References
- Atanasiu, R., Ruotsalainen, R., & Khapova, S. N. (2023). “A simple rule is born: How CEOs distill heuristics.” Journal of Management Studies, 60, 1064–1104. DOI: 10.1111/joms.12808
- Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2016). Blindspot: Hidden biases of good people. Bantam.
- Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54(7), 462–479. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.462
- Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
- Blanton, H., Jaccard, J., Klick, J., Mellers, B., Mitchell, G., & Tetlock, P. E. (2009). Strong claims and weak evidence: Reassessing the predictive validity of the IAT. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 567–582. DOI: 10.1037/a0014665
- Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables (Vol. 210). John Wiley & Sons. DOI: 10.1002/9781118619179
- Bruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64(2), 123–152. DOI: 10.1037/h0043805
- Campbell, M. R., & Brauer, M. (2021). Is discrimination widespread? Testing assumptions about bias on a university campus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(4), 756–777. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000983
- Cantu, E., & Jussim, L. (2021). Microaggressions, questionable science, and free speech. Texas Review of Law and Politics, 26, 217–268.
- Carmines, E., & Nassar, R. (2022). Comparing stereotypes across racial and partisan lines: a study in affective polarisation. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 32(3), 727–738. DOI: 10.1080/17457289.2021.1942015
- Cole, S., & Balcetis, E. (2021).
Motivated perception for self-regulation: How visual experience serves and is served by goals . In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 64, pp. 129–186). Academic Press. DOI: 10.1016/bs.aesp.2021.04.003 - Corneille, O., & Hütter, M. (2020). Implicit? What do you mean? A comprehensive review of the delusive implicitness construct in attitude research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 24(3), 212–232. DOI: 10.1177/1088868320911325
- Covers. (Jan. 8, 2024). Washington Huskies vs Michigan Wolverines Box Score on Jan 08, 2024. Retrieved from:
https://www.covers.com/sport/football/ncaaf/boxscore/302134 - Cyrus-Lai, W., Tierney, W., du Plessis, C., Nguyen, M., Schaerer, M., Giulia Clemente, E., & Uhlmann, E. L. (2022). Avoiding Bias in the Search for Implicit Bias. Psychological Inquiry, 33(3), 203–212. DOI: 10.1080/1047840X.2022.2106762
- Czerlinski, J., Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1999).
How good are simple heuristics? . In Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 97–118). Oxford University Press. - Dawes, R. M. (1979). The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. American Psychologist, 34(7), 571–582. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.34.7.571
- Devine, P. G., & Ash, T. L. (2022). Diversity training goals, limitations, and promise: A review of the multidisciplinary literature. Annual Review of Psychology, 73, 403–429. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-060221-122215
- DiDonato, T. E., Ullrich, J., & Krueger, J. I. (2011). Social perception as induction and inference: An integrative model of intergroup differentiation, ingroup favoritism, and differential accuracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(1), 66–83. DOI: 10.1037/a0021051
- Doyen, S., Klein, O., Pichon, C. L., & Cleeremans, A. (2012). Behavioral priming: it’s all in the mind, but whose mind? PloS one, 7(1),
e29081 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029081 - Finnigan, K. M., & Corker, K. S. (2016). Do performance avoidance goals moderate the effect of different types of stereotype threat on women’s math performance? Journal of Research in Personality, 63, 36–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2016.05.009
- Firestone, C., & Scholl, B. J. (2016). Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for “top-down” effects. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39,
e229 . DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X15000965 - Flore, P. C., Mulder, J., & Wicherts, J. M. (2018). The influence of gender stereotype threat on mathematics test scores of Dutch high school students: A registered report. Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 3(2), 140–174. DOI: 10.1080/23743603.2018.1559647
- Forscher, P. S., Lai, C. K., Axt, J. R., Ebersole, C. R., Herman, M., Devine, P. G., & Nosek, B. A. (2019). A meta-analysis of procedures to change implicit measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(3), 522–559. DOI: 10.1037/pspa0000160
- Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual review of psychology, 62, 451–482. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346
- Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
- Hahn, A., Judd, C. M., Hirsh, H. K., & Blair, I. V. (2014). Awareness of implicit attitudes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(3), 1369–1392. DOI: 10.1037/a0035028
- Harvey, J. T. (1998). Heuristic judgment theory. Journal of Economic Issues, 32(1), 47–64. DOI: 10.1080/00213624.1998.11506010
- Hastorf, A. H., & Cantril, H. (1954). They saw a game; A case study. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49(1), 129. DOI: 10.1037/h0057880
- Hjeij, M., & Vilks, A. (2023). A brief history of heuristics: How did research on heuristics evolve? Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–15. DOI: 10.1057/s41599-023-01542-z
- Honeycutt, N., & Jussim, L. (2020). A model of political bias in social science research. Psychological Inquiry, 31(1), 73–85. DOI: 10.1080/1047840X.2020.1722600
- Honeycutt, N., Jussim, L., Careem, A., & Lewis, N. A.
