Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Performance and Likability of the Federal Council of Switzerland Is Assessed More Positively than That of its Members on Average. Cover

The Performance and Likability of the Federal Council of Switzerland Is Assessed More Positively than That of its Members on Average.

Open Access
|Dec 2022

References

  1. Anderson, N. H. (1974). Cognitive Algebra: Integration Theory Applied to Social Attribution. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 7(C), 1101. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60035-0
  2. Anderson, N. H., Lindner, R., & Lopes, L. L. (1973). Integration theory applied to judgments of group attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26(3), 400408. DOI: 10.1037/h0034441
  3. Ariely, D. (2001). Seeing Sets: Representation by Statistical Properties. Psychological Science, 12(2), 157162. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00327
  4. Bauer, B. (2009). Does Stevens’s power law for brightness extend to perceptual brightness averaging? Psychological Record, 59(2), 171186. DOI: 10.1007/BF03395657
  5. Choi, Y. M., & Chong, S. C. (2020). Effects of Selective Attention on Mean-Size Computation: Weighted Averaging and Perceptual Enlargement. Psychological Science, 31(10), 12611271. DOI: 10.1177/0956797620943834
  6. Chong, S. C., & Treisman, A. (2005). Statistical processing: Computing the average size in perceptual groups. Vision Research, 45(7), 891900. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.10.004
  7. Dardanelli, P. (2010). Federal democracy in Switzerland. Federal Democracies, 142159. DOI: 10.4324/9780203857571-14/FEDERAL-DEMOCRACY-SWITZERLAND-PAOLO-DARDANELLI
  8. De Fockert, J. W., & Marchant, A. P. (2008). Attention modulates set representation by statistical properties. Perception and Psychophysics, 70(5), 789794. DOI: 10.3758/PP.70.5.789
  9. Demeyere, N., Rzeskiewicz, A., Humphreys, K. A., & Humphreys, G. W. (2008). Automatic statistical processing of visual properties in simultanagnosia. Neuropsychologia, 46(11), 28612864. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.05.014
  10. Efferson, C., Lalive, R., & Fehr, E. (2008). The coevolution of cultural groups and ingroup favoritism. Science, 321(5897), 18441849. DOI: 10.1126/science.1155805
  11. Federal Council. (n.d.). Retrieved February 21, 2022, from https://www.admin.ch/gov/en/start/federal-council.html
  12. Hemmerich, W. (2017). StatistikGuru: Korrelationen statistisch vergleichen. Retrieved from https://statistikguru.de/rechner/korrelationen-vergleichen.html
  13. Hewstone, M., Rubin, M., & Willis, H. (2003). Intergroup Bias. 575604. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135109
  14. Martijn, C., Spears, R., Van Der Pligt, J., & Jakobs, E. (1992). Negativity and positivity effects in person perception and inference: Ability versus morality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22(5), 453463. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2420220504
  15. Miller, C. T., & Felicio, D. M. (1990). Person-positivity bias: Are individuals liked better than groups? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26(5), 408420. DOI: 10.1016/0022-1031(90)90066-U
  16. Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2016). Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion. 5(4), 296320. DOI: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_2
  17. Sears, D. O. (1983). The person-positivity bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(2), 233250. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.44.2.233
  18. Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1987). Social Judgment and Social Memory: The Role of Cue Diagnosticity in Negativity, Positivity, and Extremity Biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(4), 689699. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.52.4.689
  19. Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and Extremity Biases in Impression Formation: A Review of Explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105(1), 131142. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.105.1.131
  20. Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1992). Caught in the act: When impressions based on highly diagnostic behaviours are resistant to contradiction. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22(5), 435452. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2420220503
  21. van Osch, Y., Blanken, I., Meijs, M. H. J., & van Wolferen, J. (2015). A Group’s Physical Attractiveness Is Greater Than the Average Attractiveness of Its Members. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(4), 559574. DOI: 10.1177/0146167215572799
  22. Vatter, A. (2020). Der Bundesrat : Die Schweizer Regierung (Vol. 12). NZZ Libro ein Imprint der Schwabe Verlagsgruppe AG. DOI: 10.5771/9783748906810-201
  23. Walker, D., & Vul, E. (2014). Hierarchical Encoding Makes Individuals in a Group Seem More Attractive. Psychological Science, 25(1), 230235. DOI: 10.1177/0956797613497969
  24. Webster, J., Kay, P., & Webster, M. A. (2014). Perceiving the average hue of color arrays. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 31(4), A283. DOI: 10.1364/JOSAA.31.00A283
  25. Whitney, D., & Yamanashi Leib, A. (2018). Ensemble Perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 69(1), 105129. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044232
  26. Willis, R. (1960). Stimulus pooling and social perception. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60(3), 365373. DOI: 10.1037/h0048912
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/spo.45 | Journal eISSN: 2752-5341
Language: English
Submitted on: Mar 10, 2022
|
Accepted on: Nov 21, 2022
|
Published on: Dec 22, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Claude Messner, Mattia Carnelli, Patrick Stefan Höhener, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.