Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Role of Impulsivity and Emotion Dysregulation Dimensions on Core Characteristics of Binge Drinking among University Students Cover

Role of Impulsivity and Emotion Dysregulation Dimensions on Core Characteristics of Binge Drinking among University Students

Open Access
|Dec 2022

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Socio-demographic and clinical variables of the sample (N = 1,555).

MEANSDRANGE
Age20.091.8617–25
Binge Drinking score18.3415.653.33–134
Consumption speed2.151.370.33–7.00
Drunkenness episodes (6-month)4.418.680–100
Drunkenness ratio (6-month)26.7723.9210–100
AUDIT Total score6.424.651–28
Beck Depression Inventory6.124.911–31
STAI-Trait44.3110.8021–79
Negative urgency9.042.884–16
Positive urgency10.342.594–16
Premeditation (lack of)7.352.354–16
Perseverance (lack of)7.332.464–16
Sensation Seeking9.793.034–16
DERS Non-Acceptance12.595.646–30
DERS Goals14.605.125–25
DERS Impulse11.644.936–30
DERS Awarness16.324.436–30
DERS Strategies18.106.958–40
DERS Clarity10.813.915–25
DERS Total score84.0620.9736–163

[i] Note: Data are presented as Mean (SD); BD: binge drinking; AUDIT: Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test; STAI: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory; DERS: Difficulty in Emotion Regulation Scale.

Table 2

Bivariate correlations made in the whole sample (N = 1,555) between core characteristics of BD, clinical characteristics, impulsivity and emotion dysregulation dimensions scores.

1234567891011121314151617
1 Speed1
2 Drunkenness2.42**
3 Drunkenness ratio.51**.61**
4 Sex.34**.21**.15**
5 Age–.07**.01–.004–.02
6 BDI3.05–.04.03–.11**–.09**
7 STAI4–.03–.06*.02–.21**–.07**.73**
8 NU5.02–.003.04–.13**–.11**.25**.38**
9 PU6.16**.14**.15**–.02–.10**.14**.23**.54**
10 PREM7.14**.17**.14**.006–.02.08**.09**.24**.27**
11 PERSE8.07**.05*.06*.02–.007.21**.22**.14**.09**.45**
12 SS9.27**.24**.23**.17*–.06*.03.02.16**.37**.14**–.02
13 NA10.003–.03.04–.09**–.09**.36**.46**.30**.26**.03.11**.12**
14 GOALS.03.02.08**–.10**–.10**.38**.49**.34**.28**.13**.19**.07**.43**
15 IMP11.08**.01.08**–.10**–.10**.39**.50**.47**.33**.16**.10**.14**.46**.52**
16 AWAR12.06*–.02.02.02.001.09**.05.06*–.008.19**.10**.05–.11**–.12**–.01
17 STRAT13.01–.03.03–.12**–.11**.53**.66*.37**.29**.07**.16**.05*.58**.65**.64**–.09**
18 CLAR14.06*.02.06*–.04–.13**.47**.55**.30**.22**.16**.19**.13**.40**.29**.39**.28**.45**

[i] Note: 1 Speed = Consumption speed, 2 Drunkenness = drunkenness episodes in the past 6 months, 3 BDI = Beck Depression Inventory, 4 STAI = State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Trait), 5 NU = Negative urgency, 6 PU = Positive urgency, 7 PREM = Premeditation (lack of), 8 PERSE = Perseverence (lack of), 9 SS = Sensation seeking, 10 NA = DERS Non-acceptance, 11 IMP = DERS Impulse, 12AWAR = DERS Awareness, 13STRAT = DERS Strategies, 14 CLAR = DERS Clarity.

* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.

Table 3

Multiple linear regression analyses of the association between binge drinking core characteristics, socio-demographic and clinical variables (N = 1,555).

COVARIATEWHOLE SAMPLE (N = 1,555)
MULTIVARIATE ANALYSES STANDARDIZED β (95% CI), p
CONSUMPTION SPEEDDRUNKENNESS EPISODESDRUNKENNESS RATIO
FINAL MODEL ADJ R2 = .19; F(9,1545) = 40.89; P < .001FINAL MODEL ADJ R2 = .11; F(7,1547) = 27.77; P < .001FINAL MODEL ADJ R2 = .083; F(9,1545) = 16.73; P < .001
Sex.303(.257–.350), p < .001.165(.116–.214), p <.001.121(.071–.171), p < .001
Age–.039(–.084;.007), p = .096.027(–.02–.075), p =.255.021(–.027–.069), p =.397
Beck Depression Inventory.103(.038–.169), p = .002–.008(–.077–.061), p =.825.028(–.042–.097), p =.437
STAI-Trait–.087(–.159 ;–.016), p =.017–.032(–.101–.038), p =.374–.016(–.092–.060), p =.682
Negative urgency–.065(–.124;–.007), p =.029–.061(–.121–.000), p =.050
Positive urgency.087(.029–.145), p =.003.082(.021–.144), p =.009
Premeditation (lack of).098(.051–.145), p <.001.158(.110–.207), p <.001.097(.047–.147), p <.001
Perseverance (lack of)
Sensation Seeking.173(.123–.222), p <.001.196(.148–.244), p <.001.175(.123–.228), p <.001
DERS Non-Acceptance
DERS Goals.065(.009–.121), p =.023
DERS Impulse.072(.016–.128), p =.012
DERS Awareness–.056(–.104;–.008), p =.022
DERS Strategies
DERS Clarity

[i] Note: adj R2 = Adjusted R-square; BD: Binge Drinking; DERS: Difficulty in Emotion Regulation Scale. STAI: Spielberger State–Trait Inventory. Data are presented in regression standardized β coefficients (β) (95% confident interval), and p-value (after controlling for sex, age, depression severity score, and anxiety score), only significant standardized β coefficients (β) (95% confident interval) of the forward procedure are presented.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.1167 | Journal eISSN: 0033-2879
Language: English
Submitted on: May 25, 2022
|
Accepted on: Dec 6, 2022
|
Published on: Dec 22, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Farid Benzerouk, Zoubir Djerada, Mickaël Naassila, Sarah Barrière, Arthur Kaladjian, Fabien Gierski, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.