Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Robust Negative Relationship Between Self-Reports of Social Skills and Performance Measures of Social Intelligence Cover

A Robust Negative Relationship Between Self-Reports of Social Skills and Performance Measures of Social Intelligence

Open Access
|Apr 2024

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Participant Demographics in Studies 1 and 2.

STUDY 1STUDY 2
Sex
      Female221 (44%)220 (52%)
      Male284 (56%)197 (47%)
      Prefer not to respondN/A4 (1%)
Race/Ethnicity
      White325 (64%)216 (51%)
      Black69 (14%)70 (17%)
      Hispanic50 (10%)44 (10%)
      Asian49 (10%)100 (24%)
      Other12 (2%)21 (5%)
      Prefer not to respondN/A3 (1%)
Age (years)
      Mean35.831.7
      Standard Deviation10.711.0

[i] Note. Participants in Study 2 could select more than one race/ethnicity.

Table 2

Descriptive Statistics and Correlation Matrix for Study 1.

MSD12345678
1. Self-rated Social Skill2.91.1
2. SST70.414.5.19.67
3. RMET77.513.8.25.47.79
4. STEU-B62.914.6.20.48.52.59
5. SI Composite70.311.6.26.77.88.77.85
6. Vocabulary80.724.5.16.35.39.44.48.64
7. Matrix Reasoning54.630.7.15.48.38.47.53.34.56
8. IQ Composite69.122.4.19.51.47.56.61.82.82.67

[i] Note. N = 505; All correlations are statistically significant at p < .05; Coefficient alpha is reported in italics on the main diagonal.

spo-4-1-78-g1.png
Figure 1

Social Intelligence Scores at Each Level of Self-rated Social Skill (Study 1; N = 505).

Note. Error bars display 95% CI.

Table 3

Multiple Regression Results from Studies 1 and 2.

OUTCOME: SOCIAL INTELLIGENCE TASK PERFORMANCEB (SE)β95% CIR2
Study 1 (N = 505).40***
      IQ Composite  0.30 (0.02)  .59***  .52, .65
      Self-rated Social Skill–1.61 (0.37)–.16***–.22, –.09
Study 2 (N = 422).45***
      IQ Composite  0.47 (0.03)  .56***  .48, .64
      Predicted SI Score  0.17 (0.05)  .14***  .06, .21
      Self-rated Social Skill–3.12 (0.57)–.21***–.28, –.13

[i] Note. Study 1: F(2, 502) = 167.80, p < .001; Study 2: F(3, 418) = 115.70, p < .001; 𝛽 = standardized regression coefficient; B = unstandardized regression coefficient; SE = standard error; *** p < .001.

Table 4

Correlation Matrix and Descriptive Statistics for Study 2.

MSD12345678910
1. Self-rated Social Skill3.11.2
2. Self-rated Intelligence3.51.0  .41
3. SST70.222.7.29.11.69
4. RMET70.221.8.35.13.53.66
5. STEU-B63.721.4.28–.06.53.56.64
6. SI Composite68.018.3.37.12.83.84.83.83
7. Vocabulary59.325.1.26–.02.31.37.41.43.78
8. Matrix Reasoning58.427.5.28–.05.56.47.53.62.39.72
9. IQ Composite58.821.9.32–.04.53.50.56.64.82.85.81
10. Predicted SI Score67.014.4.16.20.15.13.08.14.05.07.07
11. Predicted IQ Score56.218.5.12.29.04.02.01.03.36.24.35.52

[i] Note. N = 422; bold values indicate p < .05; coefficient alpha is reported in italics on the main diagonal.

spo-4-1-78-g2.png
Figure 2

Social and General Intelligence Scores at Each Level of Comparative Self-Rating for Social Skills and Intelligence (Study 2; N = 422).

Note. Error bars display 95% CI.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/spo.78 | Journal eISSN: 2752-5341
Language: English
Submitted on: Jan 31, 2024
|
Accepted on: Apr 3, 2024
|
Published on: Apr 18, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Patrick R. Heck, Matt I. Brown, Christopher F. Chabris, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.