Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The (Sometimes Misguided) Belief in the Law of Large Numbers Cover
By: Klaus Fiedler  
Open Access
|Jun 2024

References

  1. Bernoulli, J. (1713). Ars conjectandi: Usum & Applicationem Praecedentis Doctrinae in Civilibus, Moralibus & Oeconomicis (in Latin). Translated by Sheynin, Oscar.
  2. Costello, F., & Watts, P. (2019). The rationality of illusory correlation. Psychological Review, 126(3), 437450. DOI: 10.1037/rev0000130
  3. Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. (1989). Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science, 243(4899), 16681674. DOI: 10.1126/science.2648573
  4. De Finetti, B. (1972). Probability, induction, and statistics. New York: Wiley.
  5. Denrell, J. (2005). Why most people disapprove of me: experience sampling in impression formation. Psychological Review, 112(4), 951978. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.951
  6. Denrell, J., & March, J. G. (2001). Adaptation as information restriction: The hot stove effect. Organization Science, 12(5), 523538. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.12.5.523.10092
  7. Denrell, J., & Le Mens, G. (2007). Interdependent sampling and social influence. Psychological Review, 114(2), 398422. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.398
  8. Denrell, J., & Le Mens, G. (2012). Social judgments from adaptive samples. In J. I. Krueger (Ed.), Social judgment and decision making (pp. 151169). Psychology Press.
  9. Denrell, J., & Le Mens, G. (2023). The hot-stove effect. In K. Fiedler, P. Juslin & J. Denrell (Eds.), Sampling in judgment and decision making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781009002042.005
  10. Fazio, R. H., Eiser, J. R., & Shook, N. J. (2004). Attitude formation through exploration: valence asymmetries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(3), 293. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.293
  11. Fiedler, K. (2000). Illusory correlations: A simple associative algorithm provides a convergent account of seemingly divergent paradigms. Review of General Psychology, 4(1), 2558. DOI: 10.1037/1089-2680.4.1.25
  12. Fiedler, K., & Walther, E. (2004). Stereotyping as inductive hypothesis testing. New York: Psychology Press. DOI: 10.4324/9780203641538
  13. Hartwig, M., & Bond, C. F., Jr. (2011). Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments. Psychological Bulletin, 137(4), 643659. DOI: 10.1037/a0023589
  14. Hastie, R., & Park, B. (1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93(3), 258268. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.258
  15. Hütter, M., Niese, Z. A., & Ihmels, M. (2022). Bridging the gap between autonomous and predetermined paradigms: The role of sampling in evaluative learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151(8), 19721998. DOI: 10.1037/xge0001172
  16. Juslin, P., & Olsson, H. (1997). Thurstonian and Brunswikian origins of uncertainty in judgment: A sampling model of confidence in sensory discrimination. Psychological Review, 104(2), 344366. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.344
  17. Klayman, J., & Ha, Y. (1987). Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psychological Review, 94(2), 211228. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.94.2.211
  18. Krueger, J. I. (2008). From social projection to social behaviour. European Review of Social Psychology, 18(1), 135. DOI: 10.1080/10463280701284645
  19. Krueger, J. I., DiDonato, T. E., & Freestone, D. (2012). Social projection can solve social dilemmas. Psychological Inquiry, 23(1), 127. DOI: 10.1080/1047840X.2012.641167
  20. Lang, P., & Bradley, M. M. (2007). The International Affective Picture System (IAPS) in the study of emotion and attention. Handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment, 29, 7073. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780195169157.003.0003
  21. Laplace, P.-S. (1774/1986). Memoir on the probability of the causes of events. Statistical Science, 1, 364378. DOI: 10.1214/ss/1177013621
  22. Le Mens, G., & Denrell, J. (2011). Rational learning and information sampling: On the “naivety” assumption in sampling explanations of judgment biases. Psychological Review, 118(2), 379392. DOI: 10.1037/a0023010
  23. Li, H., Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1996). Reliability of measurement in psychology: From Spearman-Brown to maximal reliability. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 98107. DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.98
  24. Meehl, P. E. (1956). Clinical versus actuarial prediction. In Proceedings of the 1955 invitational conference on testing problems (pp. 136141). Princeton: Educational Testing Service.
  25. Moore, D. A., & Healy, P. J. (2008). The trouble with overconfidence. Psychological Review, 115(2), 502517. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.502
  26. Prager, J., & Fiedler, K. (2021). Forming impressions from self-truncated samples of traits-interplay of Thurstonian and Brunswikian sampling effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 121(3), 474. DOI: 10.1037/pspa0000274
  27. Prager, J., Fiedler, K., & McCaughey, L. (2023). Thurstonian Uncertainty in Self-Determined Judgment and Decision Making (pp. 311333). In K. Fiedler, P. Juslin & J. Denrell (Eds.) Sampling in judgment and decision making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781009002042.018
  28. Prager, J., Krueger, J. I., & Fiedler, K. (2018). Towards a deeper understanding of impression formation—New insights gained from a cognitive-ecological perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(3), 379. DOI: 10.1037/pspa0000123
  29. Robbins, J. M., & Krueger, J. I. (2005). Social projection to ingroups and outgroups: A review and meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(1), 3247. DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0901_3
  30. Savage, L. J. (1954). The foundations of statistics. New York: Wiley.
  31. Snyder, M., & Swann, W. B. (1978). Hypothesis-testing processes in social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(11), 12021212. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.36.11.1202
  32. Surowiecki, J. (2005). The wisdom of crowds. New York: Anchor.
  33. Vrij, A., Granhag, P. A., Mann, S., & Leal, S. (2011). Outsmarting the liars: Toward a cognitive lie detection approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(1), 2832. DOI: 10.1177/0963721410391245
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/spo.74 | Journal eISSN: 2752-5341
Language: English
Submitted on: Dec 17, 2023
|
Accepted on: May 24, 2024
|
Published on: Jun 18, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Klaus Fiedler, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.