Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Case Against Higher-Order Metaphysics Cover

The Case Against Higher-Order Metaphysics

By: Thomas Hofweber  
Open Access
|Dec 2022

References

  1. Dorr, C. 2016. To be F is to be G. Philosophical Perspectives, 30: 39134. DOI: 10.1111/phpe.12079
  2. Fritz, P. 2017. How Fine-Grained is Reality? Filosofisk Supplement, 13(2): 5257. DOI: 10.18261/issn.1504-2901-2017-01-02-07
  3. Gamut, L. 1991. Logic, Language, and Meaning, volume II. University of Chicago Press. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226791708.001.0001
  4. Goodman, J. 2017. Reality is not Structured. Analysis, 77(1): 4353. DOI: 10.1093/analys/anw002
  5. Grover, D. 1972. Propositional Quantification. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 1: 111136. DOI: 10.1007/BF00650492
  6. Hofweber, T. 1999. Ontology and Objectivity. PhD thesis, Stanford University.
  7. Hofweber, T. 2005. Conceptions of Truth. The Philosophical Review, 114(1): 136138. DOI: 10.1215/00318108-114-1-136
  8. Hofweber, T. 2009a. Ambitious, yet Modest, Metaphysics. In Chalmers, D, Manley, D and Wasserman, R (eds.), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology, 269289. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  9. Hofweber, T. 2009b. Formal Tools and the Philosophy of Mathematics. In Bueno, O and Linnebo, O (eds), New Waves in Philosophy of Mathematics, 197219. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9780230245198
  10. Hofweber, T. 2016. Ontology and the Ambitions of Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198769835.001.0001
  11. Hofweber, T. 2018. Replies to Eklund and Uzquiano. Analysis, 78(2): 315344. DOI: 10.1093/analys/any025
  12. Horwich, P. 2008. Being and Truth. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 32(1): 258273. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4975.2008.00175.x
  13. Klement, KC. 2022. The Russell-Myhill Paradox. In The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://iep.utm.edu/par-rusm/.
  14. Künne, W. 2003. Conceptions of Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/0199241317.001.0001
  15. Moltmann, F. 2003. Propositional Attitudes Without Propositions. Synthese, 35(1): 77118. DOI: 10.1023/A:1022945009188
  16. Prior, A. 1971. Objects of Thought. Clarendon Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198243540.001.0001
  17. Pryor, J. 2007. Reasons and that-clauses. Philosophical Issues, 17(1): 217244. DOI: 10.1111/j.1533-6077.2007.00131.x
  18. Rosefeldt, T. 2008. ‘That’-Clauses and Non-nominal Quantification. Philosophical Studies, 137: 301333. DOI: 10.1007/s11098-006-0002-8
  19. Trueman, R. 2021a. Idealism and the identity theory of truth. Mind, 130(519): 783807. DOI: 10.1093/mind/fzz084
  20. Trueman, R. 2021b. Properties and Propositions: The Metaphysics of Higher-Order Logic. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781108886123
  21. Uzquiano, G. 2015. A Neglected Resolution of Russell’s Paradox of Propositons. Review of Symbolic Logic, 8(2): 328344. DOI: 10.1017/S1755020315000106
  22. Uzquiano, G. 2018. Quantification, Inference, and Ontology. Analysis, 78(2): 303315. DOI: 10.1093/analys/any016
  23. Walsh, S. 2016. Predicativity, the Russell-Myhill Paradox, and Church’s Intensional Logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 45(3): 277326. DOI: 10.1007/s10992-015-9375-5
  24. Williamson, T. 2003. Everything. Philosophical Perspectives, 17(1): 415465. DOI: 10.1111/j.1520-8583.2003.00017.x
  25. Williamson, T. 2013. Modal Logic as Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552078.001.0001
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/met.83 | Journal eISSN: 2515-8279
Language: English
Submitted on: Feb 25, 2022
|
Accepted on: Nov 7, 2022
|
Published on: Dec 8, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Thomas Hofweber, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.