crossan, M. M., & Hulland, J. (2002). Journal of Management Studies, 39(4), 437. DOI: 10.1111/1467-6486.t01-1-00299
- 13Boselie, J. P., Dietz, G., & Boon, C. (2005). Commonalities and contradictions in HRM and Performance Research. Human Resource Management Journal, 15(3), 67–94. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-8583.2005.tb00154.x
- 14Boukamel, O., & Emery, Y. (2017). Evolution of organizational ambidexterity in the public sector and current challenges of innovation capabilities. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 22(2).
- 15Boukamel, O., & Emery, Y. (2018). Les freins culturels à l’innovation dans l’administration publique: Spécificités helvétiques. Gestion et Management Public, 6(4). DOI: 10.3917/gmp.064.0025
- 16Boukamel, O., Emery, Y., & Gieske, H. (2019). Towards an Integrative Framework of Innovation Capacity. The Innovation Journal, 24(3), 1–36.
- 17Boyne, G. A., Gould-Williams, J. S., Law, J., & Walker, R. M. (2005). Explaining the adoption of innovation: An empirical analysis of public management reform. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 23(3), 419–435. DOI: 10.1068/c40m
- 18Brown, L., & Osborne, S. P. (2013). Risk and innovation: towards a framework for risk governance in public services. Public Management Review, 15(2), 186–208. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2012.707681
- 19Bryson, J. M., Ackermann, F., & Eden, C. (2007). Putting the Resource-Based View of Strategy and Distinctive Competencies to Work in Public Organizations. Public Administration Review, 67(4), 702–717. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00754.x
- 20Ceylan, C. (2013). Commitment-based HR practices, different types of innovation activities and firm innovation performance. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(1), 208–226. DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2012.680601
- 21Choi, T., & Chandler, S. M. (2015). Exploration, Exploitation, and Public Sector Innovation: An Organizational Learning Perspective for the Public Sector. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 39(2), 139–151. DOI: 10.1080/23303131.2015.1011762
- 22Collis, D. J. (1994). Research Note: How Valuable Are Organizational Capabilities? Strategic Management Journal, 15, 143–152. DOI: 10.1002/smj.4250150910
- 23Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. (2006). Phases of the adoption of innovation in organizations: effects of environment, organization and top managers 1. British Journal of Management, 17(3), 215–236. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00498.x
- 24De Hoogh, A. H. B., Den Hartog, D. N., & Koopman, P. L. (2004). Gedrag En Organisatie, 17(2), 354. DOI: 10.5117/2004.017.002.005
- 25Delley, J.-D. (1994). Quand l’esprit d’entreprise vient à l’Etat: pour une réforme du service public. Lausanne: Domaine public.
- 26Denhardt, J.-V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2003). The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
- 27Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2005). New Public Management is Dead. Long live Digital-Era Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467–494. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mui057
- 28Emery, Y., & Giauque, D. (2016). L’acteur et la bureaucratie au XXIe siècle. Québec: Presses de l’Université Laval.
- 29European Commission. (2010). Innobarometer 2010: Analytical Report Innovation in Public Administration (Flash Eurobarometer 305). Retrieved from
https://data.europa.eu/data/datasets/s881_305?locale=en - 30Farazmand, A. (2009). Building Administrative Capacity for the Age of Rapid Globalization: A Modest Prescription for the Twenty-First Century. Public Administration Review, 69(6), 1007–1020. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02054.x
- 31Fernandez, S., & Moldogaziev, T. (2013). Using employee empowerment to encourage innovative behavior in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(1), 155–187. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mus008
- 32Flemig, S., Osborne, S., & Kinder, T. (2016). Risky business—reconceptualizing risk and innovation in public services. Public Money & Management, 36(6), 425–432. DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2016.1206751
- 33Fuglsang, L., & Møller, J. K. (2014).
