Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Metaphysical Explanations for Modal Normativists Cover

Metaphysical Explanations for Modal Normativists

By: Theodore Locke  
Open Access
|Sep 2020

References

  1. Bennett, K. 2018. Making Things Up. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780199682683.001.0001
  2. Boolos, G. 1983. “The Iterative Concept of Set.” In: Benaceraff, P and Putnam, H (eds.), Philosophy of Mathematics, 503530. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Brandom, R. 2008. Between Saying and Doing: Towards an Analytic Pragmatism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199542871.001.0001
  4. Correia, F and Skiles, A. 2019. Grounding, Essence, Identity. Philosophy And Phenomenological Research, 98(3): 642670. DOI: 10.1111/phpr.12468
  5. Dasgupta, S. 2014a. On the Plurality of Grounds. Philosophers’ Imprint, 14(20): 128.
  6. Dasgupta, S. 2014b. The Possibility of Physicalism. The Journal of Philosophy, 111(9): 557592. DOI: 10.5840/jphil20141119/1037
  7. Dasgupta, S. 2017. Constitutive Explanation Philosophical Issues, 27: 7497. DOI: 10.1111/phis.12102
  8. Díaz-León, E. 2018. On Haslanger’s Meta-Metaphysics: Social Structures and Metaphysical Deflationism. Disputatio: International Journal of Philosophy, 10(50): 201216. DOI: 10.2478/disp-2018-0013
  9. Dutilh Novaes, C. 2015. Conceptual Genealogy for Analytic Philosophy. In: Bell, J, Cutrofello, A and Livingston, PM (eds.), Beyond the Analytic-Continental Divide: Pluralist Philosophy in the Twenty-First Century. Abingdon: Routledge Studies in Contemporary Philosophy.
  10. Einheuser, I. 2006 Counterconventional Conditionals. Philosophical Studies, 127(3): 459482. DOI: 10.1007/s11098-004-7790-5
  11. Fine, K. 1994. Essence and Modality. Philosophical Perspectives, 8: 116. DOI: 10.2307/2214160
  12. Fine, K. 2001. The Questions of Realism. Philosophers’ Imprint, 1(1): 130.
  13. Fine, K. 2012. Guide to Ground. In: Correia, F and Schneider, B (eds.), Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality, 3780. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139149136.002
  14. Finocchiaro, P. 2019a. The Intelligibility of Metaphysical Structure. Philosophical Studies, 176(3): 581606. DOI: 10.1007/s11098-017-1029-8
  15. Finocchiaro, P. 2019b. Ideology and its Role in Metaphysics Synthese, 127. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-018-02077-6
  16. Horwich, P. 1999 Truth. 2nd Ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  17. Hume, D. 2008. An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding. Millican, P (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  18. Jenkins, CS. 2011. Is Metaphysical Dependence Irreflexive? The Monist, 94(2): 267276. DOI: 10.5840/monist201194213
  19. Kment, B. 2006. Counterfactuals and the Analysis of Necessity. Philosophical Perspectives, 20(1): 237302. DOI: 10.1111/j.1520-8583.2006.00108.x
  20. Kment, B. 2014. Modality and Explanatory Reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199604685.001.0001
  21. Kovacs, DM. 2017. Grounding and the Argument from Explanatoriness. Philosophical Studies, 174: 29272952. DOI: 10.1007/s11098-016-0818-9
  22. Kovacs, DM. 2019. Metaphysically Explanatory Unification. Philosophical Studies, 177: 16591683. DOI: 10.1007/s11098-019-01279-z
  23. Lewis, D. 1969. Convention: A Philosophical Study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  24. Locke, TD. 2019. Counterpossibles for Modal Normativists. Synthese. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-019-02103-1
  25. Locke, TD. 2020. Conceptual and Linguistic Counterparts. Manuscript.
  26. Maurin, AS. 2019. Grounding and Metaphysical Explanation: It’s Complicated. Philosophical Studies, 176(6): 15731594. DOI: 10.1007/s11098-018-1080-0
  27. Mikkola, M. 2015. Doing Ontology and Doing Justice: What Feminist Philosophy Can Teach Us About Meta-Metaphysics. Inquiry, 58(7–8): 780805. DOI: 10.1080/0020174X.2015.1083469
  28. Miller, K and Norton, J. 2017. Grounding: it’s (probably) all in the head. Philosophical Studies, 174(12): 30593081. DOI: 10.1007/s11098-016-0846-5
  29. Nolan, D. 2014. Hyperintensional Metaphysics. Philosophical Studies, 171(1): 149160. DOI: 10.1007/s11098-013-0251-2
  30. Price, H. 2011. Naturalism Without Mirrors. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  31. Raven, MJ. 2015. Ground. Philosophy Compass, 10(5): 322333. DOI: 10.1111/phc3.12220
