References
- Bach, T. 2012. Gender is a Natural Kind with a Historical Essence. Ethics, 122(2): 231–272. DOI: 10.1086/663232
- Bach, T. 2016. Social Categories are Natural Kinds, not Objective Types (and Why it Matters Politically). Journal of Social Ontology, 2(2): 177–201. DOI: 10.1515/jso-2015-0039
- Baetu, TM. 2016. From Interventions to Mechanistic Explanations Synthese, 193: 3311–3327. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-015-0930-y
- Beebee, H and Sabbarton-Leary, N. 2010. Are Psychiatric Kinds Real? European Journal of Analytic Philosophy, 6(1): 11–27.
- Bird, A. 2018. The Metaphysics of Natural Kinds. Synthese, 195(4): 1397–1426. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-015-0833-y
- Boyd, RN. 1990.
Realism, Conventionality, and ‘Realism About.’ In: George Boolos (ed.), Meaning and Method: Essays in Honor of Hilary Putnam, 171–196. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. - Boyd, RN. 1999. Kinds as the “Workmanship of Men”. In: Nida-Rümelin, J. (ed.), Rationality, Realism, Revision: Proceedings of the 3rd international congress of the Society for Analytic Philosophy, 52–89. Berlin:
de Gruyter . - Boyd, RN. 2010.
Realism, Natural Kinds, and Philosophical Methods . In: Beebee, H and Sabbarton-Leary, N (eds.), The Semantics and Metaphysics of Natural Kinds, 212–234. London: Routledge. - Boyd, RN. 2019. Rethinking Natural Kinds, Reference and Truth: Towards More Correspondence with Reality, Not Less. Synthese, 1–39. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-019-02138-4
- Brigandt, I. 2009. Natural Kinds in Evolution and Systematics: Metaphysical and Epistemological Considerations. Acta Biotheoretica, 57: 77–97. DOI: 10.1007/s10441-008-9056-7
- Chakravartty, A. 2011. Scientific Realism and Ontological Relativity. The Monist, 94(2): 157–180. DOI: 10.5840/monist20119428
- Devitt, M. 2005.
Scientific Realism . In: Jackson, F and Smith, M (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy, 767–791. Oxford: Oxford University Press. - Devitt, M. 2011.
Natural Kinds and Biological Realism . In: Campbell, JK (eds.) Carving Nature at its Joints: Natural Kinds in Metaphysics and Science, 155–174. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262015936.003.0008 - Dupré, J. 1993. The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Ellis, BD. 2001. Scientific Essentialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2001.
- Ereshefsky, M and Reydon, TAC. 2015. Scientific Kinds. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 172(4): 969–986. DOI: 10.1007/s11098-014-0301-4
- Franklin-Hall, LR. 2015. Natural Kinds as Categorical Bottlenecks. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 17(4): 925–948. DOI: 10.1007/s11098-014-0326-8
- Hacking, I. 1993.
Working in a New World: The Taxonomic Solution . In: Horwich, P (ed.), World Changes: Thomas Kuhn and the Nature of Science, 275–310. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. - Hacking, I. 2007. Natural Kinds: Rosy Dawn, Scholastic Twillight Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 61: 203–239. DOI: 10.1017/S1358246100009802
- Haslanger, S. 2016.
Theorizing with a Purpose: the Many Kinds of Sex . In: Kendig, C (ed.), Natural Kinds and Classification in Scientific Practice, 129–144. London: Routledge. - Haslam, N. 2002. Kinds of Kinds: A Conceptual Taxonomy of Psychiatric Categories. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 9(3): 203–217. DOI: 10.1353/ppp.2003.0043
- Hennig, W. 1999. Phylogenetic Systematics. Trans. by Dwight Davis, D & Zangerl, R. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
- Khalidi, MA. 2013. Natural Categories and Human Kinds: Classification in the Natural and Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511998553
- Khalidi, MA. 2016. Mind-Dependent Kinds. Journal of Social Ontology, 2(2): 223–246. DOI: 10.1515/jso-2015-0045
- Kuhn, TS. 2012. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (50th Anniversary Edition). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226458144.001.0001
- Laudan, L. 1984. Values in Science. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Laudan, L. 2014.