Framing innovation in postal services: Developing a hybrid organization . In L. Fuglsang, R. Rønning, & B. Enquist (Eds.), Framing Innovation in Public Service Sectors, 30, 112–129. New York: Routledge. - 34Gallouj, F., & Zanfei, A. (2013). Innovation in public services: Filling a gap in the literature. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 27, 89–97. DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2013.09.002
- 35Gallup. (2011). Innobarometer 2010: Analytical Report on Innovation in Public Administration. Retrieved from Brussel
- 36Giauque, D., & Emery, Y. (2016a). L’acteur et la bureaucratie au XXIème siècle. Laval: Presses Universitaires de Laval.
- 37Giauque, D., & Emery, Y. (2016b).
Les acteurs de l’administration publique au coeur du changement et de l’innovation . In D. Giauque & Y. Emery (Eds.), L’acteur et la bureaucratie au XXIème siècle chap. 14 (pp. 353–384): Presses de l’Université Laval. - 38Gieske, H., van Buuren, A., & Bekkers, V. (2016). Conceptualizing public innovative capacity: A framework for assessement. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 21(1), 1–25.
- 39Gieske, H., van Meerkerk, I., & van Buuren, A. (2018). The Impact of Innovation and Optimization on Public Sector Performance: Testing the Contribution of Connective, Ambidextrous, and Learning Capabilities. Public Performance & Management Review, 1–28. DOI: 10.1080/15309576.2018.1470014
- 40Guay, M. M. (1997). Performance et secteur public: réalités, enjeux et paradoxes. Sainte-Foy: Presses de l’Université Québec.
- 41Guest, D. E. (2011). Human resource management and performance: still searching for some answers. Human resource management journal, 21(1), 3–13. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-8583.2010.00164.x
- 42Hablützel, P. (2013).
Bureaucrates, managers ou concepteurs de systèmes ? L’administration suisse et la direction de l’administration en pleine évolution . In A. Ladner, J.-L. Chappelet, Y. Emery, P. Knoepfel, L. Mader, N. Soguel, & V. F. (Eds.), Manuel d’administration publique suisse (pp. 83–97). Lausanne: Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes. - 43Hartley, J., & Rashman, L. (2018). Innovation and inter-organizational learning in the context of public service reform. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 18(2). DOI: 10.1177/0020852318762309
- 44Hartley, J., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2013). Collaborative innovation: A viable alternative to market competition and organizational entrepreneurship. Public Administration Review, 73(6), 821–830. DOI: 10.1111/puar.12136
- 45Hildén, S., Pekkola, S., Rämö, J., Davila, A., Epstein, M. J., & Manzoni, J. F. (2014). Performance measurement and management control: Behavioral implications and human actions. 28, 177–202. DOI: 10.1108/S1479-3512_2014_0000028015
- 46Hood, C. (1991). A Public Management for all Seasons. Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
- 47Jay, J. (2013). Navigating Paradox as a Mechanism of Change and Innovation in Hybrid Organizations. The Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 137–159. DOI: 10.5465/amj.2010.0772
- 48Kouadio, A.-B. (2019). L’engagement des employés publics dans un contexte post-bureaucratique: quelles ancres dominantes pour quelle publicitude? (Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)) University of Lausanne: Lausanne.
