Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Temperament Based Personality Types in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Latent Profile Analysis Cover

Temperament Based Personality Types in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Latent Profile Analysis

Open Access
|Apr 2024

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Descriptives of all scales of EC-scale, BIS/BAS-scale, BFI, SCL-90-R, UCL and CD-RISC.

NM(SD)g1g2
EC total score4084.82(.62).20–.16
BIS total score40820.25(3.84)–.26.08
BAS total score40837.24(5.51)–.29–.02
BAS reward responsivity40816.57(2.12)–.60.11
BAS drive40810.60(2.66)–.15–.30
BAS fun seeking40810.07(2.21).04–.49
BFI extraversion4083.42(.63)–.02–.11
BFI agreeableness4083.81(.55)–.28–.08
BFI neuroticism4082.74(.62).23.13
BFI openness to experience4083.27(.67)–0.75–.29
BFI conscientiousness4083.71(.58)–.39.44
SCL-90-R agoraphobia4058.66(2.97)2.759.20
SCL-90-R depression39023.68(8.18)2.065.53
SCL-90-R anxiety39613.63(4.51)2.504.92
SCL-90-R somatic complaints39319.13(6.63)1.542.75
SCL-90-R insufficiency of thinking and acting40215.74(5.13).98.78
SCL-90-R interpersonal sensitivity39426.29(7.80)1.684.45
SCL-90-R hostility4077.36(2.13)3.5117.46
SCL-90-R sleep problems4076.46(3.11).86–.07
SCL-90-R psychoneuroticism356131.76(35.31)1.834.96
UCL active coping40718.02(3.68).03–.18
UCL palliative coping40716.20(3.49).45.68
UCL avoidance40616.01(3.50).28.11
UCL social support seeking40312.42(3.38).30–.03
UCL passive/depressive coping40711.00(3.01)1.152.15
UCL expression of emotions4055.85(1.55).44.56
UCL reassuring thoughts40712.71(2.65).13.03
CD-RISC total score39263.52(13.59)–.22.58
Table 2

Gender differences of all scales of EC-scale, BIS/BAS-scale, BFI, SCL-90-R, UCL and CD-RISC.

FEMALES M(SD)MALES M(SD)t(df)pd
EC total score478(.60)4.86(.64)1.37(406).17
BIS total score21.07(3.76)19.18(3.69)–5.09(406)<.001.51
BAS total score37.42(5.82)36.99(5.09)–.79(399).43
BAS reward responsivity16.74(2.16)16.35(2.05)–1.87(406).06
BAS drive10.63(2.84)10.56(2.41)–.27(402.62).79
BAS fun seeking10.05(2.25)10.09(2.16).17(406).87
BFI extraversion3.43(.64)3.40(.63)–.54(406).59
BFI agreeableness3.82(.56)3.79(.53)–.56(406).58
BFI neuroticism2.82(.63)2.64(.59)–2.96(406).003.30
BFI openness to experience3.22(.69)3.34(.65)1.90(406).06
BFI conscientiousness3.74(.58)3.68(.58)–1.05(406).29
SCL-90-R agoraphobia8.97(3.36)8.27(2.32)–2.49(397.05).01.24
SCL-90-R depression24.79(8.64)22.30(7.36)–3.02(388).003.31
SCL-90-R anxiety14.12(4.81)13(4.03)–2.53(392.22).01.25
SCL-90-R somatic complaints19.78(7.01)18.28(6.01)–2.24(391).03.23
SCL-90-R insufficiency of thinking and acting15.65(5.08)15.87(5.22).43(400).67
SCL-90-R interpersonal sensitivity26.57(7.93)25.92(7.64)–.82(392).41
SCL-90-R hostility7.19(1.83)7.58(2.44)1.81(318.63).07
SCL-90-R sleep problems6.53(3.13)6.37(3.10)–.49(405).62
SCL-90-R psychoneuroticism135.04(37.49)127.65(32.02)–1.97(354).05.21
UCL active coping17.55(3.69)18.63(3.58)2.95(405).003–.30
UCL palliative coping16.57(3.63)15.72(3.25)–2.45(405).02.25
UCL avoidance16.46(3.47)15.43(3.47)–2.96(404).003.30
UCL social support seeking12.76(3.70)11.98(2.86)–2.39(400).02.23
UCL passive/depressive coping11.29(3.04)10.61(2.93)–2.28(405).02.23
UCL expression of emotions5.87(1.49)5.84(1.63)–.22(403).83
UCL reassuring thoughts13.06(2.76)12.26(2.44)–3.06(405).002.31
CD-RISC total score63.20(14.20)63.92(12.81).53(390).60
Table 3

Goodness-of-fit results LPA.

NUMBER OF PROFILESAICBICSABICENTROPYLMR (p)MEANING LMRBLRT (p)MEANING BLRT
25553.145593.26*5561.52*.55.0012*1 < 2<.001*1 < 2
35553.645609.795565.37.65.31362 > 3.3322 > 3
45549.38*5621.585564.46.61.0159*3 < 4.028*3 < 4

[i] Note. AIC = Akaike Information Criterion, BIC = Bayesian Information Criterion, SABIC = Sample size Adjusted BIC, LMR = Lo-Mendell-Rubin Test, BLRT = Bootstrap Likelihood Ratio Test.

