Table 1
Correlations.
| Ident | Con W-F | Con W-G | Con F-G | FT Wall | FT Flem | FT GSC | FT Ger | FT Bru | age | gender | edu | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disident | .08 | .20* | .32*** | .24* | –.48*** | –.37*** | –.21* | .07 | –.42*** | –.03 | .00 | –.05 |
| Ident | .25** | .14 | .00 | –.04 | .09 | .35*** | .23* | .01 | .04 | .01 | –.10 | |
| Con W-F | .53*** | .31** | –.04 | –.09 | .20* | .10 | .04 | –.34*** | .19* | –.04 | ||
| Con W-G | .50*** | –.26** | –.03 | .05 | .13 | –.14 | –.05 | .07 | –.11 | |||
| Con F-G | –.21* | –.38*** | –.28** | .04 | –.29** | –.05 | .09 | –.22* | ||||
| FT Wall | .48*** | .41*** | .20* | .68*** | –.13 | .04 | .08 | |||||
| FT Flem | .57*** | .31** | .47*** | .11 | –.03 | .01 | ||||||
| FT GSC | .42*** | .58*** | –.23* | .15 | .22* | |||||||
| FT Ger | .31** | .04 | .07 | –.10 | ||||||||
| FT Bru | –.18* | .06 | .27** | |||||||||
| age | –.22* | –.32*** | ||||||||||
| gender | –.08 |
[i] N = 121. Disident = Disidentification, Ident = identification, Con W-F = Conflict between Walloons and Flemish community, Con W-G = Conflict between Walloons and German-speaking community, Con F-G = Conflict between Flemish community and German-speaking community, FT Wall = Feeling thermometer Walloons, FT Flem = Feeling thermometer Flemish community, FT GSC = Feeling thermometer German-speaking community, FT Ger = Feeling thermometer Germany, FT Bru = Feeling thermometer people from Brussel, gender (1 = female, 2 = male). ***p < .001, **p < .01, *p < .05.
Figure 1
Path model predicting attitudes toward outgroups and ingroup. All coefficients are standardized estimators. All reported effects are significant (p < .05). ap = .14.
Figure 2
Path model predicting perceptions of linguistic conflict. GSC = German-speaking community. All coefficients are standardized estimators. All reported effects are significant (p < .05). ap < .09.