Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Unravelling the Indian Conception of Secularism: Tremors of the Pandemic and Beyond Cover

Unravelling the Indian Conception of Secularism: Tremors of the Pandemic and Beyond

Secularism and Nonreligion
Volume 10 (2021): Issue 1
By: Malcolm Katrak and  Shardool Kulkarni  
Open Access
|Apr 2021

References

  1. 1Acevedo, D. 2013. Secularism in the Indian Context. Law and Social Inquiry, 38(1). DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-4469.2012.01304.x
    Back to article
  2. 2Acharya Jagdishwaranand Avadhuta v. Commissioner of Police (1983) 4 SCC 522 (India).
    Back to article
  3. 3Adelaide Company v. Commonwealth (1943) 67 CLR 116, 127 (Australia).
    Back to article
  4. 4Aruna Roy v. Union of India (2002) 7 SCC 368 (India).
    Back to article
  5. 5Austin, G. 1972. The Indian Constitution: Cornerstone of a Nation. Oxford University Press.
    Back to article
  6. 6Austin, G. 1999. Working a Democratic Constitution: A history of the Indian experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Back to article
  7. 7Bhargava, R. 1994. Giving Secularism its due. Economic and Political Weekly, 29(28).
    Back to article
  8. 8Bhargava, R. 2006. The Distinctiveness of Indian Secularism. In Srinivasan, T (ed.), The future of secularism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Back to article
  9. 9Bhargava, R. 2013. Reimagining Secularism: Respect, Domination and Principled Distance. Economic and Political Weekly, 48(50).
    Back to article
  10. 10Chandrachud, A. 2020. Republic of Religion: The Rise and Fall of Colonial Secularism in India. India: Penguin Random House.
    Back to article
  11. 11Commisioner of Police v. Acharya Jagadishwarananda Avadhuta (2004) 12 SCC 770 (India).
    Back to article
  12. 12Commissioner, Hindu Religious Endowments, Madras v. Sri Lakshmindra Thirtha Swamiar of Sri Shirur Mutt AIR 1954 SC 282 (India).
    Back to article
  13. 13Constituent Assembly Debates dated October 6, 1949 – October 17, 1949. in Lok Sabha Secretariat (1989) Constituent Assembly Debates. Vol 10, New Delhi: Government of India.
    Back to article
  14. 14Das, T. 2020, June 24. Indians who made Covid ‘Muslim virus’ after Tablighi Jamaat are cheering Odisha’s Rath Yatra. The Print. Retrieved from https://theprint.in/opinion/pov/indians-who-made-covid-muslim-virus-after-tablighi-jamaat-are-cheering-odishas-rath-yatra/447717/
    Back to article
  15. 15Datar, A. The basic structure doctrine- A 37-year journey. In Jain, S and Narayan, S (eds.), Basic Structure Constitutionalism: Revisiting Kesavananda Bharati. India: Eastern Book Company.
    Back to article
  16. 16Davis v. Beason 133 US 333 (1890) (U.S.).
    Back to article
  17. 17De Roover, J. 2002. The Vaucity of Indian Secularism: On the Indian Debate and its Western Origins. Economic and Political Weekly, 37(39).
    Back to article
  18. 18Dhavan, R. 2001. The Road to Xanadu: India’s quest for secularism. In Larson, G (ed.), Religion and Personal law in secular India- A Call to Judgement. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    Back to article
  19. 19Durgah Committee v. Syed Hussain Ali, AIR 1961 SC 1402 (India).
    Back to article
  20. 20Engineer, I. 1995. Religion, State and Secularism. Economic and Political Weekly, 30(43).
    Back to article
  21. 21Farhan Hussain v. State Criminal Petition No. 2376/2020 (India).
    Back to article
  22. 22George, V. 2020, April 02. Guarding against communal virus and blind faith. The Hindu. Retrieved from https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/guarding-against-communal-virus-and-blind-faith/article31234299.ece.
    Back to article
  23. 23Government of India: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Addressing social stigma associated with Covid-19, viewed 20 August 2020, Available at <https://www.mohfw.gov.in/pdf/AddressingSocialStigmaAssociatedwithCOVID19.pdf>.
