References
- Augustinova M. Ferrand L. Influence de la dénomination de la couleur de la première lettre dans l’effet Stroop [First-letter coloring and the Stroop effect] L’Année Psychologique 2007 107 2 163 179 10.4074/S0003503307002011
- Augustinova M. Ferrand L. Suggestion does not de-automatize word reading : Evidence from the semantically based Stroop task Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2012a 19 521 527 10.3758/s13423-012-0217-y
- Augustinova M. Ferrand L. The influence of mere social presence on Stroop interference: New evidence from the semantically-based Stroop task Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2012b 48 1213 1216 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.04.014
- Augustinova M. Flaudias V. Ferrand L. Single-letter coloring and spatial cuing do not eliminate or reduce a semantic contribution to the Stroop effect Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2010 17 827 833 10.3758/PBR.17.6.827
-
Bargh
J. A.
Uleman
J.S.
Barghl
J. A.
Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition Unintended thought 1989 New York, NY Guilford Press 3 51 - Bargh J. A. The ecology of automaticity: Towards establishing the conditions needed to produce automatic processing effect American Journal of Psychology 1992 105 181 199 10.2307/1423027
-
Bargh
J. A.
Wyer
R. S.
Jr. Srull T. K.The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition Handbook of social cognition 1994 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum 1 40 - Besner D. The myth of ballistic processing: evidence from Stroop’s paradigm Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2001 8 2 324 330 10.3758/BF03196168
- Besner D. Stolz J. A. Unconsciously controlled processing: the Stroop effect reconsidered Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1999a 6 3 440 455 10.3758/BF03210834
- Besner D. Stolz J. A. What kind of attention modulates the Stroop effect? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1999b 6 99 104 10.3758/BF03210815
- Besner D. Stolz J. A. The Stroop effect and single letter coloring : what replicates and what doesn’t? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2001 8 4 858 10.3758/BF03196229
- Besner D. Stolz J. A. Boutilier C. The Stroop effect and the myth of automaticity Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1997 4 2 221 225 10.3758/BF03209396
- Botvinick M. M. Braver T. S. Barch D. M. Carter C. S. Cohen J. D. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control Psychological Review 2001 108 3 624 652 10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624
- Botvinick M. M. Cohen J. D. Carter C. S. Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004 8 12 539 546 10.1016/j.tics.2004.10.003
- Brown T. L. Joneleit K. Robinson C. S. Brown C. R. Automaticity in reading and the Stroop task: Testing the limits of involuntary word processing American Journal of Psychology 2002 115 515 543 10.2307/1423526
- Bush G. Luu P. Posner M. I. Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex Trends Cognitive Science 2000 4 215 222 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01483-2
- Casiglia E. Schiff S. Facco E. Gabbana A. Tikhonoff V. Schiavon L. Neurophysiological correlates of post-hypnotic alexia: A controlled study with Stroop test American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis 2010 52 3 219 233 10.1080/00029157.2010.10401721
- Catena A. Fuentes L. J. Tudela P. Priming and interference effects can be dissociated in the Stroop task: New evidence in favor of the automaticity of word recognition Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2002 9 113 118 10.3758/BF03196265
- Cohen J. D. Dunbar K. McClelland J. L. On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect Psychological Review 1990 97 3 332 361 10.1037/0033-295X.97.3.332
- Conty L. Gimmig D. Belletier C. George N. Huguet P. The cost of being watched : Stroop interference increases under concomitant eye contact Cognition 2010 115 133 139 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.12.005
- Danziger S. Estevez A. F. Mari-Beffa P. Stroop Interference effects in partially colored Stroop words Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2002 9 3 536 541 10.3758/BF03196310
- Dalrymple-Alford E. C. Associative facilitation and interference in the Stroop color-word task Perception and Psychophysics 1972 11 274 276 10.3758/BF03210377
- De Houwer J. On the role of stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus compatibility in the Stroop effect Memory & Cognition 2003 31 353 359 10.3758/BF03194393
- Dumas F. Huguet P. Monteil J. M. Ayme E. Context effects in the Stroop task: Knowledge of one’s relative standing makes a difference Current Psychology Letters: Cognition, Brain, and Behavior 2005 16 1 12
- Eriksen B. A. Eriksen C. W. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task Perception & Psychophysics 1974 16 1 143 149 10.3758/BF03203267
- Goldfarb L. Aisenberg D. Henik A. Think the thought, walk the walk – Social priming reduces the Stroop effect Cognition 2011 118 193 200 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.004
- Heil M. Rolke B. Pecchinenda A. Automatic semantic activation is no myth Psychological Science 2004 15 852 857 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00766.x
- Huguet P. Dumas F. Monteil J. M. Competiting for a desired reward in the Stroop task : when attentional control is unconscious but effective versus conscious but ineffective Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 2004 58 3 153 167 10.1037/h0087441
- Huguet P. Galvaing M. P. Monteil J. M. Dumas F. Social presence effects in the Stroop tasks: Further evidence for an attentional view of social facilitation Jounal of Personality and Social Psychology 1999 77 5 1011 1025 10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.1011
-
Kahneman
D.
Henik
A.
Kubovy
M.
Pomerantz
J.R.
