Have a personal or library account? Click to login
How Do Religious People Become Atheists? Applying a Grounded Theory Approach to Propose a Model of Deconversion Cover

How Do Religious People Become Atheists? Applying a Grounded Theory Approach to Propose a Model of Deconversion

Open Access
|Apr 2019

References

  1. 1Aarnio, K and Lindeman, M. 2005. Paranormal beliefs, education, and thinking styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 39: 12271236. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.04.009
  2. 2Aarnio, K and Lindeman, M. 2007. Religious people and paranormal believers: Alike or different? Journal of Individual Differences, 28: 19. DOI: 10.1027/1614-0001.28.1.1
  3. 3Alston, W. 1967. Religion. In: Borchert, D (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2nd ed). Farmington Hills: Thomson Gale.
  4. 4Altemeyer, B and Hunseberger, B. 1997. Amazing conversions: Why some turn to faith and other abandon religion. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
  5. 5Argyle, M and Beit-Hallahmi, B. 1975. The social psychology of religion. London: Routledge.
  6. 6Argyle, M and Beit-Hallahmi, B. 2014. The psychology of religious behaviour, belief and experience. London: Routledge.
  7. 7Atheist Ireland. 2016. About Atheist Ireland [online]. Available from: https://atheist.ie/information/about/ [Accessed 14 April 2018].
  8. 8Bahçekapili, HG and Yilmaz, O. 2017. The relation between different types of religiosity and analytic cognitive style. Personality and Individual Differences, 117: 267272. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.06.013
  9. 9Barbour, JD. 1994. Version of deconversion: Autobiography and the loss of faith. Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia.
  10. 10Beit-Hallahmi, B. 2007. Atheists: A psychological profile. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  11. 11Belzen, JA. 2010. Towards cultural psychology of religion: Principles, approaches, applications. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-3491-5
  12. 12Brewster, M. 2014. Atheists in America. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. DOI: 10.7312/brew16358
  13. 13Brewster, ME, Robinson, MA, Sandil, R, Esposito, J and Geiger, E. 2014. Arrantly absent: Atheism in psychological science from 2001 to 2012. The Counseling Psychologist, 42: 628663. DOI: 10.1177/0011000014528051
  14. 14Bromley, DG. 1988. Falling from the faith. Causes and consequences of religious apostasy. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  15. 15Campbell, CD. 1971. Towards a sociology of irreligion. London: Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-00795-0
  16. 16Caplovitz, D and Sherrow, F. 1977. The religious drop-outs: Apostasy among college graduates. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  17. 17Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage Publications.
  18. 18Cohn, W and Klausner, SZ. 1962. Is religion universal? Problems of definition. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 2: 2535. DOI: 10.2307/1384090
  19. 19Cragun, RT. 2017. The declining significance of religion: Secularization in Ireland. In: Breen, MJ (ed.), Values and identities in Europe: Evidence from the European Social Survey. Routledge Advances in Sociology. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
  20. 20Cragun, RT and Hammer, JH. 2011. “One person’s apostate is another person’s convert”: What terminology tells us about pro-religious hegemony in the sociology of religion. Humanity & Society, 35: 149175. DOI: 10.1177/016059761103500107
  21. 21De Muckadell, CS. 2014. On essentialism and real definitions of religion. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 82: 495520. DOI: 10.1093/jaarel/lfu015
  22. 22Dennett, DC and LaScola, L. 2015. Caught in the pulpit: Leaving belief behind. Durham: Pitchstone Publishing.
  23. 23Donelson, E. 1999. Psychology of religion and adolescents in the United States: past to present. Journal of Adolescence, 22: 187204. DOI: 10.1006/jado.1999.0212
  24. 24Evans, JS. 2008. Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annu Rev Psychol, 59: 25578. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629
  25. 25Fazzino, LL. 2014. Leaving the church behind: Applying a deconversion perspective to evangelical exit narratives. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 29: 249266. DOI: 10.1080/13537903.2014.903664
  26. 26Fowler, JW, Streib, H and Keller, B. 2004. Manual for faith development research. Bielefeld, Germany: Research Centre for Biographical Studies in Contemporary Religion.
  27. 27Galen, LW. 2009. Profiles of the godless. Free Inquiry, 29(5): 4145.
