References
- 1Akhmetshina, E. R., & Mustafin, A. N. (2015). Public-private Partnership as a Tool for Development of Innovative Economy. Procedia Economics and Finance, 24, 35–40. DOI: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00609-7
- 2Anthes, G. (2015). Estonia: A Model for e-Government. Commun. ACM, 58(6), 18–20. DOI: 10.1145/2754951
- 3Axelsson, K., Lindgren, I., & Melin, U. (2010). Exploring the importance of citizen participation and involvement in e-government projects: Practice, incentives, and organization. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 4(4), 299–321. DOI: 10.1108/17506161011081309
- 4Bagozzi, R. P. (2007). The Legacy of the Technology Acceptance Model and a Proposal for a Paradigm Shift. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(4). DOI: 10.17705/1jais.00122
- 5Brüesch, C., Mertes, A., Flick Witzig, M., Giger, M., & Steinbrecher, M. (2017).
Digitale Verwaltung: Eine Studie des Institutes für Verwaltungs-Management (IVM) und KPMG Schweiz . Winterthur: ZHAW. - 6Buess, M., Iselin, M., & Bieri, O. (2017).
Nationale E-Government-Studie 2017. E-Government in der Schweiz aus Sicht der Bevölkerung, der Unternehmen und der Verwaltung . Luzern: Demo SCOPE AG/Interface Politikstudien Forschung Beratung GmbH. - 7Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. DOI: 10.2307/249008
- 8Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
- 9Deakin, M., Lombardi, P., & Cooper, I. (2011). The IntelCities Community of Practice: The Capacity-Building, Co-Design, Evaluation, and Monitoring of E-Government Services. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 17–38. DOI: 10.1080/10630732.2011.601107
- 10E-Government Schweiz. (2018). Etablierung einer national und international gültigen elektronischen Identität (E-ID). Retrieved from:
https://www.egovernment.ch/de/umsetzung/schwerpunktplan/elektronische-identitat/ [Last retrieved on 05.08.2018]. - 11Eidgenössisches Justiz- und Polizeidepartement EJPD. (2017). Staatlich anerkannte elektronische Identifizierungsmittel (E-ID). Retrieved from:
https://www.schweizerpass.admin.ch/dam/data/pass/aktuell/konsultation/konzept-d.pdf [Last retrieved on 05.08.2018]. - 12Engels, B., Wallner, C., Ammann, M., & Schnell, F. (2018).
Max Weber in der Digitalisierungsfalle . Zürich: Avenir Suisse. - 13Fox, M. C., Ericsson, K. A., & Best, R. (2011). Do procedures for verbal reporting of thinking have to be reactive? A meta-analysis and recommendations for best reporting methods. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 316–344. DOI: 10.1037/a0021663
- 14Frey, F., Rogg, J., & Schmid, C. (2017).
Digitale Verwaltung Schweiz: Wie gelingt der Aufstieg zur Spitze? Zürich: The Boston Consulting Group AG. - 15Friedrich, C. (2009).
Verwaltungsmodernisierung als Standortfaktor . In: Hey, M., & Engert, K. (eds.), Komplexe Regionen – Regionenkomplexe: Multiperspektivische Ansätze zur Beschreibung regionaler und urbaner Dynamiken, 137–151. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-531-91619-4_8 - 16Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2012). Towards a smart State? Inter-agency collaboration, information integration, and beyond. Inf Polity, 17(1), 269–280. DOI: 10.3233/IP-2012-000287
- 17Gil-Garcia, J. R., Helbig, N., & Ojo, A. (2014). Being smart: Emerging technologies and innovation in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 31, 11–18. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2014.09.001
- 18Harsh, A., & Ichalkaranje, N. (2015).
