References
- 1Aktaş, D. 2026.
‘The recursive formations of mixedness and belonging: Race, religion, secularism, and Christian-Muslim intimacies’ . In: Moyaert, M, Aktaş, D, Schrijvers, LL and van den Brandt, N (eds.) Mixed intimacies in postcolonial Europe: Race, religion and gender. London: Bloomsbury, forthcoming. - 2Arweck, E and Nesbitt, E. 2010. ‘Plurality at close quarters’. Journal of Religion in Europe, 3(1): 155–182. DOI: 10.1163/187489210X12597383785329
- 3Asad, T. 2003. Formations of the secular: Christianity, Islam, modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- 4Aune, K. 2011. ‘Much less religious, a little more spiritual: The religious and spiritual views of third-wave feminists in the UK’. Feminist Review, 97(1): 32–55. Available at:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/41288846 . DOI: 10.1057/fr.2010.33 - 5Barbour, IG. 2000. When science meets religion: enemies, strangers, or partners? San Francisco: HarperOne.
- 6Blanes, RL and Oustinova-Stjepanovic, G. (eds.) 2017. Being Godless: Ethnographies of atheism and non-religion. New York: Berghahn Books. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvw048p3
- 7Bracke, S. 2008. ‘Conjugating the modern/religious, conceptualizing female religious agency: Contours of a ‘post-secular’ conjuncture’. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(6): 51–67. DOI: 10.1177/0263276408095544
- 8Bruce, S. 2002.
‘God is Dead: Secularization in the West’ . Religion in the Modern World. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell - 9Catto, R, Shillitoe, R, Jones, SH, Kaden, T and Elsdon-Baker, F. 2023. ‘The social imaginary of science and nonreligion: Narrating the connection in the Anglophone West’. Secularism and Nonreligion, 12(1): article
3 . DOI: 10.5334/snr.163 - 10Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (CBS). 2021. ‘Welk geloof hangen we aan?’ Nederland in cijfers 2021. Available at:
https://longreads.cbs.nl/nederland-in-cijfers-2021/welk-geloof-hangen-we-aan/ [Accessed 4 July 2025]. - 11Cerchiaro, F. 2022. ‘Displaying difference, displaying sameness: Mixed couples’ reflexivity and the narrative-making of the family’. Sociology, 57(5): 1191–1208. DOI: 10.1177/00380385221133218
- 12Cerchiaro, F. 2023. ‘Advancing research in couple studies: Why, when and how to combine individual and couple interview’. Quality & Quantity, 57(2): 1465–1482. DOI: 10.1007/s11135-022-01395-9
- 13Cheruvallil-Contractor, S and Rye, G. 2016. ‘Motherhood, religions and spirituality’. Religion and Gender, 6(1): 1–8. DOI: 10.18352/rg.10125
- 14Collet, B. 2015. ‘From intermarriage to conjugal mixedness: Theoretical considerations illustrated by empirical data in France’. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 662(1): 129–147. DOI: 10.1177/0002716215595388
- 15Day, A. 2017. The religious lives of older laywomen: The last active Anglican generation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198739586.001.0001
- 16Engelke, M. 2015. ‘The coffin question: Death and materiality in humanist funerals’. Material Religion, 11(1): 26–48. DOI: 10.2752/205393215X14259900061553
- 17Fadil, N. 2017. ‘Recalling the “Islam of the parents”: Liberal and secular Muslims redefining the contours of religious authenticity’. Identities, 24(1): 82–99. DOI: 10.1080/1070289X.2015.1091318
- 18Fresnoza-Flot, A. 2025. Situated mixedness: Understanding migration-related intimate diversity in Belgium. DOI: 10.4324/9781003484981
- 19Heelas, P and Woodhead, L. 2005. The spiritual revolution: Why religion is giving way to spirituality. New York: Wiley.
- 20Hirschkind, C. 2011. ‘Is there a secular body?’ Cultural Anthropology, 26(4): 633–647. DOI: 10.1111/j.1548-1360.2011.01116.x
- 21Hunt, S. 2019. The Alpha enterprise: Evangelism in a post-Christian era. New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315241432
- 22Huygens, E. 2023. Living a Catholic life: Understanding the intimate lives of young Catholic women in Flanders. dissertation. Ghent University and KU Leuven. DOI: 10.5117/TVGN2024.4.010.HUYG
- 23Jamieson, L. 1998. Intimacy: Personal relationships in modern societies. Cambridge: Polity.
- 24Johansen, BS. 2022. ‘Chasing the secular: Methodological reflections on how to make the secular tangible’. Religion and Society, 13(1): 126–139. DOI: 10.3167/arrs.2022.130108
- 25King, R. 2023. The new heretics: Scepticism, secularism, and progressive Christianity. New York: NYU Press. DOI: 10.18574/nyu/9781479899340.001.0001
- 26Klug, P. 2017. ‘Varieties of Nonreligion: Why some people criticize religion, while others just don’t care’. Religious indifference: New perspectives from studies on secularization and nonreligion, 219–237. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-48476-1_11
- 27Kregting, J, Scheepers, P, Vermeer, P and Hermans, C. 2019. ‘Why Dutch Women are Still More Religious than Dutch Men: Explaining the Persistent Religious Gender Gap in the Netherlands Using a Multifactorial Approach’. Review of Religious Research, 61(2): 81–108. DOI: 10.1007/s13644-019-00364-3
- 28Kuyk, E. 2023. Tussen erfgoed en eredienst: Meervoudig gebruik van vier monumentale stadskerken. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
- 29Latour, B. 2017. Facing Gaia: Eight lectures on the new climatic regime. Cambridge: Polity.
