Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Osteometric Study of Metapodial Bones and Phalanges as Indicators of the Behavioural Ecology of Modern Reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) and Implications for Reconstruction of Paleo Mobility Cover

Osteometric Study of Metapodial Bones and Phalanges as Indicators of the Behavioural Ecology of Modern Reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) and Implications for Reconstruction of Paleo Mobility

Open Access
|May 2022

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Number of metacarpals (Mtc), metatarsals (Mtt), first phalanges (Ph1), second phalanges (Ph2) and third phalanges (Ph3) for every population included in the present study.

CARIBOU’S NAMESUBSPECIESHABITATMOBILITY PATTERNMTCMTTPH1PH2PH3
Peary CaribouRangifer tarandus pearyiArctic Tundra (Open)Migratory13161400
Barren-GroundRangifer tarandus groenlandicusTundra
(Open)
Migratory11610413
Grant CaribouRangifer tarandus grantiTundra
(Open)
Migratory3215813
Woodland CaribouRangifer tarandus caribouBoreal Forest
(Closed)
Sedentary67211417
Eastern or Migratory Woodland CaribouRangifer tarandus caribouTundra
(Open)
Migratory1011272217
Mountain CaribouRangifer tarandus caribouMountain
(Closed)
Migratory58281511
Mountain CaribouRangifer tarandus caribouMountain
(Closed)
Sedentary6817177
oq-8-106-g1.png
Figure 1

Measurements taken on metacarpals and described in the present work. See description Methods section of text.

GL: Greatest bone length (Von den Driesch, 1976).

Bp: Greatest breadth of the proximal end (Von den Driesch, 1976).

Dp: Greatest depth of the proximal end (Von den Driesch, 1976).

SD: Smallest breadth of the diaphysis (Von den Driesch, 1976).

Bd: Greatest breadth of the distal end (Von den Driesch, 1976).

Dd: Greatest depth of the distal end (Von den Driesch, 1976).

TMLMIN: Minimum mediolateral diameter of the medial trochlea (Klein et al. 2010).

oq-8-106-g2.png
Figure 2

Measurements taken on metatarsals and described in the present work. See description Methods section of text.

GL: Greatest bone length (Von den Driesch, 1976).

Bp: Greatest breadth of the proximal end (Von den Driesch, 1976).

Dp: Greatest depth of the proximal end (Von den Driesch, 1976).

SD: Smallest breadth of the diaphysis (Von den Driesch, 1976).

Bd: Greatest breadth of the distal end (Von den Driesch, 1976).

Dd: Greatest depth of the distal end (Von den Driesch, 1976).

TMLMIN: Minimum mediolateral diameter of the medial trochlea (Klein et al. 2010).

oq-8-106-g3.png
Figure 3

Measurements taken on first phalanges and described in the present work. See description Methods section of text.

GL: Greatest bone length (Von den Driesch, 1976).

Bp: Greatest breadth of the proximal end (Von den Driesch, 1976).

WI: Intermediate Width (DeGusta & Vrba, 2005).

Bd: Greatest breadth of the distal end (Von den Driesch, 1976).

LM: Midline Length. The minimum proximal distal dimension along the dorsal line (DeGusta & Vrba, 2005).

HI: Intermediate Height took on the ventral dimension of the shaft at midshaft (DeGusta & Vrba, 2005).

HD: Distal Height-the midline dorsal ventral dimension just proximal to the distal articular surface (DeGusta & Vrba, 2005).

HP: Proximal Height took on the ventral dimension of the proximal articular end, perpendicular to its major proximal distal axis (DeGusta & Vrba, 2005).

Dp: Greatest depth of the proximal end (Von den Driesch, 1976).

HPAS: Height Proximal Articular Surface. Height of the lateral articular facet of the proximal end (the authors).

WPAS: Width Proximal Articular Surface. Width of the lateral articular facet of the proximal end (the authors).

oq-8-106-g4.png
Figure 4

Measurements taken on second phalanges and described in the present work. See description Methods section of text.

GL: Greatest bone length (Von den Driesch, 1976).

LM: Midline Length. The minimum proximal distal dimension along the dorsal line.

Bd: Greatest breadth of the distal end (Von den Driesch, 1976).

LS: Superior Length- The proximal distal dimension of the dorsal surface, measured from the most proximal midline point of the dorsal surface of the proximal end to the most distal midline point on the distal articular surface (DeGusta & Vrba, 2005).

LI: Inferior Length- The proximal distal dimension of the ventral surface, measured from the most proximal midline point of the ventral surface of the proximal end to the most distal midline point on the distal articular surface (DeGusta & Vrba, 2005).