The Epistemic, the Cognitive, and the Social . In: Machamer, PK and Wolters, G (eds.), Science, Values, and Objectivity, 14–23. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt5vkg7t.5 - Locke, L. 1689/1975. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI: 10.1093/oseo/instance.00018020
- Longino, HE. 2002. The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Lowe, EJ. 2006. The Four-Category Ontology: A Metaphysical Foundation for Natural Science. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Lowe, EJ. 2014.
How Real are Artefacts and Artefact Kinds? In: Franssen, M et al. (eds.), Artefact Kinds: Ontology and the Human-Made World, 17–26. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-00801-1_2 - Magnus, PD. 2012. Scientific Enquiry and Natural Kinds: From Planets to Mallards. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9781137271259
- McMullin, E. 1982. Values in Science PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 2: 3–28. DOI: 10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1982.2.192409
- McMullin, E. 1996.
Epistemic Virtue and Theory-Appraisal . In: Douven, I and Horsten, L (eds.), Realism in the Sciences, 1–34. Leuven: Leuven University Press. - McMullin, E. 2014.
The Virtues of a Good Theory . In: Curd, M and Psillos, S (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science, 561–571. New York: Routledge. - Mill, JS. 1858. A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive; Being a Connected View of The Principles of Evidence and Methods of Scientific Investigation. New York: Harper & Brothers.
- Nanay, B. 2011. What if Reality has no Architecture? The Monist, 94(2): 181–196. DOI: 10.5840/monist20119429
- Psillos, S. 2005. Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203979648
- Quine, WVO. 1969. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press. DOI: 10.7312/quin92204
- Reiss, J and Sprenger, J. 2017. Scientific Objectivity. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (
Winter 2017 Edition), Zalta, EN (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/scientific- objectivity/ >. - Reydon, TAC. 2010.
How Special are the Life Sciences? A View from the Natural Kinds Debate . In: Stadler, F (ed.) The Present Situation in the Philosophy of Science, 173–188. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-9115-4_14 - Reydon, TAC. 2016.
From a Zooming-in Model to a Co-creation Model: Towards a more Dynamic Account of Classification and Kinds . In: Kendig (ed.), Natural Kinds and Classification in Scientific Practice, 59–73. London: Routledge. - Sveinsdóttir, ÁK. 2011.
“The Metaphysics of Sex and Gender.” In: Witt, C (ed.), Feminist Metaphysics, 47–65. New York: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-3783-1_4 - Tahko, TE. 2012. Boundaries in Reality. Ratio (new series), XXV(4): 405–424. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9329.2012.00554.x
- Tahko, TE. 2015. Natural Kind Essentialism Revisited. Mind, 124(495): 795–822. DOI: 10.1093/mind/fzv027
- Tobin, E. 2010.
Crosscutting Natural Kinds and the Hierarchy Thesis . In: Beebee, H and Sabbarton-Leary, N (eds.), The Semantics and Metaphysics of Natural Kinds, 179–191. London: Routledge. - Tsou, JY. 2016. Natural Kinds, Psychiatric Classification and the History of the DSM. History of Psychiatry, 27(4): 406–424. DOI: 10.1177/0957154X16656580
- Varzi, AC. 2011.
Boundaries, Conventions, and Realism In: Campbell, JK, et al. (eds.), Carving Nature at its Joints: Natural Kinds in Metaphysics and Science, 155–174. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262015936.003.0007 - Waters, CK. 2017.
No General Structure . In: Slater, M and Yudell, Z (eds.), Metaphysics in Philosophy of Science, 81–107. Oxford: Oxford University Press.