  28. 28Galen, LW. 2014. Nonreligious and atheist emerging adults. In: Barry, CM and Abo-Zena, MM (eds.), Emerging adults’ religiousness and spirituality: Meaning-making in an age of transition. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199959181.003.0014
  29. 29Galen, LW and Kloet, JD. 2011. Mental well-being in the religious and the non-religious: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 14: 673689. DOI: 10.1080/13674676.2010.510829
  30. 30Gervais, WM and Norenzayan, A. 2012. Analytic Thinking Promotes Religious Disbelief. Science, 336: 493. DOI: 10.1126/science.1215647
  31. 31Glaser, BG and Strauss, AL. 1967. The discovery of grounded Theory: Strategies for qualitative research. London: Aldine De Gruyter.
  32. 32Gooren, H. 2010. Religious conversion and disaffiliation: Tracing patters of change in faith practices. New York, NY: Palgrave-Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9780230113039
  33. 33Gooren, H. 2011. Deconversion: Qualitative and quantitative results from cross-cultural research in Germany and the United States: A review essay. Pastoral Psychology, 60: 609617. DOI: 10.1007/s11089-011-0369-0
  34. 34Henwood, KL and Pidgeon, NF. 1992. Qualitative research and psychological theorizing. Br J Psychol, 83(Pt 1): 97111. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1992.tb02426.x
  35. 35Hill, PC and Pargament, KI. 2003. Advances in the conceptualization and measurement of religion and spirituality. Implications for physical and mental health research. Am Psychol, 58: 6474. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.58.1.64
  36. 36Hood, RW, Jr., Hill, PC and Spilka, B. 2009. The psychology of religion: An empirical approach. New York: Guilford Press.
  37. 37Hunsberger, B. 1980. A reexamination of the antecedents of apostasy. Review of Religious Research, 21: 158170. DOI: 10.2307/3509881
  38. 38Hunsberger, B and Altemeyer, B. 2006. Atheists: a groundbreaking study of America’s nonbelievers. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
  39. 39Hunsberger, B and Brown, LB. 1984. Religious socialization, apostasy, and the impact of family background. Journal of the Scientific Study of Religion, 23: 239251. DOI: 10.2307/1386039
  40. 40Kenny, M and Fourie, R. 2014. Tracing the history of grounded theory methodology: From formation to fragmentation. The Qualitative Report, 19: 19.
  41. 41Kenny, M and Fourie, R. 2015. Contrasting classic, Straussian and constructivist grounded theory: Methodological and philosophical conflicts. The Qualitative Report, 20: 12701289.
  42. 42Kier, KJ and Davenport, DD. 2004. Unaddressed problems in the study of spirituality and health. American Psychologist, 59: 5354. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.53
  43. 43Koltko-Rivera, ME. 2004. The psychology of worldviews. Review of General Psychology, 8: 358. DOI: 10.1037/1089-2680.8.1.3
  44. 44Lee, L. 2012. Research note: Talking about a revolution: Terminology for the new field of non-religion studies. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 27: 129139. DOI: 10.1080/13537903.2012.642742
  45. 45Lindeman, M and Aarnio, K. 2006. Paranormal beliefs: their dimensionality and correlates. European Journal of Personality, 20: 585602. DOI: 10.1002/per.608
  46. 46Lindeman, M and Aarnio, K. 2007. Superstitious, magical, and paranormal beliefs: An integrative model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41: 731744. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2006.06.009
  47. 47Lipka, M. 2015. Religious ‘nones’ are not only growing they’re becoming more secular. [Online]. Available from: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/11/11/religious-nones-are-not-only-growing-theyre-becoming-more-secular/ [Accessed April 16 2018].
  48. 48Martin, M. 2007. The Cambridge companion to atheism. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  49. 49Maslow, AH. 1954. Motivation and personality. Oxford, England: Harpers.
  50. 50McAdams, DP. 2010. Review of deconversion: Qualitative and quantitative results from cross-cultural research in Germany and the United States of America. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 20: 303305. DOI: 10.1080/10508619.2010.507701
  51. 51McDargh, J. 2001. Faith development theory and the postmodern problem of foundations. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 11: 185199. DOI: 10.1207/S15327582IJPR1103_05
  52. 52Miller, WR and Thoresen, CE. 2003. Spirituality, religion, and health: An emerging research field. American Psychologist, 58: 2425. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.58.1.24
  53. 53Nilsson, A. 2013. The psychology of worldviews: Towards a non-reductive science of personality. Lund: Lund University.
