Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Better Neuronal Efficiency After Emotional Competences Training: An fMRI Study Cover

Better Neuronal Efficiency After Emotional Competences Training: An fMRI Study

Open Access
|Jul 2014

Figures & Tables

figures/Fig01_web.png
Figure 1

Design of the experimental trials. Timeline for events on each trial. An initial cue instructs participants to decrease, increase, or look. Below this instruction, the picture was presented. During the presentation of the picture, participants follow the instruction. Participants then provide a rating of their current affect and finally have a moment to relax before the onset of the next trial.

Table 1

Means, standard deviations and significance of differences on emotional intelligence between EC and improvisation group prior and after interventions.

EC groupImprovisation group
Prior intervention145.86
(20.23)
146.78
(16.79)
t(34) = -0.15, p = .879
After intervention154.83
(23.25)
140.28
(0.05)
t(34) = 2.01, p = .05
Table 2

Means and standard deviations on-line ratings of emotional arousal during each condition and for each group before emotional competencies training.

EC groupImprovisation group
Conditions
Decrease negative2.00
(0.13)
1.93
(0.13)
F(1, 34) = 0.18, p = .68
Increase positive3.20
(0.09)
3.19
(0.09)
F(1, 34) = 0.02, p = .89
Watch negative2.56
(0.12)
2.53
(0.12)
F(1, 34) = 0.61, p = .44
Watch positive2.52
(0.11)
2.39
(0.11)
F(1, 34) = 0.03, p = .87
Table 3

Means and standard deviations on-line ratings of emotional arousal during each condition and for each group after emotional competencies training.

EC groupImprovisation group
Conditions
Decrease negative1.71
(0.12)
2.06
(0.12)
F(1, 34) = 4.07, p = .05
Increase positive3.38
(0.09)
3.01
(0.09)
F(1, 34) = 8.64, p < .01
Watch negative2.71
(0.11)
2.55
(0.11)
F(1, 34) = 1.11, p = .30
Watch positive2.47
(0.12)
2.22
(0.12)
F(1, 34) = 2.18, p = .15
figures/Fig02_web.jpg
Figure 2

Activated brain regions for the contrast of decrease > watch for the negative pictures independently of the group before the EC training (first scanning). Two panels show left and right lateral views of regions active in the decrease negative – look negative contrast.

Table 4

Brain regions associated with the down-regulation of negative pictures in both groups during the first scanning session before the EC training (p < .05, corrected for whole brain volume, if not otherwise specified). Note that the contrasts reflect activity relative to the watch negative condition. All coordinates refer to MNI voxel space.

Conjuction
Anatomical regionVox.xyzBAZ-value
Decrease negative pictures > watch negative pictures
Inferior frontal gyrus470-5222-4475.06*
Inferior frontal gyrus4645224-10475.47*
Inferior frontal gyrus42154184455.29*
Inferior frontal gyrus297-54226455.07*
Inferior frontal gyrus156-42468463.89*
Middle frontal gyrus496-40164486.27*
Middle frontal gyrus37046264094.66*
Middle frontal gyrus283-46223695.40*
Middle frontal gyrus414285420105.46*
Middle frontal gyrus14236263884.50*
Medial frontal gyrus515-6284486.09*
Medial frontal gyrus5152384885.69*
Superior frontal gyrus433-345420105.53*
Superior frontal gyrus49620562895.76*
Superior frontal gyrus5128146665.33*
Superior frontal gyrus515-12126965.39*
Anterior Cingulate gyrus118-83232324.35*
Inferior parietal lobule506-50-5046406.69
Inferior parietal lobule51454-5050406.02
Supramarginal gyrus28166-5230405.70
Supramarginal gyrus239-60-5238406.70
Cerebellum505-40-56-40VIII5.60
Cerebellum47046-62-38CRII5.07
Cerebellum51-4-52-22V3.47
Lingual gyrus4914-90-8185.05
Middle Temporal gyrus37354-30-8214.24
Middle Temporal gyrus23566-34-2213.79
Inferior Temporal gyrus279-58-34-16204.26

[i] *significant at p < .05 after applying small volume corrections (see methods section for details).

Table 5

Maxima within regions showing BOLD signal changes in the decrease negative condition versus watch negative condition for training group versus improvisation group after the EC training (second scanning). Note that the contrasts reflect activity relative to the watch positive condition. All coordinates refer to MNI voxel space.

Training group < Improvisation groupImprovisation group < Training group
Anatomical regionVoxelsxyzBASPM {Z}VoxelsxyzSPM {Z}
Inferior parietal lobule422-48-3050404.12*/
Inferior parietal lobule6940-3244403.39*/
Precentral gyrus9130-325443.22*/
Inferior parietal lobule / intraparietal sulcus134-32-40503.53*/

[i] *significant at p < .05 after applying small volume corrections (see methods section for details).

figures/Fig03_web.jpg
Figure 3

Regions more activated for the control group than the training group for the contrast of decrease > watch for the negative pictures after the EC training (second scanning). Two panels show left and right lateral views of regions more active in the decrease negative – watch negative contrast in the control group.

Table 6

Maxima within regions showing BOLD signal changes in the increase positive condition for training group versus control group after the EC training (second scanning). Note that the contrasts reflect activity relative to the watch positive condition. All coordinates refer to MNI voxel space.

Training group < Improvisation groupImprovisation group < Training group
Anatomical regionVoxelsxyzBASPM {Z}VoxelsxyzSPM {Z}
Middle frontal gyrus4323046-2105.06*/
Orbitofrontal gyrus144-2846-14113.97*/
Middle frontal gyrus22344184883.75*/
Frontopolar cortex4023254-16114.08*/

[i] *significant at p < .05 after applying small volume corrections (see methods section for details).

figures/Fig04_web.jpg
Figure 4

Regions more activated for the control group than the training group for the contrast of increase > watch for the positive pictures after the EC training (second scanning). Two panels show left and right lateral views of regions active in the increase positive – watch positive contrast in the control group.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.av | Journal eISSN: 0033-2879
Language: English
Published on: Jul 21, 2014
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2014 Michel Hansenne, Delphine Nélis, Dorothée Feyers, Eric Salmon, Steve Majerus, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.