References
- 1Adcock, CS. 2014. The limits of tolerance: Indian secularism and the politics of religious freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199995431.001.0001
- 2Altemeyer, B and Hunsberger, B. 1992. Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2(2): 113–133. DOI: 10.1207/s15327582ijpr0202_5
- 3Ammerman, NT. 2013. Spiritual but not religious? Beyond binary choices in the study of religion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 52(2): 258–278. DOI: 10.1111/jssr.12024
- 4Anderson, E and Longkumer, A. 2018. ‘Neo-Hindutva’: Evolving forms, spaces, and expressions of Hindu nationalism. Contemporary South Asia, 26(4): 371–377. DOI: 10.1080/09584935.2018.1548576
- 5Asad, T. 2003. Formations of the secular: Christianity, Islam, modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- 6Barrett, JL and Lanman, JA. 2008. The science of religious beliefs. Religion, 38(2): 109–124. DOI: 10.1016/j.religion.2008.01.007
- 7Batson, CD. 2013.
Individual religion, tolerance, and universal compassion . In Clarke, S, Powell, R and Savulescu, J (eds.), Religion, intolerance, and conflict: A scientific and conceptual investigation, 88–106. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199640911.003.0005 - 8Battaglia, G. 2017. Neo-Hindu Fundamentalism Challenging the Secular and Pluralistic Indian State. Religions, 8(10): 216. DOI: 10.3390/rel8100216
- 9Berry, JW. 1997. Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology, 46(1): 5–34. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.1997.tb01087.x
- 10Bostic, JR. 2018.
Plurals, hybrids, and nomads . In Parsons, WB (ed.), Being spiritual but not religious: Past, present, future(s), 72–85. New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315107431-6 - 11Brekke, T. (ed.) 2019. Modern Hinduism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- 12Bruce, S. 2013. Secularization: In defence of an unfashionable theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- 13Cassar, S and Shinebourne, P. 2012. What does spirituality mean to you? An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the experience of spirituality. Existential Analysis, 23(1): 133–148.
- 14Chaves, M. 2010. Rain dances in the dry season: Overcoming the religious congruence fallacy. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 49(1): 1–14. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2009.01489.x
- 15Chryssides, GD. (ed.) 2019. The insider-outsider debate: New perspectives in the study of religion. Bristol: Equinox Publishing.
- 16Cottee, S. 2015. The Apostates: When Muslims leave Islam. London: C Hurst & Company.
- 17Coyle, A. 2008. Qualitative methods and ‘the (partly) ineffable’ in psychological research on religion and spirituality. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 5(1): 56–67. DOI: 10.1080/14780880701863583
- 18Crossley, ML. 2000. Introducing narrative psychology: Self, trauma and the construction of meaning. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
- 19Curtice, J, Clery, E, Phillips, M and Rahim, NN. (eds.) 2019. British social attitudes: The 36th report. The National Centre for Social Research.
- 20Davis, EB and Tisdale, TC. 2016. Enlarging the psychology of religion and spirituality research paradigm: Introduction to the special section on qualitative and mixed methods. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 8(2): 89–91. DOI: 10.1037/rel0000069
- 21Davis, RH. 2008.
Tolerance and heirarchy: Accomodating multiple religious paths in Hinduism . In Neusner, J and Chilton, B (eds.), Religious tolerance in world religions, 360–376. West Conshohocken: Templeton Foundation Press. - 22Day, A. 2011. Believing in belonging: Belief and social identity in the modern world. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199577873.001.0001
- 23Ecklund, EH, Johnson, DR, Vaidyanathan, B, Matthews, KRW, Lewis, SW, Thomson, RA and Di, D. 2019. Secularity and science: What scientists around the world really think about religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190926755.001.0001
- 24Emmons, RA and Paloutzian, RF. 2003. The psychology of religion. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1): 377–402. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145024
- 25Farias, M and Wikholm, C. 2015. The Buddha pill: Can meditation change you? London: Watkins.
- 26Fitzgerald, T. 1990. Hinduism and the “world religion” fallacy. Religion, 20(2): 101–118. DOI: 10.1016/0048-721X(90)90099-R
- 27Frazier, J. 2013.