  54. 54Paloutzian, RF, Murken, S, Streib, H and RössleNamini, S. 2013. Conversion, deconversion, and spiritual transformation: A multilevel interdisciplinary view. In: Paloutzian, RF and Park, CL (eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  55. 55Pennycook, G, Cheyne, JA, Barr, N, Koehler, DJ and Fugelsang, JA. 2014a. Cognitive style and religiousity: The role of conflict detection. Memory and Cognition, 42: 110. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-013-0340-7
  56. 56Pennycook, G, Cheyne, JA, Barr, N, Koehler, DJ and Fugelsang, JA. 2014b. The role of analytic thinking in moral judgements and values. Thinking & Reasoning, 20: 188214. DOI: 10.1080/13546783.2013.865000
  57. 57Pennycook, G, Cheyne, JA, Koehler, DJ and Fugelsang, JA. 2013. Belief bias during reasoning among religious believers and skeptics. Psychon Bull Rev, 20: 80611. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0394-3
  58. 58Pennycook, G, Cheyne, JA, Seli, P, Koehler, DJ and Fugelsang, JA. 2012. Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief. Cognition, 123: 335346. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.03.003
  59. 59Pinto, N and Moleiro, C. 2015. Gender trajectories: Transsexual people coming to terms with their gender identities. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 46: 1220. DOI: 10.1037/a0036487
  60. 60Pollack, D. 2015. Varieties of Secularization Theories and Their Indispensable Core. The Germanic Review: Literature, Culture, Theory, 90: 6079.
  61. 61Ross, CE. 1990. Religion and psychological distress. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 236245. DOI: 10.2307/1387431
  62. 62Saribay, SA and Yilmaz, O. 2017. Analytic cognitive style and cognitive ability differentially predict religiosity and social conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences, 114: 2429. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.03.056
  63. 63Schilbrack, K. 2013. What isn’t religion? Journal of Religion, 93: 291318. DOI: 10.1086/670276
  64. 64Schnell, T and Keenan, WE. 2011. Meaning-making in an atheist world. Archive for the Psychology of Religions, 33: 5578. DOI: 10.1163/157361211X564611
  65. 65Shenhav, A, Rand, DG and Greene, JD. 2012. Divine intuition: cognitive style influences belief in God. J Exp Psychol Gen, 141: 4238. DOI: 10.1037/a0025391
  66. 66Smith, JM. 2011. Becoming an atheist in America: Constructing identity and meaning from the rejection of theism. Sociology of Religion, 72: 215237. DOI: 10.1093/socrel/srq082
  67. 67Stenger, VJ. 2009. The new atheism. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
  68. 68Strauss, A and Corbin, J. 1998. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
  69. 69Streib, H, Hood, RW, Jr., Keller, B, Csöff, RM and Silver, CF. 2009. Deconversion: qualitative and quantitative results from cross-cultural research in Germany and the United States of America. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
  70. 70Sue, DW, Bingham, RP, Porche-Burke, L and Vasquez, M. 1999. The diversification of psychology: A multicultural revolution. American Psychologist, 54: 10611069. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.54.12.1061
  71. 71Svedholm, AM and Lindeman, M. 2013. The separate roles of the reflective mind and involuntary inhibitory control in gatekeeping paranormal beliefs and the underlying intuitive confusions. Br J Psychol, 104: 30319.
  72. 72Tajfel, H and Turner, J. 1979. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: Austin, W and Worchel, S (eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  73. 73The Clergy Project. 2016. Our Stories [Online]. Available: http://clergyproject.org/stories/ [Accessed].
  74. 74Thrower, J. 1980. The alternative tradition: religion and the rejection of religion in the ancient world. The Hague: Mouton Publishers. DOI: 10.1515/9783110804171
  75. 75Tillich, P. 1957. Dynamics of faith. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
  76. 76Vetter, GB and Green, M. 1932. Personality and group factors in the making of atheists. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 27: 179194. DOI: 10.1037/h0075273
  77. 77Watt, D. 2007. On becoming a qualitative researcher: The value of reflexivity. The Qualitative Report, 12: 82101.
  78. 78Willig, C. 2013. Introducing qualitative research in psychology. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  79. 79Zinnbauer, B and Pargament, K. 2005. Religiousness and spirituality. In: Zinnbauer, B and Pargament, K (eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality. New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
  80. 80Zinnbauer, BJ, Pargament, KI, Cole, B, Rye, MS, Butter, EM, Belavich, TG, Hipp, KM, Scott, AB and Kadar, JL. 1997. Religion and spirituality: Unfuzzying the fuzzy. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 36: 549564. DOI: 10.2307/1387689
  81. 81Zuckerman, P. 2008. Society without God. New York, NY: New York University Press.
  82. 82Zuckerman, P. 2011. Faith no more: Why people reject religion. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199740017.001.0001
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/snr.108 | Journal eISSN: 2053-6712
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 23, 2018
Accepted on: Apr 1, 2019
Published on: Apr 24, 2019
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Sergio Perez, Frédérique Vallières, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.