Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Perpetrator as a Potential Victim. Does Threatened Retaliation from the Victim Reduce Obedience towards Authority? Cover

Perpetrator as a Potential Victim. Does Threatened Retaliation from the Victim Reduce Obedience towards Authority?

Open Access
|Jul 2017

References

  1. 1
    Aquino K. Tripp T. M. Bies R. J. Getting even or moving on? Power, procedural justice, and types of offense as predictors of revenge, forgiveness, reconciliation, and avoidance in organization Journal of Applied Psychology 2006 91 653 668 10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.653
  2. 2
    Baron R. A. Exposure to an aggressive model and apparent probability of retaliation from the victim as determinants of adult aggressive behavior Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1971 7 343 355 10.1016/0022-1031(71)90033-3
  3. 3
    Baron R. A. Threatened retaliation from the victim as an inhibitor of physical aggression Journal of Research in Personality 1973 7 103 115 10.1016/0092-6566(73)90044-5
  4. 4
    Baron R. A. Threatened retaliation as an inhibitor of human aggression: Mediating effects of the instrumental value of aggression Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1974 3 217 219 10.3758/BF03333450
  5. 5
    Becker H. S. Notes on the concept of commitment American Journal of Sociology 1960 66 32 40 10.1086/222820
  6. 6
    Blass T. The man who shocked the world. The life and legacy of Stanley Milgram 2004 New York Basic Books
  7. 7
    Bock D. C. Warren N. C. Religious belief as a factor in obedience to destructive commands Review of Religious Research 1972 13 185 191 10.2307/3510781
  8. 8
    Burger J. M. Replicating Milgram. Would people still obey today? American Psychologist 2009 64 1 11 10.1037/a0010932
  9. 9
    Chen Y. R. Chen X. P. Portnoy R. To whom do positive norm and negative norm of reciprocity apply? Effects of inequitable offer, relationship, and relational-self orientation Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2009 45 24 34 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.07.024
  10. 10
    Cialdini R. Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion 2006 Harper Business
  11. 11
    Costanzo E. M. The effect of probable retaliation and sex related variables on obedience. Dissertation 1976 Laramie, Wyoming University of Wyoming
  12. 12
    Dolinski D. Grzyb T. One Serious Shock Versus Gradated Series of Shocks: Does “Multiple Feet-in-the-Door” Explain Obedience in Milgram Studies? Basic and Applied Social Psychology 2016 38 5 276 283 10.1080/01973533.2016.1214836
  13. 13
    Doliński D. Grzyb T. Folwarczny M. Grzybała P. Krzyszycha K. Martynowska K. Trojanowski J. Would you deliver an electric shock in 2015? Obedience in the experimental paradigm developed by Stanley Milgram in the 50 years following the original studies Social Psychological and Personality Science 2017 1 7 10.1177/1948550617693060
  14. 14
    Eisenberger R. Lynch P. Aselage J. Rohdieck S. Who takes the most revenge? Individual differences in negative reciprocity norm endorsement Personality of Social and Personality Bulletin 2004 30 787 799 10.1177/0146167204264047
  15. 15
    Falk A. Fischbacher U. A theory of reciprocity Games and economic behavior 2006 54 293 315 10.1016/j.geb.2005.03.001
  16. 16
    Fest J. Plotting Hitler’s death: The German resistance to Hitler 1933–1945 1996 London Weidenfeld & Nicholson
  17. 17
    Fisher C. T. Ethical issues in the use of human subjects American Psychologist 1968 23 532 10.1037/h0037714
  18. 18
    Freedman J. L. Fraser S. Compliance without pressure: The foot-in-door technique Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1966 4 195 202 10.1037/40023552
  19. 19
    Gilbert S. J. Another look at the Milgram obedience studies: The role of graduated series of shocks Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1981 7 690 695 10.1177/014616728174028
  20. 20
    Goldman M. Creason C. R. McCall C. G. Compliance employing a two-feet-in-the-door procedure Journal of Social Psychology 1981 152 143 147 10.1080/00224545.1981.9922755
  21. 21
    Gollwitzer M. Oswald M. E. Bieneck S. Hupfeld-Heinemann J. Justice and revenge Social psychology of punishment of crime 2009 Hoboken, NJ Wiley 137 156
  22. 22
    Goren H. Bornstein G. Budescu D. V. Erev I. Zwick R. Reciprocation and learning in the intergroup prisoner’s dilemma game Games and human behavior: Essays in honor of Amnon Rapoport 1999 Mahwah, NJ Erlbaum 299 314
  23. 23
    Gouldner A. W. The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement American Sociological Review 1960 25 161 178 10.2307/2092623
  24. 24
    Govier T. Forgivenss and revenge 2002 London and New York Routledge
  25. 25
    Kaufmann H. The price of obedience and the price of knowledge American Psychologist 1967 22 321 322 10.1037/h0037664
  26. 26
    Kilham W. Mann L. Level of destructive obedience as a function of transmitter and executant roles in the Milgram obedience paradigm Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1974 29 696 702 10.1037/h0036636
  27. 27
    Konig A. Gollwitzer M. Steffgen G. Cyberbullying as an act of revenge Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling 2010 20 210 224 10.1375/ajgc.20.2.210
  28. 28
    McCullough M. E. Kurzban R. Tabak B. A. Cognitive systems for revenge and forgiveness Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2013 36 1 15 10.1017/S0140525X11002160
  29. 29
    Milgram S. Behavioral study of obedience Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1963 67 371 378 10.1037/h0040525
  30. 30
    Milgram S. Some conditions of obedience and disobedience to authority Human Relations 1965 18 57 75 10.1177/001872676501800105
  31. 31
    Milgram S. Obedience to authority. An experimental view 1974 New York Harper & Row
  32. 32
    Mixon D. Instead of deception Journal of the Theory of Social Behavior 1972 2 145 177 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1972.tb00309.x
  33. 33
    Perugini M. Gallucci M. Presaghi F. Ercolani A. P. The personal norm of reciprocity European Journal of Personality 2003 17 251 283 10.1002/per.474
  34. 34
    Rogers R. W. Expressions of aggression: Aggression-inhibiting effects of anonymity to authority and threatened retaliation Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1980 6 315 320 10.1177/014616728062021
  35. 35
    Scholl J. The White Ross: Munich 1942–1943 1983 Middletown, CT Wesleyan University Press
  36. 36
    Seligman C. Miller R. Goldberg G. Geldberg L. Clark N. Bush M. Compliance in the foot-in-the-door techniques as a function of issue similarity and persuasion Social Behavior and Personality 1976 4 267 271 10.2224/sbp.1976.4.267
  37. 37
    Shanab M. E. Yahya K. A. A cross-cultural study of obedience Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1978 11 267 269 10.3758/BF03336827
  38. 38
    Skarnicki D. P. Folger R. Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice Journal of Applied Psychology 1997 82 434 443 10.1037/0021-9010.82.3.434
  39. 39
    Tripp T. Bies R. J. Aquino K. A vigilante model of justice: revenge, reconciliation, forgiveness, and avoidance Social Justice Research 2007 20 10 34 10.1007/s11211-007-0030-3
  40. 40
    Uehara E. S. Reciprocity reconsidered: Gouldner’s moral norm of reciprocity and social support Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 1995 12 483 502 10.1177/0265407595124001
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.397 | Journal eISSN: 0033-2879
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 11, 2017
Accepted on: Jun 6, 2017
Published on: Jul 3, 2017
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2017 Tomasz Grzyb, Dariusz Doliński, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.