Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Relationship between Functional Fitness and Ability to Ride a Bicycle among Community-Dwelling Older Adult in Japan Cover

The Relationship between Functional Fitness and Ability to Ride a Bicycle among Community-Dwelling Older Adult in Japan

Open Access
|Mar 2021

Figures & Tables

paah-5-1-85-g1.png
Figure 1

Flowchart tracking the participants.

Table 1

Participant characteristics and functional fitness.

VariablesRiding GroupControl Groupp-values
No. of participants3414
Demographic
    Gender (men/women)10/243/110.728  
    Age (years)73.1 ± 3.776.6 ± 6.00.053  
Anthropometrics
    Height (cm)156.7 ± 8.8151.5 ± 8.40.041*
    Weight (kg)56.7 ± 9.055.5 ± 8.50.058  
    BMI (kg/m2)22.4 ± 3.521.6 ± 2.50.454  
Functional Fitness test
    Arm Curl Test (reps/30 sec.)26.8 ± 4.521.7 ± 6.40.005*
    Chair Stand Test (reps/30 sec.)27.0 ± 5.822.6 ± 6.50.043*
    Back Scratch Test (cm)–6.8 ± 16.4–10.5 ± 13.60.271  
    Sit and Reach Test (cm)12.4 ± 9.010.1 ± 9.80.382  
    5-Meter Walk Test (sec.)‡§3.10 ± 0.413.58 ± 0.680.035*
    Functional Reach Test (cm)30.1 ± 5.326.9 ± 5.50.051  
    One-Leg Stand Test (sec.)43.2 ± 18.931.4 ± 23.80.166  
    Four Square Step Test (sec.)‡§5.95 ± 1.067.26 ± 2.340.046*
    Timed Up and Go Test (sec.)‡§4.81 ± 0.735.96 ± 1.280.003*

[i] Note:

Values are mean ± SD.

BMI: Body Mass Index.

*: p < 0.05.

: Fisher’s exact test was used to evaluate differences between the groups.

: Mann-Whitney U test was used to evaluate the difference between the groups.

§: Improvement of test results in a negative value.

Table 2

Spearman correlation confident (n = 48).

Arm Curl TestChair Stand TestBack Scratch TestSit and Reach Test5-Meter Walk TestFunctional Reach TestOne-Leg Stand TestFour Square Step TestTimed Up and Go Test
Arm Curl Test10.61*0.55*0.25  –0.54*0.52*0.52*–0.61*–0.62*
Chair Stand Test1  0.48*0.44*–0.52*0.30*0.47*–0.71*–0.73*
Back Scratch Test1  0.38*–0.52*0.34*0.30*–0.40*–0.46*
Sit and Reach Test1  –0.26  0.08  0.09  –0.47*–0.28
5-Meter Walk Test1  –0.36*–0.16  0.45*0.63*
Functional Reach Test1  0.42*–0.48*–0.55*
One-Leg Stand Test1  –0.52*–0.53*
Four Square Step Test1  0.75*
Timed Up and Go Test1  

[i] Note:

* p < 0.05.

Table 3

Binominal logistic regression analysis.

BpOdds Ratio95%
Confidence Interval
Timed Up and Go Test–1.250.0050.290.12–0.68
Constant7.500.002

[i] Note:

The Hosmer–Lemeshow test for goodness of fit shows that the chi-square value is 4.58 with p = 0.71; overall percentage = 77.1.

Model summary: –2 log likelihood 45.53; Cox & Snell R square 0.23; Nagelkerke R square 0.33.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/paah.85 | Journal eISSN: 2515-2270
Language: English
Submitted on: Feb 2, 2021
|
Accepted on: Feb 17, 2021
|
Published on: Mar 8, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Ryuichi Hasegawa, Fumihiko Goto, Hidehiro Watanabe, Hisanori Ido, Naoki Okayama, Mohammod Monirul Islam, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.