Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
On the Construct Validity of Performance-Based Emotion Recognition Tests: Correlations with Social-Emotional Functioning and Cognitive Skills Cover

On the Construct Validity of Performance-Based Emotion Recognition Tests: Correlations with Social-Emotional Functioning and Cognitive Skills

By:  and    
Open Access
|May 2026

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Descriptive Statistics.

TESTWOMEN (N = 111)MEN (N = 116)dOVERALL (N = 227)ALPHAOmegaHOmegaT
MSDMSDMSD
Age (Years)40.918.8240.637.8740.778.33
Highest Level of Education1
    Bachelor’s degree or equivalent undergraduate qualification47 (42%)56 (48%)103 (45%)
    Doctoral degree or equivalent advanced qualification2 (2%)2 (2%)4 (2%)
    Master’s degree or equivalent postgraduate qualification20 (18%)20 (17%)40 (18%)
    Secondary education (high school or equivalent)42 (38%)38 (33%)80 (35%)
Absorption (MODTAS)1.610.731.520.640.131.560.690.950.790.95
Vocational Interests (PGI-Short)
    Liking_jobs_people1.280.950.231.031.060.741.12- -- -- -
    Compentence_jobs_people1.390.880.450.941.020.911.02- -- -- -
    General Social Curiosity3.060.472.940.570.223.000.530.870.820.92
    Covert Social Curiosity2.810.592.360.680.712.580.670.850.730.90
Loneliness (UCLA)2.310.612.370.66–0.092.340.640.950.780.96
Social Efficacy3.910.663.930.73–0.033.920.700.820.770.86
Social Confidence3.761.203.931.32–0.133.841.260.850.750.90
SEE-480.630.110.640.12–0.140.630.110.690.670.71
STEU0.710.120.680.130.240.700.120.590.180.62
MRMET0.710.110.670.110.390.690.110.640.160.67
GERT0.570.120.550.130.160.560.130.710.400.73
Occupations Questionnaire–0.400.17–.590.191.07–0.500.200.840.550.86
Empathy (QCAE)
    Perspective taking2.870.502.820.470.112.840.470.870.650.90
    Online simulation2.990.492.980.550.012.980.520.860.830.90
    Emotion contagion2.900.602.730.670.272.810.640.780.700.83
    Proximal responsivity3.000.532.780.670.372.890.610.740.660.78
    Peripheral responsivity2.970.562.680.620.492.820.610.690.090.74
Metacognition3.190.533.100.560.163.140.550.950.850.97
Life Satisfaction (SWLS)4.171.443.931.530.164.051.490.920.850.94
Lubben Social Network (LSNS-6)2.550.892.330.920.242.440.910.830.570.93
Rejection Sensitivity (A-RSQ)
    Rejection Concern3.500.963.571.00–0.073.530.980.840.680.87
    Rejection Expectancy2.410.632.590.76–0.262.500.000.770.570.83
Predictors of Leisure Reading (PoLR)
    Reading Motivation5.591.165.081.380.405.331.300.910.820.94
    Reading Demotivation2.321.442.881.59–0.372.611.540.920.890.93
    Reading Attitudes5.410.785.230.980.215.320.890.740.560.84
Author Recognition (ART3)0.380.210.320.210.250.350.21- -- -- -
Reading Habits (RHQ)
    Fiction1.861.081.691.140.151.771.110.880.640.91
    Nonfiction2.041.232.451.30–0.322.251.280.780.660.87
Vocabulary (StuVoc4)0.860.130.850.140.030.850.130.910.560.92
General Knowledge (GK)0.710.130.750.13–0.320.730.130.790.360.81

[i] Note. This table presents the means and SD for each measure. Effect size differences between genders are represented by Cohen’s d, with positive values indicating an advantage for women, and negative values indicating an advantage for men. Reliability statistics include alpha, omega hierarchical (OmegaH), and omega total (OmegaT). These could not be calculated for tests involving a difference score (indicated by - - in the table).

1Highest Level of Education is presented in terms of total n for each value, with the percentage of participants in parentheses.

Figure 1

Exploratory Graph Analysis.

Note. This graph shows the relationships between all 31 test and subtest scores included in our test battery.

Figure 2

Test with too large redundancy given the overall network of tests examined.

Figure 3

The EGA analysis when redundant items are omitted.

Table 2

Allocation to clusters in parametric bootstrapping with 500 replications.

TESTCLUSTER
C1C2C3C4C5
QCAE_peripheral_responsivity0.920.07
QCAE_proximal_responsivity0.900.08
QCAE_online_simulation0.870.09
QCAE_emotion_contagion0.850.09
Social_curiosity0.760.070.13
Liking_jobs_people0.740.050.050.15
Reading_absorption0.710.180.07
metacognition_emotion_perception0.450.370.16
Covert_curiosity0.420.090.070.160.21
Social_efficacy0.240.580.15
Reading_non.fiction0.140.670.11
Rejection_concern0.050.830.10
SEE_481.00
MRMET1.00
GERT1.00
STEU0.99
Stuvoc0.99
Life_satisfaction0.890.08
Lubben_relations0.890.08
Rejection_expectancy0.850.10
Reading_demotivation0.95
Reading_fiction0.95
Figure 4

Structural Equation Model based on the EGA outcome shown in Figure 3.

Note. This graph represents standardized coefficients between all measures and latent variables. Asterisks represent significance (p < .05, .01, and .001) for regression paths, latent paths, and covariances. Note that names of the measures have been abbreviated (e.g., Lubben_relations is now Fam & Friends).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.1443 | Journal eISSN: 0033-2879
Language: English
Page range: 47 - 64
Submitted on: Aug 25, 2025
Accepted on: May 6, 2026
Published on: May 25, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Emalie Hendel, Marc Brysbaert, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.