Transforming e-Government to Smart Government: A South Australian Perspective . In: Jain, L. C., Patnaik, S., & Ichalkaranje, N. (eds.), Intelligent Computing, Communication and Devices, 9–16. New Delhi: Springer India. DOI: 10.1007/978-81-322-2012-1_2 - 19Hansen, M., & Meints, M. (2006). Digitale Identitäten — Überblick und aktuelle Trends. Datenschutz und Datensicherheit – DuD, 30(9), 543–547. DOI: 10.1007/s11623-006-0139-9
- 20Kanton Schaffhausen. (2017). Procivis und der Kanton Schaffhausen präsentieren eID Lösung am eGovernment Day Schaffhausen. Retrieved from:
https://www.sh.ch/index.php?id=316&no_cache=1&tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=3440&cHash=7320b8df237456f9e51f8fd5b3f6462b [Last retrieved on 03.04.2018]. - 21Kanton Schaffhausen. (2018). Schaffhauser eID+. Retrieved from:
https://www.sh.ch/Schaffhauser-eID.5016.0.html [Last retrieved on 04.03.2018]. - 22Kistler, E., & Jaufmann, D. (eds.) (1990). Mensch — Gesellschaft Technik: Orientierungspunkte in der Technikakzeptanzdebatte (Schriftenreihe Technik, Wirtschaft und die Gesellschaft von Morgen). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Retrieved from:
www.springer.com/de/book/9783810007315 [Last retrieved on 04.03.2018]. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-322-95524-1 - 23KSD Schaffhausen. (2018). E-Government Day Schaffhausen 2017. Retrieved from:
http://egov.sh.ch/ [Last retrieved on 28.10.2018]. - 24Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. T. (2003). The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12(50), 752–800. DOI: 10.17705/1CAIS.01250
- 25Loeffler, E. (2015).
Co-production of public services and outcomes . In: Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (eds.), Public Management and Governance, 319–336. New York: Routledge. - 26Lunceford, B. (2009). Reconsidering Technology Adoption and Resistance: Observations of a Semi-Luddite. Explorations in Media Ecology, 8, 29–48.
- 27Marche, S., & McNiven, J. D. (2003). E-government and e-governance: The future isn’t what it used to be. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L’Administration, 20(1), 74–86. DOI: 10.1111/j.1936-4490.2003.tb00306.x
- 28McDermott, P. (2010). Building open government. Government Information Quarterly, 27(4), 401–413. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2010.07.002
- 29OECD. (2012). Recommendation of the Council on Principles for Public Governance of Public-Private Partnerships. Retrieved from:
http://www.oecd.org/gov/budgeting/oecd-principles-for-public-governance-of-public-private-partnerships.htm [Last retrieved on 28.10.2018]. - 30Procivis AG. (2018). eID+ is…. Retrieved from:
https://procivis.ch/eid/what-is-eid/ [Last retrieved on 15.05.2018]. - 31Savoldelli, A., Codagnone, C., & Misuraca, G. (2014). Understanding the e-government paradox: Learning from literature and practice on barriers to adoption. Government Information Quarterly, 31, S63–S71. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.008
- 32Schedler, K., & Demaj, L. (2017, January 11). Verwaltung von morgen. Neue Zürcher Zeitung NZZ, 10.
- 33Scholl, H. J., & Scholl, M. C. (2014). Smart Governance: A Roadmap for Research and Practice. In: iConference 2014 Proceedings, 163–176. DOI: 10.9776/14060
- 34Steen, M., Manschot, M., & De Koning, N. (2011). Benefits of co-design in service design projects. International Journal of Design, 5(2).
- 35Torres, L., Pina, V., & Acerete, B. (2005). E-government developments on delivering public services among EU cities. Government Information Quarterly, 22(2), 217–238. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2005.02.004
- 36United Nations. (2014). E-Government Survey 2014: E-Government for the Future We Want. Retrieved form:
https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/Portals/egovkb/Documents/un/2014-Survey/E-Gov_Complete_Survey-2014.pdf [Last retrieved on 28.10.2018]. - 37United Nations. (2018). UN E-Government Survey 2018. Retrieved from:
https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2018 [Last retrieved on 28.10.2018]. - 38Von Lucke, J. (2017).
Smart Government – Intelligent vernetztes Regierungs- und Verwaltungshandeln . In: Hill, H., Kugelmann, D., & Martini, M. (eds.), Perspektiven der digitalen Lebenswelt, 99–124. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG. DOI: 10.5771/9783845283982-99 - 39World Economic Forum. (2018). Global Information Technology Report 2016: Report Highlights. Retrieved from:
http://reports.weforum.org/global-information-technology-report-2016/report-highlights/ [Last retrieved on 28.10.2018].