References
- 1Albanese, CL. 2008. A republic of mind and spirit: A cultural history of American metaphysical religion. New Haven: Yale University Press.
- 2Ammerman, NT. 2013. ‘Spiritual but not religious? Beyond binary choices in the study of religion’. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 52(2): 258–278. DOI: 10.1111/jssr.12024
- 3Barrett, JL and Lanman, JA. 2008 ‘The science of religious beliefs’. Religion, 38(2): 109–124. DOI: 10.1016/j.religion.2008.01.007
- 4Bender, C. 2010. The new metaphysicals: Spirituality and the American religious imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226043173.001.0001
- 5Besecke, K. 2014. You can’t put god in a box: Thoughtful spirituality in a rational age. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- 6Blankholm, J. 2022. The secular paradox: On the religiosity of the not religious. New York: New York University Press. DOI: 10.18574/nyu/9781479809516
- 7Bostic, JR. 2018
‘Plurals, hybrids, and nomads’ . In Parsons, WB (ed.), Being spiritual but not religious: past, present, future(s), 72–85. New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315107431-6 - 8Brown, R. 2000. ‘Social identity theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges’, Europe’s Journal of Social Psychology, 30(6): 745-778. DOI: 10.1002/1099-0992(200011/12)30:6<;745::AID-EJSP24>3.0.CO;2-O
- 9Bullivant, S, Farias, M, Lanman, JA and Lee, L. 2019. Understanding unbelief: Atheists and agnostics around the world. London: St Mary’s University.
- 10Ceriello, LC. 2018.
‘Towards a metamodern reading of spiritual but not religious mysticisms’ . In Parsons, WB (ed.), Being spiritual but not religious: past, present, future(s), 200–218. New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315107431-13 - 11Chaves, M. 2010. ‘Rain dances in the dry season: Overcoming the religious congruence fallacy’. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 49(1): 1–14. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2009.01489.x
- 12Coleman, TJ, Silver, CF and Holcombe, J. 2013 ‘Focusing on horizontal transcendence: Much more than a “non-belief”’. Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism, 21(2): 1–18. DOI: 10.1558/eph.v21i2.1
- 13Coyle, A. 2008. ‘Qualitative methods and “the (partly) ineffable” in psychological research on religion and spirituality’. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 5(1): 56–67. DOI: 10.1080/14780880701863583
- 14Cotter, CR. 2020. The critical study of non-religion: Discourse, identification and locality. New York: Bloomsbury Academic. DOI: 10.5040/9781350095274
- 15Curtice, J, et al. (eds). 2019. British social attitudes: The 36th report. London: The National Centre for Social Research.
- 16Day, A. 2011. Believing in belonging: Belief and social identity in the modern world. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199577873.001.0001
- 17Fitzgerald, T. 2000. The ideology of religious studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- 18French, CC and Stone, A. 2013. Anomalistic psychology. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-137-36806-5
- 19Fuller, RC. 2001. Spiritual, but not religious: Understanding unchurched America. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/0195146808.001.0001
- 20Fuller, RC and Parsons, WB. 2018.
‘Spiritual but not religious: A brief introduction’ . In Parsons, WB (ed.), Being spiritual but not religious: past, present, future(s), 15–29. New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315107431-2 - 21Granqvist, P and Kirkpatrick, LA. 2004. ‘Religious conversion and perceived childhood attachment: A meta-analysis’. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 14(4): 223–250. DOI: 10.1207/s15327582ijpr1404_1
- 22Hood, RW, Hill, PC and Spilka, B. 2018. The psychology of religion: An empirical approach. Fifth Edition. New York: Guilford Press.
- 23Johnson, KA, Hill, ED and Cohen, AB. 2011. ‘Integrating the study of culture and religion: Toward a psychology of worldview’. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(3): 137–152. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00339.x
- 24Lee, L. 2015. Recognizing the non-religious: Reimagining the secular. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198736844.001.0001
- 25Lewis Hall, ME and Hill, P. 2019. ‘Meaning-making, suffering, and religion: A worldview conception’. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 22(5), 467–479. DOI: 10.1080/13674676.2019.1625037
- 26Luhrmann, TM. 2020. How God becomes real: Kindling the presence of invisible others. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9780691211985
- 27Maxwell, JA. 2013. Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
- 28McNamara, P. 2014. The neuroscience of religious experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199931002.001.0001
- 29Mercadante, LA. 2014. Belief without borders: Inside the minds of the spiritual but not religious. New York: Oxford University Press.