    Back to article
  24. 24Government of India: Ministry of Home Affairs, Annexure to Ministry of Home Affairs Order No. 40-3/2020-D: Guidelines on the measures to be taken by Ministries/Departments of Government of India, State/Union Territory Governments and State/Union Territory Authorities for containment of Covid-19 epidemic in the country. 24 March 2020, viewed 21 August 2020, Available at: <https://www.mha.gov.in/sites/default/files/Guidelines_0.pdf>.
    Back to article
  25. 25Government of India: Ministry of Home Affairs, Ministry of Home Affairs Order No. 40- 3/2020-DM-I (A). 24 March 2020, viewed 21 August 2020, Available at: <https://www.mha.gov.in/sites/default/files/MHAorder%20copy_0.pdf>.
    Back to article
  26. 26Government of India: Press Information Bureau, MHA blacklists 960 foreigners, present in India on tourist visas, for their involvement in Tablighi Jamaat activities; necessary legal action to be taken. 02 April 2020, viewed 21 August 2020, Available at: <https://www.mha.gov.in/sites/default/files/PR_MHAblacklists960foreigners_03042020_0.pdf>.
    Back to article
  27. 27Gupta, S. 2020, April 11. As Tablighi Jamaat- linked cases rise, Delhi govt gives them a different name. msn news.com. Retrieved from https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/newsindia/as-tablighi-jamaat-linked-cases-rise-delhi-govt-gives-them-a-different-name/ar-BB12umIj.
    Back to article
  28. 28INDIA CONST.
    Back to article
  29. 29INDIA CONST. amend. 42nd.
    Back to article
  30. 30INDIA CONST. amend. 43rd.
    Back to article
  31. 31INDIA CONST. amend. 44th.
    Back to article
  32. 32INDIA CONST. amend. 45th.
    Back to article
  33. 33Indian Young Lawyers Association v. State of Kerala (2017) 11 SCC 577 (India).
    Back to article
  34. 34Jain, R. (2020, April 21). COVID-19: How fake news and Modi government messaging India’s latest spiral of Islamophobia. Scroll. In. Retrieved from https://scroll.in/article/959806/covid-19-how-fake-news-and-modi-government-messaging-fuelled-indias-latest-spiral-of-islamophobia.
    Back to article
  35. 35Jha, S. 2002. Secularism in the Constituent Assembly Debates. Economic and Political Weekly, 37(30).
    Back to article
  36. 36Kaul, R. 2020, 05 April. Covid-19 cases doubling in 4.1 days, Jamaat incident worsened coronavirus spread: Govt. Hindustan Times. Retrieved from https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/covid-19-doubling-rate-in-india-at-4-1-days-govt/story-CcMgi8sSrZ7LnBp1oZ70OL.html.
    Back to article
  37. 37Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) 4 SCC 225 (India).
    Back to article
  38. 38Khemka, G and Jadhav, D. 2020, July 07. SC’s Order on Rath Yatra: A Juggernaut of Judicial Evasion?. The Wire. Retrieved from https://thewire.in/law/scs-order-on-rath-yatra-a-juggernaut-of-judicial-evasion.
    Back to article
  39. 39Konan Kodio Ganstone v State of Maharashtra 2020 SCC OnLine Bom 877 (India).
    Back to article
  40. 40Kraveltovi, M and Özyürek, E. 2020. ‘Contagious Crowds: Religious gatherings in the age of coronavirus’. LSE Blogs, 13 May. Available at: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/religionglobalsociety/2020/05/contagious-crowds-religious-gatherings-in-the-age-of-coronavirus/ (Accessed: 22 August 2020).
    Back to article
  41. 41Mahant Akhileshwardasji Ramlakhandasji v. State of Gujarat 2020 SCC OnLine Guj 917 (India).
    Back to article
  42. 42Mander, H. 2020, April 13. The Coronavirus has morphed into an anti-muslim virus. The Wire. Retrieved from https://thewire.in/communalism/coronavirus-anti-muslim-propaganda-india.
    Back to article
  43. 43Md. Kameual Islam v. State 2020 SCC OnLine Mad 1171 (India).
    Back to article
  44. 44Mehta, P. 2015. The Indian Supreme Court and the Art of Democratic Positioning. In Tushnet, M and Khosla, M (eds.), Unstable Constitutionalism: Law and Politics in South Asia. Cambridge University Press.