- 49Kuhlmann, S. (2010). Performance Measurement in European local governments: a comparative analysis of reform experiences in Great Britain, France, Sweden and Germany. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76(2), 331–345. DOI: 10.1177/0020852310372050
- 50Ladner, A., Soguel, N., Emery, Y., Weerts, S., & Nahrath, S. (2019). Swiss Public Administration. Making the State Work Successfully: Palgrave Mcmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-92381-9
- 51Lægreid, P., Roness, P. G., & Verhoest, K. (2011). Explaining the innovative culture and activities of state agencies. Organization Studies, 32(10), 1321–1347. DOI: 10.1177/0170840611416744
- 52Lember, V., Kattel, R., & Tõnurist, P. (2018). Technological capacity in the public sector: The case of Estonia. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(2), 214–230. DOI: 10.1177/0020852317735164
- 53Lewis, J. M., Ricard, L. M., & Klijn, E. H. (2018). How innovation drivers, networking and leadership shape public sector innovation capacity. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(2), 288–307. DOI: 10.1177/0020852317694085
- 54Maijanen, P., & Jantunen, A. (2016). Dynamics of dynamic capabilities – the case of public broadcasting. International Journal of Business Excellence, 9(2), 135–155. DOI: 10.1504/IJBEX.2016.074850
- 55Meijer, A. (2018). Public Innovation Capacity: Developing and Testing a Self-Assessment Survey Instrument. International Journal of Public Administration, 1–11. DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2018.1498102
- 56Miao, Q., Newman, A., Schwarz, G., & Cooper, B. (2018). How Leadership and Public Service Motivation Enhance Innovative Behavior. Public Administration Review, 78(1), 71–81. DOI: 10.1111/puar.12839
- 57Moore, M., & Hartley, J. (2008). Innovations in governance. Public Management Review, 10(1), 3–20. DOI: 10.1080/14719030701763161
- 58Moynihan, D. P., & Van Wart, M. (2013). Lessons from Leadership Theory and the Contemporary Challenges of Leaders. Public Administration Review, 73(4), 553–565. DOI: 10.1111/puar.12069
- 59Newnham, L. (2018). The relationship between workplace innovation and organizational culture: a case study of a Victorian public sector organization. (Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)), RMIT University, Melbourne.
- 60Olsen, J. P. (2006). Maybe it is time to rediscover bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 1–24. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mui027
- 61Ongaro, E. (2009). Public Management Reform and Modernization. Cheltemham, UK: Edward Elgar. DOI: 10.4337/9781849802284
- 62Osborne, S., Brandsen, T., Mele, V., Nemec, J., & Flemig, S. (2019). Risking innovation. Understanding risk and public service innovation—evidence from a four nation study. Public Money & Management, 1–11. DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2019.1621051
- 63Osborne, S., & Brown, L. (2013). The handbook of innovation in public services. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: 10.4337/9781849809757
- 64Osborne, S. P. (2006). The New Public Governance? Public Management Review, 8(3), 377–387. DOI: 10.1080/14719030600853022
- 65Piening, E. P. (2013). Dynamic Capabilities in Public Organizations: A Literature Review and Research Agenda. Public Management Review, 15(2), 209–245. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2012.708358
- 66Pieterse, A. N., Van Knippenberg, D., Schippers, M., & Stam, D. (2010). Transformational and transactional leadership and innovative behavior: The moderating role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(4), 609–623. DOI: 10.1002/job.650
- 67Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- 68Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public Management Reform: a Comparative analysis. Third edition Oxford University Press.
- 69Rainey, H. G. (2011). Sampling Designs for Analyzing Publicness: Alternatives and Their Strengths and Weaknesses. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(3), 321–345. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mur029
- 70Schedler, K. (1995). New Public Management. Berne: Haupt.
- 71Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2016).
Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector . In J. T. P. Triantafillou (Ed.), Enhancing Public Innovation by Transforming Public Governance (pp. 115–116). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781316105337 - 72Stoker, G. (2006). Public Value Management. American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 41–57. DOI: 10.1177/0275074005282583
- 73Svensson, P. O., & Hartmann, R. K. (2018). Policies to promote user innovation: Makerspaces and clinician innovation in Swedish hospitals. Research Policy, 47(1), 277–288. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2017.11.006
- 74Thom, N., & Ritz, A. (2013). Le management public. Concepts innovants dans le secteur public. Lausanne: Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes.
- 75Townsend, W. (2013). Innovation and the perception of risk in the public sector. The International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 5(3), 21–34.
- 76van Acker, W., & Bouckaert, G. (2018). What makes public sector innovations survive? An exploratory study of the influence of feedback, accountability and learning. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(2), 249–268. DOI: 10.1177/0020852317700481
- 77Van Meerkerk, I., & Edelenbos, J. (2014). Policy Sciences, 47, 3. DOI: 10.1007/s11077-013-9181-2
- 78Vickers, I., Lyon, F., Sepulveda, L., & McMullin, C. (2017). Public service innovation and multiple institutional logics: The case of hybrid social enterprise providers of health and wellbeing. Research Policy, 46(10), 1755–1768. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2017.08.003
- 79Weber, M. (1956). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Tübingen, Germany: Mohr.