Perceptual organisation and attention Perceptual organization 1981 Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum 181 211 -
Kerns
J. G.
Cohen
J. D.
MacDonald
A. W.
III Cho R. Y. Stenger V. A. Carter C. S. Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control Science 2004 303 1023 1026 10.1126/science.1089910 - Klauer K. C. Herfordt J. Voss A. Social presence effects on the Stroop task: Boundary conditions and an alternative account Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2008 44 469 476 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.02.009
- Klein G. S. Semantic power measured through the interference of words with colors-naming American Journal of Psychology 1964 77 576 588 10.2307/1420768
- Küper K. Heil M. Attentional focus manipulations affect naming latencies of neutral but not of incongruent Stroop trials Swiss Journal of Psychology 2012 71 2 93 100 10.1024/1421-0185/a000075
- Kutas M. Hillyard S. A. Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity Science 1980 207 203 205 10.1126/science.7350657
- MacLeod C. M. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review Psychological Bulletin 1991 109 163 203 10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163
- MacLeod C. M. Sheehan P. W. Hypnotic control of attention in the Stroop task: a historical footnote Consciousness and Cognition 2003 12 347 353 10.1016/S1053-8100(03)00025-4
- Manwell L. A. Roberts M. A. Besner D. Single letter coloring and spatial cuing eliminates a semantic contribution to the Stroop effect Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2004 11 3 458 462 10.3758/BF03196595
- Marmurek H. H. C. Coloring only a single letter does not eliminate color-word interference in a vocal-response Stroop task: Automaticity revealed Journal of General Psychology 2003 130 207 224 10.1080/00221300309601285
- Marmurek H. H. C. Proctor C. Javor A. Stroop-like serial position effects in color naming of words and nonwords Experimental Psychology 2006 53 2 105 110 10.1027/1618-3169.53.2.105
- Mayr S. Buchner A. Negative priming as a memory phenomenon: A review of 20 years of negative priming research Journal of Psychology 2007 215 1 35 51
-
McClelland
J. L.
Coltheart
M.
The case of interactionism in language processing Attention and Performance XII: The psychology of reading 1987 London Erlbaum - Monahan J. S. Coloring single Stroop elements: Reducing automaticity or slowing color processing? Journal of General Psychology 2001 128 98 112 10.1080/00221300109598901
- Moors A. De Houwer J. Automaticity: A conceptual and theoretical analysis Psychological Bulletin 2006 132 297 326 10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.297
-
Neely
J. H.
Kahan
T.
Roediger
H.L.
III Nairne J.S. Neath I. Surprenant A.M.Is semantic activation automatic? A critical re-evaluation The nature of remembering : Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder 2001 Washington, DC American Psychological Association 69 93 - O’Regan J. K. Levy-Schoen A. Pynte J. Brugaillere B. Convenient fixation location within isolated words of different length and structure Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance 1984 10 250 257 10.1037/0096-1523.10.2.250
- Parris B. A. Sharma D. Weekes B. An optimal viewing position effect in the stroop task when only one letter is the color carrier Experimental Psychology 2007 54 4 273 280 10.1027/1618-3169.54.4.273
-
Posner
M. I.
Snyder
C. R. R.
Solso
R.L.
Attention and cognitive control Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium 1975 Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum 55 83 - Raz A. Campbell N. K. J. Can suggestion obviate reading ? Supplementing primary Stroop evidence with exploratory negative priming analyses Consciousness and Cognition 2011 20 312 320 10.1016/j.concog.2009.09.013
- Raz A. Fan J. Posner M. I. Hypnotic suggestion reduces conflict in the human brain Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2005 102 9978 9983 10.1073/pnas.0503064102
- Raz A. Kirsch I. Pollard J. Nitkin-Kanner Y. Suggestion Reduces the Stroop Effect Psychological Science 2006 17 91 95 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01669.x
- Raz A. Landzberg K. S. Schweizer H. R. Zephrani Z. R. Shapiro T. Fan J. Posner I. Posthypnotic suggestion and the modulation of Stroop interference under cyclopegia Consciousness and Cognition 2003 12 332 346 10.1016/S1053-8100(03)00024-2
- Raz A. Moreno-Íñiguez M. Martin L. Zhu H. Suggestion overrides the Stroop effect in highly susceptible individuals Consciousness and Cognition 2007 16 331 338 10.1016/j.concog.2006.04.004
- Raz A. Shapiro T. Fan J. Posner M. I. Hypnotic suggestion and the modulation of Stroop interference Archives of General Psychiatry 2002 59 1155 1161 10.1001/archpsyc.59.12.1155
- Rubichi S. Ricci F. Padovani R. Scaglietti L. Hypnotic susceptibility, baseline attentional functioning, and the Stroop task Consciousness and Cognition 2005 14 296 303 10.1016/j.concog.2004.08.003
- Sharma D. McKenna F. P. Differential components of the manual and vocal Stroop tasks Memory and Cognition 1998 26 1033 1040 10.3758/BF03201181
- Smith M. C. Theodor L. Franklin P. E. On the relationship between contextual facilitation and depth of processing Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory & Cognition 1983 9 697 712 10.1037/0278-7393.9.4.697
- Stroop J. R. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions Journal of Experimental Psychology 1935 18 643 662 10.1037/h0054651
- Vachon F. Jolicœur P. Impaired semantic processing during task-set switching: Evidence from the N400 in rapid serial visual presentation Psychophysiology 2011 48 1 102 111 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01040.x