References
- Attali, Y., Budescu, D. V., & Arieli-Attali, M. (2020). An item response approach to calibration of confidence judgments. Decision, 7(1), 1–19. 10.1037/dec0000111
- Brier, G. W. (1950). Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability. Monthly Weather Review, 78(1), 1–3. 10.1175/1520-0493(1950)078<;0001:VOFEIT>2.0.CO;2
- Budescu, D. V., & Johnson, T. R. (2011). A model-based approach for the analysis of the calibration of probability judgments. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(8), 857–869. 10.1017/S1930297500004277
- Budescu, D. V., Wallsten, T. S., & Au, W. T. (1997). On the importance of random error in the study of probability judgment: Part II. Applying the stochastic judgment model to detect systematic trends. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 10(3), 173–188. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199709)10:3<;173::AID-BDM261>3.0.CO;2-6
- Deng, S., McCarthy, D. E., Piper, M. E., Baker, T. B., & Bolt, D. M. (2018). Extreme response style and the measurement of intra-individual variability in affect. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53(2), 199–218. 10.1080/00273171.2017.1413636
- Erev, I., Wallsten, T. S., & Budescu, D. V. (1994). Simultaneous over- and underconfidence: The role of error in judgment processes. Psychological Review, 101, 519–527. 10.1037/0033-295X.101.3.519
- Fajfar, P. F., & Gurman, N. (2009). When underconfident behavior is norm: Some experimental evidences from the calibration analysis. 10.2139/ssrn.1459722
- Ferrando, P., Anguiano-Carrasco, C., & Demestre, J. (2013). Combining IRT and SEM: A hybrid model for fitting responses and response certainties. Structural Equation Modeling, 20, 208–225. 10.1080/10705511.2013.769388
- Fleming, S. M., & Lau, H. C. (2014). How to measure metacognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 443. 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00443
- Gigerenzer, G. (2004). The irrationality paradox. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 336–338. 10.1017/S0140525X04310083
- Gigerenzer, G., Hoffrage, H., & Kleinbölting, H. (1991). Probabilistic mental models: A brunswickian theory of confidence. Psychological Review, 98, 506–528. 10.1037/0033-295X.98.4.506
- Koriat, A. (1993). How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychological Review, 100, 609–639. 10.1037/0033-295X.100.4.609
- Koriat, A. (2011). Subjective confidence in perceptual judgments: A test of the self-consistency model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(1), 117–139. 10.1037/a0022171
- Koriat, A. (2013). Confidence in personal preferences. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 247–259. 10.1002/bdm.1758
- Koriat, A. (2018). When reality is out of focus: Can people tell whether their beliefs and judgments are correct or wrong? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(5), 613–631. 10.1037/xge0000397
- Koriat, A., & Adiv, S. (2015). The self-consistency theory of subjective confidence. Oxford Handbooks Online. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199336746.013.18
- Leclercq, D. (1982). Confidence marking, its use in testing. Evaluation in Education, An International Review Series, 6, 191–221. 10.1016/0145-9228(82)90001-2
- Leclercq, D. (2016).
J’en suis aussi sûr que vous, mais pas avec le même pourcentage de chances, que ce soit hors contexte ou en contexte . Evaluer. Journal International de Recherche sur l’Evaluation et la Formation, 2(1), 89–125.http://hdl.handle.net/2268/202730 - Leclercq, D. (2017).
Une mata-analyse des degrés de certitude exprimés en mots . Evaluer. Journal International de Recherche sur l’Evaluation et la Formation, 2(3), 69–105.http://hdl.handle.net/2268/210317 - Leclercq, D. (2022). Precision or granularity of confidence degrees. 8th International Biannual Conference of SIG 16 ‘Metacognition’ of EARLI (European Association for Research on Learning & Instruction).
https://orbi.uliege.be/handle/2268/292756 - Leclercq, D. (2025). Dataset on measure of confidence and measure of level of knowledge on animal cries and capital cities [Data set], 10.58119/ULG/PWNZBM, ULiège Open Data Repository, V1
- Lichtenstein, S., Fisschoff, B., & Phillips, L. (1982).
Calibration of probabilities: The state of the art to 1980 . In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under Uncertainty. Heuristics and Biases (pp. 306–334), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 10.1017/CBO9780511809477.023 - Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park.
- Masson, M. E., & Rotello, C. M. (2009). Sources of bias in the Goodman–Kruskal gamma coefficient measure of association: Implications for studies of metacognitive processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35(2), 509–527. 10.1037/a0014876
- Mattes, B., & Pieschl, S. (2022). An alignment of standards enhances metacognitive judgment accuracy in explanatory knowledge tasks with internet search. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 44(44).
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2vt834qk - Merkle, E. C., & Van Zandt, T. (2006). An application of the Poisson race model to confidence calibration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(3), 391–408. 10.1037/0096-3445.135.3.391
- Miller, D. J., Spengler, E. S., & Spengler, P. M. (2015). A meta-analysis of confidence and judgment accuracy in clinical decision making. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62(4), 553–567. 10.1037/cou0000105
- Prosperi, O. (2015). Le réalisme avec degrés de certitude. Mesure et Evaluation en Education, 38, 121–140. 10.7202/1036553ar
- Rutherford, T. (2017). The measurement of calibration in real contexts. Learning and Instruction, 47, 33–42. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.10.006
- Schraw, G., Kuch, F., & Gutierrez, A. P. (2013). Measure for measure: Calibrating ten commonly used calibration scores. Learning and Instruction, 24, 48–57. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.08.007
- Tullis, J., & Goldstone, R. (2020). Why does peer instruction benefit student learning? Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5(1). 10.1186/s41235-020-00218-5
- Winman, A., Juslin, P., & Björkman, M. (1998). The confidence – hindsight mirror effect in judgment: An accuracy-assessment model for the knew-it-all-along phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(2), 415–431. 10.1037/0278-7393.24.2.415