References
- Bardi, L., Regolin, L., & Simion, F. (2011). Biological motion preference in humans at birth: Role of dynamic and configural properties. Developmental Science, 14(2), 353–359. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00985.x
- Biro, S., Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (2007).
The role of behavioral cues in understanding goal-directed actions in infancy . In C. von Hofsten & K. Rosander (Eds.), Progress in Brain Research, 164, 303–322. Elsevier. DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6123(07)64017-5 - Csibra, G. (2008). Goal attribution to inanimate agents by 6.5-month-old infants. Cognition, 107(2), 705–717. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.08.001
- Csibra, G., Gergely, G., Bíró, S., Koós, O., & Brockbank, M. (1999). Goal attribution without agency cues: The perception of ‘pure reason’ in infancy. Cognition, 72(3), 237–267. DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00039-6
- Daum, M. M., Attig, M., Gunawan, R., Prinz, W., & Gredebäck, G. (2012). Actions seen through babies’ eyes: A dissociation between looking time and predictive gaze. Frontiers in Psychology, 3. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00370
- Daum, M. M., Gampe, A., Wronski, C., & Attig, M. (2016). Effects of movement distance, duration, velocity, and type on action prediction in 12-month-olds. Infant Behavior and Development, 43, 75–84. DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2016.03.002
- Daum, M. M., & Gredebäck, G. (2011a). Spatial cueing by referential human gestures, arrows and mechanical devices. International Journal of Mind, Brain and Cognition, 2(1–2), 113–126.
- Daum, M. M., & Gredebäck, G. (2011b). The development of grasping comprehension in infancy: Covert shifts of attention caused by referential actions. Experimental Brain Research, 208(2), 297–307. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2479-9
- Daum, M. M., Ulber, J., & Gredebäck, G. (2013). The development of pointing perception in infancy: Effects of communicative signals on covert shifts of attention. Developmental Psychology, 49(10), 1898–1908. DOI: 10.1037/a0031111
- Daum, M. M., Wronski, C., Harms, A., & Gredebäck, G. (2016). Action perception in infancy: The plasticity of 7-month-olds’ attention to grasping actions. Experimental Brain Research, 234(9), 2465–2478. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4651-3
- Driver, J., Davis, G., Ricciardelli, P., Kidd, P., Maxwell, E., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1999). Gaze perception triggers reflexive visuospatial orienting. Visual Cognition, 6(5), 509–540. DOI: 10.1080/135062899394920
- Falck-Ytter, T., Gredebäck, G., & Hofsten, C. von. (2006). Infants predict other people’s action goals. Nature Neuroscience, 9(7), 878–879. DOI: 10.1038/nn1729
- Farroni, T., Massaccesi, S., Pividori, D., & Johnson, M. H. (2004). Gaze following in newborns. Infancy, 5(1), 39–60. DOI: 10.1207/s15327078in0501_2
- Fischer, M. H., Prinz, J., & Lotz, K. (2008). Grasp cueing shows obligatory attention to action goals. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(6), 860–868. DOI: 10.1080/17470210701623738
- Flavell, J. H., Everett, B. A., Croft, K., & Flavell, E. R. (1981). Young children’s knowledge about visual perception: Further evidence for the Level 1–Level 2 distinction. Developmental Psychology, 17(1), 99–103. DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.17.1.99
- Gergely, G., & Csibra, G. (2003). Teleological reasoning in infancy: The naïve theory of rational action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(7), 287–292. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00128-1
- Gredebäck, G., & Daum, M. M. (2015). The microstructure of action perception in infancy: Decomposing the temporal structure of social information processing. Child Development Perspectives, 9(2), 79–83. DOI: 10.1111/cdep.12109
- Gredebäck, G., Johnson, S., & von Hofsten, C. (2009). Eye Tracking in Infancy Research. Developmental Neuropsychology, 35(1), 1–19. DOI: 10.1080/87565640903325758
- Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. The American Journal of Psychology, 57(2), 243–259. DOI: 10.2307/1416950
- Hernik, M., Fearon, P., & Csibra, G. (2014). Action anticipation in human infants reveals assumptions about anteroposterior body-structure and action. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281(1781), 20133205. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.3205
- Hood, B. M., Willen, J. D., & Driver, J. (1998). Adult’s eyes trigger shifts of visual attention in human infants. Psychological Science, 9(2), 131–134. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00024
- IBM Corp. Released 2020.
IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 27.0 . Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. - Jakobsen, K. V., Frick, J. E., & Simpson, E. A. (2013). Look Here! The development of attentional orienting to symbolic cues. Journal of Cognition and Development, 14(2), 229–249. DOI: 10.1080/15248372.2012.666772
- JASP Team. (2021). JASP (Version 0.16) [Computer software].