Hinduism . In Bullivant, S and Ruse, M (eds.), The Oxford handbook of atheism, 367–380. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199644650.013.015 - 28Gellner, DN and Hausner, SL. 2013.
Multiple versus unitary belonging: How Nepalis in Britain deal with “religion.” In Day, A, Vincent, G and Cotter, CR (eds.), Social identities between the sacred and the secular, 75–88. New York: Ashgate Publishing. - 29Hood, RW, Hill, PC and Williamson, PW. 2005. The psychology of religious fundamentalism. New York: Guilford Publications.
- 30Hood, RW, Hill, PC and Spilka, B. 2018. The psychology of religion: An empirical approach (Fifth Edition). New York: Guilford Press.
- 31Jacobs, S. 2010. Hinduism today. London: Continuum.
- 32Jakobsen, JR and Pellegrini, AA. (eds.) 2008. Secularisms. Durham: Duke University Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv11cw644
- 33Johnson, KA, Hill, ED and Cohen, AB. 2011. Integrating the study of culture and religion: Toward a psychology of worldview. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(3): 137–152. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00339.x
- 34Juergensmeyer, M. 2011.
Religious violence . In Clarke, PB (ed.), The Oxford handbook of the sociology of religion, 890–908. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199279791.003.0050 - 35Knott, K. 2016. Hinduism: A very short introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/actrade/9780198745549.001.0001
- 36Kramer, EM. (ed.) 2003. The emerging monoculture: Assimilation and the “model minority.” Westport: Praeger.
- 37Lee, L. 2015. Recognizing the non-religious: Reimagining the secular. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198736844.001.0001
- 38Lee, KA and Gubi, PM. 2019. Breaking up with Jesus: A phenomenological exploration of the experience of deconversion from an Evangelical Christian faith to Atheism. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 22(2): 171–184. DOI: 10.1080/13674676.2019.1623767
- 39Lewis Hall, ME and Hill, P. 2019. Meaning-making, suffering, and religion: A worldview conception. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 22(5): 467–479. DOI: 10.1080/13674676.2019.1625037
- 40Lewis, SH, Sanderson, C, Gupta, A and Klein, C. 2018. “Maybe it’s kind of normal to hear voices”: The role of spirituality in making sense of voice hearing. Journal of Spirituality in Mental Health, 1–16. DOI: 10.1080/19349637.2018.1520183
- 41Loewenthal, KM. 2013.
Religion, spirituality, and culture: Clarifying the direction of effects . In Pargament, KI, Exline, JJ and Jones, JW (eds.), APA handbook of psychology, religion, and spirituality (Vol 1): Context, theory, and research, 239–255. Washington: American Psychological Association. DOI: 10.1037/14045-013 - 42Loftus, EF. 1979. The malleability of human memory: Information introduced after we view an incident can transform memory. American Scientist, 67(3): 312–320. DOI: 10.2307/27849223
- 43Luhrmann, TM. 2012. When God talks back: Understanding the American evangelical relationship with God. New York: Vintage Books. DOI: 10.24260/alalbab.v1i1.16
- 44Madill, A. 2012.
Interviews and interviewing techniques . In Cooper, H, Camic, PM, Long, DL, Panter, AT, Rindskopf, D and Sher, KJ (eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 1: Foundations, planning, measures, and psychometrics, 249–275. Washington: American Psychological Association. DOI: 10.1037/13619-015 - 45Major, CH and Savin-Baden, M. 2010. An introduction to qualitative research synthesis: Managing the information explosion in social science research. New York: Routledge.
- 46Maxwell, JA. 2013. Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
- 47Mercadante, LA. 2014. Belief without borders: Inside the minds of the spiritual but not religious. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199931002.001.0001
- 48Murphy, J. 2017. Beyond “religion” and “spirituality”: Extending a “meaning systems” approach to explore lived religion. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 39(1): 1–26. DOI: 10.1163/15736121-12341335
- 49Murphy, J. 2021. The self and the sacred: Exploring the relationships between experiences deemed spiritual or religious and beliefs using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Thesis (PhD). Canterbury Christ Church University.
https://repository.canterbury.ac.uk/item/8zx0z/ - 50Murphy, J, Jones, FW, Nigbur, D and Gee, K. 2022. Living in a world with God: An interpretative phenomenological exploration of the religious experiences of five Baptists in Britain. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 18(2): 154–167. DOI: 10.5964/ejop.3119
- 51Newman, EJ and Lindsay, DS. 2009. False memories: What the hell are they for? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(8): 1105–1121. DOI: 10.1002/acp.1613
- 52Norton, MI, Mochon, D and Ariely, D. 2012. The IKEA effect: When labor leads to love. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3): 453–460. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcps.2011.08.002
- 53Office for National Statistics. 2013. Full story: What does the census tell us about religion in 2011?
http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171776_310454.pdf . - 54Oman, D. 2013.
