Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Effects of Aging on the Components of Auditory – Verbal Short-Term Memory Cover

The Effects of Aging on the Components of Auditory – Verbal Short-Term Memory

Open Access
|Dec 2015

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Demographic data for the 45–54, 55–64, 65–75 and 75–84 year age groups.

Variable45–54 years55–64 years65–74 years75–84 years
Number of participants20222220
Age (years)a49.60 (3.70)58.59 (3.08)68.82 (3.05)79.10 (3.28)
Gender (M/F)6/149/138/147/13
Socio-economic backgroundbLow.25.27.41.40
Middle.45.50.36.30
High.30.23.23.30
Pure-tone thresholds (dB HL) a,c
250 Hz10.75 (6.29)14.69 (6.23)20.68 (7.57)26.25 (7.76)
500 Hz10.25 (6.06)13.65 (6.25)20.81 (7.25)27.25 (8.66)
1000 Hz11.25 (8.21)12.69 (6.37)19.20 (6.79)28.13 (10.63)
2000 Hz11.50 (6.90)15.10 (7.50)23.30 (7.54)28.50 (11.28)
3000 Hz11.75 (7.48)20.00 (10.53)29.32 (7.53)36.63 (13.60)
4000 Hz15.00 (8.11)23.52 (9.75)30.57 (8.79)40.50 (13.34)
Mattis Scale (/144)a143.45 (1.00)142.45 (1.77)140.27 (2.29)140.65 (2.54)
Mill Hill (/33)a25.45 (4.37)25.59 (4.17)24.41 (4.51)26.20 (4.04)

[i] Note. a Means and standard deviations in parentheses; b Proportion; c Bilateral mean pure tone audiometry thresholds.

Table 2

Performance (mean percentage, standard deviation in parentheses) on the short-term memory tasks of the 45–54, 55–64, 65–75 and 75–84 age groups.

Task45–54 years55–64 years65–74 years75–84 years
Digit span63.75 (13.54)59.37 (8.76)50.85 (10.79)53.43 (10.43)
Digit serial order recognition85.56 (7.94)78.91 (11.23)73.11 (15.05)75.56 (6.66)
Serial order reconstruction (Animal race task)68.61 (13.77)68.28 (8.46)69.94 (6.76)62.39 (16.80)
Word recognition92.05 (5.69)88.23 (6.65)86.61 (6.81)82.50 (9.64)
Nonword delayed repetition82.16 (14.23)77.12 (10.09)67.22 (13.12)66.44 (13.18)
Rhyme probe88.52 (5.83)85.85 (7.19)78.10 (14.57)81.02 (7.60)
Category probe81.93 (6.19)81.30 (8.50)71.59 (15.02)74.89 (8.26)
figures/Fig01_web.jpg
Figure 1

Adjusted means for the analyses of covariance performed on the short-term memory tasks with mean PTA as covariate, in the 45-54, 55-64, 65-75 and 75-84 age groups; Fig. 1A. Digit span; Fig. 1B. Digit serial order recognition; Fig. 1C. Word recognition; Fig. 1D. Nonword delayed repetition; Fig. 1E. Rhyme probe; Fig. 1F. Category probe.

Table 3

Correlations between participants’ bilateral mean pure tone audiometry thresholds (mean PTAs) and their scores on the short-term memory tasks as well as between participants’ age and their scores on the short-term memory tasks.

VariablesCorrelations with participants’ mean PTAsCorrelations with participants’ age
Digit spanr = −.37, p = .001r = −.35, p = .001
Digit serial order recognitionr = −. 41, p < .001r = −.36, p = .001
Word recognitionr = −.38, p < .001r = −.35, p = .001
Nonword delayed repetitionr = −.42, p < .001r = −.50, p < .001
Rhyme prober = −.31, p = .004r = −.35, p = .001
Category prober = −.39, p < .001r = −.36, p = .001
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.bm | Journal eISSN: 0033-2879
Language: English
Published on: Dec 8, 2015
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2015 Clémence Verhaegen, Martine Poncelet, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.