  32. Rayo, A. 2015. Essence Without Fundamentality. Theoria, 30: 349363. DOI: 10.1387/theoria.14472
  33. Rosen, G. 2015. Real Definition. Analytic Philosophy, 56(3): 189209. DOI: 10.1111/phib.12067
  34. Ryle, G. 1950. “‘If,’ ‘so,’ and ‘because.’” In: Black, M (ed.), Philosophical Analysis, A Collection of Essays, 323340. Itacha: Cornell University Press:
  35. Ryle, G. 2000. The Concept of Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  36. Salmon, W. 1984. Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  37. Schaffer, J. 2009. On What Grounds What. In: Chalmers, D, Manley, D and Wasserman, R. (eds.), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology, 347383. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  38. Schaffer, J. 2012. Grounding, Transitivity, and Contrastivity. In: Correia, F and Scheider, B (eds.), Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality, 122138. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139149136.005
  39. Schaffer, J. 2016. Grounding in the Image of Causation Philosophical Studies, 173(1): 49100. DOI: 10.1007/s11098-014-0438-1
  40. Schaffer, J. 2017. Laws for Metaphysical Explanation. Philosophical Issues, 27(1): 302321. DOI: 10.1111/phis.12111
  41. Sellars, W. 1958. Counterfactuals, Dispositions and the Causal Modalities. In: Feigl, H, Schriven, M and Maxwell, G (eds.), Minnesota Studies in Philosophy of Science Volume 2: Concepts, Theories and the Mind-Body Problem, 225308. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  42. Sidelle, A. 1989. Necessity, Essence, and Individuation: A Defense of Conventionalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  43. Sider, T. 2011. Writing the Book of the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199697908.001.0001
  44. Skiles, A. 2015. Against Grounding Necessitarianism. Erkenntnis, 80(4): 717751. DOI: 10.1007/s10670-014-9669-y
  45. Thomasson, A. 2007a. Ordinary Objects. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195319910.001.0001
  46. Thomasson, A. 2007b. Modal Normativism and the Methods of Metaphysics. Philosophical Topics, 35(1–2): 135160. DOI: 10.5840/philtopics2007351/27
  47. Thomasson, A. 2009. Answerable and Unanswerable Questions. In: Chalmers, D, Manley, D and Wasserman, R (eds.), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology, 444471. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  48. Thomasson, A. 2013a. 2012 Nancy D. Simco Lecture: Norms and Necessity. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 51(2): 143160. DOI: 10.1111/sjp.12010
  49. Thomasson, A. 2013b. The Ontological Significance of Constitution. The Monist, 96(1): 5472. DOI: 10.5840/monist20139613
  50. Thomasson, A. 2014a. Ontology Made Easy. Oxford, Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199385119.001.0001
  51. Thomasson, A. 2014b. It’s a Jumble Out There: How Talk of Levels Leads Us Astray. American Philosophical Quarterly, 51(4): 285296.
  52. Thomasson, A. 2020a. A Pragmatic Method for Conceptual Ethics. In: Cappelen, H, Plunkett, D and Burgess, A (eds.), Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198801856.003.0021
  53. Thomasson, A. 2020b. Norms and Necessity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190098193.001.0001
  54. Thompson, N. 2018. Irrealism about Grounding. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 82: 2344. DOI: 10.1017/S1358246118000206
  55. Warren, J. 2017. Epistemology versus Non-causal Realism Synthese, 194: 16431662. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-015-1010-z
  56. Wilsch, T. 2015. The Deductive-Nomological Account of Metaphysical Explanation. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 94(1): 123. DOI: 10.1080/00048402.2015.1033637
  57. Wilson, A. 2017. Metaphysical Causation Noûs. 52(4): 723751. DOI: 10.1111/nous.12190
  58. Yap, A. 2010. Feminism and Carnap’s Principle of Tolerance. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 25(2): 437454. DOI: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2009.01080.x
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/met.35 | Journal eISSN: 2515-8279
Language: English
Submitted on: Dec 22, 2019
|
Accepted on: Jun 24, 2020
|
Published on: Sep 14, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Theodore Locke, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.