- 30Lauwers, AS. 2023. ‘Religion, secularity, culture? Investigating Christian privilege in Western Europe’. Ethnicities, 23(3): 403–425. DOI: 10.1177/14687968221106185
- 31Lee, L. 2014. ‘Secular or nonreligious? Investigating and interpreting generic “not religious” categories and populations’. Religion, 44(3): 466–482. DOI: 10.1080/0048721X.2014.904035
- 32Lee, L. 2015. Recognizing the non religious: Reimagining the secular. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- 33Manning, CJ. 2013. ‘Unaffiliated parents and the religious training of their children’. Sociology of Religion, 74(2): 149–175. DOI: 10.1093/socrel/srs072
- 34Mercadante, L. 2020. ‘Spiritual struggles of nones and “spiritual but not religious”’. Religions, 11(10):
513 . DOI: 10.3390/rel11100513 - 35Moyaert, M. 2024. Christian imaginations of the religious other: A history of religionization. Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell.
- 36Page, S. 2016. ‘Altruism and sacrifice: Anglican priests managing ‘intensive’ priesthood and motherhood’. Religion and Gender, 6(1): 47–63. DOI: 10.18352/rg.10127
- 37Quack, J and Schuh, C. (eds.) 2017. Religious indifference: New perspectives from studies on secularization and nonreligion. New York: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-48476-1
- 38Remmel, A. 2017.
‘Religion, Interrupted? Observations on Religious Indifference in Estonia’ . In: Quack, J and Schuh, C (eds.) Religious indifference: New perspectives from studies on secularization and nonreligion. New York: Springer, pp. 123–142. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-48476-1_7 - 39Roodsaz, R. 2022. ‘The “hard work” of polyamory: Ethnographic accounts of intimacy and difference in the Netherlands’. Journal of Gender Studies, 31(7): 874–887. DOI: 10.1080/09589236.2022.2098094
- 40Schnell, T. 2010. ‘Existential indifference: Another quality of meaning in life’. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 50(3): 351–373. DOI: 10.1177/0022167809360259
- 41Schrijvers, LL. 2024. ‘Race and religion in everyday life: Antisemitism, Islamophobia, and Christian privilege among female converts in the Netherlands’. Sociology of Religion,
srae006 . DOI: 10.1093/socrel/srae006 - 42Schrijvers, LL. 2026.
‘Ritual (non)participation amongst nonreligious-Christian and Jewish-Christian couples’ . In: Moyaert, M, Aktaş, D, Schrijvers, LL and van den Brandt, N (eds.) Mixed intimacies in postcolonial Europe: Race, religion and gender. London: Bloomsbury, forthcoming. - 43Schuh, C, Burchardt, M and Wohlrab-Sahr, M. 2012. ‘Contested secularities: Religious minorities and secular progressivism in the Netherlands’. Journal of Religion in Europe, 5(3): 349–383. DOI: 10.1163/18748929-00503002
- 44Song, M. 2017. Multiracial parents: Mixed families, generational change, and the future of race. New York: NYU Press.
- 45Strhan, A and Shillitoe, R. 2019. ‘The stickiness of non-religion? Intergenerational transmission and the formation of non-religious identities in childhood’. Sociology, 53(6): 1094–1110. DOI: 10.1177/0038038519855307
- 46Sumerau, JE and Cragun, RT. 2016. ‘“I think some people need religion”: The social construction of nonreligious moral identities’. Sociology of Religion, 77(4): 386–407. DOI: 10.1093/socrel/srw031
- 47Tamimi Arab, P. 2018. Amplifying Islam in the European soundscape: Religious pluralism and secularism in the Netherlands. London: Bloomsbury. DOI: 10.5040/9781474291460
- 48Taves, A. 2018. ‘What is nonreligion? On the virtues of a meaning systems framework for studying nonreligious and religious worldviews in the context of everyday life’. Secularism and Nonreligion, 7(1):
9 . DOI: 10.5334/snr.104 - 49Therrien, C, Gall, JL and Cerchiaro, F. 2022. ‘Above and beyond social boundaries: Everyday life of mixed Muslim–non-Muslim families in contemporary societies’. Social Compass, 69(3): 263–294. DOI: 10.1177/00377686221113253
- 50Valenta, M. 2012. ‘Pluralist democracy or scientistic monocracy? Debating ritual slaughter’. Erasmus Law Review, 5(1). DOI: 10.5553/ELR221026712012005001003
- 51Wohlrab-Sahr, M and Kaden, T. 2014. ‘Exploring the non-religious: Societal norms, attitudes and identities, arenas of conflict’. Archives de sciences sociales des religions, 167: 105–125. DOI: 10.4000/assr.26145
- 52Zambelli, E and de Hart, B. 2025. Regulating interracialized intimacies: Perspectives from Europe and beyond. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781003449560