Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Are Reference Rules Inessential to Meaning? Cover

Are Reference Rules Inessential to Meaning?

By: Kirk Ludwig  
Open Access
|Dec 2020

References

  1. Boswell, J. 1995. Same-sex unions in pre-modern Europe. New York: Vintage Books. DOI: 10.1177/135583589500100210
  2. Davidson, D. 2005. A Nice Derangement of Epitaphs. In: Davidson, D (ed.), 89108. Truth, Language, and History. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/019823757X.003.0007
  3. Eskridge, WN. 1993. A history of same-sex marriage. Virginia Law Review, 79(7): 14191513. DOI: 10.2307/1073379
  4. Jankovic, M. 2014a. Communication and shared information. Philosophical Studies, 169(3): 489508. DOI: 10.1007/s11098-013-0205-8
  5. Jankovic, M. 2014b. Conventional meaning. Unpublished thesis (PhD), Indiana University.
  6. Ludwig, K. 2017. From plural to institutional agency: Collective action 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198789994.001.0001
  7. Richard, M. 2019. Meanings as species. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198842811.001.0001
  8. Richard, M. 2020. Is reference essential to meaning? Metaphysics, 3(1): 6880.
  9. Searle, J. 1995. The construction of social reality. New York: Free Press.
  10. Steindorff, G. 1904. Durch die libysche wuste zur amonoase. Liepzig: Velohgen and Klasing. DOI: 10.2307/198498
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/met.60 | Journal eISSN: 2515-8279
Language: English
Submitted on: Nov 7, 2020
|
Accepted on: Nov 10, 2020
|
Published on: Dec 3, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:

© 2020 Kirk Ludwig, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.