    Back to article
  45. 45Mittal, A. 2020, April 11. Fletcher Voices: Covid-19 a test for secular India. Tuft University: World Peace Foundation. Retrieved from https://sites.tufts.edu/reinventingpeace/2020/04/11/fletcher-voices-covid-19-a-test-for-secular-india/.
    Back to article
  46. 46Munshi, K. 1967. Indian Constitutional Documents, Vol. 1. India: Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan.
    Back to article
  47. 47Niazi, S. 2020, April 13. No data to link Tablighi Jamaat to Covid-19 spread. Anadolu agency. Retrieved from https://www.aa.com.tr/en/asia-pacific/-no-data-to-link-tablighi-jamaat-to-covid-19-spread-/1803064.
    Back to article
  48. 48Orissa Vikash Parishad v. Union of India & Ors. 2020 SCC OnLine 533 (India).
    Back to article
  49. 49Padhy, S. 2004. Secularism and Justice: A Review of Indian Supreme Court Judgments. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(46/47).
    Back to article
  50. 50Pantham, T. 1997. Indian secularism and its critics: Some reflections. The Review of Politics, 59(3). DOI: 10.1017/S0034670500027704
    Back to article
  51. 51Press Trust of India. 2020, April 07. Mumbai police registers FIR against 150 Tablighi Jamaat attendees for negligence. The Print. Retrieved from https://theprint.in/india/mumbai-police-registers-fir-against-150-tablighi-jamaat-attendees-for-negligence/397019/.
    Back to article
  52. 52Rao, B. 1968. The Framing of India’s Constitution: A Study. India: Universal Law Publishing.
    Back to article
  53. 53Rao, B. 2006. The Variant Meanings of Secularism in India: Notes towards conceptual clarifications. Journal of Church and State, 48(1). DOI: 10.1093/jcs/48.1.47
    Back to article
  54. 54S. R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994) 3 SCC 1 (India).
    Back to article
  55. 55Seervai, H. 1991. Constitutional Law of India, Vol. 1. India: Universal Law Publishing. Seervai, H. 1993. Constitutional Law of India, Vol. 2. India: Universal Law Publishing.
    Back to article
  56. 56Sen, R. 2016. Secularism and Religious Freedom. In Choudhary, S, et al. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Indian Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Back to article
  57. 57Sen, R. 2019. Articles of Faith: Religion, Secularism, and the Indian Supreme Court. India: Oxford India Paperbacks.
    Back to article
  58. 58Sezgin, Y and Kunkler, M. 2014. Regulation of “Religion” and the “Religious”: The politics of judicialization and bureaucratization in India and Indonesia. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 56(2). DOI: 10.1017/S0010417514000103
    Back to article
  59. 59Singh, V. 2020, March 31. Home ministry asked states to identify 824 Tablighi members. The Hindu. Retrieved from https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/home-ministry-to-blacklist-800-tablighi-preachers-from-indonesia-for-violation-of-visa-rules/article31214048.ece.
    Back to article
  60. 60Sri Venkataramana Devaru v. State of Mysore, AIR 1958 SC 255 (India).
    Back to article
  61. 61Tilkayat Shri Govindlalji Maharaj v. State of Rajasthan AIR 1963 SC 1638 (India).
    Back to article
  62. 62Tripathi, P. 1966. Mr. Justice Gajendragadkar and Constitutional Interpretation. Journal of the Indian Law Institute, 8(4).
    Back to article
  63. 63Tripathi, P. 1966. Secularism: Constitutional Provision and Judicial Review. Journal of the Indian Law Institute, 8(2).
    Back to article
  64. 64UNDP Regional Bureau for Asia and the Pacific. 2020. The social and economic impact of COVID-19 in the Asia-Pacific region, 2020, UNDP Regional Bureau for Asia and the Pacific 2020, viewed 20 September 2020, Available at: <https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/librarypage/crisis-prevention-and-recovery/the-social-and-economic-impact-of-covid-19-in-asia-pacific.html>.
    Back to article
  65. 65Yildrim, S. 2004. Expanding Secularism’s Scope: An Indian Case Study. American Journal of Comparative Law, 52(4). DOI: 10.2307/4144469
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/snr.145 | Journal eISSN: 2053-6712
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Oct 28, 2020
Accepted on: Mar 13, 2021
Published on: Apr 20, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Malcolm Katrak, Shardool Kulkarni, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 10 (2021): Issue 1Next article