- Johnson, M. H., Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. K. (1991). Components of visual orienting in early infancy: Contingency learning, anticipatory looking, and disengaging. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3(4), 335–344. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.1991.3.4.335
- Johnson, M. H., Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. K. (1994). Facilitation of saccades toward a covertly attended location in early infancy. Psychological Science, 5(2), 90–93. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00636.x
- Johnson, S. C., Bolz, M., Carter, E., Mandsanger, J., Teichner, A., & Zettler, P. (2008). Calculating the attentional orientation of an unfamiliar agent in infancy. Cognitive Development, 23(1), 24–37. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2007.09.002
- Johnson, S. C., Slaughter, V., & Carey, S. (1998). Whose gaze will infants follow? The elicitation of gaze-following in 12-month-olds. Developmental Science, 1(2), 233–238. DOI: 10.1111/1467-7687.00036
- Kamewari, K., Kato, M., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., & Hiraki, K. (2005). Six-and-a-half-month-old children positively attribute goals to human action and to humanoid-robot motion. Cognitive Development, 20(2), 303–320. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2005.04.004
- Kanakogi, Y., & Itakura, S. (2011). Developmental correspondence between action prediction and motor ability in early infancy. Nature Communications, 2(1), 1–6. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1342
- Kuhlmeier, V. A., Troje, N. F., & Lee, V. (2010). Young Infants Detect the Direction of Biological Motion in Point-Light Displays. Infancy, 15(1), 83–93. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-7078.2009.00003.x
- Langdon, R., & Smith, P. (2005). Spatial cueing by social versus nonsocial directional signals. Visual Cognition, 12(8), 1497–1527. DOI: 10.1080/13506280444000805
- Leslie, A. M. (1995).
A theory of agency . In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A. J. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 121–149). Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press. - Luo, Y. (2011). Three-month-old infants attribute goals to a non-human agent. Developmental Science, 14(2), 453–460. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00995.x
- Luo, Y., & Baillargeon, R. (2005). Can a Self-Propelled Box Have a Goal?: Psychological Reasoning in 5-Month-Old Infants. Psychological Science, 16(8), 601–608. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01582.x
- Luo, Y., Kaufman, L., & Baillargeon, R. (2009). Young infants’ reasoning about physical events involving inert and self-propelled objects. Cognitive Psychology, 58(4), 441–486. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.11.001
- Lycan, W. (1999).
Intentionality . In R. Wilson & F. Keil (Eds.), MIT Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science (pp. 413–415). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. - MATLAB. (2007).
version R207a . Natick, Massachusetts: The MathWorks Inc. - Phillips, B. (2019). Seeing Seeing. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 1–20. DOI: 10.1111/phpr.12636
- Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of Attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(1), 3–25. DOI: 10.1080/00335558008248231
- Premack, D. (1990). The infant’s theory of self-propelled objects. Cognition, 36(1), 1–16. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(90)90051-K
- Qian, Q., Wang, X., Song, M., & Wang, F. (2017).
Gazes Induce Similar Sequential Effects as Arrows in a Target Discrimination Task . In Z. Shi, B. Goertzel, & J. Feng (Eds.), Intelligence Science I (pp. 57–65). Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-68121-4_6 - Ristic, J., & Kingstone, A. (2005). Taking control of reflexive social attention. Cognition, 94(3), B55–B65. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.04.005
- Rohlfing, K. J., Longo, M. R., & Bertenthal, B. I. (2012). Dynamic pointing triggers shifts of visual attention in young infants. Developmental Science, 15(3), 426–435. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01139.x
- Santos, N. S., David, N., Bente, G., & Vogeley, K. (2008). Parametric induction of animacy experience. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(2), 425–437. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.012
- Schlottmann, A., & Ray, E. (2010). Goal attribution to schematic animals: Do 6-month-olds perceive biological motion as animate? Developmental Science, 13(1), 1–10. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00854.x
- Shimizu, Y. A., & Johnson, S. C. (2004). Infants’ attribution of a goal to a morphologically unfamiliar agent. Developmental Science, 7(4), 425–430. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00362.x
- Simion, F., Regolin, L., & Bulf, H. (2008). A predisposition for biological motion in the newborn baby. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(2), 809–813. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0707021105
- Woodward, A. L. (1998). Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor’s reach. Cognition, 69(1), 1–34. DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00058-4
- Wronski, C., & Daum, M. M. (2014). Spatial orienting following dynamic cues in infancy: Grasping hands versus inanimate objects. Developmental Psychology, 50(8), 2020–2029. DOI: 10.1037/a0037155
- Yoon, J. M. D., & Johnson, S. C. (2009). Biological motion displays elicit social behavior in 12-month-olds. Child Development, 80(4), 1069–1075. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01317.x