Defining religion and spirituality . In Paloutzian, RF and Park, CL (eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (2nd ed.), 3–22. New York: Guilford Publications. - 55Paloutzian, RF and Park, CL. 2013.
Recent Progress and Core Issues in the Science of the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality . In Paloutzian, RF and Park, CL (eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (2nd ed.), 3–22. New York: Guilford Publications. - 56Park, CL. 2013.
Religion and Meaning . In Paloutzian, RF and Park, CL (eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (2nd ed.), 357–379. New York: Guilford Publications. - 57Patton, MQ. 2015. Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
- 58Pew Research Center. 2017. The changing global religious landscape.
https://www.pewforum.org/2017/04/05/the-changing-global-religious-landscape/ . - 59Rappaport, RA. 1999. Ritual and religion in the making of humanity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511814686
- 60Sherkat, D. 2003.
Religious socialization: Sources of influence and influences of agency . In Dillon, M (ed.), Handbook of the sociology of religion, 151–163. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511807961.012 - 61Sinha, V. 2019.
Modern Hindu diaspora(s) . In Brekke, T (ed.), Modern Hinduism, 179–199. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198790839.003.0011 - 62Slone, JD. 2004. Theological incorrectness: Why religious people believe what they Shouldn’t. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/0195169263.001.0001
- 63Smith, JA. 2011. Evaluating the contribution of interpretative phenomenological analysis. Health Psychology Review, 5(1), 9–27. DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2010.510659
- 64Smith, JA. 2019. Participants and researchers searching for meaning: Conceptual developments for interpretative phenomenological analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 16(2), 166–181. DOI: 10.1080/14780887.2018.1540648
- 65Smith, JA, Flowers, P and Larkin, M. 2009. Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. London: Sage Publications.
- 66Smith, JA and Osborn, M. 2015. Interpretative phenomenological analysis as a useful methodology for research on the lived experience of pain. British Journal of Pain, 9(1): 41–42. DOI: 10.1177/2049463714541642
- 67Smith, JM and Cragun, RT. 2021.
Secularity and Nonreligion . In Bloomsbury Religion in North America. London: Bloomsbury Academic. DOI: 10.5040/9781350971059.007 - 68Suri, H and Clarke, D. 2009. Advancements in research synthesis methods: From a methodologically inclusive perspective. Review of Educational Research, 79(1): 395–430. DOI: 10.3102/0034654308326349
- 69Taves, A and Asprem, E. 2018.
Scientific worldviews studies: A pragmatic proposal . In Petersen, AK, Sælid, GI, Martin, LH, Jensen, JS and Sørensen, J (eds.), Evolution, cognition, and the history of religion: A new synthesis, 297–308. Leiden: Brill. - 70Taves, A, Asprem, E and Ihm, E. 2018. Psychology, meaning making, and the study of worldviews: Beyond religion and non-religion. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 10(3), 207–217. DOI: 10.1037/rel0000201
- 71Winell, M. 2017.
The challenge of leaving religion and becoming secular . In Zuckerman, P and Shook, JR (eds.), The Oxford handbook of secularism, 603–620. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199988457.013.37 - 72Wooffitt, R and Widdicombe, S. 2006.
Interaction in interviews . In Drew, P, Raymond, G and Weinberg, D (eds.), Talk and interaction in social research methods, 28–49. London: Sage Publications. DOI: 10.4135/9781849209991.n3 - 73Wulff, DM. 1991. Psychology of religion: Classic and contemporary views. New York: Wiley.
- 74Yardley, L. 2000. Dilemmas in qualitative health research. Psychology & Health, 15(2): 215–228. DOI: 10.1080/08870440008400302