*Preferred model.

Table 4

Differences in terms of EC/BIS/BAS total scores and BAS subscales between the overcontrolled/inhibited and resilient type.

M(SD)t (df)SIG. (2-TAILED)COHEN’S d
EC total score4.40 (.37)1–27.11 (406)<.001**2.73
5.41 (.37)2
BIS total score21.51 (3.43)18.64 (406)<.001**–.87
18.43 (3.67)2
BAS total score37.12 (5.40)1–.51(406).61.05
37.40 (5.68)2
BAS reward responsivity16.68 (2.05)11.25 (406).21–.13
16.41 (2.22)2
BAS drive10.32(2.60)1–2.50 (406).013.25
10.99(2.70)2
BAS fun seeking10.12 (2.22)1.52 (406).602–.05
10 (2.21)2

[i] Note. N.A. = not applicable.

1 Overcontrolled/Inhibited type.

2 Resilient type.

** Corrected p < .008.

pb-64-1-1257-g1.png
Figure 1

Two personality subtypes characterised by their centered Effortful Control (EC) and Behavioural Inhibition Scale/Behavioural Activation (BIS/BAS) patterns.

Table 5

Differences in terms of the non-normally distributed SCL-90-R scales between the overcontrolled/inhibited and resilient type.

M(SD)USIG. (2-TAILED)COHEN’S d
SCL-90-R agoraphobia9.08(3.33)115786<.001**.35
8.06(2.23)2
SCL-90-R depression25.73 (9.16)110891.50<.001**.74
20.70 (5.26)2
SCL-90-R anxiety14.71 (5.06)111916.50<.001**.67
12.11 (3.02)2
SCL-90-R hostility7.60 (2.30)115928.50<.001**.36
7.02 (1.80)2

[i] Note.

1 Overcontrolled/Inhibited type.

2 Resilient type.

** Corrected p < .013.

Table 6

Differences in terms of the normally distributed SCL-90-R scales between the overcontrolled/inhibited and resilient type.

M(SD)t (df)SIG. (2-TAILED)COHEN’S d
SCL-90-R somatic complaints20.30(7.03)14.38(385.85)<.001**–.43
17.49(5.65)2
SCL-90-R insufficiency of thinking and acting17.10(5.33)17.03(394.84)<.001**–.68
13.78(4.12)2
SCL-90-R interpersonal sensitivity28.06(8.53)15.11(391.78)<.001**–.58
23.69(5.69)2
SCL-90-R sleep problems6.91(3.11)13.56(405)*<.001**–.36
5.81(3.01)2
SCL-90-R psychoneuroticism141.16(38.32)16.64(352.05)<.001**–.67
118.70(25.53)2

[i] Note.

1 Overcontrolled/Inhibited type.

2 Resilient type.

* Equal variances assumed.

** Corrected p < .01.

Table 7

Differences in terms of Big Five traits between the overcontrolled/inhibited and resilient type.

M (SD)t (df)SIG. (2-TAILED)COHEN’S d
BFI extraversion3.32 (.59)1–3.89(406)<.001**.39
3.56 (.67)2
BFI agreeableness3.75 (.56)1–2.55 (406).010**.26
3.89 (.52)2
BFI conscientiousness3.53 (.55)1–7.96 (406)<.001**.80
3.96 (.52)2
BFI neuroticism2.94 (.58)18.17 (406)<.001**–.84
2.46 (.57)2
BFI openness3.14 (.62)1–4.91 (406)<.001**.49
3.46 (.70)2

[i] Note. N.A. = not applicable.

1 Overcontrolled/Inhibited type.

2 Resilient type.

** Corrected p < .01.

Table 8

Differences in terms of coping styles between the overcontrolled/inhibited and resilient type.

M(SD)t (df)SIG. (2-TAILED)COHEN’S d
UCL active coping17.03 (3.35)1–6.87(405)*<.001**.69
19.44 (3.68)2
UCL palliative coping16.37 (3.40)11.15(405)*.25–.12
15.96 (3.61)2
UCL avoidance16.75 (3.60)15.25(404)*<.001**–0.53
14.95 (3.07)2
UCL social support seeking12.40 (3.33)1–.18(401)*.86.02
12.46 (3.45)2
UCL passive/depressive coping11.81(3.18)17.36(404.60)<.001**–.70
9.82(2.82)2
UCL expression of emotions5.91 (1.52)1.84(403)*.40–.08
5.78 (1.61)2
UCL reassuring thoughts12.61 (2.56)1–.96(405)*.34.09
12.86 (2.78)2

[i] Note. N.A. = not applicable.

1 Overcontrolled/Inhibited type.

2 Resilient type.

* Equal variances assumed.

** Corrected p < .007.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.1257 | Journal eISSN: 0033-2879
Language: English
Submitted on: Sep 7, 2023
Accepted on: Mar 8, 2024
Published on: Apr 8, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Xenia Brancart, Gina Rossi, Eva Dierckx, Indra De Vos, Rudi De Raedt, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.