HD: Distal Height -The dorsal ventral dimension of the distal end, measured just proximal to the distal articular surface (DeGusta & Vrba, 2005).

HL: Lateral Height- The dorsal ventral dimension of the lateral portion of the proximal articular facet, measured from the most ventral point to the most dorsal point (DeGusta & Vrba, 2005).

HM: Medial Height -The dorsal ventral dimension of the medial portion of the proximal articular facet, measured from the most ventral point to the most dorsal point (DeGusta & Vrba, 2005).

Dp: Greatest depth of the proximal end (Von den Driesch, 1976).

oq-8-106-g5.png
Figure 5

Measurements taken on third phalanges and described in the present work. See description Methods section of text.

Ld: Length of the dorsal surface (Von den Driesch, 1976).

LI: Inferior Length (DeGusta & Vrba, 2005).

HT: Total Height-The maximum ventral dorsal dimension of the proximal end (DeGusta & Vrba, 2005).

WB: Basal Width-The maximum medio-lateral dimension taken at the ventral base of the proximal articular facet (DeGusta & Vrba, 2005).

WM: Medium Width, taken in the middle of the proximal articular surface (the authors).

Table 2

Codes used in this study.

CODEMEANING
Rtcaribou_MSRangifer tarandus caribou Mountain Sedentary
Rtcaribou_BSRangifer tarandus caribou BorealForest Sedentary
Rtpeary_TMRangifer tarandus peary Tundra Migratory
Rtgroenlandicus_TMRangifer tarandus groenlandicus Tundra Migratory
Rtgranti_TMRangifer tarandus granti Tundra Migratory
Rtcaribou_MMRangifer tarandus caribou Mountain Migratory
Rtcaribou_TMRangifer tarandus caribou Tundra Migratory
Table 3

Two-way Manova on metatarsal and metacarpals. Significant level <0.05.

MANOVA
DFTEST STATISTIC (WILKS’LAMBDA)FP
Metacarpus
Subspecies30.078257.65571.310e–13
    Pattern10.374339.31239.941e–07
    Habitat20.724080.97600.4852
Metatarsus
Subspecies30.05899.9272<2.2e–16
    Pattern10.483656.55832.749e–05
    Habitat20.519722.37800.007576
Table 4

One way PERMANOVA to test statistically significant differences for anterior and posterior phalanges. Significant level <0.05.

PERMANOVA
DFMEAN SQUAREFR2P
Anterior posterior 1st phalanx14.49710.810.0700.003
Anterior posterior 2nd phalanx16.63818.070.1350.001
Anterior posterior 3rd phalanx10.0900.280.0060.834
Table 5

Performance of machine learning algorithms depending on the skeletal part to separate anterior and posterior first and second phalanges.

BONEMEASUREMENTSALGORITHMACCURACYKAPPA95%CISENSITIVITYSPECIFICITYBALANCED ACCURACY
First PhalanxAllSupport Vector Machines97.7%0.950.87–0.9910.950.97
ProximalSupport Vector Machines90.7%0.810.77–0.970.890.910.90
ProximalNeural Network93%0.850.80–0.980.890.950.92
DistalSupport Vector Machines65%0.240.49–0.780.310.910.61
Second PhalanxAllBlending94%0.870.80–0.990.8510.92
ProximalExtreme Gradient Boosting Tree65%0.260.47–0.800.500.760.63
Table 6

Two-way PERMANOVA on phalanges. Significant level <0.05.

PERMANOVA
DFMEAN SQUAREFR2P
Anterior First phalanx
Subspecies36.0723.430.510.001
    Pattern12.269.480.060.002
    Habitat20.974.060.050.009
Posterior First phalanx
Subspecies37.7131.530.510.001
    Pattern10.562.320.010.118
    Habitat21.887.710.080.002
Anterior Second phalanx
Subspecies24.7115.310.420.001
    Pattern10.712.310.030.121
    Habitat20.210.700.010.529
Posterior Second phalanx
Subspecies13.118.330.130.003
    Pattern11.102.940.040.067
    Habitat10.350.940.010.377
Third phalanx
Subspecies22.2614.020.260.001
    Pattern10.563.480.030.024
    Habitat21.137.050.130.001
oq-8-106-g6.png
Figure 6

Principal Component Analysis on metacarpals. The seven groups take into account subspecies, habitat and mobility.

oq-8-106-g7.png
Figure 7

Principal Component analysis on metatarsals. The seven groups take into account subspecies, habitat and mobility.

oq-8-106-g8.png
Figure 8

Principal Component Analysis on metatarsals. According to habitat (dichotomy open-close).