Jr. . (2024). Are STEM faculty biased against female applicants? A robust replication and extension of Moss-Racusin and Colleagues (2012). Registered registration report, in principle acceptance at Metapsychology. - Iyengar, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2015). Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 690–707. DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12152
- Jussim, L. (1991). Social perception and social reality: A reflection-construction model. Psychological review, 98(1), 54. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.98.1.54
- Jussim, L. (2012). Social perception and social reality: Why accuracy dominates bias and self-fulfilling prophecy. USA: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195366600.001.0001
- Jussim, L., Careem, A., Goldberg, Z., Honeycutt, N., & Stevens, S. T. (in press).
IAT scores, racial gaps and scientific gaps . To appear in (J. Krosnick, T. Stark & A. Scott, eds), The Cambridge handbook of implicit bias and racism. Cambridge University Press. - Jussim, L., Crawford, J. T., Anglin, S. M., Stevens, S. T., & Duarte, J. L. (2016). Interpretations and methods: Towards a more effectively self-correcting social psychology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 116–133. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.003
- Kahan, D. M., Hoffman, D., Evans, D., Devins, N., Lucci, E., & Cheng, K. (2016). Ideology or situation sense: An experimental investigation of motivated reasoning and professional judgment. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 164, 349–439.
- Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511809477
- Krueger, J. I., & Funder, D. C. (2004). Towards a balanced social psychology: Causes, consequences, and cures for the problem-seeking approach to social behavior and cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(3), 313–327. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X04000081
- Krueger, J., & Rothbart, M. (1988). Use of categorical and individuating information in making inferences about personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(2), 187. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.55.2.187
- LaPiere, R. T. (1936). Type-rationalizations of group antipathy. Social Forces, 15, 232–237. DOI: 10.2307/2570963
- Lilienfeld, S. O. (2017). Microaggressions: Strong claims, inadequate evidence. Perspectives on psychological science, 12(1), 138–169. DOI: 10.1177/1745691616659391
- Lloyd, M. E. (1990). Gender factors in reviewer recommendations for manuscript publication. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23(4), 539–543. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1990.23-539
- Meehl, P. E. (1978). Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 806–834. DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.46.4.806
- Meehl, P. E. (1990). Why summaries of research on psychological theories are often uninterpretable. Psychological Reports, 66, 195–244. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1990.66.1.195
- Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(41), 16474–16479. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1211286109
- Nødtvedt, K. B., Sjåstad, H., Skard, S. R., Thorbjørnsen, H., & Bavel, J. J. V. (2021). Racial bias in the sharing economy and the role of trust and self-congruence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 27(3), 508–528. DOI: 10.1037/xap0000355
- Paluck, E. L., Porat, R., Clark, C. S., & Green, D. P. (2021). Prejudice reduction: Progress and challenges. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 533–560. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-071620-030619
- Peer, E., & Gamliel, E. (2013). Heuristics and biases in judicial decision making. Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association, 49, 114–118.
- Peyton, K., & Huber, G. A. (2021). Racial resentment, prejudice, and discrimination. The Journal of Politics, 83(4), 1829–1836. DOI: 10.1086/711558
- Quillian, L., Pager, D., Hexel, O., & Midtbøen, A. H. (2017). Meta-analysis of field experiments shows no change in racial discrimination in hiring over time. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(41), 10870–10875. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1706255114
- Sackett, P. R., Hardison, C. M., & Cullen, M. J. (2004). On interpreting stereotype threat as accounting for African American-White differences on cognitive tests. American Psychologist, 59(1), 7–13. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.7
- Schaerer, M., du Plessis, C., Nguyen, M. H. B., van Aert, R. C., Tiokhin, L., Lakens, D., … & Gender Audits Forecasting Collaboration. (2023). On the trajectory of discrimination: A meta-analysis and forecasting survey capturing 44 years of field experiments on gender and hiring decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 179, 104280. DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2023.104280
- Shah, A. K., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). Heuristics made easy: an effort-reduction framework. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 207. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.207
- Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(1), 4–28. DOI: 10.1006/jesp.1998.1373
- Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797
- Sue, D. W., Capodilupo, C. M., Torino, G. C., Bucceri, J. M., Holder, A., Nadal, K. L., & Esquilin, M. (2007). Racial microaggressions in everyday life: Implications for clinical practice. American Psychologist, 62(4), 271. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.62.4.271
- Tappin, B. M., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2020). Bayesian or biased? Analytic thinking and political belief updating. Cognition, 204, 104375. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104375
- Tomeh, D. H., & Sackett, P. R. (2022). On the continued misinterpretation of stereotype threat as accounting for Black-White differences on cognitive tests. Personnel Assessment and Decisions, 8(1), 1–14. DOI: 10.25035/pad.2022.01.001
- Van Baar, J. M., & FeldmanHall, O. (2022). The polarized mind in context: Interdisciplinary approaches to the psychology of political polarization. American Psychologist, 77(3), 394–408. DOI: 10.1037/amp0000814
- Williams, M. T. (2020). Microaggressions: Clarification, evidence, and impact. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(1), 3–26. DOI: 10.1177/1745691619827499
- Williams, W. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2015). National hiring experiments reveal 2: 1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(17), 5360–5365. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1418878112