Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Acquiring Expertise in Precision Sport – What Can We Learn from an Elite Snooker Player? Cover

Acquiring Expertise in Precision Sport – What Can We Learn from an Elite Snooker Player?

Open Access
|Jun 2021

Figures & Tables

paah-5-1-111-g1.png
Figure 1

Experiment procedures and variables of interest.

paah-5-1-111-g2.png
Figure 2

Setup of the cue ball (white) and a near object ball (red) for the short shots and a far object ball (black) for the long shot situations.

Table 1

Protocols of the five selected types of shots in snooker.

TasksObject ball distanceDescription
Warm-upShortTo conduct a short pot without any spin.
StunShortTo pot the near object ball with great power and no spin, such that the cue ball continues to move forward slightly after impact.
Top spinShortTo pocket the near object ball with top spin such that the cue ball continues going forward after impact.
Back spinLongTo pot the far object ball with back spin such that the cue ball is drawn back after impact.
StopLongTo perform a long pot and park the cue ball immediately after impact.
paah-5-1-111-g3.png
Figure 3

Key moments defined in a stroke of the cueing movement: (a) start of back swing, (b) end of back swing, (c) start of forward swing, (d) impact, and (e) end of follow through.

paah-5-1-111-g4.png
Figure 4

Definition of the discrepancy angle to indicate the overlap in cue stick positions between the last practice swing and the final stroke.

paah-5-1-111-g5.png
Figure 5

Schematic representation of the player’s stance posture on two force platforms and the centre of pressure expressed as the percentage of the distance between two feet (COPx%).

Table 2

Kinematic data of the cue stick and upper limb joints in five selected shots in snooker.

Warm-upStunTop spinBack spinStop
Successful rate1/31/33/31/31/3
Discrepancy angle [°]0.6 (0.1)0.8 (0.1)0.9 (0.1)0.4 (0.1)0.9 (0.1)
Cue tip speed at impact [m/s]1.24 (0.04)2.57 (0.11)2.58 (0.23)4.02 (0.04)2.99 (0.15)
Wrist ROM [°]26.9 (0.8)27.9 (0.8)28.4 (1.0)25.4 (1.2)29.7 (1.0)
Elbow ROM [°]128.3 (1.0)136.7 (0.2)137.6 (1.1)141.2 (2.5)138.0 (1.2)

[i] Results are shown as mean (standard deviation) of 3 trials for each type of shot.

paah-5-1-111-g6.png
Figure 6

Representative ground reaction forces of 3 trials of the back spin shot (final stroke).

Table 3

Transfer of weight (expressed as COPx%) at five key moments in the final stroke.

Moment aMoment bMoment cMoment dMoment e
Warm-up61.7 (0.6)61.7 (0.7)61.6 (0.7)61.5 (0.8)61.6 (0.8)
Stun61.5 (0.6)61.4 (0.7)61.3 (0.7)61.1 (0.8)61.1 (0.7)
Top spin60.1 (0.9)59.9 (0.8)59.8 (0.8)59.6 (0.7)59.8 (0.8)
Back spin60.6 (0.4)60.5 (0.4)60.2 (0.2)60.3 (0.4)60.1 (0.4)
Stop61.0 (0.4)60.8 (0.4)60.8 (0.4)60.6 (0.5)60.5 (0.4)

[i] Centre of pressure in the mediolateral direction are shown as a percentage of the distance between the right foot (0%) and left foot (100%). Moment a: start of back swing; Moment b: end of back swing; Moment c: start of forward swing; Moment d: impact; Moment e: end of follow through.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/paah.111 | Journal eISSN: 2515-2270
Language: English
Submitted on: May 25, 2021
Accepted on: Jun 3, 2021
Published on: Jun 25, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Pui Wah Kong, Jing Wen Pan, Danny P. K. Chu, Pak Ming Cheung, Patrick Wing Chung Lau, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.