Table 7

Details on the performance of Machine Learning algorithms according to mobiliy pattern (migratory/sedentary) as predictor variable.

BONEMEASUREMENTSALGORITHMACCURACYKAPPA95%CISENSITIVITYSPECIFICITYBALANCED ACCURACY
MetacarpusCompleteStacking90,4%0.760.69–0.980.8710.93
MetacarpusProximalXgbTree95,2%0.850.76–0.9910.800.90
MetacarpusDistalNeural Network and Blending90%0.730.68–0.980.8710.93
MetatarsusAllRandom Forest86,9%0.590.66–0.9710.500.75
MetatarsusProximalStacking82%0.420.61–0.9510.330.66
MetatarsusDistalSupport Vector Machines91,3%0.770.71–0.980.940.830.88
Anterior First PhalanxAllStacking90%0.800.70–0.980.920.870.9
Posterior First PhalanxAllStacking91,3%0.770.71–0.980.940.830.88
Anterior Second PhalanxAllNeural Network88,2%0.760.63–0.9810.810.90
ProximalBlending88%0.740.63–0.980.90.830.87
DistalStacking76%0.480.50–0.930.810.660.74
Posterior Second PhalanxAllNeural Network93,3%0.860.68–0.9910.880.94
Third PhalanxAllExtreme Gradient Boosting Tree92%0.780.73–0.9910.710.85
ProximalStacking80%0.520.59–0.930.830.710.77
Table 8

Details on the performance of Machine Learning algorithms according to habitat (open/close) as predictor variable.

BONEMEASUREMENTSALGORITHMACCURACYKAPPA95%CISENSITIVITYSPECIFICITYBALANCED ACCURACY
MetatarsusDistalSupport Vector Machines93,75%0.870–69–0.9910.90.95
Anterior First PhalanxAllSupport Vector Machines91,6%0.830.73–0.9810.830.91
Posterior First PhalanxAllStacking95,6%0.910.78–0.990.9110.95
DistalBlending82%0.640.61–0.950.910.720.82
ProximalBlending86%0.740.66–0.970.7510.87
Anterior Second PhalanxAllBlending76%0.540.50–0.9310.550.77
Third PhalanxAllSupport Vector Machines95.8%0.910.78–0.9910.920.96
Table 9

Classification results for proximal metacarpal according to XgbTree algorithm.

BONE TYPEBONE REFERENCEALGORITHMMIGRATORYSEDENTARYCLASSIFICATION
Mtc proximalR11e–874XgbTree0.94182540.05817461Migratory
Mtc proximalS6d–716XgbTree0.94182540.05817461Migratory
Mtc proximalQ12f–972XgbTree0.94182540.05817461Migratory
Mtc proximalN8d–1237XgbTree0.94182540.05817461Migratory
Table 10

Classification results for distal metacarpal (mobility pattern) and distal metatarsal (Mobility pattern and Habitat) according to SVM and NN algorithms. See Results section to key accuracies and Kappa values.

BONE TYPEBONE REFERENCEALGORITHMMOBILITY PATTERN CLASSIFICATIONHABITAT CLASSIFICATION
Mtc distalT6c–200NNMigratory
Mtc distalO9d–658NNSedentary
Mtc distalN10hNNMigratory
Mtc distalQ12d–591NNMigratory
Mtc distalO8e inf–1837NNMigratory
Mtc distalQ12f–971NNMigratory
Mtc distalR11c–441NNMigratory
Mtc distalO8c–717NNSedentary
Mtc distalS5d–590NNMigratory
Mtc distalM8e–484NNMigratory
Mtc distalM8e–474NNMigratory
Mtc distalQ9d–763NNMigratory
Mtt distalP9c–116SVMMigratoryOpen
Mtt distalR10c–494SVMMigratoryOpen
Mtt distalT6c–163SVMMigratoryOpen
Mtt distalR11e–1745SVMMigratoryOpen
Mtt distalO8e inf–1745SVMMigratoryOpen
Mtt distalO8e inf–1824SVMMigratoryOpen
Mtt distalO9c–253SVMMigratoryOpen
Mtt distalS10f inf–95SVMMigratoryOpen
Mtt distalT11f–7SVMMigratoryOpen
Mtt distalO8d–1467SVMMigratoryOpen
Mtt distalN8c–387SVMMigratoryOpen
Mtt distalN7c–176SVMMigratoryOpen
Mtt distalM8c –57SVMMigratoryOpen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/oq.106 | Journal eISSN: 2055-298X
Language: English
Submitted on: Jul 15, 2021
Accepted on: Apr 18, 2022
Published on: May 9, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Ana Galán López, Sandrine Costamagno, Ariane Burke, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.