- 30Murphy, J. 2017. Beyond “religion” and “spirituality”: Extending a “meaning systems” approach to explore lived religion. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 39(1): 1–26. DOI: 10.1163/15736121-12341335
- 31Murphy, J. 2021. The self and the sacred: Exploring the relationships between experiences deemed spiritual or religious and beliefs using interpretative phenomenological analysis [Doctoral Dissertation, Canterbury Christ Church University]. Research Space.
https://repository.canterbury.ac.uk/item/8zx0z/ . - 32Murphy, J, Jones, FW and Nigbur, D. 2022a. ‘I believe in something; I don’t know what it is’: An exploration of five british hindus’ worldviews using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Secularism and Nonreligion, 11, 4. DOI: 10.5334/snr.160
- 33Murphy, J., Jones, FW, Nigbur, D and Gee, K. 2022b. Living in a world with God: An interpretative phenomenological exploration of the religious experiences of five Baptists in Britain. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 18(2): 154–167. DOI: 10.5964/ejop.3119
- 34Paloutzian, RF and Park, CL. 2013.
‘Recent progress and core issues in the science of the psychology of religion and spirituality’ . In Paloutzian, RF and Park, CL (eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality, 3–22. 2nd edn. New York: Guilford Publications. - 35Paloutzian, RF, et al. 2013.
‘Conversion, deconversion, and spiritual transformation: A multilevel interdisciplinary view’ . In Paloutzian, RF and Park, CL (eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality, 399–421. 2nd edn. New York: Guilford Publications. - 36Pargament, KI. 1997. The psychology of religion and coping: Theory, research, practice. New York: Guilford Press.
- 37Pargament, KI, Falb, MD, Ano, GG and Wachholtz, AB. 2013.
The religious dimension of coping: Advances in theory, research, and practice . In Paloutzian, RF and Park, CL (eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality, 560–579, 2nd edn. New York: Guilford Publications. - 38Park, CL. 2013.
‘Religion and meaning’ . In Paloutzian, RF and Park, CL (eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality, 357–379. 2nd edn. New York, NY: Guilford Publications. - 39Partridge, CH. 2018. High culture: Drugs, mysticism, and the pursuit of transcendence in the modern world. New York: Oxford University Press.
- 40Paterson, BL, et al. 2001. Meta-study of qualitative health research: A practical guide to meta-analysis and meta-synthesis. Thousand Oaks: Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9781412985017
- 41Patton, MQ. 2015. Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. 4th edn. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
- 42Pevateaux, CJ. 2018.
‘Being spiritual but not hierarchical’ . In Parsons, WB (ed.), Being spiritual but not religious: past, present, future(s), 236–252. New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315107431-15 - 43Pietkiewicz, I and Smith, JA. 2014. ‘A practical guide to using interpretative phenomenological analysis in qualitative research psychology’. Czasopismo Psychologiczne Psychological Journal, 20(1): 7–14. DOI: 10.14691/CPPJ.20.1.7
- 44Roof, WC. 1999. Spiritual marketplace: Baby boomers and the remaking of American religion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- 45Steensland, B, Kucinskas, J & Sun, AXD (Eds.). 2021. Situating spirituality: Context, practice, and power. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197565001.001.0001
- 46Smith, JA. 2011. ‘Evaluating the contribution of interpretative phenomenological analysis’. Health Psychology Review, 5(1): 9–27.DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2010.510659
- 47Smith, JA, Flowers, P and Larkin, M. 2009. Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. Los Angeles: Sage.
- 48Spilka, B, Shaver, P and Kirkpatrick, LA. 1985. ‘A general attribution theory for the psychology of religion’. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 24(1): 1. DOI: 10.2307/1386272
- 49Suri, H and Clarke, D. 2009. ‘Advancements in research synthesis methods: From a methodologically inclusive perspective’. Review of Educational Research, 79(1): 395–430. DOI: 10.3102/0034654308326349
- 50Taves, A. 2009. Religious experience reconsidered: A building block approach to the study of religion and other special things. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9781400830978
- 51Taves, A and Asprem, E. 2018.
‘Scientific worldviews studies: A pragmatic proposal’ . In Petersen, AK, et al. (eds.), Evolution, cognition, and the history of religion: A new synthesis, 297–308. Leiden: Brill. DOI: 10.1163/9789004385375_020 - 52Taves, A, Asprem, E and Ihm, E. 2018. ‘Psychology, meaning making, and the study of worldviews: Beyond religion and non-religion.’ Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 10(3): 207–217. DOI: 10.1037/rel0000201
- 53Wanless, C. 2017. ‘Individualized religion and the theory of learning’. Journal of the British Association for the Study of Religion (JBASR), 18: 11. DOI: 10.18792/jbasr.v18i1.6
- 54Wulff, DM. 2000.
‘Mystical Experience’ . In Cardeña, E, Lynn, SJ and Krippner, S (eds.), Varieties of anomalous experience: Examining the scientific evidence, 397–440. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. - 55Wuthnow, R. 1998. After heaven: Spirituality in America since the 1950s. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI: 10.1525/9780520924444
- 56Zinnbauer, BJ, et al. 1997. ‘Religion and spirituality: Unfuzzying the fuzzy’. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 36(4), 549–564. DOI: 10.2307/1387689